Efficiency Performance Contracting

21
Efficiency Performance Efficiency Performance Contracting Contracting Reducing Wastes and Costs Reducing Wastes and Costs through Innovative Supply through Innovative Supply Contracts Contracts Energy Management Seminar Energy Management Seminar November 13, 2008 November 13, 2008 Thomas J. Bierma, MBA, Ph.D., Thomas J. Bierma, MBA, Ph.D., Environmental Health Program Environmental Health Program Illinois State University Illinois State University iSU

description

iSU. Efficiency Performance Contracting. Reducing Wastes and Costs through Innovative Supply Contracts Energy Management Seminar November 13, 2008 Thomas J. Bierma , MBA, Ph.D., Environmental Health Program Illinois State University. iSU. Research since 1995. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Efficiency Performance Contracting

Page 1: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Efficiency Performance Efficiency Performance ContractingContracting

Reducing Wastes and Costs through Reducing Wastes and Costs through Innovative Supply ContractsInnovative Supply Contracts

Energy Management SeminarEnergy Management SeminarNovember 13, 2008November 13, 2008

Thomas J. Bierma, MBA, Ph.D., Thomas J. Bierma, MBA, Ph.D., Environmental Health ProgramEnvironmental Health Program Illinois State UniversityIllinois State University

iSU

Page 2: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Research since 1995Research since 1995

Change incentives for suppliersChange incentives for suppliers

to pay for performance and savings to pay for performance and savings rather than “stuff.”rather than “stuff.”

Does it work?Does it work?

Funded by the Illinois Sustainable Technology Center and the Funded by the Illinois Sustainable Technology Center and the U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency

iSU

Page 3: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Electricity32%

Nat. Gas12%

Wst&w tr5%

Chemicals6%

Tooling35%

Paint10%

Plant F - $1,009kTypical Spend in Key Non-Core Areas

Total spend: $0.5 – $2 million/yr

Manufacturing SME

Energy spend: $0.2 – $.9 million/yr

Page 4: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Question…iSU

How much could these costs be reduced by implementing projects with a payback period of….

1 year?2 years?3 years?4 years?

Electricity32%

Nat. Gas12%

Wst&w tr5%

Chemicals6%

Tooling35%

Paint10%

Plant F - $1,009k

Page 5: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Question…iSU

Yet these opportunities go untapped year after year…

Why?

Page 6: Efficiency Performance Contracting

A Major Cause…iSU

Core Competence

“The key skills or knowledge needed to build and maintain a competitive edge.” (Quinn 1994).

These technologies lie outside the core competence of the business, so time and money go elsewhere.

Page 7: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Question…iSU

Since suppliers have this core competence…

can we create incentives so suppliers apply that competence to increase customer efficiency rather than only sell them “stuff?”

Page 8: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Answer…iSU

For chemicals – Absolutely!

Electricity32%

Nat. Gas12%

Wst&w tr5%

Chemicals6%

Tooling35%

Paint10%

Plant F - $1,009k

Chemical Management Services (CMS)

Page 9: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Answer…iSU

For tooling – Absolutely!

Electricity32%

Nat. Gas12%

Wst&w tr5%

Chemicals6%

Tooling35%

Paint10%

Plant F - $1,009k

Tooling Management Contracts

Page 10: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Answer…iSU

For energy in the M.U.S.H market – Absolutely!

Electricity32%

Nat. Gas12%

Wst&w tr5%

Chemicals6%

Tooling35%

Paint10%

Plant F - $1,009k

ESCOs

Energy savings performance contracts

Page 11: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Question…iSU

Can we learn from these examples to create a market in energy savings outside the M.U.S.H. market? (for the rest of us?)

Electricity32%

Nat. Gas12%

Wst&w tr5%

Chemicals6%

Tooling35%

Paint10%

Plant F - $1,009k

Page 12: Efficiency Performance Contracting

What the customer (energy user) wants

iSU

1. Savings and performance – not “stuff”

2. Work with one, trusted supplier

3. Pay for it out of savings – if possible

Page 13: Efficiency Performance Contracting

What is the lowest-hanging fruit?

iSU• Lighting

• Waste heat recovery

• Compressed air

• Cooling

• What else?

Page 14: Efficiency Performance Contracting

One supplier?iSU

• Can one supplier handle all these?

• Would it require an alliance of suppliers?

• Who would lead the alliance?

Page 15: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Financial IncentivesiSU

Two models

• Pay-for-performance / Shared savings

• Sole supplier with targets

Page 16: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Capital Financing?iSU

• Delta Institute, Chicagonon-profit, member of CCX

• Will there be additional Federal incentives?

Page 17: Efficiency Performance Contracting

DiscussioniSU

• We have not found working examples of this yet in our research.

• Are there ideas about how to create it, or how to improve it?

Page 18: Efficiency Performance Contracting

ContactsContactsTom Bierma, Illinois State UniversityTom Bierma, Illinois State University

[email protected]

309/438-7121309/438-7121

Dan Marsch, Illinois STCDan Marsch, Illinois [email protected]

309/671-3196 ext. 202309/671-3196 ext. 202

iSU

Page 19: Efficiency Performance Contracting

Hitachi Metals and DCTHitachi Metals and DCT

Page 20: Efficiency Performance Contracting

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996

Per

cent

age

of B

asel

ine*

Engine production

Coolant usage

Coolant waste haulage

Engine production, coolant usage, and coolant waste haulage, Navistar, 1989-1996.

Plus 93% reduction in engine head and block rework

Page 21: Efficiency Performance Contracting

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998

Pe

rce

nt

of

1994

ba

seli

ne

Coolant Usage, GM-EMD, 1994-1998