Effort Reporting: Back to the Basics NCURA FRA 2013 New Orleans
description
Transcript of Effort Reporting: Back to the Basics NCURA FRA 2013 New Orleans
Effort Reporting: Back to the Basics NCURA FRA 2013New OrleansPatrick Fitzgerald
Associate Dean for Research AdministrationHarvard UniversityFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Effort Reporting…not the PIs’ favorite task…
2
3
Regulations Governing “Effort Reporting” for Universities OMB Circular A-21
Cost Principles for Educational Institutions
Section J. 10: “Compensation for personal services”
Payroll distribution system “will reasonably reflect the activity for which the employee is compensated by the
institution…”
Overview of Requirements Theory:
Salary charged to sponsored agreements is based on estimate of effort on the project
Must verify how much effort actually expended to ensure that charges are appropriate
Why? Provides support for salary charged to
sponsored agreements Labor costs are 2/3 of direct research costs Documents that effort commitments have been
met; direct charged salary and cost sharing 4
5
A-21 Section J.10 “Compensation for personal
services” Covers amounts paid by the institution
for services rendered during the period of performance under sponsored agreements,
Costs are allowable to the extent they conform to the established policies of the institution and are consistently applied
Reliance is placed on estimates in which a “degree of tolerance” is appropriate
6
A-21 Requirements After-the-fact confirmation of personnel
costs charged to sponsored agreements Signed by the employee, principal
investigator or responsible official(s) using suitable means of verification that
the work was performed Must be incorporated into institution’s
official records Reports will reasonably reflect the
activities for which employees are compensated by the institution
Discussion Question #1
Who has primary responsibility for signing effort certifications at your school? Does your policy assign this
responsibility to the right person? What do you think constitutes
“suitable means of verification” that the work is performed?
7
8
A-21 Requirements The institution’s effort reporting system
must provide for modification of an individual's salary distribution commensurate with a significant change in the employee's work activity A-21 doesn’t define “significant”
Time is expressed in terms of a percent of total activity (“effort”)—not
hours Frequency of reporting varies depending
upon method of certification
Discussion Questions Harvard requires monthly effort
certifications for non-faculty. We will be changing to quarterly.1. What is the frequency of certification at
your institution?2. Is this the appropriate interval? If not, what
do you think is the appropriate frequency for certification, and why?
3. What would a federal auditor do if a certification is not signed?
9
10
A-21 Requirements Effort reporting system should be
part of institution’s official records System will provide for
independent internal evaluations to ensure compliance
What is the “independent internal evaluation” process at your institution?
11
A-21 Section J.10d. Salary rates for faculty members
Charges for work performed on sponsored agreements by faculty members during the academic year will be based on the individual faculty member’s regular compensation….
In no event will charges to sponsored agreements exceed the proportionate share of the base salary for that period
What does “proportionate share” mean?
12
A-21 Section J J.10.d.(2) Periods outside the academic
year
Work performed during summer months will be paid a rate not in excess of the base salary divided by the period to which the base salary relates.
NSF policy change -- maximum of two months summer salary may now be paid over calendar year as “supplemental” salary
13
Effort Certification--Recap Salary is charged during the project
and actual effort is certified after the activity has occurred.
Salary must be commensurate with effort
Certification = verification that effort commitment was fulfilled
14
Managing Effort Salaries = Actual effort, not estimated Whose effort is committed in the proposal?
Direct-charged salary Cost shared salary
Adjustments/reductions? Reduced budget = reduced effort?
Scope of work changes No cost extension: who pays for salaries during
the extension period?
15
Effort Reporting – Areas of Risk Faculty effort based on 100%, not hours
worked How do we differentiate faculty’s
institutional time from personal time? Standard for reporting=“reasonable”
(not precision). What is a reasonable variance? Institutional Base Salary:
12 months; 10 months; 9months How do we deal with consulting effort?
16
Effort Reporting – Areas of Risk Proposals with no effort commitment
OK for equipment grants, travel grants, conference grants only
Personnel with salary charged to projects for which there was no effort commitment in the proposal, especially administrative salaries
Cost transfers made after effort has been certified
17
Effort Reporting – Areas of Risk Charging 100% of salary to sponsored
projects Doesn’t leave time for other activities How do you account for proposal
preparation? Charging salary to grants in excess of
effort provided Summer salary for academic year effort Not providing required level of effort for NIH
Career awards
18
Effort Reporting – Areas of Risk Individual certifying effort does not have
“suitable means of verification” Certification is signed after the period
required by institution’s policy Charging salary on NIH grants in excess of
cap Failure to track effort commitments for which
salary wasn’t requested (cost sharing) No documented “internal independent
evaluation” process
19
Ideas to Minimize Risk Evaluate Effort Reporting/Certification Policy
Policy should be understandable and flexible Does frequency of certification and required time
period for certification make compliance more challenging?
Who can certify effort? Is this who should certify? Engage and Educate Faculty
Explain “why” in addition to “how” Relationship of effort reporting to grant terms Consequences of not following policy Salary should be commensurate with effort
20
Ideas to Minimize Risk
Review of salary charges to avoid future problems Gaps in support for postdocs/grad students Avoid over-expenditures, misallocation, transfers
Avoid 100% Effort Charges to Grants Doesn’t allow for other activities We can’t draw a bright line between compensated
effort and uncompensated, especially for faculty Most faculty and researchers prepare proposals
21
Ideas to Minimize Risk
Document your “internal independent evaluation” process
Education is the Key to Compliance Remember, you will be audited against A-21
and your institutional policies Learn from others—Audit findings at other
institutions keep us informed and help us prevent similar problems
22
NSF OIG Recent Audit Findings
NSF Audit of Cornell*
23
“Cornell’s policies and procedures did not:” Adequately define what constitutes suitable means of verification Require certifiers to document how they obtained suitable means of
verification, or Hold certifying officials accountable for non-compliance of policies
and procedures; Require the training or involvement of key grants management
personnel namely principal investigators (PIs), in the effort certification process
Identify the use of group certifications whereby one administrative manager certifies multiple employees effort for an entire year with a single signature without supporting documentation from the employee or the PI.”
*NSF OIG, Semiannual Report to Congress, March 2010
24
University of Delaware (NSF)* 6 employees lacked an understanding of their
responsibilities for effort reporting Labor charges were certified up to 600 days
after the University’s mandated turn around time
Lack of policy defining what constitutes suitable means of verification
Administrative time or excess salary charged to NSF grants
*NSF OIG, Semiannual Report to Congress, March 2010
25
More Examples SUNY Stony Brook*
Employees did not have first hand knowledge when they certified effort reports
University of Wisconsin-Madison* Inadequate oversight of the effort reporting
process and inadequate training of personnel involved in the labor effort reporting process
*NSF OIG, Semiannual Report to Congress, March 2010