El Futuro de la Innovación en España...El Futuro de la Innovación en España La Aproximación del...
Transcript of El Futuro de la Innovación en España...El Futuro de la Innovación en España La Aproximación del...
El Futuro de la Innovación en EspañaLa Aproximación del Investigador Básico y Aplicado
Carlos Cordón-Cardó, M.D., Ph.D.Profesor y “Vice-Chair,” Departamento de Patología
Profesor, Departamento de UrologíaDirector Asociado, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbia University
V Foro Europeo de Política Farmacéutica
Madrid – 25 de Mayo, 2009
PharmaBiotech
DiagnosticsDevices
Creation of unimagined products, services and businesses:Integration of IHx, Dx and Rx.
Universities &Government
Labs
PhysiciansHospitalsPharmacy
OtherCaregivers
DISCOVERY AND INNOVATIONMostly Still Developing in University-Based Settings
DISCOVERY AND INNOVATIONUniversity-Based Efforts – Spain vs Europe vs USA
Performance on Innovation at Universities:
Spain 3.6 licenses/year – €45,000/yr EU 11.2 licenses/year – €266,800/yrUSA 26.3 licenses/year – €7,000,000/yr
Turning innovations into technologies reflects in the market, resulting in increased jobs, taxes, and exports. USA Universities have developed “Technology Transfer Offices.”
Patent layers and biotechnology consultants.Particular focus on start-up companies.
(Source: Capital IQ, Windhover, Burrill Analysis)
INDUSTRY TRENDS AND RELEVANCE OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
Per year: 300 invention disclosures, 50 license deals, 100 industry sponsored agreements, and more than 10 new start-up companies.
50 technology transfer specialists, including 15 licensing officers with academic & industry experience, and 5 in-house attorneys.
Since 1983: Office has filed over 3500 inventions and 1000 patents.
Since 1983: 93 companies based on Columbia's technologies have been created, 65 of which are still active today – 33 were venture-backed, 12 have gone public, and 9 have been acquired.
Major support of an educated investment community.
MANDATES OF THE BASIC/CLINICAL INVESTIGATOR
Bring competitive grants/improve outcomes – Pathway to discovery.
Excel in research/clinical service activities.
Pharma contracts – Philanthropy funds.
Pathway to discovery – Patenting – Creation of new company –Development of IP portfolio – Licensing
FROM THE BENCH TO THE BEDSIDE
ImPath – Created with $2 Million Dollar (1989); Public IPO (1995); Acquired by Genezyme ($350 Million Dollar – 1998). Today serves over 12,000 hospitals and 3,000 clinics (valued at $2.5 Billion Dollar).
Roche Diagnostics – Over $3 Billion Dollar/year.
Vysis – Creation with $6 Million Dollar – IPO followed by acquisition by Abbot for $450 Million Dollar.
• VC & “angels” are hesitant to invest.Business models are changingMore financing of projects
• Higher bar for regulatory approval & reimbursement compression.
• Capital efficiency required.
BUT…
• Rate of start-ups around the world are increasing (go figure…)
ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTIES IMPACT ON ENTREPRENEURIAL START-UPS
It’s a fabulous time to be an investor!(…tougher to be a company looking for financing)
CAUSES FOR ADVERSE OUTCOME IN CANCER
LIMITED BIOLOGY KNOWLEDGE
SUBOPTIMAL TUMOR TARGETING
INSUFFICIENT TUMOR DOSE
POOR CORDINATION – MULTIMODAL Rx
LATE DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASE
Women679,510
2009 Estimated USCancer Cases
Men720,280
CANCER STATISTICS (2009)1:2 MEN / 1:3 WOMEN
1:6 CANCER TREATED PATIENTSWILL DEVELOPED A SECOND CANCER
Spain: 185,000
MANAGEMENT & COST IN ONCOLOGY
96,553
$86,894
$84,525
$81,658
$49,907
0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000
Medicare Cost per patient from diagnosis to death scaled to 2001 costs
Bladder Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Breast Cancer
Prostate Cancer
Lung CancerLung Cancer
Prostate Cancer
Breast Cancer
Colon Cancer
Bladder Cancer
Costs per patient from diagnosis to cure/death“Medicare Service” (Seguridad Social USA) –2001
[USA Dolars]
Breast Cancer – Cost 2007“Targeted Therapies” - Herceptin
Breast Cancer – Cost 2001$84,500
Breast Cancer – Cost 2007$165,500
““Predictive Molecular StudiesPredictive Molecular Studies””$1,500$1,500--3,5003,500
MANAGEMENT & COST IN ONCOLOGY
HEALTH CARE RELATED EXPENSES
Oncológy-Related Costs Represent 15% ofHealth-Related Expenses
Public and Private Cost of Health (USA- 2006)2.1 Trillion Dolars
Projected Public & Private Cost of Healthy (USA- 2016)4 Trillion Dolars
20 cent of each Dolar will be expende on Health
MANAGEMENT & COST IN ONCOLOGY
(Source: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services)
Program Administration
7%
Prescription Drugs10%
Investment7%
Nursing Home Care6%
Dental Services
4%Hospital Care31%
Physician & Clinical
Services21% Other
Spending*14%
*Other spending: Other professional services, other personal healthcare, home healthcare, durable medical products, government public health activities
HEALTH CARE RELATED EXPENSES
13.7%
13.6%
11.6%
7.9%7.5%
5.7%
5.5%
5.4%
5.0%
4.6%
4.6%
4.3%
3.5%3.1% 2.1%2.0% Cost of diagnostic services represent
2%-4% of the final expenses.
However, this 3% guides the 97% of the total cost for management.
In certain cases, we could either delay or defray such expense.
Most appropriate intervention in some cases is “not to treat.”
MANAGEMENT & COST IN ONCOLOGY
THE CHANGING FOCUS IN HEALTH CARE
THE STRATEGIC FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE
Economic Unsustainability Reform and Rational Care
Confronting the Imbalance Between Infinite Demand and Finite Resources
or
Access,Cost,
Qualityof care
Molecularand
PersonalizedMedicine
Proficientuse of
Information(e.health)
THE STRATEGIC FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE
TO GIVE EACH PATIENT A BETTER CHANCE
OF CURE BY OPTING FOR THE MOSTAPPROPRIATE THERAPY,
OFFERING GOOD QUALITY OF LIFE, AND PRESERVING MORAL INTEGRITY.
PERSONALIZED & PREDICTIVE MEDICINE
PROSTATE CANCER ANALYSIS: GLEASON GRADE
Normal Prostate
Case 1 (Gleason 6) Case 2 (Gleason 6)
Patient Outcome?
PROSTATE CANCER BIOPSY: GLEASON GRADE
Different Histopathology in Similar Grades
LYMPH NODE – GERMINAL CENTER MULTIPLEXING PROTEIN DETECTION
EMA = Red, Ki67 = Blue, pAkt = Green
KEPLER’S SUPERNOVAChandra/Hubble/Spitzer
TECHNOLOGY IS “HERE”BUT IN OTHER AREAS OF KNOWLEDGE
SYSTEMS PATHOLOGYINTEGRATION OF CLINICAL VARIABLES,HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES, AND MOLECULAR PROFILES, ALLOWING INDIVIDUAL PREDICTION ASSESSMENT.
APPLICATION OF TECHNIQUES IN OBJECT-ORIENTED IMAGE ANALYSIS, PATTERN RECOGNITION, & QUANTITATIVE BIOMARKER MULTI-PLEXING.
COMPLEX DATASETS ARE ANALYZEDBY SUPERVISED MATHEMATICAL APPROACHES, INCLUDING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS AND NEURAL NETWORKS.(Capodieci et al, Nature Meth 2:263, 2005; Saidi et al, Nature Clin Pract 4:39, 2007; Cordon-Cardo et al, JCI 117:370, 2007; Tabesh et al, Trans Med Imaging 26:1366, 2007; Donovan et al, JCO 26:3923, 2008; Donovan et al, J Urol In Press 2009)
SEGMENT, CLASSIFY, FEATURE EXTRACTION
Original image
1403
~~~~ ≤++=Φ BGR YYY
RY~ Bξ~
0≤++
−
BGR
BR
YYYYY
1000~~~~~
−≥++
−−++
−=BGR
BR
BGR
BRYYY
YYYYY
YYHueDiff
BGR
BB YYY
Y~~~
~~++
=ξ
015.0~~~~~
−≤++
−
BGR
BR
YYYYY
Magic Developer StudioMagic Developer Studio – New Project
Magic Developer Studio – New Project
CYTOKERATIN 14
CYTOKERATIN 18
CD 34
PTEN
NEW ADVANCES IN MULTIPLEXING PROTEIN DETECTION
Green: AMACR
Blue Nuclei: DAPI
Red: AR
Orange: AMACR(+) Epi Gland
Green: AMACR(-) Epi Gland
Blue: AR(-) / AMACR(-) Nuclei
Red: AR(+) / AMACR(-) Nuclei
Light Blue: AR(-) / AMACR(+) Nuclei
Light Pink: AR(+) / AMACR(+) Nuclei
Pink: Stromal Nuclei
Note: AMACR = Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase
AR = Androgen Receptor
PREDICTION OF TIME TO CLINICAL FAILURE – BIOPSY STUDY
(Donovan et al, J Urol - In Press 2009)
Prob
abili
ty o
f Rem
aini
ng
Clin
ical
Fai
lure
-Fre
e
Actual Time to Clinical Failure (months)
PREDICTION OF TIME TO CLINICAL FAILURE – RISK GROUPS
P < 0.0001
PREDICTIVE ACCURACY: 92% - SPECIFICITY: 91%; SENSITIVITY: 90%
Low-Risk (257 Pts., 252 Clinical Failure-Free)
High-Risk (88 Pts., 63 Clinical Failure-Free)n = 345
(Donovan et al, J Clin Oncol 26:3923, 2008)
Validation - n = 385 HR = 11
PSA Gleason Stage
5.1 ng/ml 3+4 T1c
AUA Clinical Judgment
Online Tools
SystemsPathology
Intermediate
Low85%Free
High RiskPx⊕ SCORE
46
Risk Assessment
Disease Progression in 2.5 months
Intermediate
Case #3: 62 y/o male with no family history of PrCa, negative DRE,and mildly elevated PSA.
Ki67 High (26%)/AR High (4.5Index)
PSA Gleason Stage
5 ng/ml 6 T3
AUA Clinical Judgment
Online Tools
SystemsPathology
HighRisk
Intermediate
Low RiskPx⊕ SCORE
12
Risk Assessment
No Disease Progression in 172 months
HighRisk
Case #1: 59 y/o male in good health, suspicious DRE,elevated PSA, and by imaging stage T3.
Ki67 Low (1%)/AR Low (1.25Index)
RANGE OF TARGET MOTION DURING TREATMENT
(PTV-CTV) = Safety Margins:CTV – Prostate and seminal vesiclesPTV – 10 mm around CTV, except
6 mm at rectal interface
Diagnosis and Workup Tumor Phenotyping Treatment Planning
Treatment Delivery
FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY
Diagnosis and Workup
Treatment Delivery
FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY
(Collaboration with C. Ling & Z. Fuks)
Tumor Phenotyping
Treatment Planning
Treatment Delivery
Diagnosis and Workup
Tumor Phenotyping
SINGLE-DOSE RADIOTHERAPY Treatment Planning
STEREOTACTIC SINGLE-DOSE RADIOTHERAPY FOR BRAIN METASTASESRELATIONSHIP OF DOSE AND LOCAL CONTROL
UCSF Series; Shiah et al, IJROBP 1997
261 lesions in 119 patients with lung, breast, melanoma, renal, colorectal, testicular,
gynecological and thyroid tumors
Patients with metastatic breast, colorectal, lung, head and neck, liver, pancreatic, sarcoma, melanoma and other tumors
0 12 24 36 48
20
40
60
80
100
p=0.04
23-24 Gy (n=67; 82%)
21-22 Gy (n=42; 69%)
18-20 Gy (n=11; 25%)
p=0.18
Time (months)
Loca
l Rel
apse
-free
Sur
viva
l
Oligometastatic lesions (n=120) to soft tissues and boneGreco & Zelefsky, 2009 - Unpublished
50
p=0.03
18-23 Gy (N=35;80%)
24Gy (N=68;96%)
0 10 20 30 4070
80
90
100
Loca
l Rel
apse
Fre
e Su
rviv
al
Oligometastatic lesions (n=103) to the spineYamada, IJROBP, 112:650, 2008
Time (months)
Local Control of Oligometastatic Tumors The MSKCC Series of SD-IGRT
SYSTEMS PATHOLOGY PLATFORMINNOVATIVE AND SUPERIOR
1.0 2.08 3.0 4.0
Prostate BiopsyTest
Biopsy Gleason predicts
PSA-Rec
1.971.03
1.22
MammaPrint predicts time to
distant metastasis
(breast)
Oncotype DX predicts likelihood of distant recurrence (breast)
Percent positive biopsies predicts PSA-Rec
Reduction in breast cancer recurrence
(Herceptin)
PSA predictsPSA-Rec
3.21
ProstateNomogram
2.323.47
ProstatectomyTest
11.0HR
2.5
Predictive, personalized, and cost-effective; individualized patient management.
Diagnostic and prognostic approachthat “groups” patients into disease categories.
TECHNICAL, SOCIAL AND ETHICAL CHALLENGES
NOVEL METHOS, SUPER-SUBSPECIALIZED PROFESIONALS,INTEGRATED-MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS
GENETIC DISCRIMINATION, INSURANCE POLICIES,PUBLIC DEBATE AND LEGISLATION
COST OF NEW TREATMENTS, EQUAL ACCESS TO CARE,INFORMED CONSENT AND CONFIDENTIALITY ISSUES
EDUCATIONAL AND ECONOMICAL CHALLENGES
REMODELING OF UNIVERSITY STRUCTURE TO INCORPORATEPROFESSIONAL TEAMS TO ASSIST INVESTIGATORS.
EMPOWERING VENTURE CAPITAL AND BANKING GROUPS TOPARTICIPATE IN FUNDING OF EARLY START-UPS.
EDUCATION OF SOCIETY AIM AT UNDERSTANDING THE VALUEOF INVESTING IN SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION.
CREATING NEW MODELS – PUBLIC/PRIVATE ENTERPRISES.
DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING CUSTOMIZATION OF HEALTHCARE – PERSONALIZED, PATIENT-CENTERED CARE .
FAILING TO PLAN IS PLANNING TO FAIL!