Effects of Plug-In Electric Vehicles on Electrical Distribution Systems · 2012-05-22 · Electric...
Transcript of Effects of Plug-In Electric Vehicles on Electrical Distribution Systems · 2012-05-22 · Electric...
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 1 of 19
Effects of Plug-In Electric Vehicles on Electrical Distribution Systems
David Steen
The work is financed by Göteborg Energi Research Foundation
Chalmers University of Technology
Electrical Power Engineering Energy and Environment
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 2 of 19
Outline
• Background • Plug in Electric Vehicles (PEVs)
– Drive pattern – Energy consumption
• Distribution systems – Design – Load profiles – Spot price
• Case study results • Conclusions
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 3 of 19
Background
• Increased interest to reduce the dependency on fossil fuel.
– Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs) have the potential to reduce the fossil fuel usage.
• A large scale introduction of PEVs will increase the usage of electricity. – Increased peak demand?
• Is there a need to control the charging? – How to control the charging most optimal? – How would controlled charging affect the distribution system? – Potential to support renewable electricity production?
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 4 of 19
Vehicle Usage Data
The figure above is based on a national travel survey conducted by SIKA/TRAFA.
Distance/day commuting 24 km Distance/day leisure 30 km
Energy consumption* 0.2 kWh/km Charge power* 3.68 kVA Power factor* 0.95
Charge efficiency* 88% * Estimated value
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 5 of 19
Location of the Vehicles
Parked vehicles during the night
The figures above is based on data from the city of Gothenburg and SIKA/TRAFA.
Parked vehicles during the day
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 6 of 19
A Residential Distribution System in Gothenburg
130/10 kV
= 10/0.4 kVsubstation
SS = Sectionalizing SwitchTS = Tie Switch
SS
SS
TSTS
Normal Operation
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 7 of 19
A Residential Distribution System in Gothenburg
130/10 kV
= 10/0.4 kVsubstation
SS = Sectionalizing SwitchTS = Tie Switch
SS
SS
TSTS
“Redundancy” Operation
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 8 of 19
Load Profiles in the Distribution System
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 9 of 19
Nordpool Electricity Price
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 10 of 19
Case Study – Charge Strategies
• Uncontrolled charging – The charging is conducted immediately after each journey.
• Loss-optimal charging – The charging is conducted to minimize the losses in the distribution
system.
• Price-optimal charging – The charging is conducted to minimize the electricity cost and
support renewable energy production.
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 11 of 19
Case Study – Demographical Data
Residential DS Commercial DS No. of vehicles used for leisure journeys
1395 154
No. of vehicles commuting to work in the DS
137 624
No. of vehicles commuting home to the DS
1091 120
• Demographical data has been used to evaluate the
location of the vehicles over the day.
DS = Distribution System
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 12 of 19
Case Study – Stop Time Vehicles
VW = Vehicles stopping at work VH = Vehicles stopping at home VL = Vehicles stopping after leisure
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 13 of 19
Case Study – Parked Vehicles
VWP = Vehicles parked at work VHP = Vehicles parked at home VLP = Vehicles parked at home after leisure
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 14 of 19
Case Study – Load Profile Residential Area Charging only at home
Charging at home and at work
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 15 of 19
Case Study – Load Profile Commercial Area Charging only at home
Charging at home and at work
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 16 of 19
• Charging at home
• Charging at home and work
Case Study – Maximum Penetration
Residential Commercial Normal Redund. Normal Redund. Uncontrolled 76% 0% >100% >100% Loss-optimal >100% 0% >100% >100% Price-optimal 49% 0% >100% >100%
Residential Commercial Normal Redund. Normal Redund. Uncontrolled >100% 0% >100% >100% Loss-optimal >100% 0% >100% >100% Loss-optimal 49% 0% >100% >100%
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 17 of 19
Case Study – Loss, Voltage and Cost
• Residential Area
• Commercial Area
Charging at home Min. voltage [pu] Loss increase [%] Cost [sek/charge] Uncontrolled 0.96 28 7.51 Loss-optimal 0.97 23 6.61 Price-optimal 0.95 33 6.29
Charging at home Min. voltage [pu] Loss increase [%] Cost [sek/charge] Uncontrolled 0.98 3.6 7.51 Loss-optimal 0.98 2.3 6.35 Price-optimal 0.98 2.5 6.29
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 18 of 19
Conclusions
• PEVs will affect the distribution system.
– Local variation. – Vehicle usage is important.
• By controlling the charging the impact could be reduced. – Formulation of control strategy is important. – Increased number of PEVs can be supported without reinforcing
the distribution system – Decreased total system loss due to PEVs
• Charge cost are reduced by 12-16% for controlled charging compared to uncontrolled charging.
Electric Power Engineering
David Steen Chalmers Energy Conference 2012 19 of 19
Contact Information
David Steen Division of Electric Power Engineering Department of Energy and Environment Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
Phone: +46(0)31 - 772 16 63 Mobile: +46(0)739 - 16 95 96 E-mail: [email protected] www.chalmers.se/ee/SV/personal/steen-david