Effective Value of Weak Axial Coupling: A Review · 2018-06-26 · Effective Value of Weak Axial...
Transcript of Effective Value of Weak Axial Coupling: A Review · 2018-06-26 · Effective Value of Weak Axial...
Effective Value of Weak Axial Coupling: A Review
Jouni Suhonen
Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä
NDM2018 (6th Symposium on Neutrinos and Dark Matter inNuclear Physics 2018)
Daejeon, South Korea, June 29 - July 4, 2018
Contents:
Double-beta-decay rates
Effective value of gA:
from allowed β Decays
from forbidden β Decays
Effects on 0νββ NMEs
Is there any reactor-ν anomaly?
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 1 / 34
Motivation for the Work: Double Beta Decay
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 2 / 34
Two-Neutrino Double Beta Decay of 116Cd
11648Cd68
0+gs
(8.25± 0.15)× 1019 a
t1/2(2νβ−β−) =
1+gs 11649In67
0+gs11650Sn66
stable2νβ−β−
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+
...
n n
p p
(Z,N-2)
(Z,N-2)
INTERMEDIATE STATES
INITIAL NUCLEUS
FINAL NUCLEUS
e1-
1
e2-
2
2νββ − rate ∼∣
∣
∣M
(2ν)GTGT
∣
∣
∣
2= (gA)
4∣
∣
∣
∑
m,nML(1+m )MR(1+n )
Dm
∣
∣
∣
2
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 3 / 34
Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of 116Cd
11648Cd68
0+gs
1+gs 11649In67
0+gs11650Sn66
stable0νβ−β−
5+isom
4+2+
8−isom4+7−
6−4+5−
3+4−
2−7+
...
MASS MODE
n n
p p
(Z,N-2)
(Z,N-2)
INTERMEDIATE STATES
INITIAL NUCLEUS
FINAL NUCLEUS
e1-
e2-
L=2
helicities
helicities
m =0
0νββ − rate ∼∣
∣
∣M
(0ν)GTGT
∣
∣
∣
2= (gA,0ν)
4∣
∣
∣
∑
Jπ (0+f ||O
(0ν)GTGT(J
π)||0+i )
∣
∣
∣
2
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 4 / 34
Definitions
See also: “Value of the axial-vector coupling strength in β and ββ decays: A review”published in Frontiers in Physics 5 (2017) 55.
Nucleon weak current in a nucleus:
jµN = gVγµ − gAγ
µγ5
Quenching:
q = gA/gfreeA
Free value of gA (Particle Data Group 2016) from the decay of free neutron:
gfreeA = 1.2723(23)
Effective value of gA:
geffA = qgfree
A
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 5 / 34
Gamow-Teller β decays
There are data on:
Gamow-Teller β
TRANSITIONS
Theoretical approaches:
ISM (Interacting Shell Model)pnQRPA (proton-neutron QRPA)
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 6 / 34
Typical Gamow-Teller β transitions
10040Zr60
0+gs
ML
1+gs10041Nb59
0+gs10042Mo58
stable
MR
10041Nb59
1+gs
ML
0+gs10042Mo58
1+gs10043Tc57MR
10042Mo58
0+gs
ML
1+gs10043Tc57
0+gs10044Ru56
stable
MR
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 7 / 34
Interacting Shell Model (ISM)
Results from:
Quenching of gA
in the ISM calculations
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 8 / 34
Results from the ISMg A
A
60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1400.0
0.5
1.0
gfreeA
Honma et al.
Caurier et al.
Juodagalvis et al.
Siiskonen et al.
Kumar et al. Horoi et al.
Kumar et al.: J. Phys. G43 (2016) 105104
Honma et al.: J. Phys.Conf. Ser. 49 (2006) 45
Caurier et al.: Phys.Lett. B 711 (2012) 62
Horoi et al.: Phys. Rev.C 93 (2016) 024308
Juodagalvis et al.:Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005)024306
Siiskonen et al.: Phys.Rev. C 63 (2001)055501
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 9 / 34
Proton-neutron Quasiparticle Random-PhaseApproximation (pnQRPA)
Results from:
Quenching of gA
in the pnQRPA calculations
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 10 / 34
Results from the pnQRPA analyses
A pn Conf. geffA [1]
62 − 70 1p3/2 − 1p1/2 0.81 ± 0.2078 − 82 0g9/2 − 0g9/2 0.88 ± 0.1298 − 116 0g9/2 − 0g7/2 0.53 ± 0.13
118 − 136 1d5/2 − 1d5/2 0.65 ± 0.17138 − 142 1d5/2 − 1d3/2 1.14 ± 0.10
[1] H. Ejiri, J. S., J. Phys. G 42 (2015)
055201
Other analyses in the whole range:
[2] P. Pirinen, J. S., Phys. Rev. C 91
(2015) 054309
[3] F. Deppisch, J. S., Phys. Rev. C 94
(2016) 055501
g A
A
60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1400.0
0.5
1.0
Ejiri et al. (2015)
Whole pnQRPA range
gfreeA
linear fit
fundamental effective value
Fundamental quenching: M. Ericson (1971); M. Ericson et al. (1973);M. Rho (1974); D. H. Wilkinson (1974)
(Meson-exchange currents → effective two-body operators)
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 11 / 34
Results from the ISM on top of the pnQRPA rangesg A
A
60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1400.0
0.5
1.0
gfreeA
Honma et al.
Caurier et al.
Juodagalvis et al.
Siiskonen et al.
Kumar et al. Horoi et al.
Kumar et al.: J. Phys. G43 (2016) 105104
Honma et al.: J. Phys.Conf. Ser. 49 (2006) 45
Caurier et al.: Phys.Lett. B 711 (2012) 62
Horoi et al.: Phys. Rev.C 93 (2016) 024308
Juodagalvis et al.:Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005)024306
Siiskonen et al.: Phys.Rev. C 63 (2001)055501
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 12 / 34
Calculations for the β decays and ββ decays
Results from:
Quenching of gA
in the pnQRPA-based,
ISM-based andIBM-based calculations
of β decays and ββ decays
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 13 / 34
The studied cases
10042Mo580+
gs
1+gs
10043Tc57
0+gs
10044Ru56
4.4
4.59(7.1± 0.4)× 1018y
11648Cd680+
gs
1+gs
11649In67
0+gs
11650Sn66
4.47
4.662(2.8± 0.2)× 1019y
12852Te760+
gs
1+gs
12853I75
0+gs
12854Xe74
5.049
6.061(1.9± 0.4)× 1024y
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 14 / 34
Results from the β+ββ calculations against thepnQRPA ranges from Gamow-Teller β decays
g A
A
60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1400.0
0.5
1.0
gfreeA
β
β
β
ββ
ββ
ββ
IBFFM-2
Faessler et al.
Suhonen et al. (β)
Suhonen et al. (ββ)
ββ IBM-2
ββ ISM
pnQRPA: Faessler et al.,A. Faessler, G. L. Fogli, E.Lisi, V. Rodin, A. M.Rotunno, F. Šimkovic,arXiv 0711.3996v1[Nucl-th]
pnQRPA: Suhonen et al.,J. Suhonen, O. Civitarese,Nucl. Phys. A 924 (2014)1
ββ ISM and IBM-2: J.Barea, J. Kotila, F.Iachello, Phys. Rev. C 87(2013) 014315
IBFFM-2: N. Yoshida, F.Iachello, Prog. Theor.Exp. Phys. 2013 (2013)043D01
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 15 / 34
Forbidden β decays and the value of gA
Results from:
Quenching of gA
as derived fromβ decays
of forbiddenness F
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 16 / 34
INCENTIVE: 0νββ decay through the higher angular-momentum states
11648Cd68
0+gs
1+gs 11649In67
0+gs11650Sn66
stable0νβ−β−
5+isom
4+2+
8−isom4+7−
6−4+5−
3+4−
2−7+
...
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 17 / 34
Global study for the first-forbidden (F = 1) 2−
gs → 0+gs decays
H. Ejiri, N. Soukouti and J. S., Spin-dipole nuclear matrix elements for double beta decays and
astro-neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 729 (2014) 27
kmNM
km
Km=kmNM
= 1
8436Kr48
0+gsstable
ML
2−gs 8437Rb47
0+gs8438Sr46
MR
M(SD2−) =√
MLMR
〈k〉 =⟨
Mexp(SD2−)
Mqp(SD2−)
⟩
≈ 0.18
〈kNM〉 =⟨
Mexp(SD2−)
MpnQRPA(SD2−)
⟩
≈ 0.45
⇒ geffA ≈ 0.57
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 18 / 34
Extrapolation to β decays of higher forbiddenness (F ≥ 2)
Based on the global studies inH. Ejiri, J. S., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 42 (2015) 055201
H. Ejiri, N. Soukouti, J. S., Phys. Lett. B 729 (2014) 27
J. Kostensalo, J.S., Phys. Rev. C 95 (2017) 014322 conclude that all unique-forbidden β transitions
roughly evenly quenched)Then: Low-energy quenching of gA derivable from the hatched regions of theGamow-Teller studies in the pnQRPA framework:
Mass range A = 76 − 82 A = 100 − 116 A = 122 − 136
geffA,0ν 0.5 − 1.0 0.4 − 0.7 0.5 − 0.8
Assumption: Also the forbidden non-unique virtual transitions behave like the
forbidden unique virtual transitions. BUT: How to study the forbiddennon-unique decays?Caveat: 0νββ decay is a high-momentum transfer process (q ∼ 100MeV) ⇒ less quenching (J. Menéndez, D. Gazit, A. Schwenk, PRL 107 (2011) 062501)
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 19 / 34
Spectrum-shape method (SSM)
Results from:
Effective value of gA
as derived fromelectron spectra of
forbidden non-unique β decays
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 20 / 34
Spectrum shape of higher-forbidden non-unique βdecays
Half-life:t1/2 = κ/C .
Dimensionless integrated shape function:
C =
∫ w0
1C(we)pwe(w0 − we)
2F0(Zf ,we)dwe .
Shape factor:
C(we) =∑
ke,kν ,K
λke
[
MK(ke, kν)2+ mK(ke, kν )
2−
2γke
keweMK(ke, kν )mK(ke, kν )
]
,
where
λke=
Fke−1(Z, we)
F0(Z, we); γke
=√
k2e − (αZf )
2 ,
Fk−1(Z, we) being the generalized Fermi function.
Decomposition of the shape factor:
C(we) = g2VCV(we) + gA
2CA(we) + gVgACVA(we).
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 21 / 34
ISM-computed β spectra for different values of gA
Normalized
ISM-computed
electron spectra for
the 2nd-forbidden
nonunique β−
decays of 94Nb and98Tc (gV = 1.0).
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 22 / 34
Example: ISM- and MQPM-computed electron spectra
Normalized ISM-
and
MQPM-computed
electron spectra for
the 2nd-forbidden
nonunique β− decay
of 99Tc (gV = 1.0)
using different
values of gA.
(ISM)
(MQPM)Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 23 / 34
Example: Decay of 113Cd – Comparison with data
Normalized electron spectrafor the 4th-forbiddennonunique β− decay
113Cd(1/2+) → 113In(9/2+)(gV = 1.0).
Experimental data from:
The COBRA collaboration,
L. Bodenstein-Dresler et
al., arXiv:1806.02254[nucl-ex] 6 Jun 2018
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 24 / 34
Distribution of the best-match gA values from 44 detector units
gA(ISM) = 0.92 ± 0.02gA(MQPM) = 0.91 ± 0.01gA(IBFM-2) = 0.94 ± 0.09
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 25 / 34
Example: Decay of 115In – Comparison with data
Normalized electron spectrafor the 4th-forbiddennonunique β− decay
115In(9/2+) → 115Sn(1/2+)(gV = 1.0).
Result from:
The MIT-CSNSM-Jyväskylä
collaboration, A. Leder et
al., to be submitted.gA(ISM) = 0.83 ± 0.03
gA(IBFM-2) = 0.88 ± 0.06gA(MQPM) = 0.94+0.03
−0.04
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 26 / 34
Summary of the exploratory work on β spectra
Transition Jπii (gs) J
πf
f (nf ) Branching K Sensitivity Nucl. model
36Cl → 36Ar 2+ 0+ (gs) 98% 2 None ISM48Ca → 48Sc 0+ 4+ (2) ∼0% 4 None ISM48Ca → 48Sc 0+ 6+ (gs) ∼0% 6 None ISM50V → 50Cr 6+ 2+ (1) ∼0% 4 Weak ISM
60Fe → 60Co 0+ 2+ (1) 100% 2 None ISM85Br → 85Kr 3/2− 9/2+ (gs) ∼0% 3 Moderate MQPM87Rb → 87Sr 3/2− 9/2+ (gs) 100% 3 Moderate MQPM, ISM92Rb → 92Sr 0− 0+ (gs) 95% 1 Weak ISM93Zr → 93Nb 5/2+ 9/2+ (gs) 5 ≤% 2 Weak MQPM93Y → 93Zr 1/2− 1/2+ (1) 2% 1 Moderate ISM
94Nb → 94Mo 6+ 4+ (2) 100% 2 Strong NSM95Sr → 95Y 1/2+ 1/2− (gs) 56% 1 Weak ISM
96Zr → 96Nb 0+ 4+ (2) ∼0% 4 None ISM96Zr → 96Nb 0+ 6+ (gs) ∼0% 6 Strong ISM96Y → 96Zr 0− 0+ (gs) 96% 1 weak ISM
97Zr → 97Nb 1/2+ 9/2+ (gs) ∼0% 4 Strong MQPM97Y → 97Zr 1/2+ 1/2− (gs) 40% 1 Weak ISM
98Tc → 98Ru 6+ 4+ (3) 100% 2 Strong ISM99Tc → 99Ru 9/2+ 5/2+ (gs) 100% 2 Strong MQPM, ISM
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 27 / 34
Summary on β spectra continues . . .
Transition Jπii (gs) J
πf
f (nf ) Branching K Sensitivity Nucl. model
101Mo → 101Tc 1/2+ 9/2+ (gs) ∼0% 4 Strong MQPM113Cd → 113In 1/2+ 9/2+ (gs) 100% 4 Strong MQPM, ISM, IBFM-2115Cd → 115In 1/2+ 9/2+ (gs) ∼0% 4 Strong MQPM115In → 115Sn 9/2+ 1/2+ (gs) 100% 4 Strong MQPM, ISM, IBFM-2117Cd → 117In 1/2+ 9/2+ (gs) ∼0% 4 Strong MQPM119In → 119Sn 9/2+ 1/2+ (gs) ∼0% 4 Strong MQPM123Sn → 123Sb 11/2− 1/2+ (4) ∼0% 5 Weak MQPM125Sb → 125Te 7/2+ 9/2− (3) 7.2% 1 None MQPM126Sn → 126Sb 0+ 2+ (5) 100% 2 None ISM133Sn → 133Sb 7/2− 7/2+ (gs) 85% 1 Weak ISM134Sb → 134Te 0− 0+ (gs) 98% 1 Weak ISM135Cs → 135Ba 7/2+ 3/2+ (gs) 100% 2 None MQPM
135Te → 135I 7/2− 7/2+ (gs) 62% 1 Weak ISM137Cs → 137Ba 7/2+ 3/2+ (gs) 5.4% 2 None MQPM, ISM137Xe → 137Cs 7/2− 7/2+ (gs) 67% 1 Weak ISM138Cs → 138Ba 3− 3+ (1) 44% 1 Strong ISM139Ba → 139La 7/2− 7/2+ (gs) 70% 1 Weak ISM139Cs → 139Ba 7/2+ 7/2− (gs) 85% 1 Weak ISM
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 28 / 34
Summary on β spectra continues . . .
Transition Jπii (gs) J
πf
f (nf ) Branching K Sensitivity Nucl. model
141Ce → 141Pr 7/2− 5/2+ (gs) 31% 1 Weak MQPM142Pr → 142Nb 2− 2+ (1) 3.7% 1 Weak ISM143Pr → 143Nb 7/2+ 7/2− (gs) 100% 1 Weak ISM159Gd → 159Tb 3/2− 5/2+ (1) 26% 1 None MQPM161Tb → 161Dy 3/2+ 5/2− (1) ∼0% 1 None MQPM169Er → 169Tm 1/2− 3/2+ (1) 45% 1 None MQPM210Bi → 210Po 1− 0+ (gs) 100% 1 Strong ISM211Pb → 211Bi 9/2+ 9/2− (gs) 91% 1 Weak ISM213Bi → 213Po 9/2− 9/2+ (gs) 66% 1 Weak ISM
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 29 / 34
Effects of quenched values of gA
Results from:
Effects of a quenched gA
on NMEs of 0νββ decays:
[
T(0ν)1/2
]−1= (gA,0ν)
4G(0ν)∣
∣M(0ν)∣
∣
2(
〈mν〉me
)2
M(0ν) = M(0ν)GT −
(
gVgA,0ν
)2M
(0ν)F + M
(0ν)T
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 30 / 34
Example: 0νββ NMEs of 76Ge, effect on the half-lifeJiao et al.: Phys.Rev. C 96 (2017)054310(GCM+ISM)
Menendez et al.:Nucl. Phys. A818 (2009) 139(ISM)
Senkov et al.:Phys. Rev. C 93(2016) 044334(ISM)
Barea et al.: Phys.Rev. C 91 (2015)034304 (IBM-2)
Suhonen: Phys.Rev. C 96 (2017)055501 (pnQRPA+ isospinrestoration + dataon 2νββ)
Menendez et al.
Barea et al.
Jiao et al. (triaxial)
Jiao et al. (axial)
Senkov et al.
Suhonen
〈mν〉 = 50meV
5× 1026
1× 1027
5× 1027
1× 1028
0.5 1.0
T(0ν)
1/2
gA
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 31 / 34
Novel application of electron spectra of forbiddendecays
Try to investigate:
Reactor-ν anomaly
andthe spectral shoulder
See: L. Heyen, J. Kostensalo, N. Severijns, J.S., First forbiddentransitions in the reactor anomaly, arXiv:1805.12259 [nucl-th] 30 May2018
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 32 / 34
Results from the analyses (see the parallel talk of JoelKostensalo on Tuesday evening!)
Taking into account the(first-forbidden)
decays of86Br(0+), 86Br(2+), 87Se, 88Rb,89Br(3/2+), 89Br(5/2+), 90Rb,91Kr(5/2−), 91Kr(3/2−), 92Rb,
92Y, 93Rb, 94Y(0+), 94Y(0+),95Rb(7/2+), 95Rb(3/2+), 95Sr,
96Y, 97Y, 98Y, 133Sn, 134mSb(6+),134mSb(6+?), 135Te, 136mI, 137I,
138I, 139Xe, 140Cs, 142Cs
decreases the ν flux by
5% !
2 3 4 5 6 7Prompt energy (MeV)
−7.5
−5.0
−2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
Norm
alize
d di
ffere
nce
(%)
Double ChoozRENODaya Bay
Huber-Mueller uncertaintyForbidden correction
The spectral sholder appears due to forbidden
spectral corrections !Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 33 / 34
Conclusions and OutlookConclusions:
The long chain of ISM calculations and the recent pnQRPA and IBM-2 calculations ofGamow-Teller β decays and 2νββ decays are (surprisingly!) consistent with each otherand clearly point to a A-dependent quenched gA
Studies on GT 1+ and SD 2− β decays shed light on the suppression chain: quasiparticleNME → pnQRPA NME → experimental NME
Studies of high-forbidden unique β decays (F ≥ 2) → uniform quenching → speculationsabout modifications in the 0νββ-decay half-lives
The spectrum-shape method (SSM) for forbidden non-unique β decays is a robust tool
(largely independent of the nuclear model, the assumed Hamiltonian and mean field) to
seach for the effective value of gA and to try to solve other problems, like those related to
the reactor-ν spectra.
Outlook:Urge measurements of the β spectra for the interesting decays amenable to the SSM
The effective value of gA is involved in all weak processes, and thus has impact on studies
of rare β decays, neutrino physics and astrophysics
Jouni Suhonen (JYFL, Finland) NDM2018 34 / 34