Effect of environmental pollutants on human semen

3
Bull Environ. Contam, Toxicol. (1988)40:102-104 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Environmental ~Contamination ~and Toxicology Effect of Environmental Pollutants on Human Semen Sarbjit Kaur Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India Wlth the increased release of numerous chemlcal sub- stances lnto the biosphere, careful assessment of health effects of polluted environment must be made for maln- talnln 9 and enhancing the quallty of human 11re on thls earth. 51gnlflcant number of malformed chlldren are born each year (Hoar 1986). Sixty-five to 70% of all blrth defects have an unknown etiology. More than one-third of early human conception and upto 75% of recognlsed pregnancies are terminated by spontaneous abortlon (Cleg9 et al 1986). The extent of the effect of environ- mental pollution on human reproductive performance ls for the most part unknown. Of the approximately flve m1111on chemicals in existence, humans could be exposed to a sufficient quantlty of an estimated 55000 for toxlclty to be of potential problem (National Academy of 5clence 7984). Methods that do not requlre autopsy or surgery such as semen analysls would be attractive for assessing the effect of environmental toxicology on quallty of human 11re. Therefore, the present study was conducted to observe the effects of heavlly polluted environment of industrial area of Ludhlana and relati- vely clean, pollution free environment of Chandlgarh on the human semen quallty. It was belleved that the functlon of the male reproductive system may often be the most sensitive to toxlc effects. HATERIALS AND HETHODS All semen donors (age 55-45 years) were healthy clini- cally. They had come for vasectomy operation to varlous hospitals. They had normal testes and genetalla as examlned by a gynaecologlst. Subjects were instructed to abstaln from ejaculating for two days prior to each donation. 5ubjects were of mlddle income group. Only non-smokers and non-drug addlcted persons were sorted 5end reprint requests to Dr 5arbjit Kaur at the above address. 102

Transcript of Effect of environmental pollutants on human semen

Page 1: Effect of environmental pollutants on human semen

Bull Environ. Contam, Toxicol. (1988)40:102-104 �9 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

E n v i r o n m e n t a l ~ C o n t a m i n a t i o n ~and Toxicology

Effect of Environmental Pollutants on Human Semen

Sarbjit Kaur

Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India

Wlth the i n c r e a s e d r e l e a s e o f numerous chemlca l sub- s tances l n t o the b i osphe re , c a r e f u l assessment o f h e a l t h e f f e c t s o f p o l l u t e d env i ronment must be made f o r maln- t a l n l n 9 and enhanc ing the q u a l l t y o f human 11re on t h l s e a r t h . 5 1 g n l f l c a n t number o f mal fo rmed c h l l d r e n a r e born each year (Hoar 1986). S i x t y - f i v e to 70% o f a l l b l r t h d e f e c t s have an unknown e t i o l o g y . More than o n e - t h i r d o f e a r l y human c o n c e p t i o n and upto 75% o f r e c o g n l s e d p regnanc ies are t e r m i n a t e d by spontaneous a b o r t l o n (Cleg9 et a l 1986). The e x t e n t o f the e f f e c t o f e n v i r o n - menta l p o l l u t i o n on human r e p r o d u c t i v e per fo rmance l s f o r the most p a r t unknown. Of the a p p r o x i m a t e l y f l v e m1111on chemica l s i n e x i s t e n c e , humans cou ld be exposed to a s u f f i c i e n t q u a n t l t y o f an e s t i m a t e d 55000 f o r t o x l c l t y to be o f p o t e n t i a l p rob lem ( N a t i o n a l Academy o f 5c lence 7984). Methods t ha t do not r e q u l r e au topsy or s u r g e r y such as semen a n a l y s l s would be a t t r a c t i v e f o r assess ing the e f f e c t o f e n v i r o n m e n t a l t o x i c o l o g y on q u a l l t y o f human 11re. The re fo re , the p resen t s tudy was conduc ted to observe the e f f e c t s o f h e a v l l y p o l l u t e d env i ronment o f i n d u s t r i a l a r e a o f Ludhlana and r e l a t i - ve l y c l ean , p o l l u t i o n f ree env i ronment o f Chandlgarh on the human semen q u a l l t y . I t was b e l l e v e d t h a t the f u n c t l o n o f the male r e p r o d u c t i v e system may o f t e n be the most s e n s i t i v e to t o x l c e f f e c t s .

HATERIALS AND HETHODS

A l l semen donors (age 55-45 y e a r s ) were h e a l t h y c l i n i - c a l l y . They had come f o r vasectomy o p e r a t i o n to va r l ous h o s p i t a l s . They had normal t e s t e s and g e n e t a l l a as examlned by a g y n a e c o l o g l s t . S u b j e c t s were i n s t r u c t e d to a b s t a l n f r om e j a c u l a t i n g f o r two days p r i o r to each d o n a t i o n . 5 u b j e c t s were o f m ldd le income group. Only non-smokers and non-drug a d d l c t e d persons were s o r t e d

5end r e p r i n t r eques t s to Dr 5 a r b j i t Kaur at the above address.

102

Page 2: Effect of environmental pollutants on human semen

o u t . Twenty semen dono rs were t hose who were w o r k i n g and r e s l d l n 9 i n h e a v l l y p o l l u t e d i n d u s t r i a l a r e a os Ludh lana c l t y , P u n j a b , I n d l a f o r a mlnlmum o f a t l e a s t one y e a r . F o r t y semen d o n o r s (one y e a r s c o n t i n u o u s s t a y ) were f rom C h a n d l g a r h , P u n j a b , I n d l a wh lch does no t have p o l l u t i o n c r e a t l n g l n d u s t r y i n the c l t y . 5pe rma tozoa w e r e f l x e d by a d d l n g a few d rops o f semen on to a s m a l l amount o f b u f f e r e d s a l l n e s o l u t l o n f o r 8 h r s . A d rop o f t h l s f o r m o l s a l l n e s o l u t l o n f l x e d semen was p l a c e d on a m i c r o s c o p e s11de unde r a c o v e r g l a s s . Acrosome m o r p h o l o g y was e v a l u a t e d w l t h p h a s e - c o n t r a s t m i c r o s c o p e and was c a t e - g o r l s e d l n t o no rma l acrosome and damaged ac rosome. F r u c t o s e and c i t r i c a c l d were e s t i m a t e d i n the semen samples a c c o r d i n g to the methods o f Mann ( 1 9 6 4 ) and Mann and Lu twak-Mann ( 1 9 7 6 ) . S t u d e n t ' s ' t ' t e s t was emp loyed f o r a n a l y s i s .

RESULT5 AND DI5CU5510N

The ave rage (• no rma l acrosomes were 95~ • 2 . 0 g i n semen f rom the semen dono rs o f c l t y C h a n d l g a r h . I n the semen o f p e r s o n s r e s l d l n g c o n t i n u a l l y f o r one y e a r i n the h e a v l l y p o l l u t e d i n d u s t r i a l a rea os L u d h l a n a the ave rage p e r c e n t a g e os no rma l ac rosomes was 70~ �9 5~. The f r u c t o s e c o n c e n t r a t i o n was s i g n i f i c a n t l y h i g h e r (P 0 . 0 5 ) i n the semen o f men f rom p o l l u t e d i n d u s t r i a l a rea o f L u d h l a n a than i n the semen os men f rom c l t y C h a n d l g a r h ( T a b l e 1), whereas c l t r i c a c l d was s i g n i f i - c a n t l y l o w e r (P 0 . 0 1 ) i n semen o f p e r s o n s f rom the p o l l u t e d i n d u s t r i a l a rea o f L u d h l a n a as compared to t h a t f rom the men f rom C h a n d l g a r h . The d e t e r m i n a t i o n

Tab le 1. C o n c e n t r a t i o n o f d i f f e r e n t m a r k e r s o f the male a c c e s s o r y sex g l a n d s i n men f rom p o l l u t e d i n d u s t r i a l a r e a o f L u d h i a n a and r e l a t i v e l y c l e a n c i t y C h a n d i g a r h

P o l l u t e d i n d u s t r i a l a rea o f Ludh iana

R e l a t i v e l y c l e a n c i t y C h a n d i g a r h

Fructose 570 • 12. 200 • 40

Citric acid 520 • 70** 600 • 20

Values are mean • SEN in mg/lO0 ml semen; P <O.05; P <0.01.

os d i f f e r e n t m a r k e r s i n semen i s to check the s t a t e o f the a c c e s s o r y sex g l a n d s . I n t h i s r e g a r d , f r u c t o s e l e v e l s a r e used to v e r i f y the f u n c t i o n a l s t a t e o f the s e m i n a r v e s i c l e s and c i t r i c a c i d to assess the p r o s t a t e f u n c t l o n ( E l i a s s o n 1968; Mann and Lu twak-Mann 1976) . These t e s t s a r e o f t e n u t i l i z e d f o r d i a g o n i z i n g c e r t a i n p a t h o l o g i c a l c o n d i t i o n s os the human r e p r o d u c t i v e t r a c t

103

Page 3: Effect of environmental pollutants on human semen

t ha t can produce a l t e r a t i o n s in the chemlcal composition os the semen. In conc lus ion , t h i s s tudy shows tha t sperm morphology and markers l e v e l s of semlnal ves l c l es and p r o s t a t e s a r e g r e a t l y a f f e c t e d by the h e a v l l y p o l l u t e d environment o f Ludhlana c i t y , as compared to the r e l a t i - vely c lean c l t y Chandlgarh os Punjab, I n d l a .

REFERENCES

Clegg ED, Sakai CS, Voytek PE (1986) Assessment o f r e p r o d u c t i v e r l s k s . B lo l Reprod 5 4 : 5 - 1 6

Hoar RM (1986) E f f e c t s os envi ronment upon f e t a l develop- ment : Concepts and deslgn. B lo l Reprod 54 :1 -4

E l iasson R (1968) Biochemical ana l ys l s os human semen in the s tudy os phys io logy and pa thophys lo logy o f the male accessory g e n l t a l g lands. F e r t 1 1 S t e r 1 1 1 9 : 3 4 4 - 3 4 9

Mann T (1964) The b i o c h e m i s t r y o f semen and o f the male r e p r o d u c t i v e t r a c t . 2nd Ed. Mehnen, London

Mann T, Lutwak-Mann C (1976) Eva lua t i on o f the func- t i o n a l s t a t e o f male accessory glands by the analysls o f semlnal plasma. Andro log la 8 : 2 5 7 - 2 4 2

Nat lona l Academy os Science (1984) Rlsk assessment in the Federa l Government, Managln9 the process, Washington DC:Nat lona l Academy Press

Recelved A p r i l 20, 1987; Accepted May 15, 1987.

104