EI/JIG 1530 STANDARD 2nd Edition (May 2019 ......EI/JIG 1530 STANDARD – 2nd Edition (May 2019)...

EI/JIG 1530 STANDARD – 2nd Edition (May 2019)

Ver. 2.0 June 2019 Joint Inspection Group of 29

UNCONTROLLED COPY – MASTER COPY HELD BY JIG

INSPECTION OF SUPPLY & DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE JIG INSPECTION PROGRAMME

Location

Facility (Refinery/Terminal/Pipeline Operator)

Managing/Operating Company

Name of inspector and company

Date of visit

Recommendations reviewed with

Date of issue of this report

Overall Assessment (see page 2 for definitions)

Note if the assessment is Less than Satisfactory, the report shall be issued within 3 weeks of the inspection

and a follow-up inspection shall be scheduled within the next 6 months.

Last JIG inspection

(name of company and date visited)

Has a Tier 3 non-disclosure agreement been signed by all inspecting parties (where applicable)

Have any items of a serious nature been

communicated to all participants and the local manager without delay?

Last external HSSE Management System Audit

(by participant or consultant)

(name of company and date visited)

Date of last revision to local/site operating procedures.

This document is intended for the guidance of Members of the Joint Inspection Group (JIG) and companies affiliated with Members of the JIG. The contents contained within the completed

document are confidential to Members of the JIG and Joint Venture participants and in the case of Throughput Locations confidential to through-putting companies and shall not be copied, re-

distributed or passed to unauthorised parties.

Neither the JIG, its Members, nor the companies affiliated with its Members accept responsibility for the adoption of this document or for compliance with this document. Any party using this document

in any way shall do so at its own risk.

This document shall be used for locations registered to JIG’s Inspection Tracking System, known as “JITS”. This

document shall be deemed a sampling review to determine the overall rating of the operation and identify areas for improvement. It is not a compliance audit.




Notes for Inspectors

Notification to Site Management and Recommended inspection time

Prior to the inspection, the inspector shall send details of the inspection programme to the location management, outlining the main tasks to be witnessed and checks to be made during the inspection. The time required for the

inspection will vary, depending on the type and size of operations and other location-specific factors. The recommended time shown on the following table (# days per inspection type) can be used as a guidance for

inspectors, but the actual time shall be subject to agreement with the site management prior to the inspection visit.

S&D Small/Med Large

TMNL 1.5-2 2

PIPE 1 1

REF 2 2-3

Questions and Abbreviations Each question in this report is identified by a reference number. These reference numbers should be inserted next

to any Recommendations made. Inspectors should use the following abbreviations: C Comment R Recommendation (Normal/High) NA Not applicable

Y Yes RO Recommendation Overdue NW Applicable but Not Witnessed

High Priority Recommendations

These are Recommendations concerning quality control, technical, operational or HSSE issues that may lead to a major incident or major disruption in operations, if they are not effectively addressed at the earliest possible

opportunity.

Recommendations Open/Overdue

These are Recommendations shown in the previous JIG Inspection Report which remain open, have not been closed out by the due date or, in the opinion of the Inspector, have not been satisfactorily addressed. They should

be identified on page A-2 with a comment on the status of implementation.

Close-out Meeting

The inspector shall discuss the inspection findings and agree close-out dates for all recommendations at the conclusion of the inspection visit.

The Summary Page

Page A-1 shall be used to give an overall assessment of the facility in accordance with the below definitions:

- highlight any significant areas of concern and - state how many Open/Overdue and High Priority Recommendations there are

Good: Used when the following criteria are met:

• There are no open/overdue recommendations from the previous international inspection reports that are within the control of the facility management; and

• There are no High Priority Recommendations in the current report; and • Recommendations in the current report are of minor nature and do not reflect systemic issues; and • There is evidence of good HSSE performance for the inspection period

Satisfactory: There are no systemic quality control or safety issues. The previous recommendations have been satisfactorily addressed with clear gap closure plans in place to close out any remaining open/overdue recommendations.

Less than Satisfactory (LTS): This operation is showing signs of systemic failure to meet quality control or safety requirements. Recommendations from the previous international inspection report have not been satisfactorily addressed and staff attitudes suggest that the operation is more likely to deteriorate than to improve. Note for the term “Systemic issues”: In the context of the above definitions, systemic issues are widespread issues, affecting or relating to a wider group of people or wider parts of the operation, with unaddressed underlying causes.




A-1: SUMMARY

OVERALL ASSESSMENT:

(The Overall Assessment criteria shown on p.2 shall be followed)




A-2: OPEN/OVERDUE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION

Ref High Priority Recommendations Status

Ref Recommendations Status




A-3: RECOMMENDATIONS - CURRENT INSPECTION

Ref Recommendations Status Target

Date

(1) High Priority Recommendations:

Ref Recommendations Status Target

Date

(2) Recommendations:




A-4: COMMENTS

Ref Comments




A-5 GENERAL INFORMATION -OWNERSHIP AND USAGE Facility Owner / Operator

Other Participants/Users

ORGANISATION AND PERSONNEL Facility Contact: Title / Position

Telephone number:

Mobile/out of hours no:

Email address 1: Email address 2:

Aviation Grades handled at Facility

Jet A Jet A-1 Avgas Other E.g. JP-8

(Tick as appropriate)

A1: QC, OPERATING MANUALS, INSPECTION REPORTS AND NEW FACILIITES

Inspector shall check that Standards and Procedures are available and up to date, including check of AMC/Derogation documentation if applicable. Inspector shall sample check a Bulletin closed

out within the period from the last inspection and verify effective implementation.

QC and Operating Procedures Reference A1-1 Is a current copy EI/JIG 1530 Standard available?

Are current applicable JIG Bulletins available?

2.1

Annex M

A1-2 Are copies of applicable standard(s) or specification(s) concerning the aviation

fuels handled available at facilities manufacturing and storing aviation fuels?

2.1

6.2 A1-3 Have detailed quality control and operating procedures/task breakdowns based

on the Standard been prepared that are site specific, implemented and up to

date? Are they easily accessible for reference by the persons operating the equipment?

9.1.7

A1-4 Does the location have an effective documented and auditable aviation fuel

quality assurance organization with specific roles and authorization levels documented?

2.1

2.4

A1-5 Does the facility management continuously update and close out

recommendations directly in the JIG Inspection Tracking System?

Bulletin 122

A1-6 Has a gap assessment of facilities/procedures against EI/JIG 1530 Standard

been completed? Is a Management of Change process being applied when new editions or addenda of EI/JIG 1530 are issued?

Annex M

Bulletin 122

A1-7 Where conformance with any of the EI/JIG 1530 requirements cannot be

achieved, has an Alternative Means of Conformance (AMC) or Derogation been developed and implemented in accordance with Annex M (Including

documented Risk Assessments)?

1.3

Annex M

A1-8 If Derogations have been developed, - are they accompanied by an explicit identification and quantification of

the residual risks to product quality, if the primary proposed control fails?

- is there at least one physical control barrier and/or at least one

recovery that operates continuously? - where recovery barriers alone are used, are they routinely assessed

and have demonstrated effectiveness?

Annex M.2.2




A1-9 Are AMCs and/or Derogations regularly reviewed (e.g. annually), by a formally

constituted body that meets the requirements of Annex M.2, and are closeout plans in place?

Annex M.1

Annex M.2

A1-10 Are short-term, one-off deviations from normal operating procedures managed

by a documented Waiver process in accordance with 1.3?

1.3

A1-11 Are inspection report recommendations and their status reviewed by the

Management Committee/Board?

A1-12 Where applicable national or regional legislation requires compliance with a standard that differs from EI/JIG 1530 Standard, is this clearly documented?

Foreword

A1-13 Is there a document retention policy consistent with EI/JIG 1530 requirements? 2.5 New Plant and Equipment, existing plant modifications and

repair/maintenance

A1-14 Where there are new installations or alterations to existing facilities are they:

- Designed to current standards? - Made from materials compatible with aviation fuels?

- Approved by a competent technical authority? - Commissioned to industry requirements including pre-conditioning

(Flushing and Soak Testing) with samples taken and tested, before

being released into service? - In case of tank repairs covering greater than 5% of tank surface area,

is a soak test carried out?

9.1.1

3 6.4.3

9.1.5 Annex D

9.5.2.9

A1-15 Other comments or recommendations QC and Operating Procedures (Limit to C, R or NA)




B1 (Pipeline): RECEIPT BY PIPELINE - FACILITIES AND PROCEDURES

Inspector shall inspect facilities and should witness receipt procedures

Receipt Facilities Reference B1P Are off-loading points grade marked and colour coded to EI 1542 and marked

with flow direction arrows?

9.3.10

B2P Is sampling conducted to required standards using suitable equipment? 4.1 4.2

4.5.2

4.5.8 Pipeline Receipt Procedures – General

(Single-Grade and Multi-Product Pipelines)

B3P Before receipt starts, are - all valves checked to ensure that they are correctly set?

- pipeline low points and receipt tanks drained, and - is the pumping sequence, timing, expected quantity and relevant

densities known?

8.3.3.1 8.3.2.5

B4P Are automatic or continuous line monitoring systems that include calibrated densitometers and turbidity analysers (or equivalent) deployed?

Alternatively, are samples drawn close to the custody transfer point for a Control Check (and conductivity if SDA is present):

- Approx 1 min after commencement of flow?

- At middle of transfer? - Approx 5 mins before pumping is due to finish?

- At any change of batch? Is the density compared with the batch density shown on the Release

Certificate?

8.3.3.2

B5P If a large amount of water or solid contaminants or abnormal density is found,

is action taken in line with 8.3.3.3?

8.3.3.3

B6P After a pump-over is completed, is it confirmed that the correct quantity has been received and that all valves of the relevant storage tanks are closed and

sealed or locked?

8.3.3.4 8.3.4.5

8.4.1

Additional requirements for Multi-Product Pipelines B7P For multi-product pipeline receipts,

- are only positively segregated white oil lines being used for aviation fuel

receipt? - Is the receipt pipework designed to facilitate the detection and

management of interfaces?

8.3.2.2

9.3.8.2

B8P Is product sequencing and interface detection satisfactory, and are leading and

trailing interfaces directed into non-aviation storage or slop tanks?

8.3.2.4

B9P Is the receiving terminal aware of any DRA injected and has a risk assessment

been carried out to manage the risk of potential contamination of Jet Fuel with

DRA?

8.3.4.3

B10P Other Comments or Recommendations Receipt by pipeline (Limit to C,

R or NA)




B1 (Vessels): RECEIPT BY SEAGOING & COASTAL/INLAND WATERWAY VESSEL - FACILITIES AND PROCEDURES

Inspector shall inspect facilities and should witness vessel discharge procedures

Note: Where vessel arrivals are infrequent and it is not possible to witness discharge procedures, the inspector should respond “NW” to question B5V and respond to the remaining questions with information obtained by

reviewing documents and discussing with those responsible for the receipt procedures

Receipt Facilities (Vessel) Reference B1V Are off-loading points grade marked and colour coded to EI 1542 and marked


9.3.10

Delivery Vessel B2V Has vessel suitability been checked and has the terminal been informed about

suitability prior to arrival?

10.1.2

10.1.3 B3V Are details of previous cargoes available? 10.1 B4V If non-dedicated, are change of grade procedures followed?

Note: vessels that use cargo tanks for ballast on return journeys, irrespective of the previous cargo carried, and/or vessels greater than 20 000 tonnes

deadweight shall not be considered dedicated.

8.3.5

10.1

B5V Are Vessel's papers including surveyor's load port report (if applicable) available and checked prior to receipt?

8.3.5.1

Discharge Procedures B6V On arrival, are all deck cargo accesses closed and secured? A check should be

made to ascertain that. 8.3.5.1

B7V Are compartment ullages measured and checked against loading documents? 8.3.5.1 B8V Are compartments checked for water with either paste or electronic means?

If a large amount of water is found, is action taken in line with 8.3.5.1(d)? 8.3.5.1

B9V Is sampling conducted to required standards using suitable equipment? 4.1

4.2 4.5.2

4.5.8 B10V Is an All-level, running or composite 500 ml sample taken from each

compartment for Control Check and conductivity measurement and are results

compared with Release Certificate? If Control Check results are not satisfactory, is action taken in line with 8.3.5.1

(e)?

If required are additional tests performed prior to acceptance of cargo?

8.3.5.1 (e)

B11V In case of simultaneous discharge of aviation fuel and a different product, do

the ship’s cargo tanks and lines, discharge manifold and shore-lines enable a

minimum of two-valve segregation, or double block and bleed valve or twin seal valve or blind?

8.3.5.1 (g)

B12V During discharge, are samples drawn from receipt pipeline as close to the vessel as possible for Control Check:

- For all vessels, approximately 5 minutes after commencement and

immediately before end of discharge? - Also, for non-dedicated vessels, at intervals determined by risk

assessment (typically every 2 hours) during discharge?

8.3.5.2

B13V If multiple grades are handled, is the interface directed into non-aviation storage or slop tanks? Is the interface management effective?

8.3.5.2

B14V After vessel receipt, are inlet lines and valves of the relevant storage tanks

closed and sealed or locked? Note: After discharge, a check of the vessel cargo system should be made to

ensure that the correct quantity has been discharged.

8.3.5.3

8.4.1




B15V Other Comments or Recommendations Receipt by vessel (Limit to C, R

or NA)

B1 (Road/Rail): RECEIPT BY ROAD TANKER OR RAIL TANK CAR - FACILITIES AND PROCEDURES

Inspector shall inspect facilities and witness discharge procedures

Receipt Facilities (Road and Rail) Reference B1R Are off-loading points grade marked and colour coded to EI 1542 and marked


9.3.10

B2R Are discharge hoses (where used) in good condition, of a suitable type for the

grade and fitted with caps to prevent entry of dirt, etc?

10.3.3.2

B3R Do discharge connections ensure a satisfactory degree of grade security?

10.3.1.1 10.3.1.2

B4R Are pump start/stop switches safely accessible, near to the receipt area, fully effective and clearly identified?

9.1.8

B5R Are bonding wires in good condition? Inspector to check electrical continuity.

(not required for permissive bonding systems which are self-checking)

Bulletin 122

B6R Are road tanker/rail car receipt areas constructed of a low permeability material and do the areas have a positive slope and drainage to an oil water

separator?

Bulletin 122

Delivery equipment (Road and Rail) B7R Does documentation of lined road and rail tank cars show that they have been

soak tested, sampled and tested, before being released into service? For new road tankers and rail tank cars that have been soak tested by the manufacturer,

has the condition been verified by an initial inspection and is soak test carried out

if there is indication of possible contamination?

Annex D.2.2

Annex D.5

B8R If road tankers/rail tank cars are not dedicated:

- Does delivery documentation state previous grade carried?

- Does documentation show that satisfactory change of grade procedures have been observed?

8.3.6.1

10.3.2

B9R Is the Release Certificate and loading documents checked before receipt of product, and do they correctly identify the transportation equipment and grade

and quantity loaded?

8.3.6.1

B10R Is grade identification clearly displayed on equipment? 8.3.6.1 10.3.1.1

10.3.1.2 Discharge Procedures (Road and Rail) B11R On arrival, are seals on all filling orifices, manlids and outlets checked?

8.3.6.1

B12R Is equipment bonded to offloading facility before hoses are connected and is bonding maintained until hoses are disconnected?

Bulletin 122

B13R Before discharge, is any trace of free settled water or sediment drained from each compartment?

Is sampling conducted to required standards using suitable equipment?

4.1 4.2

4.5.2 4.5.8

8.3.6.2 B14R Where road tankers with compartment discharge lines are manifolded together

without individual sample lines, are samples taken for Visual Appearance Check

and density determination in accordance with 8.3.6.3?

Up to three compartments on any road tanker or three rail tank cars may be combined for density determination.

8.3.6.3




Are density results compared with the batch density reported on the Release

Certificate? B15R After receipt, are inlet lines and valves of the relevant storage tanks closed and

sealed or locked? 8.3.6.6

8.4.1 B16R Where Driver Controlled Delivery (DCD) is conducted, are the requirements of

EI/JIG 1530 Section 10.3.5 being met?

- are road tankers dedicated?

- are road tankers bottom loaded? - are road tankers loaded and discharged using a grade selective

system (such as grade selective mechanical couplings or grade selective permissive bonding)?

- Is the scope of additional tasks performed by the drivers clearly identified with written procedures available and training/

authorisation documented?

10.3.5

B17R Other Comments or Recommendations Receipt by road and rail (Limit to C, R or NA)




B2: STORAGE FACILITIES AND PROCEDURES

Inspector shall inspect facilities, including a selection of storage tanks, and witness draining and

sampling procedures.

Segregation Reference B2-1 At storage installations supplied by a non-dedicated system and handling only

aviation fuels, is jet fuel and avgas received via dedicated and separated lines?

8.3.2.1

Is there a procedure ensuring that prior to receipt, valves are closed, sealed or

locked so as to ensure that product is not inadvertently delivered from a tank during receipt of aviation fuel?

8.3.2.5

8.3.2.6

B2-3 If product is received via a non-dedicated transportation/multi-product system

where subsequently only Control Checks are performed downstream, is there positive segregation between the multiproduct receipt line and the aviation fuel

tank inlet line?

8.3.2.2

9.3.8

B2-4 At facilities supplying aviation fuels direct to airport service tanks, are: - storage tank inlet lines equipped with positive segregation between tested

and untested material of the same product or grade?

- export lines separated from other products or grades with positive segregation between tested and untested material of the same product or

grade?

8.3.2.1 9.3.8.2

B2-5 If positive segregation is achieved by double block and bleed valves, are routine

checks performed, at least every 3 months, to confirm integrity of the block

valves?

8.4.1

9.3.8

9.5.1.6

Tankage B2-6 Is general appearance (paintwork, signs of rust or leakage) satisfactory? B2-7 Are all tanks and pipework constructed of materials that are compatible with

aviation fuels (in applications in contact with aviation fuel)? 9.1.3

B2-8 Do storage tanks meet the minimum design requirements of EI/JIG 1530 Standard

including: - Means of effective removal of water and sediment

- Internal lining (at least the bottom and first metre of walls)

- Separate inlet and outlet lines - Means of tank entry for personnel/cleaning

- Gauge hatch / sampling point Note: requirements vary depending on whether direct or indirect supply to airport

service tanks or whether tanks are routinely used for both aviation and non-aviation fuels (“switch tanks”)

9.3

9.3.5

9.3.6

9.3.4 9.3.7

9.3.11 9.3.12

B2-9 Are tanks clearly numbered? Are tanks and pipelines grade marked and colour

coded to EI 1542?

9.3.10

B2-10 Is there a system to indicate Tank Status? (Receiving, Settling, Delivering)

8.4.1

B2-11 Are handrails, ladders and steps adequate and in good condition?

Bulletin 122

B2-12 Are P/V valves, flame arrestors (where fitted), vents and wire mesh (~ 5mm)

clean and free of damage? Are pressure/vacuum relief valves installed on above ground tanks storing avgas?

9.3.3

B2-13 If fitted, are Floating Suctions OK? (Inspector to check buoyancy)

Where Floating Suctions are not fitted on tanks supplying directly to airport service tanks, does the tank design meet the minimum suction height requirements of

9.3.9?

9.3.9

B2-14 Are valves in good condition and free of leaks?

B2-15 Do thermal relief arrangements prevent contamination with other fuel grades and,

where positive segregation is mandated, prevent receipt of unbatched aviation

9.3.8.3




fuel into storage? Inspector to check there is no bypass of inlet valve

arrangements. B2-16 Are tanks fitted with high level alarm systems as a minimum? Where required

(vessel or pipeline supply) are storage tanks equipped with a separate (high-high)

level shut off system that stops the fuel flow at a predetermined level? Is any relaxation to these requirements supported by documented risk

assessments to demonstrate acceptability of relaxed procedures?

Bulletin 122

Bunded Area B2-17 Is bund capacity sufficient? (at least 110% of the storage capacity of the largest

tank) For “catchpot” or horizontal double skinned tanks, do they meet the overfill

and containment requirements of JIG Bulletin 122?

Bulletin 122

B2-18 Are bunds maintained in good condition? Bulletin 122 B2-19 Is bottom of bunded area free of vegetation? Bulletin 122 B2-20 Are bund drain valves closed and secured? Bulletin 122 Fire Extinguishers B2-21 Are the servicing dates shown on fire extinguishers? Draining and Sampling Facilities and Procedures B2-22 After the tank contents have settled for at least 30 minutes after filling, are Upper,

Middle and Lower samples taken for a Visual Appearance Check and to confirm homogeneity by density measurement?

8.4.1

B2-23 Is sampling conducted to required standards using equipment suitable for Aviation

fuels? Are samples clearly labelled?

4.1

4.2 4.5.2

4.5.8 B2-24 Is there an effective water draining / flushing / sampling system on all storage

tanks?

Are tank-side fast flush tanks facilities of suitable design? Is the drain line

- of a diameter appropriate for the size of the tank (e.g. for very large tanks a

4” (100 mm) or greater diameter drain line)? - fitted with spring-loaded valves?

9.3.5

B2-25 Is flushing and sampling carried out at full flow? Are Visual Appearance / Control Checks carried out correctly?

As a minimum, are tank low points flushed of free water and sediment: - before receipt

- after settling;

- before putting tank on delivery, - daily when on delivery, and

- weekly if not on delivery?

4.1 4.1.6

4.5.8 8.3.2.5

8.4.2

9.5.1.1

B2-26 If drained product is returned to storage, is it returned via an appropriate grade

separated return system?

9.3.5

B2-27 Are tank-side quick flush tanks kept clean and empty when not in use for flushing

and sampling?

9.5.2.11

B2-28 Is conductivity measured correctly? 4.5.8.6

B2-29 Are suitable thermometers and density measurement equipment available?

Is equipment stored correctly?

Annex F.1

B2-30 Are pipeline breakout/staging tanks designed and operated to the requirements of Annex N?

Has it been ensured that these tanks are not used for delivery into Airport Service Tanks?

Annex N




B2-31 Where existing tanks have a common inlet/outlet line, are procedures in place to

ensure that the line is flushed clear of untested product before delivery and that the line is filled only with certified product?

9.3.7

Additive Handling – Facilities and Procedures

B2-32 Are additives on site within their recommended shelf lives? 7.7 7.8

B2-33 Can it be confirmed that only additives approved by the relevant aviation fuel

specification are used in aviation fuels? Is the amount of dosed additive recorded in the appropriate documentation?

Is the concentration after addition within specification requirements?

7.2

7.3.5 7.9.2

10.2.8

B2-34 Where antioxidants are added at the point of manufacture, are they added after hydro processing or synthesizing and before or during release from the site?

7.3.1

B2-35 Where successive MDA treatments are made, is there a process in place to ensure

requirements in the governing specifications are met (e.g. max limits, max initial dose, reporting requirements)?

7.3.3

B2-36 Are additive containers; - Stored either in a well-ventilated building or

- if outdoors, are they stored upright (typically on pallets) under cover; with

drum top covers used - Or, for drums, stacked on their sides with bungs below the liquid level

7.5.1

B2-37 Are additive tanks constructed to a recognised design standard and of materials

compatible with the additive being stored? Are additive storage tanks of appropriate size, with a low point drain, and is there

a stock measurement system? - Where FSII is stored (including where blended with LIA) are additive

facilities not constructed from aluminium and are systems in place to avoid contamination by water (e.g. Silica desiccant dryer on vent)?

7.3.5

7.5.2

B2-38 When opening or decanting additives into bulk tanks, are steps taken to minimise

degradation and contamination?

7.7

B2-39 Does the additive dosing procedure cover: - the possible presence of additive and its concentration before additional dosing,

to avoid exceeding the maximum allowable total concentration defined by the specification?

- Inclusion of the tank heel in calculations?

- comparison of the quantity of additive(s) used with the quantity of fuel dosed? –checking to avoid and correct any dosing errors on site before product is

released? -checking to ensure adequate mixing (testing U/M/L samples of tank?)?

7.2

7.9.2 7.3.5

7.9.3.3

8.5

B2-40 Where FSII addition is required, is it done by in-line injection only? 7.9.3.2 Synthetic Components B2-41 Is an approved antioxidant additive added to all synthesised components and is it

added to the bulk product as soon as practicable after hydroprocessing or

fractionation?

11.3

B2-42 Are all synthetic components covered by an RCQ? 11.3 B2-43 After production to the point of blending, are all synthetic blend components

handled and transported in the same manner as finished jet fuel in order to maintain product integrity and traceability?

11.3

B2-44 Do batch blending operations ensure homogeneity of the blended batch and

layered tanks are not released?

8.1.1

8.4.1 11.3

B2-45 Once the synthetic fuel blend has been created, is a batch defined, and the batch

tested in accordance with the governing fuel specification and are test certificates defined by the governing specification issued?

8.4.3.2

11.3




B2-46 For jet fuel blended with synthetic components downstream of a refinery, does the

CoA state the point of manufacture (blending), the original source location, volume percentage, and certification references for the blend components used?

2.3

11.3

B2-47 Other Comments or Recommendations storage facilities and procedures

(Limit to C, R or NA)




B3: LOADING FACILITIES & PROCEDURES

Inspector shall inspect facilities and should witness loading operations

Loading Vessels Reference

B3-1 If vessel supply is direct to an airport, is pipework separated between grades? 9.3.8 B3-2 Are loading points grade-marked and colour coded to EI 1542 and marked with

flow direction arrows? 9.3.10

B3-3 Does the design and construction of swivel joints on articulated pipework connected to loading hoses exclude any joints that require greasing, where

possible?

9.1.5

B3-4 Are hoses or marine loading arms in good condition? B3-5 Does the Vessel comply with the selection/suitability criteria shown in 10.1? 10.1 B3-6 Before loading Vessel:

Are low points in the loading pipeline cleared of any free water?

Is a responsible person appointed to inspect the vessel, witness the loading procedure and prepare a report?

10.2.3.3

10.1.5

B3-7 During loading, are samples drawn from loading pipeline as close to the Vessel

as possible for Control Check (results compared against the shore tank test

results): - at commencement?

- immediately before the end of pumping? - if there is a change of batch?

10.1.5 (d)

B3-8 For non-dedicated vessels, or where loading is via non-segregated shore

facilities, are additional sampling and testing procedures in line with 10.1.5 (e) followed?

10.1.5 (e)

B3-9 After loading, are composite samples prepared and retained in line with

10.1.5 (f)? Are retention samples sealed?

10.1.5 (f)

B3-10 Before departure, are all vessel tank openings closed and secured, the results of

the quality checks recorded and reported?

10.1.5 (g)

10.1.5 (i) Loading Road Tankers and Railcars B3-11 Is pipework fully segregated between grades? Are procedures in place to avoid

loading the incorrect grade of fuel?

9.3.10

10.3.1.2 (c) B3-12 Are loading points grade-marked and colour coded to EI 1542 and marked with

flow direction arrows? 9.3.10

B3-13 Does the design and construction of swivels on pipework connected to loading

hoses exclude any joints that require manual greasing, where possible?

9.1.5

B3-14 Are loading areas constructed of a low permeability material and do they have a

positive slope and drainage to an oil water separator?

Bulletin 122

B3-15 Are pump start/stop switches safely accessible, near to the loading point, fully effective and clearly identified?

B3-16 Do loading hoses meet EI 1529 or ISO 1825 type C or equivalent and are they

in good condition? Grease-free pantograph loading systems are also acceptable.

10.3.3.2 (a)

B3-17 Is grade identification clearly displayed on Rail tank cars/road tankers? 10.3.1.1

10.3.1.2 B3-18 Is road tanker bonded to loading facility before hoses are connected and is

bonding maintained until hoses are disconnected?

Are bonding wires in good condition? (not required for permissive bonding systems which are self-checking)

Inspector to check electrical continuity.

Bulletin 122

B3-19 Where equipment is top-loaded, is a downpipe used to eliminate splash filling

and minimise static charge generation?




B3-20 Where equipment is top-loaded, is there adequate fall protection? Bulletin 122 B3-21 Do road tanker/rail tank car(s) comply with the criteria shown in 10.3.1?

Are all road tankers constructed of carbon steel and rail tank cars constructed of

carbon steel that supply airport service tanks, internally coated with an epoxy

coating complying with EI 1541?

10.3.1.1 (d) 10.3.1.2 (a)

B3-22 Where rail tank cars or road tankers have been previously used to transport

other products, are the correct cleaning procedures employed/documented to

ensure they are fit to carry aviation fuels?

10.3.2.1

B3-23 Are procedures and equipment available to prevent over-filling? Bulletin 122 B3-24 Before loading:

Are low points in the loading pipeline cleared of any free water? Are cargo tank compartments checked to ensure that they are clean & dry?

10.2.3.3 10.3.3.1 (c)

B3-25 After loading:

- Are all tank low points checked for the presence of free water and sediment after settling for at least 5 minutes (each compartment in the

case of multiple compartments)? - Is a Control Check performed for the first load of the day and after a

change in batch? - Are tank compartment openings secured and preferably sealed?

- Are grade identification markings checked?

10.3.3.2 (b)

10.3.3.2 (f)

B3-26 Where Driver Controlled Loading (DCL) is conducted, are the requirements of EI/JIG 1530 Section 10.3.4 being met?

-Is the scope of the additional tasks to be performed by the drivers

clearly identified and specific written procedures available? - Have drivers who perform DCL received suitable training and are

training records available?

10.3.4

Transfers by Pipeline B3-27 For multi-product pipelines, is pipework positively segregated between grades?

Are single grade pipelines grade-separated?

9.3.8

10.2.3.1 c B3-28 For multi-product pipeline deliveries:

- are the other products transported compatible with aviation fuel?

- is product sequencing and interface detection satisfactory, - are leading and trailing interfaces directed into non-aviation storage?

- Has it been ensured that slops or interfaces are not reinjected into jet

fuel?

10.2.2 10.2.6

B3-29 During transfers by pipeline are continuous line monitoring systems including

calibrated densitometers and turbidity analysers deployed, or are samples taken and tested as specified in 10.2.3.3?

10.2.3.3

B3-30 Are samples taken for retention as specified in 10.2.3.3? 10.2.3.3 B3-31 For dedicated jet fuel pipelines, are procedures in place to handle the 'pigged

cloud'? Inspector to confirm that in multiproduct pipelines, pigging operations do not

take place in jet fuel.

10.2.7

Filling Drums, IBCs and ISO Tank Containers B3-32 Do drums, IBCs and ISO containers comply with the materials of construction

requirements? 10.4.2.1 10.4.3.2

B3-33 Do the drum, IBC and ISO container filling equipment and quality control

procedures meet the required standards?

10.4

B3-34 Are drums and IBC stored in accordance with 10.4.2.5? 10.4.2.5 B3-35 Are change of grade procedures followed for ISO containers? 10.4.3.4 Ship to ship Transfers and Floating Storage B3-36 Are the suitability procedures detailed in 10.1.2-4 employed where a vessel is

being used as floating storage or loaded from floating storage?

Check that copper coils and zinc coatings are not used for floating storage

10.1.2 10.1.3

10.1.4




10.1.6 B3-37 Are suitable hoses being used and maintained in good condition?

Inspector to check records of use and maintenance records 10.1.6

B3-38 Are tanks containing aviation fuel segregated from other grades on board the

vessel, using a minimum of two valves?

10.1.6

B3-39 At the start of transhipment, are duplicate samples drawn for a Control Check as described in 10.1.6?

10.1.6

B3-40 After receipt into a ship’s tank on the floating storage or after ship-to-ship transfer, are samples taken in duplicate, labelled and sealed? Is a batch make-

up record prepared showing the information listed in 10.1.6?

10.1.6

B3-41 Other Comments or Recommendations loading facilities and procedures (Limit to C, R or NA)




C1: FILTRATION EQUIPMENT

At least one filter vessel shall be opened for inspection

General/external inspection Reference C1 Do filter vessels meet the requirements of EI 1596 and have all existing filter

vessels been assessed against the requirements of EI 1596? 9.4.2

C2 Are filter water separators installed for jet fuel delivery direct to airport service tanks (whether via Vessel, pipeline, road or rail car)?

Do the elements meet the requirements of EI 1581, latest edition?

Are Category M elements used where fuel contains FSII additive?

For avgas deliveries directly to airport service tanks, are filter/water separators meeting EI 1581 or microfilters meeting EI 1590 (latest edition) installed?

9.4.1

7.3.5

C3 Where microfilters are used to protect Filter Water Separators, do they meet the

requirements of EI 1590, latest edition?

Note: If the microfilter in use is not qualified to EI 1590, it shall meet the requirements of EI 1589. Inspector to verify.

9.4.2

C4 Where a mesh strainer creates a low point, has it been fitted with a low point drain?

9.4.2

C5 Inspector to verify that filter monitors (including those qualified to EI 1583) are

not used in any aviation fuel handling systems.

9.4.2

C6 Are plates attached to each vessel stating that they meet the EI standards and giving the correct designation, type and number of the elements installed?

9.4.5

C7 Is the maximum achievable flow rate marked on the body of each vessel and is it less than the rated flow for the vessel?

9.4.6

C8 Are dates of inspection and element changes displayed on the body of the

vessels?

C9 Are filter elements stored and used in accordance with manufacturers

requirements? 9.4.6

C10 Are pressure differential gauges of direct reading design and in good condition? Inspector to check for zeroing and free movement.

Is the differential pressure (dP) observed during pumping operations, at least

once a day, to ensure that the maximum limit is not exceeded?

9.4.7 9.4.11

C11 Is a working and tested air eliminator and pressure relief valve fitted?

Are any isolation/ maintenance valves sealed in the normal operating position?

9.4.5 C12 Are drain points readily accessible with sufficient clearance to accommodate a

wide neck glass jar?

9.4.7

C13 Is filter sump draining carried out correctly under pressure? Inspector to witness filter sump drain being performed.

9.4.7

C14 Are clay treaters designed and operated in accordance with Annex H? Annex H

Internal Inspection - Inspector to examine at least one vessel C15 Vessel reference/identity number: C16 Is there an adequate work platform for safe filter vessel access? 9.4.5 C17 Are elements in good condition?

All elements (coalescers and separators) from the same manufacturer? Inspector to comment on any visible damage or signs of possible surfactant

contamination or microbiological growth and action taken: Separator elements shall be removed for water test.

9.4.7

9.4.7

C18 Are elements tightened to the torque recommended by manufacturer using a

click-stop type calibrated torque wrench?

Annex F.3

C19 For elements longer than 18” (45cm), is an anti-vibration plate (“spider”) fitted

and bonded to the shell of the vessel?

(No stacked elements)

C20 Is the vessel cover seal in good condition? 9.4.9




Seals shall be replaced after a maximum of three compressions. C21 Is lining in sound condition? 9.4.7 C22 After inspection, is the vessel filled slowly?

Inspector should discuss procedure for filling slowly and procedure for checking

that the air eliminator is functioning correctly.

9.4.7

C23 Other Comments or Recommendations filtration equipment (R, C or NA)

EI/JIG 1530 STANDARD of 29

Ver. 2.0 June 2019 Joint Inspection Group Page 22 of 29


D1: HEALTH, SAFETY, SECURITY & ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT

This inspection is not an HSSE audit. However, the inspector should check that the location has a

system in place for HSSE Management, that meets the requirements of the JIG HSSE MS Standard

HSSE Management Reference D1-1 Are external HSSE Management System audits conducted at least every three

years and is the latest report available?

JIG HSSE MS

D1-2 Is an HSSE induction programme implemented for all personnel, contractors, and visitors?

Was a suitable induction performed when the inspector arrived on site?

JIG HSSE MS

D1-3 Are ‘Safety Walks’ conducted by Managers and Supervisors to a defined frequency and recorded?

JIG HSSE MS

D1-4 Are safety signs prominently displayed throughout the location and are the

signs well maintained?

JIG HSSE MS

Work Control Procedures D1-5 Is there evidence that a permit to work system is being used with appropriate

safeguards for confined space entry, hazardous entry (pressure etc), hot work, isolation, electrical work and other activities requiring control?

JIG HSSE MS

D1-6 Does the permit to work system include the assignment of competent persons

to authorise permits?

JIG HSSE MS

Security D1-7 Is the location adequately secured to prevent the access of unauthorised

people? Inspector to check that there are no obvious security issues during visit

JIG HSSE MS

D1-8 Other Comments or Recommendations HSSE requirements (Limit to C,

R or NA)




D2: TRAINING, MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE, INCIDENTS & EMERGENCY PROCEDURES

This inspection is not an HSSE audit. However, the inspector should check that the HSSE

requirements outlined in the JIG HSSE MS Standard are in place.

Training, Product handling and PPE Reference D2-1 Is there a current training plan for new and existing personnel, including

contractors and sub-contractors, and are refresher training requirements

defined?

JIG HSSE MS

EI/JIG 1530

2.4

D2-2 Do training records include:

- HSSE awareness and skills training? - Regular Operating and QC training?

- Fire-fighting training? - Fire drills and emergency procedure exercises?

- Follow up on-the-job observation training? Do training records include details of theoretical and practical content and how

competency is assessed and signed off for both initial and refresher training

when required?

JIG HSSE MS

EI/JIG 1530 2.4

4.5.8.10

D2-3 Does the location have a PPE policy which includes the requirement for

management and visitors to wear appropriate PPE?

JIG HSSE MS

D2-4 Can appropriate medical aid and ambulance service be obtained within a reasonable timeframe?

JIG HSSE MS

D2-5 Is a stocked first aid kit available and has clear responsibility for maintaining it

been assigned?

JIG HSSE MS

D2-6 Are adequate washing facilities provided? JIG HSSE MS Management of Change D2-7 Is a procedure in place for management of change to be applied including a

post-implementation review? Does the MOC process consider the impact of proposed changes on product

quality?

JIG HSSEMS

EI/JIG 1530 3.3

Incident reporting and Investigation D2-8 Is there a written procedure for incident reporting (including PQ incidents)? JIG HSSE MS D2-9 Are reports of incidents (including PQ incidents) and actions taken shared with

personnel and participant companies?

JIG HSSE MS

D2-10 Is each product quality incident documented, and record maintained for at least

five years?

EI/JIG 1530

9.6.4 Emergency Response Procedures D2-11 Are written pre-planned response procedures in place for:

· Equipment breakdown affecting ability to operate?

· Power failure? · Product spillage?

· Serious injury to staff, contractors or third parties? · Terrorist actions, bomb warning, civil disturbance etc.?

· Fuel quality problems? · Fire?

. Stock shortages

. Large scale health risks (e.g. communicable diseases) Is there evidence that personnel have been made aware of the contents

relevant to them?

JIG HSSE MS

D2-12 Are emergency telephone numbers immediately available and up to date? JIG HSSE MS D2-13 Emergency shut-down procedures in place? JIG HSSE MS D2-14 Is a drawing of the installation prominently displayed, identifying the location of

firefighting equipment, emergency shut-down devices, alarm activation points, exits, assembly points and first aid equipment?

JIG HSSE MS

EI/JIG 1530




Is a set of critical drawings (general layout, piping and instrumentation

diagram, process flow diagram) of the storage installation available either electronically or in hard copy?

Are critical drawings updated after any modification or system change?

9.1.6

D2-15 Other Comments or Recommendations HSSE documentation (Limit to C, R or NA)




E1: QUALITY CONTROL DOCUMENTATION

Inspector shall check documentation for compliance with JIG requirements.

Product Documents Reference E1-1 Are Release Certificates (RC) confirming compliance with governing fuel

specification and, if applicable, latest issue of AFQRJOS ("Aviation Fuel Quality Requirements for Jointly Operated Systems") available and do they contain the

information required in 2.2.5 (a-d) depending on the type of transfer:

- Grade and quantity? - Date and time of release/loading or transfer?

- Product has been settled and tested as required? - Batch number or other unique identifier/test report number?

- Certified Batch density at 15 degrees C?

- Conductivity and temperature (if applicable)? - “Water/Sediment Free” certification by means of a Visual Appearance

Check? - Signature of releasing authority confirming the requirements of 8.4.4

and Annex A have been met?

2.2.5

8.3.1.1 8.7.2

8.4.4

Annex B

E1-2 Are Refinery Certificates of Quality (RCQ) and Certificates of Analysis (CoA) or Recertification Certificates, as appropriate, available, signed/ dated and do they

confirm compliance with a recognised fuel specification and the latest issue of AFQRJOS if applicable?

2.2. 2.2.6

8.3.1.2 Annex B

E1-3 Do Refinery Certificates include the information listed in 2.2.2, including (where

required) the manufacturing process (non-hydroprocessed, severely

hydroprocessed etc.) and amount and type of approved additives used in ppm or % by weight (including nil additions)?

2.2.2

E1-4 Do Certificates of Analysis include the information listed in 2.2.3? 2.2.3

2.3 E1-5 Do Recertification Test (RT) Certificates include the information listed in 2.2.4,

supported by a comparison of Recertification Test results with previous analyses? 2.2.4 4.5.6

E1-6 If more than three new batches have been received into a tank on top of a certified heel, is a CoA produced?

2.2.4

E1-7 Where Static Dissipator Additive is added downstream of the Refinery, are

quantities of additive used recorded on appropriate documents?

8.5.4

E1-8 Where product is re-batched, do certificates produced (either CoA, RT Certificate or RC) list the component batches and do they permit traceability to be

maintained?

2.3

E1-9 Does certification documentation take into consideration all component volumes

greater than 3% of the total batch volume?

10.2.3.4

E1-10 For fungible pipeline systems - does the pipeline operator ensure that all batches entering the system meet the

relevant specification

- where batch traceability is lost, are the original RCQs, RT certificates and/or CoAs for all fuel batches entering the system available to the pipeline operator

and a CoA produced for the new batch at the receiving location?

2.3

E1-11 Is the latest test Certificate for a batch of product (RCQ, CoA, RT) less than 180 days old?

When the latest test certificate for a given batch is more than 180 days old, is a CoA test conducted (where possible with comparison made with the latest

applicable certificate against the allowable variations in 4.5.6, Tables 2/3)?

2.2.6 4.5.6

Product Receipt Records E1-12 Do product receipt records include:

- Date, time of receipt and volume?

8.3.1.1

2.2.5




- Product receipt Release Certificate details?

- Tank dips and daily volume reconciliation?

E1-13 Are differences between delivered and received volumes at standard

temperature investigated to confirm that no contamination has taken place?

8.3.2.7

E1-14 Is product quarantined if test results indicate possible contamination and does it remain under quarantine until further investigation has established that the

aviation fuel is on specification and is acceptable for aviation use?

4.5.1 4.5.6

Sample Retention and Records

E1-15 Is a record maintained of all samples taken for testing or retention? 4.1.9

E1-16 Are retention samples taken when RCQ, CoA or RT Certificate testing is required

prior to tank release? Are retention samples available for the current and the previous batch?

8.4.3.6

E1-17 Are samples for laboratory testing or retention, taken and stored in appropriate

containers that are suitably labelled? Are retention samples sealed, ideally with a tamper-proof seal?

(Inspector to witness samples and suitability of storage facility if on site)

If clear bottles are used for retention samples kept by a laboratory, are they kept

in the dark?

4.5.2

5.8

Settling, Testing & Release – Non dedicated/non segregated supply E1-18 Do records show that product is settled for at least the minimum required time,

in accordance with options given in 8.4.2?

8.4.2

E1-19 Do records demonstrate that, once tank homogeneity has been confirmed,

composite tank samples are prepared for Recertification Test (or Certificate of

Analysis Test where batch identity is lost) against the requirements of the governing specification and variability limits (for Recertification testing), including

FAME/DRA testing where necessary?

Has a risk assessment been performed to determine whether FAME/DRA testing

is required?

8.4.4

4.5.7

8.1.1 8.3.4.3

8.3.4.4

E1-20 Are Release Certificates (RC) issued by the location containing the information

required in 2.2.5 (a-d) depending on the type of transfer?

Examples of RC are available in Annex B.3 or B.4

2.2.5

8.4.4

Annex B

E1-21 Are controls in place for changing the status of inlet and outlet lines and the status of the tank from ‘settling’ to ‘released’, on tank release?

8.4.4

E1-22 Where tanks have been layered is additional testing carried out on each sample

and are appropriate release procedures in place?

8.4.3

Settling, Testing & Release – Dedicated and segregated supply E1-23 Do records show that product settled for at least the minimum required time, in

accordance with options given in 8.4.2?

8.4.2

E1-24 Do records demonstrate that, once tank homogeneity has been confirmed, a representative sample is taken for Control Check and observed density is

compared with the expected density (both at standard temperature)?

8.4.3 8.4.4

E1-25 Are Release Certificates (RC) issued by the location containing the information required in 2.2.5 (a-d) depending on the type of transfer?

Examples of RC are available in Annex B.3 or B.4

2.2.5 8.4.4

Annex B E1-26 Are controls in place for changing the status of inlet and outlet lines and the

status of the tank from ‘settling’ to ‘released’, on tank release?

8.4.4.

Transfers from the Location (via vessel, pipeline, railcar or truck) E1-27 Are results of the quality checks conducted during transfers or after loading from

the location (via vessel, pipeline, railcar or truck) recorded and reported? 10.1.5.i 10.3.3.2.e

E1-28 If product containing bio-component (or dye) is transported in a multi-product pipeline that transports jet fuel, has a risk assessment and successful trial been

completed, and specific operating procedures are implemented?

10.2.2




E1-29 Prior to deliveries, is a copy of the latest supplying tank RCQ, CoA, or RT

Certificate provided to each receiving location?

10.1.5

10.2.3.4 10.3.6

E1-30 Are Release Certificates available for each transfer from the location?

Note: The RC need not duplicate existing documents, but the information shall be part of the consignment notes.

2.2.5

8.3.1.1 10.1.6

Static Stock E1-31 If product is held in a storage tank for longer than six months with no receipts,

are the requirements of Annex C met prior to the product being used?

Is a comparison of the new CoA made with the latest applicable RCQ/CoA/RT and are any significant differences investigated prior to release?

2.2.6 Annex C

E1-32 If time between product receipts into a tank exceeds one month, is conductivity

of jet fuel containing SDA checked at monthly intervals and recorded with temperature of fuel?

9.5.1.4

9.6.1

Additive Records E1-33 Is each delivery of aviation-approved additive supplied with:

- a quality certificate confirming that the relevant additive meets the

specification;

- batch details of additive manufacture; - shelf life information; and

- whether or not the additive supplied is in concentrate or diluted form - a Safety Data Sheet (SDS)?

7.4.1 7.4.2

7.4.3

E1-34 Are additive tank inspection and cleaning records available? 7.6.2 E1-35 Are records available of monthly additive samples taken into a glass bottle to

confirm satisfactory visual appearance?

7.6.2

E1-36 Where FSII is stored, are records available of samples taken for Periodic Testing? 7.8 E1-37 Are records available of additive injection equipment tests at regular intervals

(typically every 6 months) to verify the correct dosage is being delivered? 7.3.9.2 7.9.3

E1-38 Are traceable records available of any additive quantities added at the facility and reported on the appropriate test certificates/documentation (e.g. CoA or RT or

RC)?

Note: the documentation shall also include information on the amounts previously added, where this information is available, along with the new

additions.

5.1 7.2

7.9.2

7.9.3.3 7.10.1.1

7.11 Authorised Signatories E1-39 Is the process for authorizing signatories fully documented, including a registry

of those holding the signatory authority?

- For certifying laboratories? - For operational staff at fuel handling facilities?

5.2

A.2

E1-40 Other Comments or Recommendations Depot QC documentation (Limit to C, R or NA)

Laboratories E1-41 Does the laboratory adopt appropriate quality control and assurance standards,

that apply to the tests used for aviation fuel certification?

5.1

E1-42 Are there records of the laboratory's participation in comparative testing (cross check) correlation schemes available that include the tests used for aviation fuel

certification?

Where the correlation scheme indicates a bias in testing, is corrective action taken?

5.1

E1-43 In the event that a laboratory test result does not meet specification, are the

data integrity steps in Annex E, Figure E.1 or E.2 followed? Does the laboratory have a documented procedure for investigating and

documenting any disputed results?

5.11

Annex E




E2: SUPPLY DEPOT – RECORDS OF ROUTINE CHECKS AND MAINTENANCE

Equipment Reference

Storage Tanks E2-1 Daily/weekly low point draining and Visual Appearance / Control Checks 9.5.1.1

9.6.1 E2-2 Quarterly Draining double block & bleed valves and integrity checks (non-

dedicated/non-segregated supply systems)

9.5.1.6

E2-3 Monthly floating suctions buoyancy checks where applicable Bulletin 122

9.5.1.2

9.6.2 E2-4 Condition of vents and coarse mesh screens (or PV valves and flame arrestors

where fitted) (quarterly/annual)

Bulletin 122

9.5.1.3

9.6.1 E2-5 High level alarm systems’ checks (monthly/annual) Bulletin 122 E2-6 Documentation of storage tank internal inspections, cleaning and return into

service? (requirements depend on tank design, PQ history, MBG testing and if directly or indirectly supplying airport service tanks)

9.5.2

E2-7 Are storage tanks tested for MBG in accordance with 9.5.2/Tables 13-14 ?

Where there are indications of likely microbiological activity, are they immediately investigated, including by on-site assay tests carried out on low point drain

samples of jet fuel using a suitable test kit?

9.5.2

9.5.4

E2-8 If chemicals had to be used for the cleaning, are records of additional steps taken to ensure no contamination of the fuel available, and has a CoA Test been

conducted? Is any product treated with biocide directly downgraded to non-aviation use?

9.5.2.5 9.5.4

7.3.6

E2-9 Are detailed records maintained of the types and quantity of sediments found

during tank cleaning?

9.5.2.6

E2-10 Are detailed records of the condition of tank interior fittings and coatings

maintained?

9.5.2.7

E2-11 Do records show that fixed product recovery tanks are tested quarterly for MBG and cleaned in accordance with EI/JIG 1530?

9.5.2.10

E2-12 Do records show that mobile product recovery tanks are inspected visually

(without entry) quarterly for cleanliness and condition?

9.5.2.10

E2-13 Are records available of checks of thermal relief valves fitted on pipes and lines,

in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations? 9.5.1.7

Change of Grade Procedures E2-14 Are change of grade requirements, including sampling and testing before

release, followed and recorded?

9.5.3

Bonding (Bridger receipt/loading) E2-15 Daily visual check of bonding wires and clips Bulletin 122 E2-16 Weekly electrical continuity check

(not required for permissive bonding systems)

Bulletin 122

Field Test Equipment E2-17 Thermometers (including Resistance Temperature Devices) and Hydrometers

(including electronic instruments)-6-monthly accuracy check

Annex F.1

E2-18 Conductivity meters: in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations Annex F.2 Fire extinguishers E2-19 Monthly visual condition check E2-20 Annual maintenance by manufacturer/competent employee/ contractor Electrical Equipment E2-21 Monthly emergency shut down switch test records? E2-22 Annual earthing straps/rods electrical resistance checks Bulletin 122 E2-23 Other Comments or Recommendations depot records of routine checks

and maintenance (C, R or NA)




E3: FILTRATION EQUIPMENT – RECORDS

Filtration Equipment Reference E3-1 Daily draining filter vessel sumps under pressure & Visual Appearance Check 9.4.6

9.4.9 9.6.2

E3-2 Weekly differential pressure monitoring and recording at maximum achievable

flow

9.4.7

9.4.9 9.6.2

E3-3 Weekly Graphs of differential pressure (dP) readings at maximum operating flow

rate? Or:

Where correction to maximum achievable flow is necessary, is it established by using a procedure endorsed by the filter manufacturer?

Record of action taken when unusual dP result is found?

9.4.7

9.4.9 9.6.2

E3-4 6-monthly (monthly for Avgas) dP gauge checks for zeroing & free movement If a piston type DP gauge which incorporates a small filter in its design is used, is

this filter replaced every 10 years (or in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendation if different)?

Are Electronic dP measuring devices calibrated/tested in accordance with

manufacturers recommendations?

9.4.10 9.6.2

E3-5 Monthly mesh strainer low point drain and annual inspection and cleaning 9.4.2 E3-6 Microfilter element replacement with cause (eg max dP or time limit) 9.4.8

9.6.2 E3-7 Coalescer element replacement with cause (eg max dP or time limit) 9.4.8

9.6.2 E3-8 Annual internal inspections of filter vessel:

- cleanliness - element appearance

- element torque check - internal lining condition

- cover seal condition / cover seal replacement

- free draining to sump

9.4.7

9.4.9 9.6.2

E3-9 Separator elements (Teflon/synthetic) testing (and replacement if required) 9.4.8

E3-10 Calibration certificate for torque wrench (according to manufacturer’s

recommended frequency, but at least 5-yearly). Annex F.3

E3-11 Are records available of annual checks of air eliminators and of

thermal/pressure relief valves mounted on filter vessels?

9.4.6

9.4.7 Bulletin 122

E3-12 Where filter vessels are fitted with an automatic draining system, is it maintained in accordance with manufacturers recommendations?

9.4.7 (d)

E3-13 EI 1582 Similarity Data Sheets confirming element configuration and flow rate for

FWS vessels qualified to latest edition of EI 1581 by similarity (and where vessels have been de-rated to reduced flow rate)?

9.4.6

E3-14 Other Comments or Recommendations Filtration records (C, R or NA)

EI/JIG 1530 STANDARD 2nd Edition (May 2019 ......EI/JIG 1530 STANDARD – 2nd Edition (May 2019)...

Documents

Transcript of EI/JIG 1530 STANDARD 2nd Edition (May 2019 ......EI/JIG 1530 STANDARD – 2nd Edition (May 2019)...