Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

14
Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed Heidi Mathie Mucha, Ph.D Utah SPDG Coordinator

description

Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed. Heidi Mathie Mucha , Ph.D Utah SPDG Coordinator. Building Strong Partnerships. Communication Collaboration Bridging the gap from pre-service to practice. Communication. Creating opportunities for feedback from IHE’s - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

Page 1: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

Heidi Mathie Mucha, Ph.DUtah SPDG Coordinator

Page 2: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

Building Strong Partnerships

Communication

Collaboration

Bridging the gap from pre-service to practice

Page 3: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

Communication

Creating opportunities for feedback from IHE’s

“The feedback loop enables the learning process. The feedback loop provides a trusted

guidance system.” (Fixsen & Blasé, 2006)

Page 4: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed
Page 5: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

ABC State Support Team

District Systems Coach

ABC District Team ABC School Team

Training Technical Assistance Logistics Public

Relations

ABC Research & Policy Team

Page 6: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

Collaboration

• Common projects and common goals.

• Capitalizing on strengths of local IHE faculty.

Page 7: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

For entire application visit: www.updc.org/abc

Page 8: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed
Page 9: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed
Page 10: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

Bridging the Gap: From pre-service to practice

• Using participating schools for student teaching, practicum and internships. Opportunities to observe evidence-based practices.

• Awareness presentations across multiples universities.

• Supply & Demand Survey and Meetings.

Page 11: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

• Purpose of the Survey

– Determine Special Education personnel needs by State, Region, District, and Charter over the next 7 years

– Determine the ability of the Institutions of Higher Education in providing those personnel

– Inform state level projects and activities

Page 12: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

Average NeedsFY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Average

CD/SP Communication Disorders/Speech Pathology 96 100 95 102 105 104 107 101.257

ECSE Special Education (Birth-5) 49 47 47 51 48 48 48 48.2871

SE HI Special Education Hearing Impaired (Deaf) 18 19 19 17 20 21 19 19

SE M/M Special Education Mild/Moderate 216 219 221 230 218 219 221 220.514

SE SEV Special Education Severe 86 88 88 94 91 93 97 91

SE VI Special Education Visually Impaired 20 18 20 21 23 24 23 21.2571

SP School Psychologist 61 63 68 65 66 67 67 65.2871

SE Admin Special Education Administration 57 60 62 63 62 60 59 60.4257

Page 13: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

Average Needs

CD/SP ECSE SE HI SE MM SE SEV SE VI SP SE Admin0

50

100

150

200

250Average (2013-2019)

Supply Demand

Page 14: Effective Partnerships with Institutes of Higher Ed

More information

Heidi Mathie Mucha, [email protected]

www.updc.org/abcwww.essentialeducator.org