Effect of Organometallic Fuel Additives on Nanoparticle Emissions from … · 2016. 4. 13. ·...

21
Effect of Organometallic Fuel Additives on Nanoparticle Emissions from a Gasoline Passenger Car Jeremy T. Gidney and Martyn V. Twigg Johnson-Matthey Plc. David B. Kittelson University of Minnesota 13th ETH Conference on Combustion Generated Particles Zurich, 22rd – 24th June 2009

Transcript of Effect of Organometallic Fuel Additives on Nanoparticle Emissions from … · 2016. 4. 13. ·...

  • Effect of Organometallic Fuel Additives on Nanoparticle Emissions from a Gasoline Passenger Car

    Jeremy T. Gidney and Martyn V. TwiggJohnson-Matthey Plc.

    David B. KittelsonUniversity of Minnesota

    13th ETH Conference onCombustion Generated Particles

    Zurich, 22rd – 24th June 2009

  • Outline

    • Introduction• Experimental• Total particle measurements• Solid particle measurements• Conclusions

  • Introduction

    • Paper submitted to EST– Jeremy T. Gidney, Martyn V. Twigg, and David B. Kittelson, 2009. Effect of

    Organometallic Fuel Additives on Nanoparticle Emissions from a Gasoline Passenger Car

    • Investigates the influence of inorganic fuel additives (Mn, Fe, Pb) on nanoparticle emissions from a PFI gasoline vehicle

    • Issues– Health impacts

    • Solid nanoparticles• Rapid translocation in body

    – Catalyst plugging and engine deposits– Iron and manganese octane boosters still used in Eastern Europe, China, and

    developing countries• Mn used at 30, 50, and 55 mg/liter in China, Russia, and Lithuania, respectively• Mn allowed but not used at levels up to 8 and 18 mg/liter in US and Canada,

    respectively• Fe allowed at levels up to 37 mg/liter in Russia

  • Health

    • Correlations between fine particles and excess deaths• Increased asthma and respiratory problems in

    children living near roadways• Special concerns about ultrafine and nanoparticles

    – More surface area and number per unit mass– Increased deep lung deposition efficiency– Very small particles may pass through cell membranes and

    along neurons– Effects of solid particles clear, volatile particles uncertain

  • Outline

    • Introduction• Experimental• Total particle measurements• Solid particle measurements• Conclusions

  • Vehicle and fuels used in study

    Vehicle Subcompact carModel year 2000Engine type Gasoline spark ignitionFuel system Multi point injection

    Engine 4 cylinder, 1.6 litre displacementCatalyst volume 1.66 litre

    Emissions conformance European Stage 3Vehicle age 11,000 milesCatalyst age 4,000 miles

    Catalyst cell density 400 cpsi, 6 mil wall thicknessCatalyst formulation Palladium/rhodium

    Lubrication oil Fully synthetic 5 - 30 SAE

    Table 1: Vehicle, catalyst and other details

    Batch Additive Metal concentration Additive concentrationcode mg/l g/20 litreMn-8 (CH3C5H4)Mn(CO)3 8.3 0.658

    Mn-18 (CH3C5H4)Mn(CO)3 18 1.429Fe-8 Fe(C6H5)2 8.4 0.562

    Pb-30 Pb(C2H5)4 31.3 0.626

    Table 2. Details of additive concentrations used in the present study

  • Particle measurement and sampling

    Sample Aerosol Inlet

    Aerosol Charger

    Sheath air flow

    Grounded Electrode Rings

    High voltage electrode

    Charged Particle Trajectories

    Sizing range 5-2000 nmResponse time ~ 1 s

    • Cambustion DMS500* used for particle measurements• Samples taken at engine out, catalyst out, and tailpipe using short sampling lines• Integrated DMS diluter used for engine and catalyst out measurements• Dekati ejector dilutor used for tailpipe measurements• Catalytic stripper used to remove volatiles for solid particle measurements

    *Reavell, K., T. Hands, and N. Collings, 2002. “A Fast Response Particulate Spectrometer for Combustion Aerosols,” SAE paper 2002-01-2714Kittelson, David, Tim Hands, Chris Nickolaus, Nick Collings, Ville Niemelä, and Martyn Twigg, 2004. “Mass Correlation of Engine Emissions with Spectral Instruments,” JSAE paper number 20045462

  • Outline

    • Introduction• Experimental• Total particle measurements• Solid particle measurements• Conclusions

  • Cycle average pre and post catalyst size distributions for high speed EUDC test cycle.

    0.00E+00

    1.00E+08

    2.00E+08

    3.00E+08

    4.00E+08

    5.00E+08

    6.00E+08

    1 10 100 1000Size (nm)

    dN/d

    logD

    p/cc

    Mn-8 Fe-8 Pb-30 Gasoline

    • Engine out measurements (pre-catalyst) show large accumulation mode– All three metals increase particle emissions– Iron and manganese show clear nucleation mode

    • Post-catalyst measurements show large reductions in accumulation mode region indicating efficient removal of organic carbon by three-way catalyst

    • Post-catalyst measurements show a distinct nucleation mode for all three metals

    Pre-catalyst

    0.00E+00

    5.00E+07

    1.00E+08

    1.50E+08

    2.00E+08

    2.50E+08

    3.00E+08

    1 10 100 1000Size (nm)

    dN/d

    logD

    p/cc

    Mn-18 Mn-8 Fe-8 Pb-30

    Post-catalyst

  • Cycle average post catalyst and tailpipe size distributions for high speed EUDC test cycle.

    • Tailpipe out concentrations roughly a factor of two lower than post catalyst due to diffusion and thermophoresis losses in exhaust system

    • Clear, large nucleation mode for Mn and Fe, smaller mode for Pb, no significant mode for standard gasoline

    • Why does lead make such a small nucleation mode?

    0.00E+00

    5.00E+07

    1.00E+08

    1.50E+08

    2.00E+08

    2.50E+08

    3.00E+08

    1 10 100 1000

    Size (nm)

    dN/d

    logD

    p/cc

    Mn-18 Mn-8 Fe-8 Pb-30

    Post-catalyst

    0.00E+00

    2.00E+07

    4.00E+07

    6.00E+07

    8.00E+07

    1.00E+08

    1.20E+08

    1.40E+08

    1.60E+08

    1 10 100 1000

    Size (nm)

    dN/d

    logD

    p/cc

    Mn-18 Mn-8 Fe-8 Pb-30 Gasoline

    Tailpipe

  • Chemical equilibrium calculations suggest lead compounds are more likely to be lost to walls

    • Calculations were done using the NASA CEAgui chemical equilibrium program– Gasoline containing sulphur (50 ppm S)– 8.4 and 31.3mg/l iron or lead, respectively– Excess air factor of 0.98– Calculations are based on bulk phase properties, nanoscale and kinetic factors not included

    • Iron forms stable solid compound below about 900 C, Mn expected to behave in similar manner• Lead compounds are volatile above about 600 C.

    – This temperature is often exceeded at the catalyst inlet– Temperatures at the exhaust valve are even higher

    • Volatile compounds are more likely to be lost by mass transfer to the walls of the exhaust system than solid particles because of much higher diffusion coefficients

    • Some of the deposited material likely to blow off in larger particles

    0.00E+00

    1.00E-07

    2.00E-07

    3.00E-07

    4.00E-07

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

    Temperature (°C)

    Mol

    e Fr

    actio

    n FeFeOFe(OH)2Fe3O4(cr)

    0.00E+00

    1.00E-07

    2.00E-07

    3.00E-07

    4.00E-07

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

    Temperature (°C)M

    ole

    Frac

    tion

    PbPbOPbS(cr)PbSPb(L)

  • Outline

    • Introduction• Experimental• Total particle measurements• Solid particle measurements• Conclusions

  • A catalytic stripper was used to remove volatile particles with little loss of solid particles

    • Recent stripper design– Stripper consists of a 2 substrate catalyst* followed by a cooling coil– The first substrate removes sulfur compounds– The second substrate is an oxidizing catalyst– Diffusion and thermophoretic losses present but well defined

    *Catalysts were provided by Johnson-Matthey

  • Both manganese and iron led to significant solid nanoparticle emissions

    • These results are not corrected for diffusion and thermophoresis losses, which are about 60% at 7.5 nm and 30% at 200 nm

    • These results show that the nucleation mode consists mainly of solid particles, most likely iron and manganese oxides

    • These are the types of particles that have been shown to translocate along the olfactory nervous system to the brain in rats*

    0.00E+00

    2.00E+07

    4.00E+07

    6.00E+07

    8.00E+07

    1.00E+08

    1 10 100 1000Size (nm)

    dN/d

    logD

    p/cc

    Mn-8 Tail Pipe Average Mn-8 Post Stripper

    0.00E+00

    2.00E+07

    4.00E+07

    6.00E+07

    8.00E+07

    1.00E+08

    1 10 100 1000Size (nm)

    dN/d

    logD

    p/cc

    Fe-8 Tail Pipe Average Fe-8 Post Stripper

    *Translocation of inhaled ultrafine manganese oxide particles on the central nervous system. Alison Elder, Robert Gerlein, Vanessa Silva, Tessa Feikert, Lisa Opanashuk, Janet Carter, Russell Potter, Andrew Maynard, Yasuo Ito, Jacob Finkelstein and Gunter Oberdorster. Environmental Health Perspectives, Volume 114, Number 8, August 2006.

  • Solid nucleation mode emissions with metal doped gasoline are remarkably similar to idling Diesel

    • All measurements made downstream of a catalytic stripper• Diesel results are for a heavy-duty engine without after treatment complying with US 2004

    standards– Measurements made with an SMPS– BP50 fuel– Solid ash particles mainly from additives in the lube oil, Ca, Zn, Mg, P

    0.00E+00

    1.00E+07

    2.00E+07

    3.00E+07

    4.00E+07

    5.00E+07

    6.00E+07

    1 10 100 1000Size (nm)

    dN/d

    logD

    p/cc

    Mn-8 EUDC post stripper

    Mn-8 50 kph post stripper

    Mn-8 Idle post stripper

    0.00E+00

    1.00E+07

    2.00E+07

    3.00E+07

    4.00E+07

    5.00E+07

    6.00E+07

    1 10 100 1000Size (nm)

    dN/d

    logD

    p/cc

    Mode 1 solid

    Mode 2 solid

    Mode 5 solid

    Carbonaceous soot

    Ash

  • Here the results for the EUDC measurements of solid number emissions and the EU number standard

    0.0E+00

    2.0E+12

    4.0E+12

    6.0E+12

    8.0E+12

    1.0E+13

    1.2E+13

    1.4E+13

    1.6E+13

    1.8E+13

    1.00 10.0 100 1000

    Diameter (nm)

    Cum

    mul

    ativ

    e N

    umbe

    r (pa

    rtic

    le/k

    m)

    Mn-8Fe-8EU solid number standardEU lower size limit

    79% below 23 nm

    79% below 23 nm

  • Outline

    • Introduction• Experimental• Total particle measurements• Solid particle measurements• Conclusions

  • Conclusions

    • Mn and Fe additives are used many areas outside the EU, Japan, and US

    • Mn and Fe additives resulted in the formation of a distinct nucleation mode– The particles in this mode were nearly all solid, likely metal oxides– Particles in this mode were nearly all below the current lower size limit

    of EU number regulations– With Mn-8 and Fe-8

    • Total solid number emissions were 25-30 times current EU standard• Only about 20% of the solid particle emissions were in the EU

    measurement range above 23 nm– Dosing rates of up to 55 mg/liter used in some countries would lead

    much higher emissions

  • Health – Ultrafine particles are deposited on the deep lung regions more efficiently than fine particles

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    1 10 100 1,000 10,000

    Diameter (nm)

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    Con

    cent

    ratio

    n (1

    /Cto

    tal)d

    C/d

    logD

    p

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    Dep

    ositi

    on

    Number Surface Mass Deposition (Alveolar + Tracheo-Bronchial, ICRP 1994)

    Fine ParticlesDp < 2.5 µm

    Ultrafine ParticlesDp < 100 nm

    NanoparticlesDp < 50 nm

    PM10Dp < 10 µm

    Deposition

  • Which is the relevant measure of biological impact of particles, number, surface, or mass?

    Percent of Neutrophils in BAL 24 hrs after Instillation of TiO2 in Rats

    0 500 1000 1500 20000

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    ultrafine TiO2 (~20nm)fine TiO2 (~250nm)saline

    Correlation with Particle Mass

    Particle Mass, μg

    % N

    eutr

    ophi

    ls

    0 50 100 150 200 2500

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    ultrafine TiO2 (~20nm)fine TiO2 (~250nm)saline

    Percent of Neutrophils in BAL 24 hrs after Instillation of TiO2 in RatsCorrelation with Particle Surface Area

    Particle Surface Area, cm2

    % N

    eutr

    ophi

    ls

    Oberdorster’s work suggests best correlation of biological impact is with surface area Oberdorster, G., Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 74:1-8 (2001).

  • Proposed PMP number measurement system

    A specially designed CPC with a lower size cutoff of 23 nm is used

    Effect of Organometallic Fuel Additives on Nanoparticle Emissions from a Gasoline Passenger CarOutlineIntroductionHealthOutlineVehicle and fuels used in studyParticle measurement and samplingOutlineCycle average pre and post catalyst size distributions for high speed EUDC test cycle.Cycle average post catalyst and tailpipe size distributions for high speed EUDC test cycle.Chemical equilibrium calculations suggest lead compounds are more likely to be lost to wallsOutlineA catalytic stripper was used to remove volatile particles with little loss of solid particlesBoth manganese and iron led to significant solid nanoparticle emissionsSolid nucleation mode emissions with metal doped gasoline are remarkably similar to idling DieselHere the results for the EUDC measurements of solid number emissions and the EU number standardOutlineConclusionsHealth – Ultrafine particles are deposited on the deep lung regions more efficiently than fine particlesWhich is the relevant measure of biological impact of particles, number, surface, or mass?Proposed PMP number measurement system