Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

19
Applicazione del recupero attivo, termico e passivo nell'handball: modalità a confronto. Laureando Marco Iorio Relatore Dr. Antonio Tessitore Correlatore Dr. Bas de Geus

description

Purpose: Junior male handball players (n=15) were studied to examine the effect of Cooling versus Active and Passive Recovery interventions in the half of two 30 minutes trainings. Methods: Four test batteries (W, T1, Recov, T2) composed of Rate of Perceived Exertion and Thermal Stress Scales, blood samples taken from the earlobe to determine lactate level, countermovement jump, hand grip strength test and 10 meters sprint with light signal reaction time, were used during a simulated handball match. After 10 minutes of warm-up (W), two sessions of 30 minutes training (T1, T2) were separated by an 8 minutes recovery (Recov) period. During Recov one of the three recovery interventions (cooling vest applied on the upper body, cycling and seated rest) was applied. Results: Cycling group showed a lower blood lactate concentration during Recov (p

Transcript of Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Page 1: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Applicazione del recupero attivo, termico e passivo nell'handball:

modalità a confronto.

Laureando

Marco Iorio

Relatore

Dr. Antonio Tessitore

Correlatore

Dr. Bas de Geus

Page 2: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.2

Pers J, Bon M, Kovacic S, Sibila M, Dezman B. Observation and analysis of large-scale human motion. Hum Mov Sci. 2002 Jul;21(2):295-311

Handball Performance Profile

1. Team Sport: technical, tactical, psychological/social and physical characteristics;

2. Alternate aerobic-anaerobic metabolism;3. Match Analysis:   - distance covered = 4,8 ± 0,32 km;  - 7% in sprinting (s > 5,2 m/s);   - 25% fast running (s < 5,2 m/s);   - 31% slow running (s < 3,0 m/s);   - 37% walking or standing still (s < 1,4 m/s);  - 2600 changes of activity in a match.

Page 3: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.3

Why Recovery?

High Training Density in preseason

High Match Density in season

Short Recovery Periods

Overreaching

Overtraining

Page 4: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.4

Thorlund et al. 2008; Wojtys et al. 1996; Gabett 2000; Pinto et al. 1999.

Why Recovery in the half time?

1. Decrease of performance in the 2nd

Half;

2. Increase of Injuries in the 2nd Half.

Page 5: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.5

1. Active Recovery: Decrease of blood lactate level (Reilly 2002; Spierer 1996)

2. Thermal Applications :1. Cryotherapy and coooling :

Decrease of blood flow, acute inflammation in muscle damage, muscle pain, swelling and lose of force

(Yanagisawa 2003)

2. Contrast temperature:Increase of blood flow, decrease of blood lactate, decrese of muscolar inflammatory rections, oedema (Coffey 2004)

Recovery Literature

Page 6: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.6

3. Electromyostimulation DOMS decrease (Tessitore et al. 2008), blood lactate decrease (Martin et al. 2007)

4. Stretching:Range of motion increase (Magnusson 2005) but, decrease of power (Shrier 2004), decrease of sprint speed (Nelson 2005)

5. Massage:Blood Lactate decrease (Weerapong 2005)

6. Other interventions:Hot water immersion, active recovery in water, compression garments, passive recovery.

Recovery Literature

Page 7: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.7

Recovery Literature

But…

1. Contrasting Results for every kind of interventions

2. No research applied during half time

Page 8: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.88

Purpose

May Cooling or Active Recovery, applied during the rest between two halves of a simulated Handball match, improve the players’s performance?

Page 9: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.9

- Subject: hanball players (n = 15; age = 18,27±1,33 years;weight 79,50±7,33 kg; height = 1,83±0,05; BMI = 23,65±2,04).

- Trial Protocol (1 Familiarization + 3 Trial):

(Training protocol: W=warm-up - 10’; T1=training 1 - 30’; R= Recovery - 10’; T2=training 2 - 30’)

(Test Batteries: tests take the name of training sections: Test1=W; Test2=T1; Test3=R; Test4=T2)

Materials and methods

Page 10: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.1010

Recovery Protocols:- Cooling Group: 8 min of cooling vest application,

seated;

- Cycling Group: 8 min of cycling at 120 bpm;

- Control Group: 8 min seated.

Materials and methods

Page 11: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.11

  Test Protocol:  - Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale;  - Thermal Stress scale (PT);  - Blood Sample (lactate level taken from the

earlobe);  - Countermovement Jump (CMJ);  - Hand Grip Strength Test;  - 10 meters Sprint + Light signal Reaction Time.

  Heart Rate were measured during the whole trials

Materials and methods

Page 12: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.12

Materials Recovery Interventions

  Cooling:   - Cooling Vest: vest (Jako Double, Hollenbach,

Belgium) + ice packs (4 sizes, Naqi, Halen, Belgium);

  - Wet underwear t-shirt;  - Rectal Thermister (LT-8°, Saitama, Japan);  Cycling:  - cyclergometer (n=5) + heart rate monitors

(n=5).

Page 13: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.13

- RPE (Borg) Scale;- Thermal Stress Scale;- Bionsen 5030, EKF Diagnostic, Germany;- Optojump Microgate, Italy;- Hidraulic Hand Dynamometer, Saehan Corporation,

Korea;- Powertimer Newtest, Finland;- Polar Team System, Finland.

Materials test Battery

Page 14: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.1414

Results of cycling group

Lower Blood Lactate Concentration in R (p<0,05)

Decrease of forearms flexor muscle strenght in T2 (p<0,006)

Page 15: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.1515

Results of cooling group

*

Ѳ: p=0,062

Ѳ

High Decrease of Perceived Temperature in R (p<0,001)

High Decrease of Heart Rate in R (p<0,001)

Tendency to significantly lower RPE in R (p=0,062)

Faster Reaction Time in R and T2 (p<0,001)

Page 16: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.

Conclusion

  Recovery Interventions don’t seems to improve player’s muscolar or metabolic performance...

16

Page 17: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.

Conclusion

  Limits of Research:1.No Literature;2.High number of variables;3.Cooling Vest.

17

Page 18: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.1818

Discussion

Decrease of RPE, PT, HR & RT correlated?

Wich kind of Intervention?

New COOLING Research

Page 19: Effects of Cooling Versus Active and Passive Recovery Interventions in Handball

Pag.

Thank You!

19

to all the Blits Members…NATUURLIJK!