Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
-
Upload
nauman-azeemi -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
1/25
11
Effect of Animal Dung asEffect of Animal Dung as
Feed on productionFeed on productionperformance of Cattle andperformance of Cattle and
BuffaloBuffalo
M. Nauman Manzoor
2001-ag-1467Institute of Animal Nutrition and Feed
TechnologyUniversity of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
2/25
22
IntroductionIntroductionPakistan is facing feed shortagePakistan is facing feed shortage
Required CP & TDN are 10.9 & 90.36Required CP & TDN are 10.9 & 90.36
million tons respectively but available aremillion tons respectively but available are
6.7 & 69 only6.7 & 69 only
Our animals are deficient 38.1 % in CP andOur animals are deficient 38.1 % in CP and24.02 % in TDN24.02 % in TDN
Continue.Continue.
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
3/25
33
Animals are getting their nutrients from:Animals are getting their nutrients from:
Fodders & crop residues 51 %Fodders & crop residues 51 %
Rangelands 38 %Rangelands 38 %
Post harvest grazing 3 %Post harvest grazing 3 %
Cereal by products 6 %Cereal by products 6 %
andand
Oil cakes 2 %Oil cakes 2 %
(Sarwar(Sarwaret alet al., 2002)., 2002)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
4/25
44
Animal Excreta as feedAnimal Excreta as feed
Animal Dung can be more valuable andAnimal Dung can be more valuable and
economical as feed for ruminantseconomical as feed for ruminants
The economical value of animal dungThe economical value of animal dung
as feed component in balanced rationas feed component in balanced ration
for several classes of ruminants mayfor several classes of ruminants maybe 3 to 10 times greater than theirbe 3 to 10 times greater than their
value as plant nutrientsvalue as plant nutrients
(Hadjitanayiotou(Hadjitanayiotou et alet al., 1993)., 1993)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
5/25
55
Chemical Composition ofChemical Composition of
Buffalo DungBuffalo DungDM 10DM 10--25 %25 %CP 8CP 8--18 %18 %
NFE 14NFE 14--48 %48 %
EE 1EE 1--3 %3 %CF 23CF 23--52 %52 %
NDF 50NDF 50--63 %63 %
ADF 35ADF 35--42 %42 %
Cellulose 15Cellulose 15--23 %23 %
Hemicelluloses 16Hemicelluloses 16--21 %21 %
Lignin 9Lignin 9--21 %21 %
Ash 3Ash 3--21 %21 % (Jakhmola, 1988)(Jakhmola, 1988)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
6/25
66
Chemical Composition ofChemical Composition of
Broiler LitterBroiler LitterDM 80.5 %DM 80.5 %CP 24.9 %CP 24.9 %
TDN 50 %TDN 50 %
CF 23.4 %CF 23.4 %Ash 24.7 %Ash 24.7 %
Ca 2.3 %Ca 2.3 %
P 1.6 %P 1.6 %
Cu 473 ppmCu 473 ppm
Mg 348 ppmMg 348 ppm
(Jacob(Jacob et alet al., 1997)., 1997)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
7/25
77
Processing methods of AnimalProcessing methods of Animal
ExcretaExcretaScreeningScreening (Johnson(Johnson et alet al., 1982)., 1982)
DryingDrying(El(El--AshryAshry et alet al., 1985)., 1985)
Heat TreatmentHeat Treatment (Harmon(Harmon et alet al., 1974)., 1974)
Chemical treatmentChemical treatment (Lamm(Lamm et alet al., 1979)., 1979)
EnsilingEnsiling (Jakhmola(Jakhmola et alet al., 1984)., 1984)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
8/25
88
Fermentation of animalFermentation of animal
wastewasteAnaerobic conditions and lactic acidAnaerobic conditions and lactic acidproduction restrict the growth of Clostridiaproduction restrict the growth of Clostridiaand Coliform bacteriaand Coliform bacteria
Fermentation improves animal acceptability,Fermentation improves animal acceptability,
lower nutrient losses, eliminates pathogenslower nutrient losses, eliminates pathogensand deand de--odorize animal wasteodorize animal waste
(Pathak and Jakhmola, 1983)(Pathak and Jakhmola, 1983)
(Harmon(Harmon et alet al., 1975)., 1975)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
9/25
99
Usage of Animal WasteUsage of Animal Waste
Animal waste can be beneficial in terms ofAnimal waste can be beneficial in terms of
fixing N in poor quality roughages like:fixing N in poor quality roughages like:
Wheat StrawWheat Straw (Chaudhry(Chaudhry et alet al., 1996)., 1996)
Rice StrawRice Straw (Kwak(Kwak et alet al., 2004)., 2004)
Rye StrawRye Straw (Cornman(Cornman et al.,et al., 1981)1981)
Rice HullsRice Hulls (Kwak(Kwak et alet al., 2004)., 2004)
Ground HayGround Hay (Lamm(Lamm et alet al., 1979)., 1979)
Corn CobsCorn Cobs (Smith & Lindhal, 1978)(Smith & Lindhal, 1978)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
10/25
1010
Influence of varying levels of fermented wheatInfluence of varying levels of fermented wheat
straw on nutrients intake in buffalo calvesstraw on nutrients intake in buffalo calves
(Sarwar(Sarwaret alet al., 2006)., 2006)
Items Kg/dayItems Kg/day Diets (%)Diets (%)
FWS 0FWS 0 FWSFWS
1515
FWSFWS
2525
FWSFWS
3535
S.E.S.E.
Dry matterDry matter 4.254.25 4.854.85 5.755.75 5.945.94 0.350.35
Organic matterOrganic matter 3.733.73 4.194.19 5.015.01 5.135.13 0.310.31
Crude proteinCrude protein 0.5140.514 0.5820.582 0.690.69 0.7130.713 0.080.08
Neutral detergentNeutral detergent
fiberfiber
1.981.98 2.332.33 2.812.81 2.822.82 0.230.23
Acid detergentAcid detergent
fiberfiber
1.271.27 1.51.5 1.791.79 1.821.82 0.170.17
Ether extractEther extract 0.1270.127 0.1450.145 0.1720.172 0.1780.178 0.030.03
Energy (Mcal/day)Energy (Mcal/day) 9.529.52 10.8610.86 12.8812.88 13.3013.30 1.231.23
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
11/25
1111
Influence of varying levels of fermented wheatInfluence of varying levels of fermented wheat
straw on nutrients digestibilities in buffalo calvesstraw on nutrients digestibilities in buffalo calvesItems %Items % DietsDiets
FWS 0FWS 0 FWS 15FWS 15 FWS 25FWS 25 FWS 35FWS 35 S.E.S.E.
Dry matterDry matter 63.7563.75 64.3164.31 64.5064.50 64.4564.45 4.564.56Organic matterOrganic matter 66.566.5 67.2167.21 66.7666.76 66.8566.85 5.985.98
Crude proteinCrude protein 71.8571.85 71.9271.92 72.2172.21 72.0172.01 5.985.98
NDFNDF 61.3261.32 61.0261.02 60.9560.95 61.3361.33 4.854.85
ADFADF 54.354.3 55.0155.01 54.1254.12 55.3255.32 3.873.87
Ether extractEther extract 75.6275.62 74.9274.92 75.5475.54 75.4175.41 6.126.12
Continue.Continue.
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
12/25
1212
Digestibility of Nutrients by crossbred cattleDigestibility of Nutrients by crossbred cattle
calves fed varying levels of FWS with 4 %calves fed varying levels of FWS with 4 %
molasses, 4 % urea and 30 % cattle dungmolasses, 4 % urea and 30 % cattle dungItemsItems FWS 0 %FWS 0 % FWS 20FWS 20
%%
FWS 30FWS 30
%%
FWS 40FWS 40
%%
Dry MatterDry Matter 65.965.9 66.266.2 65.865.8 65.0965.09
Organic MatterOrganic Matter 68.8968.89 69.3969.39 69.0169.01 68.968.9
Crude ProteinCrude Protein 72.672.6 73.073.0 73.273.2 72.372.3
NDFNDF 61.2961.29 61.0961.09 60.8960.89 60.3160.31
ADFADF 56.0156.01 56.0956.09 55.4955.49 56.6456.64
Ether ExtractEther Extract 74.9274.92 74.874.8 74.6274.62 74.9174.91
(Afzal, 2004)(Afzal, 2004)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
13/25
1313
Average DM and NDF digestibility of UntreatedAverage DM and NDF digestibility of Untreated
and Manure treated Wheat Strawand Manure treated Wheat Straw
(Qadir, 2004)(Qadir, 2004)
TrailsTrails A: Untreated Wheat StrawA: Untreated Wheat Straw B: Manure Ensiled WheatB: Manure Ensiled WheatStrawStraw
DMDM
DigestibilityDigestibility
NDFNDF
DigestibilityDigestibility
DMDM
DigestibilityDigestibility
NDFNDF
DigestibilityDigestibility
II 13.7713.77 42.742.7 15.3315.33 58.358.3
IIII 13.6613.66 40.1740.17 15.5315.53 56.956.9
MeanMean 13.7113.71 41.4341.43 15.4315.43 57.657.6
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
14/25
1414
Ruminal characteristics of cannulated Buffalo bullsRuminal characteristics of cannulated Buffalo bulls
fed diets containing different levels of fermentedfed diets containing different levels of fermented
wheat straw at 3 hourswheat straw at 3 hours
(Hasan, 2004)(Hasan, 2004)
ItemsItems FWS 0FWS 0 FWS 10FWS 10 FWS 20FWS 20 FWS 30FWS 30
NHNH33--N (mg/dl)N (mg/dl) 18.2918.29 21.121.1 24.3524.35 26.9126.91
pHpH 6.16.1 6.36.3 6.66.6 6.76.7
Total VFAsTotal VFAs
(mol/100mol)(mol/100mol)
149149 139139 135135 132132
AcetateAcetate 66.166.1 65.165.1 61.361.3 60.160.1
PropionatePropionate 20.9220.92 19.3219.32 19.0119.01 19.319.3
ButyrateButyrate 7.97.9 7.77.7 7.87.8 7.77.7
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
15/25
1515
Ruminal characteristics of cannulated Buffalo bullsRuminal characteristics of cannulated Buffalo bulls
fed diets containing different levels of fermentedfed diets containing different levels of fermented
wheat straw at 6 hourswheat straw at 6 hours
ItemsItems FWS 0FWS 0 FWSFWS
1010
FWSFWS
2020
FWS 30FWS 30
NHNH33--N (mg/dl)N (mg/dl) 17.8217.82 19.1419.14 22.422.4 23.1023.10pHpH 6.16.1 6.36.3 6.66.6 6.76.7
Total VFAsTotal VFAs
(mol/100mol)(mol/100mol)
145145 140140 143143 147147
AcetateAcetate 61.961.9 62.362.3 65.965.9 66.866.8
PropionatePropionate 21.9421.94 18.0118.01 19.1119.11 2020
ButyrateButyrate 7.87.8 7.97.9 88 8.108.10
Continue.Continue.
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
16/25
1616
Nitrogen balance and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) inNitrogen balance and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in
buffalo bulls fed diets containing different levels ofbuffalo bulls fed diets containing different levels of
fermented wheat strawfermented wheat straw
ItemsItems FWS 0FWS 0 FWSFWS
1010
FWS 20FWS 20 FWS 30FWS 30
Nitrogen intakeNitrogen intake 153.2153.2 153.6153.6 154.5154.5 153.44153.44
Fecal NitrogenFecal Nitrogen 50.6550.65 50.5350.53 49.5849.58 49.0749.07
Urinary balanceUrinary balance 78.8878.88 79.979.9 80.280.2 80.580.5
Nitrogen balanceNitrogen balance 23.6723.67 23.1723.17 24.7224.72 23.8723.87% of Digestible N% of Digestible N
IntakeIntake
23.1523.15 22.5522.55 23.523.5 2323
BUN (mg/dl)BUN (mg/dl) 19.319.3 2020 19.519.5 21.0121.01
Continue.Continue.
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
17/25
1717
Influence of varying levels of fermented wheat strawInfluence of varying levels of fermented wheat straw
on Nitrogen balance in buffalo calveson Nitrogen balance in buffalo calves
ItemsItems DietsDietsFWS 0FWS 0 FWS 15FWS 15 FWS 25FWS 25 FWS 35FWS 35 S.E.S.E.
Nitrogen intake (g/day)Nitrogen intake (g/day) 82.2482.24 93.1293.12 110.4110.4 114.08114.08 6.156.15
Faecal nitrogen (g/day)Faecal nitrogen (g/day) 16.8916.89 18.8518.85 20.9020.90 21.0321.03 1.891.89
% of intake% of intake 20.5420.54 20.2420.24 18.9318.93 18.4318.43 1.561.56
Apparent absorption (g/d)Apparent absorption (g/d) 65.3565.35 74.2774.27 89.5089.50 93.0593.05 8.958.95
% of intake% of intake 79.4679.46 79.7679.76 81.0781.07 81.5681.56 1.551.55
Urinary nitrogen (g/day)Urinary nitrogen (g/day) 8.568.56 9.219.21 10.8910.89 11.0211.02 2.162.16
Apparent retention (g/day)Apparent retention (g/day) 56.7956.79 65.0665.06 78.6178.61 82.0382.03 8.658.65
% of intake% of intake 69.0569.05 69.8769.87 71.2071.20 71.9071.90 1.051.05
Nitrogen balance (g/day)Nitrogen balance (g/day) 25.4525.45 28.0628.06 31.7931.79 32.0532.05 3.463.46
% of intake% of intake 30.9730.97 30.1330.13 28.7928.79 28.0928.09 0.210.21
(Sarwar(Sarwaret alet al., 2006)., 2006)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
18/25
1818
Influence of varying levels of fermented wheat strawInfluence of varying levels of fermented wheat straw
on weight gain and feed efficiency in buffalo calveson weight gain and feed efficiency in buffalo calves
Continue.Continue.
ItemsItems DietsDiets
FWSFWS
00
FWSFWS
1515
FWSFWS
2525
FWSFWS
3535
S.E.S.E.
Weight gain/Weight gain/dd
(gm)(gm)
495495 572572 645645 672672 22.522.5
FeedFeedconversionconversion
rationration
8.588.58 8.488.48 8.918.91 8.808.80 1.321.32
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
19/25
1919
Weight gain, feed efficiency, energy efficiency, FCR,Weight gain, feed efficiency, energy efficiency, FCR,
and cost of unit live weight gain by cross bred cattleand cost of unit live weight gain by cross bred cattle
calves fed varying levels of fermented wheat strawcalves fed varying levels of fermented wheat straw
with 4 % molasses, 4 % urea and 30 % cattle dungwith 4 % molasses, 4 % urea and 30 % cattle dung
(Afzal, 2004)(Afzal, 2004)
ItemsItems FWS 0FWS 0 FWS 20FWS 20 FWS 30FWS 30 FWS 40FWS 40
Weight Gain/day (g)Weight Gain/day (g) 350350 449.62449.62 485.51485.51 491.76491.76
DMI/Kg LWG (Kg)DMI/Kg LWG (Kg) 8.918.91 8.458.45 8.718.71 8.668.66
Energy/Kg LWG (MCal)Energy/Kg LWG (MCal) 19.9119.91 18.9318.93 19.5119.51 19.4019.40
D.E/Kg LWG (MCal/Kg)D.E/Kg LWG (MCal/Kg) 13.1513.15 12.5312.53 12.8412.84 12.6212.62
FCRFCR 0.1120.112 0.1180.118 0.1140.114 0.1160.116
Cost/Unit LWGCost/Unit LWG(Rs.)(Rs.) 40.540.5 34.3834.38 32.9132.91 30.0830.08
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
20/25
2020
Performance of lactating cows fed differentPerformance of lactating cows fed different
amounts of processed Poultry Excreta in totalamounts of processed Poultry Excreta in total
mixed rationsmixed rations
(Arave(Arave et alet al., 1990)., 1990)
ItemsItems 0 %0 % 5.9 %5.9 % 11.7 %11.7 % 17.4 %17.4 %
BW (Kg)BW (Kg) 583583 621621 548548 573573
DMI (Kg/100 Kg BW)DMI (Kg/100 Kg BW) 3.43.4 3.33.3 3.63.6 3.43.4
DMI (Kg/day)DMI (Kg/day) 19.819.8 20.620.6 19.619.6 19.419.4
Milk (Kg/day)Milk (Kg/day) 28.228.2 28.628.6 26.926.9 27.227.2
Fat (Kg/day)Fat (Kg/day) 0.910.91 1.031.03 0.950.95 0.910.91
FCM (Kg/day)FCM (Kg/day) 2525 26.826.8 2525 24.524.5
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
21/25
2121
Milk yield and composition of NiliMilk yield and composition of Nili--Ravi buffalo fedRavi buffalo fed
diets containing different levels of FWSdiets containing different levels of FWS
(Hasan, 2004)(Hasan, 2004)
ItemsItems FWS 0FWS 0 FWS 10FWS 10 FWS 20FWS 20 FWS 30FWS 30Milk yield Kg/dayMilk yield Kg/day 9.169.16 9.819.81 9.989.98 10.1810.18
Milk yield 4 % FCMMilk yield 4 % FCM 10.3710.37 11.4711.47 11.6711.67 11.9411.94
Fat %Fat % 4.914.91 5.115.11 5.815.81 5.515.51
Protein %Protein % 2.752.75 3.43.4 4.774.77 3.493.49
Total Solids %Total Solids % 14.2514.25 14.1214.12 15.115.1 14.4114.41
Solids not Fat %Solids not Fat % 9.949.94 9.759.75 10.5410.54 9.949.94
Fat kg/dayFat kg/day 0.440.44 0.50.5 0.580.58 0.560.56
Protein kg/dayProtein kg/day 0.280.28 0.390.39 0.560.56 0.420.42
Total Solids kg/dayTotal Solids kg/day 1.471.47 1.631.63 1.761.76 1.721.72
Solids not Fat kg/daySolids not Fat kg/day 1.031.03 1.121.12 1.231.23 1.191.19
Milk Urea NitrogenMilk Urea Nitrogen
(mg/dl)(mg/dl)
21.6621.66 24.2924.29 26.9426.94 28.1128.11
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
22/25
2222
Environmental Concerns ofEnvironmental Concerns of
Animal WasteAnimal WasteAnimal waste causes N and P leaching toAnimal waste causes N and P leaching to
the soil, water and airthe soil, water and air
Excess of N and P from animal manureExcess of N and P from animal manure
may spread out from the area of animalmay spread out from the area of animal
production and cause Nitrate pollution inproduction and cause Nitrate pollution indrinking water for humans and livestockdrinking water for humans and livestock
(Jacques(Jacques et alet al., 1989)., 1989)
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
23/25
2323
Health RisksHealth Risks
Salmonella, ESalmonella, E--Coli and CampylobacterColi and Campylobacterwere checked but not detected inwere checked but not detected in
processed broiler litterprocessed broiler litter
(Haapapuro, 1997)(Haapapuro, 1997)
(Jeffrey(Jeffrey et alet al., 1998)., 1998)
There may be a severe risk to health ofThere may be a severe risk to health of
animals and consumers due to wronganimals and consumers due to wrong
processing techniques. Extra care must beprocessing techniques. Extra care must betaken when using Animal Dung/Poultrytaken when using Animal Dung/Poultry
Litter as Feed for LivestockLitter as Feed for Livestock
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
24/25
2424
ConclusionsConclusions
Fermented Animal dung is a good andFermented Animal dung is a good andeconomical source to improve nutritiveeconomical source to improve nutritivevalue of roughagesvalue of roughages
Animal dung does not improve digestibilityAnimal dung does not improve digestibilityand FCR significantly but improvesand FCR significantly but improvesNutrients Intake, Ruminal Characteristics,Nutrients Intake, Ruminal Characteristics,Weight gain, milk quantity and qualityWeight gain, milk quantity and quality
Processing of Animal Waste is helpful toProcessing of Animal Waste is helpful toeliminate pollution caused by Animaleliminate pollution caused by Animalexcretaexcreta
-
8/7/2019 Effect of Animal Dung as Feed on Production Performance of Cattle and Buffalo (by M. Nauman Manzoor)
25/25
2525