Effect of carbon content on the microstructure and the cracking susceptibility of Fe-based...
Transcript of Effect of carbon content on the microstructure and the cracking susceptibility of Fe-based...
www.elsevier.com/locate/apsusc
Applied Surface Science 240 (2005) 63–70
Effect of carbon content on the microstructure and the cracking
susceptibility of Fe-based laser-clad layer
Sheng Li*, Qian-Wu Hu, Xiao-Yan Zeng, Sheng-Qin Ji
State Key Laboratory of Laser Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology,
Wuhan, Hubei 430074, PR China
Received in revised form 2 June 2004; accepted 2 June 2004
Available online 19 August 2004
Abstract
The laser cladding of Fe-based alloys on a medium carbon steel substrate was performed using a CO2 laser and Ar shielding
gas that was blown into a molten pool. The microstructure and cracking susceptibility of the laser-clad layers were studied in
terms of carbon additions. Results show that the small change of the carbon content in the alloy powders can obviously change
the microstructure and properties of the layers. When the carbon content is in the range of 0.3–0.4 wt.%, the decrease of the
carbon content in alloy powders will increase the hardness and toughness of the layers simultaneously under the same process
parameters. As a result, crack-free coatings with high hardness can be obtained. As the carbon content increases from 0.2 wt.%
to 0.4 wt.%, the segregation ratio of chromium increases, while the segregation ratios of nickel, manganese, and silicon first
decrease and then increase. At the same time, a new designing principle concerning the composition and microstructure has been
put forward, and the principal mechanisms of strengthening and toughening of the layers are fine-grain strengthening and low
carbon martensitic phase transformation strengthening.
# 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PACS: 42.62.�b; 61.82.Bg
Keywords: Laser cladding; Fe-based alloy; Carbon content; Cracking susceptibility; Peritectic
1. Introduction
Compared with other conventional surface treat-
ment techniques such as flame spraying, plating, and
arc welding, laser cladding has several advantages
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 27 87541780;
fax: +86 27 87541423.
E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Li).
0169-4332/$ – see front matter # 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.06.098
attracting researchers to pay much attention to its
application in industry. (1) Laser cladding creates a
true metallurgical bond between the cladding layers
and the base material. (2) The heating and cooling
rates are high, resulting in a fine microstructure and/or
metastable phases. (3) The dilution and the heat-
affected zone of the base material are very small.
(4) Local treatment is possible. However, due to the
very high cooling rate of layers, laser-clad layers are
.
S. Li et al. / Applied Surface Science 240 (2005) 63–7064
easy to crack, especially when the hardness of layers is
high. As a result, this technology is not widely used in
factories. In order to solve this problem, material
researchers have put up with several measures such
as preheating, tempering, optimizing process para-
meters and using graded coatings [1,2]. But these
measures have some drawbacks, such as increasing
the cost of production, reducing the efficiency of
production and worsening the working conditions.
Furthermore, the effects of these measures are very
limited [3,4]. Hence, the crack problem does not
obtain a very good settlement.
We think that the best approach to decreasing the
cracking susceptibility is to study new cladding mate-
rials suited to the technology. In fact, there have
already been some reports on the application of this
approach to laser cladding. It has been pointed out that
increasing Ni and Co content can improve the tough-
ness of the layers and decrease the cracking suscept-
ibility [4–7]. However, adding large amounts of
toughness phase elements, such as Ni and Co, to
alloys will bring several harmful effects, such as
lowering the hardness and prosperities of the layers
and increasing the cost of production. It is well known
that carbon plays a very important role on the micro-
structure and property of Fe-based alloy, but there is
little data available regarding the effects of carbon
content on the microstructure and cracking suscept-
ibility of laser-clad layers. In this paper, we have
investigated them with several kinds of Fe-based alloy
powders, which contain different carbon content, and
have drawn some significant conclusions. We hope
that our results will be beneficial to the design of laser-
clad alloys.
Fig. 1. Effect of C content in the powders on the hardness of clad
layer.
2. Experimental procedures
Fe-based alloy powders self-made (Fe0) with var-
ious carbon contents were laser clad onto medium
carbon steel substrates of Ø 40 mm � 10 mm with
argon gas shielding (blowing to melting pool in the
open system). The alloy powders Fe0 had the compo-
sition (wt.%) Fe95.5–Ni1.5–Cr1–Mn1–Si1.
The laser used was a continuous wave (CW) CO2
type operated at 3.5 kW, 4 mm laser beam diameter
(D). The thickness of the preplaced powder was
1.2 mm. The traverse speed Vs was 6 mm/s and
3 mm/s. The overlapping number was 8 and the over-
lapping factor was 0.33.
The cracking susceptibility of the layers was
assessed via the length of crack: (a) in unit cladding
area (cm2)
a ¼P
Li
A
Li (mm) is the length of crack I and A the area of clad
layer. The penetration visualization method was used
to measure cracks. A microscope at 10� was used to
measure the crack number of the layer.
The macro-hardness tests of the cladding layers
were performed using a Rockwell type tester, and the
micro-hardness tests were performed using a Vickers-
1000 digital micro-hardness tester with a load of
0.098 N and a dwelling time of 15 s. Microstructures
were studied by means of optical microscopy (OM)
and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray
diffraction structures analysis was carried out. The
average chemical compositions of the phases were
analyzed by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)
and the average chemical compositions of the layers
were studied by means of chemical analysis.
3. Results
3.1. Effect of carbon content in the powders on the
hardness of clad layer
The effects of carbon content in the powders on the
hardness of clad layers are shown in Fig. 1. Under the
same traverse speed, the hardness of clad layers using
S. Li et al. / Applied Surface Science 240 (2005) 63–70 65
Fig. 2. Effect of C content in the powders on the cracking suscept-
ibility of clad layer.
the powders containing 0.3 wt.% C (Fe2) is higher than
that of clad layers using the powders containing
0.2 wt.% C (Fe1) and also than that of clad layers using
the powders containing 0.4 wt.% C (Fe3). Fig. 1 also
indicates that, for all the three kinds of powders used,
the hardness of clad layers increases with increasing the
traverse speed. Apparently, this is a good method of
changing the hardness of clad layers slightly.
3.2. Effect of carbon content in the powders on the
cracking susceptibility of clad layer
The effects of carbon content in the powders on the
cracking susceptibility of clad layers are shown in Fig.
2. It shows that, despite the change of the traverse
speed, the clad layers using Fe1 and Fe2 are crack-
free. This indicates that these two kinds of alloy
powders have good properties of resisting cracking.
Cracks can be observed in the laser-clad layers using
Fe3, though the length of cracks decreases with
decreasing the traverse speed.
Table 1
The average contents of Cr, Ni, Mn, and Si in grain boundary and in ma
Cr (at.%)
Fe1, 6 mm/s (see Fig. 4a (1)) 1.16
Fe1, 6 mm/s (see Fig. 4a (2)) 0.85
Fe2, 6 mm/s (see Fig. 4b (1)) 1.17
Fe2, 6 mm/s (see Fig. 4b (2)) 0.83
Fe3, 6 mm/s (see Fig. 4c (1)) 1.55
Fe3, 6 mm/s (see Fig. 4c (2)) 0.80
Analysis points (see Fig. 4): 1, grain boundary; 2, matrix.
3.3. Effect of carbon content in the powders on the
microstructure of clad layer
Fig. 3 shows the effects of carbon content and the
traverse speed on the microstructures of clad layers.
Under the relatively high traverse speed (6 mm/s), with
the increase of the carbon content from 0.2 wt.% to
0.4 wt.%, the main structures of the clad layers change
from the mixed structures of black troosite and white
ferrite (Figs. 3a and 4a) to the mixed structures of
cryptocrystal martensite and ferrite (Figs. 3c and 4b),
and then to the mixed structures of plate martensite and
ferrite (Figs. 3e and 4c). While under the relatively low
traverse speed (3 mm/s), with increasing carbon con-
tent, the main structures of the clad layers change from
the mixed structures of troosite and ferrite (Fig. 3b) to
the mixed structures of martensite, black sorbite
(HV418) and ferrite (HV390) (Fig. 3d and g), and then
to the mixed structures of pearllite and ferrite (Fig. 3f).
Fig. 3 (except Fig. 3f) also indicates white pro-eutectoid
ferrite networks precipitated along prior austenite grain
boundaries. Therefore, the change law of the prior
austenite grain size can be found. Under the same
process parameters, as the carbon content increases,
the average grain size of prior austenite decreases at
first, and then increases afterwards. With decreasing the
traverse speed, the average grain size of prior austenite
increases obviously when the same alloy powder is
used. Fig. 3f shows a piece of crack in the clad layer. The
crack is black and crooked, and this reveals the crack in
the Fe-based laser clad layers is hot crack.
3.4. Effect of carbon content in the powders on the
solute segregation ratio of clad layers
Table 1 shows the average contents of Cr, Ni, Mn,
and Si in the grain boundary and in the matrix,
trix, respectively
Ni (at.%) Mn (at.%) Si (at.%)
1.52 1.57 1.26
1.38 0.93 1.07
1.39 1.41 1.12
1.38 0.94 1.11
1.63 1.61 1.22
1.35 0.92 1.02
S. Li et al. / Applied Surface Science 240 (2005) 63–7066
Fig. 3. OM micrographs of clad layers: (a) 0.2 wt.% C (Fe1), 6 mm/s; (b) 0.2 wt.% C (Fe1), 3 mm/s; (c) 0.3 wt.% C (Fe2), 6 mm/s; (d) 0.3 wt.%
C (Fe2), 3 mm/s; (e) 0.4 wt.% C (Fe3), 6 mm/s; (f) 0.4 wt.% C (Fe3), 3 mm/s; (g) 0.3 wt.% C (Fe2), 3 mm/s.
respectively. And Fig. 5 shows the calculated segrega-
tion ratios of these solute atoms. As can be seen from
Table 1 and Fig. 5, the phenomena of solute segrega-
tion are obvious although the segregation ratios vary
with solute atoms and carbon content. Fig. 5 also
shows that, as the carbon content increases from
0.2 wt.% to 0.4 wt.%, the segregation ratio of chro-
mium increase, while the segregation ratios of nickel,
S. Li et al. / Applied Surface Science 240 (2005) 63–70 67
Fig. 3. (Continued ).
manganese and silicon first decrease and then
increase. Previous investigation [8] has shown that
the grain size could play an important role in the
segregation phenomena, and usually increasing grain
size will increase segregation when the solute content
is small. As stated in Section 3.3, when the carbon
content increases from 0.2 wt.% to 0.4 wt.% the aver-
age grain size of layers decreases at first and then
increases afterwards. This is the most important rea-
son that the segregation ratios of most solute atoms
such as Ni, Mn, and Si are small when the carbon
content in powders is 0.3 wt.%.
3.5. X-ray diffractometry phases analysis
Fig. 6 shows that, under the relatively high
traverse speed (6 mm/s), the main phases of the
cladding layers using Fe1, Fe2, and Fe3 are all a-
Fe. Table 2 shows the theoretical lattice constant of
a-Fe and the calculated lattice constants of a-Fe
from the XRD results of clad layers. As can be seen
in Table 2, with the increase of the carbon content
from 0.2 wt.% to 0.4 wt.%, the deviations on lattice
constant increase. As a result, compared with the
Fig. 4. SEM micrographs of clad layers: (a) Fe1, 6 mm/s; (b) Fe2,
6 mm/s; (c) Fe3, 6 mm/s; 1, grain boundary; 2, matrix.Table 2
The a-Fe phase lattice constants in the cladding layers
Fe (A) 2.861
Fe0 + 0.2 wt.% C, 6 mm/s (A) 2.873
Fe0 + 0.3 wt.% C, 6 mm/s (A) 2.876
Fe0 + 0.4 wt.% C, 6 mm/s (A) 2.881
layers using Fe1 and Fe2, the layers using Fe3 have
low toughness. This is one of the most important
reasons that the cladding layers using Fe3 have high
cracking susceptibility.
S. Li et al. / Applied Surface Science 240 (2005) 63–7068
Fig. 5. Solute segregation ratios. Analysis points (see Fig. 4): 1,
grain boundary; 2, matrix.
Fig. 6. XRD results of clad layers. (a) Fe1, 6 mm/s; (b) Fe2, 6 mm/s;
(c) Fe3, 6 mm/s.
Fig. 7. The delta region of the iron–carbon equilibrium diagram.
4. Discussion
4.1. Effect of carbon content in the powders on the
microstructure and the hardness of clad layer
The most interesting thing is that the hardness of
the cladding layer may decrease with the increase of
carbon content when the process parameters are the
same (Fig. 1). For example, when the traverse speed is
6 mm/s, the hardness of the layers decreases from
HRC60 to HRC52 while the carbon content increases
from 0.3 wt.% to 0.4 wt.%. We need to further study
the solidification of the Fe-based alloy in order to
explain the strange phenomenon.
Fig. 7 is the delta region of the iron–carbon equili-
brium diagram [9]. Fig. 7 shows that, with the increase
of carbon content from 0.1% to 0.18% (point H to
point J in Fig. 7), the solidification temperature range
(DT) decreases, DT is the smallest when the carbon
content is 0.18 wt.% and then DT increases with the
increase of carbon content from 0.18 wt.% to
0.51 wt.% (point J to point B in Fig. 7). Obviously,
due to the different grain growth time, the alloy that
has a wider DT will have larger grain size than the
alloy that has a smaller DT. Fig. 3 shows that, under the
same process parameters and with the increase of
carbon content, the average grain size first becomes
small and then becomes big afterwards. From this, the
solidification process of Fe1, Fe2, and Fe3 can be
considered as corresponding to the lines I, II, and III in
Fig. 7. It is worth noting that there is some distance
between the carbon contents in the three kinds of Fe-
based alloy powders and in the lines in Fig. 7. For
S. Li et al. / Applied Surface Science 240 (2005) 63–70 69
example, the carbon content in the peritectic point
(point J in Fig. 7) is 0.18 wt.% while that in the layer
using Fe2 in Fig. 3c, by chemical analysis, is
0.247 wt.%. The small distance between them is
caused by other alloy elements [10].
In the absence of appreciable work hardening, the
relationship between the hardness and the average grain
size of metal material can be described as follows [11]:
Hs ¼ Hi þ Kd�1=2 (1)
where Hs is the hardness of metal material, Hi and K are
the appropriate constants associated with the hardness
measurements.
From Eq. (1) the hardness increases with decreasing
the average grain size. Then the reason that the hardness
of the layers using Fe2 is higher than that of the layers
using Fe3 is that the average grain size of the former is
much smaller than that of the latter, though the carbon
content in the former is less than that in the latter.
4.2. Effect of carbon content in the powders on the
microstructure and the cracking susceptibility of
clad layer
The cracks in the laser-clad layers are generally
regarded as hot cracking [4] and Fig. 3f also proves
that the cracks in the Fe-based laser-clad layers are hot
cracking. Previous investigations [12–14] have shown
that, under the same technical conditions, hot cracking
susceptibility is mainly determined by DT and the
plasticity of the alloy. Because of its smallest DT
and high plasticity, due to fine grains, the cladding
alloys using Fe2 have excellent properties of resisting
cracking. Although the cladding alloys using Fe1 have
wider DT than the cladding alloys using Fe2, the
former also have good properties of resisting cracking
because of its high plasticity, due to low carbon con-
tent. Furthermore, as can be seen from the solidifica-
tion of the cladding alloys using Fe2 (line II in Fig. 7),
the peritectic reaction (L0.53 wt.% C + d0.08 wt.% C !g0.18 wt.% C) can exhaust all the liquid phase and d
solid solution at the same time, which will diminish
the harmful effect of the remaining liquid films
between the grain boundaries to the utmost. There
are three reasons that the cladding alloys using Fe3
have high cracking susceptibility. The first is that the
cladding alloys using Fe3 have wide DT. The second is
that it has low plasticity, due to high carbon content.
The last is that, as can be seen from its solidification
(line III in Fig. 7), the grains of the cladding alloy will
contract obviously with the transition of d-Fe to g-Fe
(d + L ! g + L), whereas there is still an amount of
remaining liquid films between grain boundaries at
this time, resulting in a higher cracking susceptibility.
4.3. The best designing principle concerning the
composition and microstructure of Fe-based alloy for
laser cladding
Although many researchers have studied Fe-based
alloys for laser cladding, most of the alloys that they
used can be described as ‘‘high carbon content and
eutectic structure’’ [15–18]. This is the present main
designing principle concerning the composition and
microstructure of Fe-based alloy for laser cladding.
The main characteristics of the designing principle are
as follows:
(1) T
he cladding alloys, with a composition in/or nearthe eutectic point, have high carbon content (2.5–
6 wt.%) and then have small DT, fine grains and
relatively high plasticity. As a result, the cladding
alloys exhibit relatively little tendency toward
cracking.
(2) T
he main mechanism of strengthening is fine-grain strengthening, two-phase strengthening
and solid solution strengthening. The strengthen-
ing phase is alloy carbide, and the matrix is
austenite or ferrite, which is non-equilibrium
phase with extended solid solution alloy elements.
It is known that high carbon content (about
4.3 wt.%) and large quantity of alloy carbides addi-
tions will increase the hardness of the alloy, whereas
they will also impair the plasticity and toughness of
the alloy. Actually, there is seldom example that Fe-
based alloy of ‘‘high carbon content and eutectic
structure’’ has been used in the manufacturing by
laser cladding as yet.
We think the cracks of laser cladding layers have
embodied the deep contradiction between high hard-
ness and good toughness of alloys and the designing
principle of ‘‘low carbon content and peritectic struc-
ture’’ is better than that of ‘‘high carbon content and
eutectic structure’’. The main characteristics of the
S. Li et al. / Applied Surface Science 240 (2005) 63–7070
designing principle of ‘‘low carbon content and peri-
tectic structure’’ are as follows:
(1) T
he cladding alloys, with a composition in theperitectic point (point J in Fig. 7), contain low
carbon content (about 0.25 wt.%). The alloys have
small DT and very fine grains.
(2) T
he main structure of the layers is low carbonmartensite with relatively high hardness and good
toughness, and there exits very low carbon ferrite
with high plasticity and toughness between the
grain boundaries, which can absorb and decrease
stresses of the layers, and reduce the cracking
susceptibility.
Without taking measures such as preheating and
tempering, crack-free laser-cladding layers with high
hardness (HRC60) can be obtained by using Fe2.
Recently, we have successfully repaired some huge
rolls of the Pear River Steel Company in Guangdong
province of China. The successful application of Fe2
indicates that our designing principle of ‘‘low carbon
content and peritectic structure’’ is right.
5. Conclusions
Based upon the study, the following conclusions
can be drawn:
(1) T
he hardness of the laser-clad layers does notalways increase with the increase of the carbon
content. Under the same traverse speed, the hard-
ness of layers using the powders containing
0.3 wt.% C is higher than that of layers using
the powders containing 0.2 wt.% C or 0.4 wt.% C.
For all the Fe-based powders used, the hardness of
clad layers increases with increasing the traverse
speed.
(2) T
he cladding layers using the powders containingnot more than 0.3 wt.% C all have good properties
of resisting cracking, while those using the pow-
ders containing more than 0.3 wt.% C have higher
cracking susceptibility. The cracking susceptibil-
ity decreases with a decrease of the traverse speed.
(3) T
he small change of the carbon content in thealloy powders can change the microstructure and
properties of the layers obviously. The change of
the traverse speed can also change the microstruc-
ture and properties of the layers to some extent.
(4) A
s the carbon content increases from 0.2 wt.% to0.4 wt.%, the segregation ratio of chromium
increases, while the segregation ratios of nickel,
manganese and silicon first decrease and then
increase. Decreasing grain size will be beneficial
to decreasing solute segregation. At the same
time, with the increase of the carbon content,
the deviations on lattice constant of a-Fe increase.
(5) C
ompared with the designing principle of ‘‘highcarbon content and eutectic structure’’, that of ‘‘low
carbon content and peritectic structure’’ is better.
The laser-clad alloys of ‘‘low carbon content and
peritectic structure’’ have small solidification tem-
perature range, fine grains and small deviation on
lattice constant, and then have high hardness and
good plasticity and toughness simultaneously.
References
[1] R. Dekumbis, in: Proceedings of 6th International Conference
on Laser in Manufacturing, UK, 1989, p. 185.
[2] K.P. Cooper, J.D. Ayre, T. Proc. Conf. ICALEO’87.
[3] A. Frenk, C.F. Marsden, J.D. Wagniere, A.B. Vannes, M.
Laracine, M.Y. Lormand, Surf. Coat. Technol. 45 (1991) 435.
[4] W.L. Song, Doctoral Dissertation, Huazhong University of
Science and Technology, Wuhan, 1996, p. 17.
[5] W.L. Song, P.D. Zhu, C. Kun, Surf. Coat. Technol. 80 (1996)
279.
[6] W.L. Song, J. Echigoya, Z. Beidi, X. Changsheng, C. Kun,
Surf. Coat. Technol. 138 (2001) 291.
[7] A.N. Grezov, A.N. Safenov, Weld. Int. 1 (1987) 50.
[8] K. Ishida, J. Alloys Compd. 235 (1996) 244.
[9] S.H. Avner, Introduction to Physical Metallurgy, New York,
US, 1974, p. 232.
[10] M. Cong, The Foundry Manual, Beijing, China, 1991, p. 83.
[11] Y.S. Sato, M. Urata, H. Kokawa, K. Ikeda, Mater. Sci. Eng. A
354 (2003) 298.
[12] N. Bailey, Weld. Res. Int. 8 (1987) 215.
[13] T.G.F. Gray, Rational Welding Design, London, UK, 1975, p.
82.
[14] W.L. Song, Z. Beidi, X. Changsheng, H. Wei, C. Kun, Surf.
Coat. Technol. 115 (1999) 270.
[15] J. Singh, J. Mazumder, Metall. Trans. A 18 (A) (1987) 313.
[16] K. Nagarathnam, K. Komvopoulos, Metall. Trans. A 26A
(1995) 2131.
[17] Q.M. Zhang, J.J. He, W.J. Liu, M.L. Zhong, Surf. Coat.
Technol. 162 (2003) 140.
[18] H.Y. Zhao, Doctoral Dissertation, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, 2001, p. 35.