Effects of Cold Weather on the Con Edison Electric System: Jan. & Feb. 2014
description
Transcript of Effects of Cold Weather on the Con Edison Electric System: Jan. & Feb. 2014
Central Operations
1
Effects of Cold Weather on the Con Edison Electric System:
Jan. & Feb. 2014
May 15, 2014
Central Operations
Winter 2013-2014
Central Park set a record low temperature for January 7th
– Low temperature of 4 degrees
– Previous record was set in 1896 (6 degrees)
This winter saw 13 days with snowfall above 1 inch
Dept. of Sanitation spread 456,000 tons of salt across NYC
– Most since 2008-2009 (409,000)
– High salt use drives distribution equipment impact
Central Operations
Winter 2013-2014
December January February Winter Season Total
Average Temperature 38.5°F 28.6°F 31.6°F 32.9°F
Normal 37.5°F 32.6°F 35.3°F 35.1°F
Departure from Normal +1.0°F -4.0°F -3.7°F -3.2°F
Total Snow 8.6” 19.7” 29” 57.3”
Normal 4.8” 7” 8.8” 20.6”
Departure from Normal +3.8” +12.7” +20.2” +36.7”
*all data based on Central Park official climate station
Central Operations
4
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
12,000
13,000
14,000
Con Edison Peak System LoadsJanuary & February, 2014
Con Ed Peak System Load Previous Peak (Winter) Previous 3-Yr Avg. Winter Peak All-Time Summer Peak
Previous 3-Yr Avg Peak: 8,655 MW
New All-Time Winter Peak: 9,063 MW
Previous Winter Peak: 8,950 MW
All-Time Summer Peak: 13,322 MW
Central Operations
5
CECONY Summary
Overall the electric system performed very well
– Breaker and substation equipment had no significant issues
• No SF6 or compressed air issues
– Proactive discussions with NYISO and Con Ed Gas Control
– Zone J Power Plants
• Dual fuel burning capability was an asset
• Infrequency of use was evident initially
Implement Weather protocols
– Closely monitor predicted weather (Precip & Temps)
– Adjust staffing to assure proper coverage
– Restrict scheduled work to prevent contingencies
Central Operations
6
Fuel Supply ChallengesHigh natural gas demand
Generators gas deliveries were not interrupted and no days where gas was not able to be scheduled
Oil was the more economical fuel for 27 days
Operators NYISO / Con Ed closely tracked fuel supplies.
Closely monitored Min Oil Burn requirements
Some GTs unavailable to the system
Liquid fuel challenges in late January
– Local inventory limited
– Longer lead times on delivery
– Limited barging available
Central Operations
7
CECONY Summary
Steam Production
– No alerts or reserve issues
– Very close coordination with Con Ed Gas Control
– Fuel related concerns for contracted production
• Longer lead times securing additional inventory
• Barge availability was lower
– Con Ed owned steam system units
• Very closely coordinated barge deliveries between all sites
• Tide restrictions and additional tug boats needed due to ice in the river
• Overcame the challenges associated with the infrequency of burning oil
Central Operations
8
Ideas for the future
Gather fuel inventory electronically
– Online inventory tool
– Weekly projections
Pre- Season Actions
– Demonstrate capability
• Liquid fuel use
• Auto swap if available
– Communicate
• Seasonal fuel supply
• Available inventory