Effects of Angle Orientation of Muon Detectors on Muon Flux

42
Effects of Angle Orientation of Muon Detectors on Muon Flux Marco Lin – Lake Shore Kristian Wilks – Lake Shore

description

Effects of Angle Orientation of Muon Detectors on Muon Flux . Marco Lin – Lake Shore Kristian Wilks – Lake Shore. Overview. Introduction Problem Statement/Hypothesis Materials Procedures Data and Analysis Conclusion Applications/Future Research . Introduction – Cosmic Rays. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Effects of Angle Orientation of Muon Detectors on Muon Flux

Effects of Angles on Muon Flux

Effects of Angle Orientation of Muon Detectors on Muon Flux Marco Lin Lake ShoreKristian Wilks Lake ShoreOverview IntroductionProblem Statement/Hypothesis Materials Procedures Data and Analysis Conclusion Applications/Future Research

2Lin - Wilks2Introduction Cosmic RaysSupernova3

Lin - WilksElementaryLeptonsMuon 200x electron mass-1/2 Spin2.2 micro-seconds

Introduction - Muon

4http://neutron.magnet.fsu.edu/muon_relax.htmlLin - WilksThe rate of muon hits in an area at a given timeEvents per meter squared per 60 seconds

Introduction Muon Flux 5Lin - WilksProblem StatementWhich angle 0, 45 or 90 degrees to the north/south horizontal would acquire the highest muon flux6

uuuLin - WilksMuon DetectoruuuuuuuuuHypothesis The muon sensors at 90 degrees from the north/south horizontal would have the highest muon flux7

Lin - WilksMaterials8Lin - Wilks

Performance Study

9Performance study for experimentCalibration

Lin - WilksProceduresRandomized StudiesSet mount to appropriate angle Run flux study at one fold for at least 8 hoursRun flux study at two fold for at least 8 hoursAnalyze data on Elab

10Lin - Wilks 90 Degrees 45 Degrees 0 DegreesSet Up of Experiment

11

Lin - Wilks12Lin - Wilks

DataDegrees Vertical from South(One fold Coincidence)Mean (Events Per Meter Squared Per 60 Seconds)Standard Deviation 0579728045707921090827020013Degrees Vertical from South(Two fold Coincidence)Mean (Events Per Meter Squared Per 60 Seconds)Standard Deviation 011874547373901040172Lin - Wilks

14

90 degrees45 degrees0 degreesFlux Study One FoldLin - Wilks1415

90 degrees45 degrees0 degrees

Flux Study Two FoldLin - Wilks15Statistical Test: ANOVAComparison of multiple independent populationsAssumptionsMultiple independent samplesNormally distributedSimple Random SampleLargest standard deviation is less than twice the smallest

16Lin - WilksStatistical Test: ANOVAHo: 0 = 45 = 90All three angle means are the sameHa: 0, 45, and 90 are not all equalNot all angle means are the same17Lin - WilksStatistical Test: ANOVAResultsOne-Fold CoincidenceP-value = 6.71x10^-92 Two-Fold CoincidenceP-value = 1.78x10-55 18Lin - WilksStatistical Test: Two-Sample t TestComparison of two means of independent populationsAssumptionsNormally DistributedKnown Standard DeviationSimple Random SampleAdequate sample size

19Lin - Wilks

Statistical Test: Two-Sample t TestNull Hypothesis1= 2Means of both angles are the sameAlternative Hypothesis1>2Mean of angle 1 (larger angle) is greater than mean of angle 2 (smaller angle)

20Lin - WilksStatistical Test: Two-Sample t TestResults (0ne-Fold, 0 degrees vs. 45 degrees)T-value = 25.3973 Means 25.3973 deviations apartP-value = 4.43x10^-35Below the 0.05 accepted significance levelMeans that there is a 4.43x10^-35 chance of getting data like this if null hypothesis is true

21Lin - WilksStatistical Test: Two-Sample t TestResults (0ne-Fold, 45 degrees vs. 90 degrees)T-value = 29.404 Means 29.404 deviations apartP-value = 3.55x10^-44 Below the 0.05 accepted significance levelMeans that there is a 3.55x10^-44 chance of getting data like this if null hypothesis is true

22Lin - WilksStatistical Test: Two-Sample t TestResults (Two-Fold, 0 degrees vs. 45 degrees)T-value = 24.3451 Means 24.3451 deviations apartP-value = 7.44x10^-19 Below the 0.05 accepted significance levelMeans that there is a 7.44x10^-19 chance of getting data like this if null hypothesis is true

23Lin - WilksStatistical Test: Two-Sample t TestResults (Two-Fold, 45 degrees vs. 90 degrees)T-value = 19.3764 Means 19.3764 deviations apartP-value = 2.84x10^-29 Below the 0.05 accepted significance levelMeans that there is a 2.84x10^-29 chance of getting data like this if null hypothesis is true

24Lin - Wilks One Fold Two Fold Statistical Test: Regression25Lin - Wilks

Conclusion90 degree > 45 degrees > 0 degreesAccept Hypothesis 26

Lin - WilksErrors and LimitationOne sensor was from older seriesGeometry was at 90 degree position all the timeThree and four fold

27Lin - WilksConclusionThere is a positive linear relationship from 0 degrees to 90 degreesPrevious Research28

Lin - WilksFurther Research Three fold and four foldMore angles Thinner panels 29Lin - WilksApplications Muon CatalystUnlimited Power Source Using Muons and Deterium Super Nova

30Lin - WilksMuon Catalyst Muon Catalyst

31Lin - Wilks

Muon Catalyst Deuterium Abundant in Ocean

Muons from Cosmic Rays

32Lin - Wilks

Applications Lin - Wilks33

Deuterium Atom(Stable Isotope ofHydrogen) Muon Expel Electron

Applications 34Lin - Wilks

Deuterium Deuterium Bond

Helium Three

Tritium Atom Applications 35Lin - Wilks

Applications 36Lin - Wilks

Deterium Tritium Bond

Muon and neutron Expelled energy Is released

Helium Gas Applications 37Lin - Wilks

Acknowledgments Dr. HarrWayne StateJuandell Matthews and Adrian IonascuMr. NiedballaMrs. GravelMr. McmillanParents

38Lin - WilksWork Cited http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wu-IKqxVOfohttp://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/home/http://neutron.magnet.fsu.edu/muon_relax.html

39Lin - Wilks

40Any Questions?Lin - Wilks

41Any Questions?Lin - Wilks

42Any Questions?Lin - Wilks