EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

download EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

of 26

Transcript of EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    1/26

    Control Systems 2015

    2 Career Avenues

    Control

    Systems

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    2/26

    Control Systems 2015

    3 Career Avenues

    IndexChapter: -1 Control systems : Introduction1.1 Introduction

    1.2 Definitions and Terminology

    1.3 Example of Control Systems

    1.4 Closed-Loop and Open-Loop Control Systems

    1.5 Closed-loop versus open-loop control systems

    1.6 The Control Problems

    1.7 Response Characteristics and System Configurations

    1.8 Analysis and Design Objectives

    1.9 The Design Process

    Chapter: - 2 Laplace Transform and Transform Function

    2.1 Dynamic Systems

    2.2 Review of Complex Variables and Complex Functions

    2.3 Review of Laplace Transform

    2.4 Transfer Functions

    Chapter: - 3 Reduction of Multiple Subsystems

    3.1 Introduction

    3.2 Block diagrams

    3.3 Signal Flow Graphs

    3.4 Masons rule

    Chapter: -4Modeling a Control System

    4.1 Analogous Systems

    4.2 Electrical Systems

    4.3 Mechanical Systems

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    3/26

    Control Systems 2015

    4 Career Avenues

    Chapter: - 5Time Response

    5.1 Poles, Zeros, and System Response

    5.2 First Order Systems

    5.3 Second Order System: Introduction

    5.4 The General Second Order System5.5 Type of a transfer function and steady-state errors

    5.6 Sensitivity

    Chapter: - 6 Control Action

    6.1 Introduction

    6.2 Proportional Control

    6.3 Derivative Control

    6.4 Integral Control

    6.5 Proportional plus Integral plus Derivative Control

    6.6 PID controller theory further explanation

    Chapter: - 7 STABILITY

    7.1 Introduction

    7.2 Routh-Hurwitz criterion

    7.3 Routh - Hurwitz criterion: special cases

    7.4 Routh-Hurwitz criterion: additional examples

    Chapter: - SYSTEM STABILITY

    8.1 Review of System Stability and Some Concepts Related to Poles and Zero.8.2 Sketch the Polar plot of Frequency Response

    8.3 Nyquist Criterion and Diagram

    8.4 Cauchys Principle of Argument

    8.5 Nyquist Criterion

    Chapter:- Bode Plots and Gain Adjustments Compensation

    9.1 Introduction

    9.2 Plotting frequency response

    9.3 Asymptotic Approximations: Bode Plots

    9.4 Bode plots for Second-order9.5 Stability, Gain Margin, and Phase Margin via Bode Plots

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    4/26

    Control Systems 2015

    5 Career Avenues

    Chapter: - Root Locus Techniques

    10.1 Introductions10.2 The root locus concept

    10.3 Construction Rules

    Chapter: - Compensation of Control Systems

    11.1 LEAD COMPENSATOR

    11.2 LEAD COMPENSATOR DESIGN USING ROOT LOCUS TECHNIQUES

    11.3 BODE DESIGN OF LEAD COMPENSATOR

    11.4 LAG COMPENSATOR DESIGN USING BODE PLOTS

    11.5 BODE DESIGN OF LAG COMPENSATOR

    11.6 LAG-LEAD COMPENSATOR DESIGN USING BODE PLOTS

    11.7 Design procedure: Compensator Structure

    Chapter:- State space representation of control system

    12.1 Introduction

    12.2 SOME OBSERVATIONS

    10.3 THE GENERAL STATE-SPACE REPRESENTATION

    12.4 APPLYING THE STATE-SPACE REPRESENTATION

    12.5 CONVERTING A TRANSFER FUNCTION TO STATE SPACE

    12.6 CONVERTING A STATE SPACE TO TRANSFER FUNCTION

    12.6 CONTROLLABILITY AND OBSERVABILITY

    12.7 METHODS INVOLVING EIGEN VALUES

    12.8 FREQUENCY-DOMAIN SOLUTION OF THE STATE EQUATION

    12.9 FINDING THE STATE TRANSITION MATRIX12.10 STATE EQUATION FROM TRANSFER FUNCTIONS

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    5/26

    Control Systems 2015

    6 Career Avenues

    CHAPTER 1

    Control systems : Introduction

    1.1 Introduction

    Control systems are everywhere around us, they regulate temperature in homes, stabilize aircraft and

    spacecraft, affect production of food by regulating the quality and purity of produce, are used inrefineries, and so on.

    A system is generally made up of components which could be mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, and/orpneumatic. The function of the control system is to regulate the output of the system in accordancewith some input signal. The controlled output may be position, velocity, acceleration, temperature, etc.The output is required to track and follow the input signal as closely as possible. The output ismeasured by using transducers and, fed back to the controller in order to correct deviations from theinput signal. This is referred to as feedback and is an essential element of closed-loopcontrol systems.When feedback is not used, we have an open-loopcontrol system.

    In closed-loop control systems, feedback is used for calculating the error which is the difference

    between the input and output signals. The error signal is then filtered, amplified and applied to apower element within the system such as an electrical motor, hydraulic valve/ram) that acts upon thequantity to be controlled.

    Modern control is increasingly based on having an electrical signal as input and having transducersthat produce electrical signals as a measure of the output. These are then fed into the controller whichacts upon the system being controlled. Computers are increasingly used in control applications.

    1.2. Definitions and Terminology

    Controlled Variable and Manipulated Variable:The controlled variable is the quantity or condition that is measured and controlled. The manipulated

    variable is the quantity or condition that is varied by the controller so as to affect the value of the

    controlled variable. Normally, the controlled variable is the output of the system.

    Control:

    Control means measuring the value of the controlled variable of the system and applying themanipulated variable to the system to correct or limit deviation of the measured value from a desiredvalue.

    Plants:

    A plant may be a piece of equipment, perhaps just a set of machine parts functioning together, thepurpose of which is to perform a particular operation. In this book, we shall call any physical object tobe controlled (such as a mechanical device, a heating furnace, a chemical reactor, or a spacecraft) aplant.

    Processes:Defined as natural, progressively continuing operation or development marked by a series of gradualchanges that succeed one another in a relatively fixed way and lead toward a particular result or end;or an artificial or voluntary, progressively continuing operation that consists of a series of controlledactions or movements systematically directed toward a particular result or end. In this book we shallcall any operation to be controlled a process. Examples are chemical, economic, and biological

    processes.

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    6/26

    Control Systems 2015

    7 Career Avenues

    Systems:A system is a combination of components that act together and perform a certain objective. A systemis not limited to physical ones. The concept of the system can be applied to abstract, dynamic

    phenomena such as those encountered in economics. The word system should, therefore, beinterpreted to imply physical, biological, economic, and the like, systems.

    Disturbances:

    A disturbance is a signal that tends to adversely affect the value of the output of a system. If adisturbance is generated within the system, it is called internal, while an external disturbance isgenerated outside the system and is an input.

    Feedback Control systems:

    A system that maintains a prescribed relationship between the output and the reference input bycomparing them and using the difference as a means of control is called a feedback control system.An example would be a room-temperature control system. By measuring the actual room temperatureand comparing it with the reference temperature (desired temperature), the thermostat turns the heatingor cooling equipment on or off in such a way as to ensure that the room temperature remains at acomfortable level regardless of outside conditions.

    1.3. Example of Control Systems

    An example of a closed-loop system is a temperature-control system in a room. For this system wewish to maintain, automatically, the temperature of the room at a desired value. To control any

    physical variable, which we usually call a signal,we must know the value of this variable, that is, wemust measure this variable. We call the system for the measurement of a variable a sensor. In thissystem, the sensor is a thermistor. Thermistor is a device which has a resistance that varies withtemperature. By measuring this resistance, we obtain a measure of the temperature.

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    7/26

    Control Systems 2015

    8 Career Avenues

    We defined theplant of a control system as that part of the system to be controlled. It is assumed inthis example that the temperature is increased by activating a gas furnace or a heating sub-system.Hence the plant input is the electrical signal that activates the furnace, and the plant output signal isthe actual temperature of the living area. The plant is represented as shown in the above figure. In thisexample, the output of each of the systems is connected to the input of the other, to form the closed

    loop. In most closed-loop control systems, it is necessary to connect a third system into the loop toobtain satisfactory characteristics for the total system. This additional system is called a compensatoror a controller.

    The usual form of a single loop closed-loop control system is as follows:

    The system input is a reference signal; usually we want the system output to be equal to this input.In the temperature-control system, this input is the setting of theDesired Temperature. If we want tochange the temperature, we change the system input. The system output is measured by the sensor,and this measured value is compared with (subtracted from) the input. This difference signal iscalled the error signal, or simply the error. If the output is equal to the input, this difference is zero,and no signal reaches the plant. Hence the plant output remains at its current value. If the error isnot zero, in a properly designed system the error signal causes a response in the plant such that themagnitude of the error is reduced. The compensator is a filter for the error signal, since usually

    satisfactory operation does not occur if the error signal is applied directly to the plant.

    1.4. Closed-Loop and Open-Loop Control Systems

    Open-loop control systems:Those systems in which the output has no effect on the control action are called open-loop controlsystems. In other words, in an open-loop control system the output is neither measured nor fed backfor comparison with the input. One practical example is a washing machine. Soaking, washing, andrinsing in the washer operate on a time basis. The machine does not measure the output signal, that is,the cleanliness of the clothes.

    In any open-loop control system the output is not compared with the reference input. Thus, to eachreference input there, corresponds a fixed operating condition; as a result, the accuracy of the system

    depends on calibration. In the presence of disturbances, an open-loop control system will not performthe desired task. Open-loop control can be used, in practice, only if the relationship between the inputand output is known and if there are neither internal nor external disturbances. Clearly, such systemsare not feedback control systems. Note that any control system that operates on a time basis is openloop. For instance, traffic control by means of signals operated on a time basis is another example ofopen-loop control.

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    8/26

    Control Systems 2015

    9 Career Avenues

    Closed-loop control systems:

    Feedback control systems are often referred to as closed-loop control systems. In practice, the termsfeedback control and closed-loop control are used interchangeably. In a closed-loop control systemthe actuating error signal, which is the difference between the input signal and the feedback signal(which may be the output signal itself or a function of the output signal and its derivatives and/orintegrals), is fed to the controller so as to reduce the error and bring the output of the system to a

    desired value. The term closed-loop control always implies the use of feedback control action in orderto reduce system error.

    1.5. Closed-loop versus open-loop control systems

    An advantage of the closed loop control system is the fact that the use of feedback makes the systemresponse relatively insensitive to external disturbances and internal variations in system parameters. Itis thus possible to use relatively inaccurate and inexpensive components to obtain the accurate controlof a given plant, whereas doing so is impossible in the open-loop case. From the point of view ofstability, the open-loop control system is easier to build because system stability is not a major

    problem. On the other hand, stability is a major problem in the closed-loop control system, which maytend to overcorrect errors that can cause oscillations of constant or changing amplitude.

    1.6. The Control Problems

    We may state the control problem as follows. A physical system or process is to be accuratelycontrolled through closed-loop, or feedback, operation. An output variable, called the response, isadjusted as required by the error signal. This error signal is the difference between the systemresponse, as measured by a sensor, and the reference signal, which represents the desired systemresponse.

    Generally a controller, or compensator, is required to filter the error signal in order that certain controlcriteria, or specifications, are satisfied. These criteria may involve, but not be limited to:1. Disturbance rejection

    2. Steady-state errors3. Transient response characteristics4. Sensitivity to parameter changes in the plant

    Solving in control problem generally involves1. Choosing sensors to measure the plant output2. Choosing actuators to drive the plant3. Developing the plant, actuator, and sensor equations (models)4. Designing the controller based on the developed models and the control criteria5. Evaluating the design analytically, by simulation, and finally, by testing the physical system6. If the physical tests are unsatisfactory, iterating these steps

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    9/26

    10

    The relatio

    below.

    1.7. Respo

    Response c

    Inp

    Out

    Tra

    Stea

    resp

    Stea

    Two major

    I

    areer Aven

    ship of mat

    se Charact

    aracteristic

    t/stimulus

    ut the act

    sient respo

    dy-state res

    onse

    dy-state err

    system conf

    pen-Loop

    t consists o

    nput transd

    rives a pr

    ues

    ematical a

    eristics and

    input, out

    a desired r

    al respons

    se a grad

    onse afte

    r the diff

    igurations o

    ystems a

    subsystem

    ucerconver

    cess or pla

    alysis and

    System C

    put, transie

    F

    sponse

    al change b

    r the transi

    rences bet

    f control sy

    shown in

    called an i

    ts the form

    t. Other si

    esign to ph

    nfiguratio

    t response,

    igure 1.2

    efore the st

    nt response

    een input a

    tems:

    igure 1.2.

    put transdu

    of the inpu

    gnals, such

    sical-syste

    s

    steady-state

    ady-state re

    , which is i

    d output

    cer, control

    to that use

    as disturb

    Control S

    design pr

    response an

    sponse

    s approxim

    ler and pro

    d by theco

    nces, are s

    stems 20

    cedures is

    d steady-sta

    ation to the

    ess or plant

    ntroller. Co

    own adde

    15

    epicted

    te error

    desired

    .

    ntroller

    to the

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    10/26

    Control Systems 2015

    11 Career Avenues

    controller and process outputs via summing junctions.The open-loop system cannot correctfor these disturbances.Examples toasters, washing machine (washing process)

    Figure 1.3

    Closed-Loop (Feedback Control) Systems The disadvantages of open-loop systems may

    be overcome in closed-loop system as shown in Figure 1.3. An output transducer/ sensor,

    measures the output response and converts into the form used by controller. The closed-loop systems measured the output response through a feedback path, and comparing that

    response to the input at the summing junction. If there is any difference between the two

    responses, the system drives the plant, via the actuating signal, to make a correction. If

    there is no difference, the system does not drive the plant.

    Examples air conditioning, lift, washing machine (water level control)

    Figure 1.4

    Controller

    Process

    Or Plant+

    -

    Error

    SummingJunction

    Input

    Transducer

    OutputTransducer= sensor

    SummingJunction

    SummingJunction

    + +

    + +

    Disturbances 1 Disturbances 2

    Controller

    ProcessOr Plant

    InputTransducer

    SummingJunction

    SummingJunction

    + +

    + +

    Disturbances 1 Disturbances 2

    Input= ref

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    11/26

    Control Systems 2015

    12 Career Avenues

    The differences between open and closed-loop system are:

    Closed-Loop System Open-Loop System

    Have the feedback path. Does not have the feedback path.Greater accuracy. Not accurate.Less sensitive to noise, disturbances and

    changes in the environment.

    Sensitive to noise, disturbances and changes

    in the environment.The system can compare the output responsewith the input and make a correction if there isany difference.

    The system cannot correct the disturbances.

    More complex and expensive. Simple and inexpensive.

    1.8. Analysis and Design Objectives

    Control systems are dynamic: they respond to an input by undergoing a transient response beforereaching steady-state response that generally resembles the input.The 3 major objectives are:

    o Producing the desired transient responseo Reducing steady-state erroro Achieving stability

    Transient Response

    Important in control systemEx: In the case of an elevator, a slow transient makes passenger impatient, whereas an excessivelyrapid response makes them uncomfortable. Too fast a transient response could cause permanent

    physical damage. Therefore, we have to analyze the system for its existing transient response. Then,adjust parameters or design components to yield a desired transient response.

    Steady-State Response

    This response resembles the input and is usually what remains after the transients have decayed tozero. We define steady-state errors quantitatively, analyze a systems steady-state error, and thendesign corrective action to reduce this error.

    1.9. The Design Process

    The design of a control system follows these steps:1. Determine a physical system and specifications from requirements.2. Draw a functional block diagram.3. Represent the physical system as a schematic.4. Use the schematic to obtain a mathematical model such as a block diagram.5. Reduce the block diagram.6. Analyze and design the system to meet specified requirements and specifications that

    include stability, transient response and steady-state performance.

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    12/26

    Control Systems 2015

    13 Career Avenues

    This topic is for those students who dont have the knowledge of Laplace Transform and Transform

    Function. If you are already comfortable with these topics you can skip this chapter.

    CHAPTER 2

    Laplace Transform and Transform Function

    2.1. Dynamic Systems

    This course is about controlling dynamic systems. What makes dynamic systems unique anddistinctive is that dynamic systems have a memory. Their present output, y(t), does not just depend onthe present input signal value u(t), but on past inputs u() for t.

    The way this memory is described in mathematical form is through integral/differential equations. Inthis course, we will learn that even simple dynamic systems are modeled by derivative and integralterms.

    The Laplace transform allows us to transform these integral/differential equations into simpler

    algebraic equations and solving them. It is a method for solving differential equations andcorresponding initial and boundary value problems.

    2.2. Review of Complex Variables and Complex Functions

    Analysis of dynamic systems relies heavily on the theories associated with complex variables andcomplex functions. A complex number has a real part and an imaginary part, both of which areconstant. If the real part and/or imaginary part are variables, a complex number is called a complexvariable. In the Laplace transformation, we use the notation s as a complex variable; that is,s= +jwhere is the real part and is the imaginary part.

    Complex function:

    A complex function F(s), a function of s, has a real part and an imaginary part orF(s) = Fx+ jFy

    where Fx is the real part and jFy is the imaginary part. F(s) can be represented graphically in thecomplex plane as follows:

    I

    Re

    Fy

    Fx

    |F|

    F(s)

    )(sF-

    Fy

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    13/26

    Control Systems 2015

    14 Career Avenues

    The magnitude of F(s) is denoted by |F| and is equal to22

    yx FF . Its angle is obtained as)/(tan 1 xy FF

    . The angle is measured counterclockwise from the positive real axis.

    The complex conjugate of F(s) is defined as yxjFFF

    . Another form in which complex conjugate

    is denoted is*

    F .Note that the magnitude of F(s), denoted by |F|, can also be defined as:22

    yx FFFFF

    2.3. Review of Laplace Transform

    We can convert many common functions, such as sinusoidal functions, differential equations, andexponential functions, into algebraic functions of a complex variable s. Operations such asdifferentiation and integration can be replaced by algebraic operations in the complex plane. Thus, alinear differential equation can be transformed into an algebraic equation in a complex variable s. Ifthe algebraic equation in s is solved for the dependent variable, then the solution of the differentialequation (the inverse Laplace transform of the dependent variable) may be found by use of a Laplacetransform table or by use of the partial-fraction expansion technique.

    An advantage of the Laplace transform method is that it allows the use of graphical techniques forpredicting the system performance without actually solving system differential equations. Anotheradvantage of the Laplace transform method is that, when we solve the differential equation, both thetransient component and steady-state component of the solution can be obtained simultaneously.

    Let us define

    f(t) = a function of time t such thatf (t) = 0 for t < 0

    s = a complex variableL = an operational symbol indicating that the quantity that it prefixes is to be transformed by the

    Laplace integral

    0)( dtetf st

    .F(s) = Laplace transform off (t)

    Then the Laplace transform off (t) is given by

    0

    )()()]([ dtetfsFtfL st

    Laplace transform of common functions have been tabulated [see the text book page 40] and are usedto transform the time domain functionsf(t)into their Laplace form directly from tables and, vice versa.

    Important Properties of Laplace Transforms

    Real differentiation theorem.

    The Laplace transform of the derivative of a functionf (t) is given by

    )0()(])(

    [ fssFdt

    tdfL

    where f (0) is the initial value off (t) evaluated at t = 0.Similarly, we obtain the following relationship for the second derivative off(t) applies:

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    14/26

    Control Systems 2015

    15 Career Avenues

    )0()0()(])(

    [ 22

    2

    sffsFsdt

    tfdL

    and for theth

    n derivative:

    )0()0(...)0()0()(])(

    [)1()2(

    21

    nn

    nnn

    n

    n

    ffsfsfssFsdt

    tfdL

    In most of the problems that we will consider in this course, it is assumed that the initial values of f (t)

    and its derivatives are equal to zero, then the Laplace transform of theth

    n derivative off (t)is given by

    )(sFsn .

    Real-integration theorem.

    Similarly to above, the Laplace transform of dttf )( exists and is given by

    sf

    s

    sF

    dttfL

    )0()(

    )(

    1

    for zero initial value,

    s

    sFdttfL

    )()(

    .

    Final-value theorem.

    The final-value theorem is extensively used throughout the course and relates the steady-state behavioroff (t) to the behavior of sF(s) in the neighborhood of s = 0. The final-value theorem may be stated asfollows:

    If f (t) and df (t)/dt are Laplace transformable, if F(s) is the Laplace transform of f (t), and if)(lim tft exists, then

    )(lim)(lim 0 ssFtf st

    This formula allows you to calculate the final steady state value off(t)by using F(s)without having toconvert F(s)back into its time domain representationf(t).

    Other important properties of Laplace transforms are tabulated in the text book page 41.

    Inverse Laplace Transformation

    The reverse process of finding the time functionf(t) from the Laplace transform F(s) is

    called the inverse Laplace transformation. The notation for the inverse Laplace transformation is1

    L ,and the inverse Laplace transform can be found from F(s)by the following inversion integral:

    jc

    jc

    stdsesF

    jtfsFL )(

    2

    1)()]([1

    for t>0where cis a constant related to the stability and convergence of the integral.

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    15/26

    Control Systems 2015

    16 Career Avenues

    Evaluating the inversion integral appears complicated. In practice, we seldom usethis integral for finding f(t). Instead, we usually decompose the F(s) into a simpler form by using

    partial fraction expansion and, then use a conversion table to obtain the time domain equivalent of thepartial fractions.

    If a particular transform F(s) cannot be found in a table, then we expand it into partial fractions and

    write F(s) in terms of simple functions of s for which the inverse Laplace transforms are alreadyknown.

    Partial-fraction expansion method for finding inverse Laplace transforms:

    For problems in control systems analysis, F(s), the Laplace transform of f (t), frequently occurs in theformF(s) =B(s)/A(s) where A(s) and B(s) are polynomials in s. In the expansion of F(s) = B(s)/A(s) into a

    partial-fraction form, it is important that the highest power of s inA(s) be greater than the highestpower of s inB(s). If such is not the case, the numeratorB(s)must be divided by the denominatorA(s)in order to produce a polynomial in splus a remainder (a ratio of polynomials in s whose numerator isof lower degree than the denominator).

    If F(s) is broken up into components,)(...)()( 1 sFsFsF n then its inverse Laplace transform is

    obtained as:

    )(...)()(...)()( 11

    111 tftfsFLsFLsFL nn

    The advantage of the partial-fraction expansion approach is that the individual terms of F(s), resultingfrom the expansion into partial-fraction form, are very simple functions of s; consequently, it is notnecessary to refer to a Laplace transform table if we memorize several simple Laplace transform pairs.It should be noted, however, that in applying the partial-fraction expansion technique in the search forthe inverse Laplace transform of F(s)=B(s)/A(s) the roots of the denominator polynomial A(s) must

    be obtained in advance. That is, this method does not apply until the denominator polynomial hasbeen factored.

    Partial-fraction expansion whenF(s) involves distinct poles only:

    Consider F(s) written in the factored form

    ))...((

    ))...((

    )(

    )()(

    1

    1

    n

    m

    psps

    zszsK

    sA

    sBsF

    for m< n

    wherep andzare either real or complex quantities.

    If F(s)involves distinct poles only, then it can be expanded into a sum of simple partial fractions asfollows:

    n

    n

    ps

    a

    ps

    a

    sA

    sBsF

    ...

    )(

    )()(

    1

    1

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    16/26

    Control Systems 2015

    17 Career Avenues

    where ka

    (k= 1, 2, . . . , n) are constants. The coefficient ka

    is called the residue at the pole at

    kps . The value of ka can be found by multiplying both sides of the above Equation by )( kps

    and letting kps

    which gives:

    kps

    kksAsBpsa

    )()(

    since:

    tp

    k

    k

    k keaps

    aL

    1

    thenf(t) is obtained astp

    n

    tp neaeatf ...)( 11 for all .0t

    2.4. Transfer Functions

    A mathematical model of a dynamic system is defined as a set of equations that represents thedynamics of the system accurately or, at least, fairly well. Note that a mathematical model is not

    unique to a given system. A system may be represented in many different ways and, therefore, mayhave many mathematical models, depending on one's perspective. The degree of accuracy andcomplexity of models is very much dependent on the use and application that they are intended for.

    The dynamics of many systems, whether they are mechanical, electrical, thermal, economic,biological, and so on, may be described in terms of differential equations. Such differential equationsmay be obtained by using physical laws governing a particular system, for example, Newton's laws formechanical systems and Kirchhoff's laws for electrical systems. We must always keep in mind thatderiving a reasonable mathematical model is the most important part of the entire analysis.

    Mathematical models

    Mathematical models may assume many different forms. We will consider be considering the

    transient-response or frequency-response analysis of single-input-single-output, linear, time-invariantsystems. Here, a transfer function representation is more convenient than any other. Once amathematical model of a system is obtained, various analytical and computer tools can be used foranalysis and synthesis purposes.

    Simplicity versus accuracy

    It is possible to improve the accuracy of a mathematical model by increasing its complexity. In somecases, we include hundreds of equations to describe a complete system at a certain level of accuracy.If extreme accuracy is not needed, however, it is preferable to obtain only a reasonably simplifiedmodel. In fact, we are generally satisfied if we can obtain a mathematical model that is adequate forthe problem under consideration. It is important to note, however, that the results obtained from theanalysis are valid only to the extent that the model approximates a given dynamic system.

    In general, in solving a new problem, we find it desirable first to build a simplified model so that wecan get a general feeling for the solution. A more complete mathematical model may then be built andused for a more complete analysis.

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    17/26

    Control Systems 2015

    18 Career Avenues

    Linear systems

    A system is called linear if the principle of superposition applies. The principle of superposition statesthat the response produced by the simultaneous application of two different forcing functions is thesum of the two individual responses. Hence, for the linear system, the response to several inputs can

    be calculated by treating one input at a time and adding the results. It is this principle that allows oneto build up complicated solutions to the linear differential equation from simple solutions.

    Linear time-invariant systems and linear time-varying systems

    A differential equation is linear if the coefficients are constants or functions only of the independentvariable. Dynamic systems that are composed of linear time-invariant lumped-parameter componentsmay be described by linear time-invariant (constant coefficient) differential equations. Such systemsare called linear time-invariant (orlinear constant-coefficient) systems. Systems that are represented

    by differential equations whose coefficients are functions of time are called linear time-varyingsystems. An example of a time-varying control system is a spacecraft control system. (i.e. mass of aspacecraft changes due to fuel consumption.)

    Nonlinear systems

    A system is nonlinear if the principle of super-position does not apply. Thus, for a nonlinear systemthe response to two inputs cannot be calculated by treating one input at a time and adding the results.Although many physical relationships are often represented by linear equations, in most cases actualrelationships are not quite linear. In fact, a careful study of physical systems reveals that even so-called "linear systems" are really linear only in limited operating ranges. In practice, manyelectromechanical systems, hydraulic systems, pneumatic systems, and so on, involve nonlinearrelationships among the variables. For example, the output of a component may saturate for largeinput signals. There may be a dead space that affects small signals. (The dead space of a component isa small range of input variations to which the component is insensitive). Square-law nonlinearity mayoccur in some components. For instance, dampers used in physical systems may be linear for low-velocity operations but may become nonlinear at high velocities, and the damping force may become

    proportional to the square of the operating velocity. Examples of characteristic curves for these

    nonlinearities are shown in your text.

    Transfer Functions

    In control theory, functions called transfer functions are commonly used to characterize the input-output relationships of components or systems that can be described by linear, time-invariant,differential equation.

    The transfer function of a linear, time-invariant, differential equation system is defined as the ratio ofthe Laplace transform of the output (response function) to the Laplace transform of the input (drivingfunction) under the assumption that all initial conditions are zero. Consider the linear time-invariantsystem defined by the following differential equation:

    xbxbxbxbyayayayamm

    mm

    onn

    nn

    o

    1

    )1(

    1

    )(

    1

    )1(

    1

    )(

    ......

    whereyis the output of the system andxis the input. The transfer function of this system is obtainedby taking the Laplace transforms of both sides of the above equation, under the assumption that allinitial conditions are zero.

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    18/26

    Control Systems 2015

    19 Career Avenues

    Transfer function = nnnn

    o

    mm

    mm

    o

    asasasa

    bsbsbsbsG

    11

    1

    11

    1

    ...

    ...)(

    By using the concept of transfer function, it is possible to represent system dynamics by algebraicequations in s. If the highest power of s in the denominator of the transfer function is equal to n, the

    system is called an nth-order system.

    Comments on transfer function

    The applicability of the concept of the transfer function is limited to linear, time-invariant, differentialequation systems. The transfer function approach, however, is extensively used in the analysis anddesign of such systems. In what follows, we shall list important comments concerning the transferfunction. (Note that in the list a system referred to is one described by a linear, time invariant,differential equation.)

    1. The transfer function of a system is a mathematical model in that it is an operational method ofexpressing the differential equation that relates the output variable to the input variable.

    2. The transfer function is a property of a system itself independent of the magnitude and nature

    of the input or driving function.3. The transfer function includes the units necessary to relate the input to the output; however, it

    does not provide any information concerning the physical structure of the system. (i.e. transferfunctions of many physically different systems can be identical.)

    4. If the transfer function of a system is known, the output or response can be studied for variousforms of inputs with a view toward understanding the nature of the system.

    5. If the transfer function of a system is unknown, it may be established experimentally byintroducing known inputs and studying the output of the system. Once established, a transferfunction gives a full description of the dynamic characteristics of the system, as distinct fromits physical description.

    To derive the transfer function, we proceed according to the following steps.1. Write the differential equation for the system.2. Take the Laplace transform of the differential equation, assuming all initial conditions are zero.3. Take the ratio of the Laplace transforms of the output to the input. This ratio is the transfer

    function.

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    19/26

    20

    Objectives

    After this c

    3.1 Introdu

    We have b

    More com

    response of

    single trans

    Then, we c

    information

    3.2 Block d

    In the previ

    presented.

    variable to t

    input variab

    graphically

    following fi

    model and t

    Many syste

    few more

    component

    areer Aven

    apter, you

    educe a blo

    rom input to

    nalyze and

    ction

    en working

    licated syst

    a single tra

    er function.

    n apply th

    about the e

    iagrams

    us section

    y definitio

    he Laplace

    le, Y(s)be t

    denoting th

    gure. The b

    he arrows r

    s are com

    lements su

    parts of a bl

    ues

    Reduct

    hould be ab

    k diagram o

    output

    esign for tra

    with indivi

    ems are re

    sfer functi

    analytical

    tire system

    he concept

    the transfe

    ransform o

    e output va

    relationshi

    ock represe

    present sig

    osed of mu

    h as summ

    ock diagra

    X(s)

    CH

    ion of

    le to:

    multiple su

    sient respon

    dual subsys

    resented b

    n can be ca

    techniques

    .

    f a transfer

    r function i

    the input v

    riable, and

    Y(s) = X(s

    ts a transfe

    als (e.g. ele

    ltiple subsy

    ing junctio

    for a linear

    F

    G(

    PTER

    ultiple

    systems to

    se, a system

    tems repres

    the interc

    culated, we

    of the previ

    function fo

    the ratio o

    riable. Let

    (s) be the t

    )U(s)is thr

    r function c

    ctrical volta

    tems. Whe

    and picko

    , time-invar

    igure 3.1

    )

    3

    Subsys

    single bloc

    onsisting of

    ented by a

    onnection o

    want to rep

    ous chapter

    a linear ti

    the Laplace

    X(s)be the

    ransfer func

    ugh a block

    rrespondin

    ge from a p

    multiple s

    f points m

    ant system

    Y(s)

    Control S

    tems

    representing

    multiple sub

    lock with i

    f many su

    resent multi

    s and obtai

    e-invariant

    transform

    Laplace tra

    ion. Onem

    diagram, a

    to a syste

    sition sens

    bsystems a

    st be adde

    re shown i

    stems 20

    the transfer

    ystems

    s input and

    systems. Si

    ple subsyst

    transient r

    system was

    f the output

    nsform of t

    ethod of

    shown in t

    s mathem

    r).

    e interconn

    to the bl

    Figure 3.1.

    15

    function

    output.

    nce the

    ms as a

    esponse

    e)

    e

    tical

    ected, a

    ck. All

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    20/26

    21

    We will no

    transfer fun

    reducing m

    Cascade F

    Figure 3.2(

    transfer fun

    Parallel Fo

    Figure 3.3(

    in Figure 3.

    Feedback

    The third t

    simplified

    areer Aven

    examine

    ction repres

    re complic

    rm

    ) shows an

    ction.

    rm

    ) shows an

    3(b).

    orm

    opology is

    odel. We o

    ues

    ome comm

    entation for

    ted systems

    example of

    example of

    the feedba

    btain the eq

    n topologi

    each of th

    to a single

    cascaded su

    F

    arallel sub

    F

    k form as

    ivalent, or

    s for interc

    m. These

    lock.

    systems an

    igure 2.2

    ystems. Th

    igure 3.3

    shown in

    losed-loop,

    nnecting s

    ommon top

    d Figure 3.

    equivalent

    Figure 3.4(

    transfer fu

    Control S

    bsystems a

    ologies will

    (b) shows t

    transfer fun

    ) and Fig

    ction show

    stems 20

    d derive th

    form the

    e equivale

    ction, Ge(s)

    re 3.4(b) s

    in Figure 3

    15

    e single

    asis for

    t single

    appears

    hows a

    .4(c).

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    21/26

    22

    Moving Bl

    Figure 3.5

    past a sum

    Figure 3.6

    past a picko

    areer Aven

    cks to Cre

    hows equi

    ing junctio

    hows equi

    ff point.

    ues

    te Familia

    alent block

    .

    alent block

    Figure 3.

    Forms

    diagrams f

    diagrams f

    4 (a), (b) an

    rmed when

    rmed when

    d (c)

    transfer fu

    transfer fu

    Control S

    ctions are

    ctions are

    stems 20

    oved left

    oved left

    15

    r right

    r right

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    22/26

    d

    se

    a

    s

    s

    23

    igure 3.5:

    iagram alge

    umming junquivalent fo

    oving a bl

    .to the left

    umming jun

    .to the righ

    umming jun

    Figure 3.

    Block dia

    algebra fo

    pointsequivalen

    for movin

    a.to the l

    pickoff po

    b.to the r

    pickoff po

    areer Aven

    lock

    bra for

    ctionsrms for

    ck

    ast a

    ction;

    t past a

    ction

    ram

    r pickoff

    forms

    a block

    ft past a

    int;

    ght past a

    int

    ues

    Control S stems 2015

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    23/26

    24

    Ex 3.1 Red

    Answer:

    areer Aven

    ce the bloc

    ues

    diagram s

    own in Fig

    F

    re 3.7 to a

    igure 3.7

    ingle transf

    Control S

    er function.

    stems 20

    15

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    24/26

    25

    Ex 3.2 Red

    Answer:

    areer Aven

    cethe bloc

    ues

    k diagram s own in Fig

    F

    ure 3.8 to a

    igure 3.8

    single trans

    Control S

    er function.

    stems 20

    15

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    25/26

    26

    Do-it-your

    3.9.

    Answer:

    s

    sT

    2

    )(4

    areer Aven

    elf: Find t

    ss

    s

    2

    12

    3

    Rule

    Closed loop

    system

    Addition or

    subtraction

    Moving a

    starting poin

    Moving a

    summing po

    Cascaded

    elements

    ues

    e equivalen

    R(s)

    R(s)

    R(s)

    Table 3-1

    t

    int

    G1(s)

    G2

    R(s)

    +

    B(

    R(s) +

    G1(s

    transfer fu

    F

    Original syst

    +

    +

    G2(

    Some rules

    (s)

    G(s)

    -

    )

    G

    -

    ction, T(s)

    igure 3.9

    m

    B(s)

    C(s))

    or block dia

    C(s)

    C(s)

    C(s)(s)

    C(s)G(s)

    (s)

    C(s)/R(s) f

    Reduce

    R(s)

    ram reductio

    R(s)

    R(s)

    R(s) G(

    G(s

    G(s

    B(s)

    R(s)

    Control S

    r the syste

    d system

    B

    1(s)G2(s)

    1(s)+G2(s)

    C(s)s)

    )

    +

    stems 20

    shown in

    C(s)

    (s)

    (s)

    (b)

    (s)

    C(s)

    15

    igure

  • 7/25/2019 EE Control Systems Sample Career Avenues

    26/26

    Control Systems 2015

    Exercise: Consider the transfer function of the system shown in Fig. 3-9a. The final transfer functionis shown in Fig. 3-9d. Note that the first reduction involves a parallel combination; the secondinvolves a cascade combination.

    C(s)

    C(s)

    -+

    C(s)R(s) +

    -G1(s)

    Fig.3-9 Obtaining transfer function by block diagram reduction

    G3(s)

    G2(s)

    (a)

    (b)

    +

    +

    H1(s)

    G4(s)

    H2(s)

    -+

    R(s) +

    -G1(s)

    H2(s)

    )(

    )(

    4

    1

    sG

    sH

    G2(s)+G3(s) G4(s)C(s)

    H2(s)

    R(s) +

    -)]()()[(1

    )()]()([)(

    321

    4325

    sGsGsH

    sGsGsGsG

    G1(s)

    (c)

    (d)

    R(s))()()(1

    )()(251

    51

    sHsGsGsGsG

    First reduction

    Next reduction