Education Review Office

26
NZPF Moot - 2007 1 Education Review Office Ko te Tamaiti te Putake o te Kaupapa The Child the Heart of the Matter

description

Education Review Office. Ko te Tamaiti te Putake o te Kaupapa The Child the Heart of the Matter. Frances Salt Acting Chief Review Officer Graham Stoop Chief Review Officer (From 12 March 2007). To provide external evaluation that contributes to high quality education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Education Review Office

Page 1: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 20071

Education Review Office

Ko te Tamaiti te Putake o te Kaupapa

The Child the Heart of the Matter

Page 2: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 20072

Frances SaltActing Chief Review

Officer

Graham StoopChief Review Officer(From 12 March 2007)

Page 3: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 20073

The Purpose of the Education Review Office

To provide external evaluation thatcontributes to high quality education

for young New Zealanders

Page 4: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 20074

Education Review Office Work

160 Review Officers (statutory officers)

10 local ERO offices

900 school reviews per year

1200 early childhood reviews per year

3 yearly cycle of reviews

Page 5: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 20075

Rotorua

Napier

Wellington

Christchurch

Dunedin

Auckland

Hamilton

Wanganui

Nelson

Te Uepü-ä-Motu is a national team for reviews of kura kaupapa Mäori and köhanga reo.

Moana Pasefika, based in the Auckland Office, provides Pacific review support.

ERO’s Local Offices

Page 6: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 20076

Chief Review Officer Statutory Powers (S325-328 Ed. Act)

Power to

designate Review Officers

enter schools and early childhood centres

initiate reviews and investigations

report

(No power to enforce recommendations)

Page 7: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 20077

The Review Officer

The designated review officer

is a trained and qualified

professional evaluator

Page 8: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 20078

How ERO Evaluates

Manual of Standard Procedures Code of Ethical Conduct Evaluation Indicators Evidence-based judgements

Refer to: www.ero.govt.nz

Page 9: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 20079

ERO’s Reviews

Education Reviews Supplementary Reviews Special Reviews

Page 10: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200710

ERO’s Education Reviews

Participatory Focus on student achievementHave improvement as their

purposeAim to complement each

school’s own self-review

Page 11: Education Review Office

ERO’s Focus on Improvement

Compliance

Have we done it?

Improvement

How well have we done it?How much better can we do

it?

NZPF Moot - 200711

Page 12: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200712

ERO’s External Evaluation

Education Reviews: Three Strands

School Priorities Areas of National Interest Compliance Issues

Page 13: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200713

School Priorities Strand

Focused on student achievement

Linked to school self-review information

Usually different from previous review

Decided by ERO after scoping exercise

Page 14: Education Review Office

Areas of National Interest Strand

Evaluations undertaken in all applicable schools nationally for a set period of time

ERO decides on topics and duration of evaluation

Reported in ERO individual reports

Aggregated for ERO national reports

14NZPF Moot - 2007

Page 15: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200715

Areas of National Interest 2007Schools with Years 1 to 8

Term 1 Achievement of Mäori Students

Progress since last ERO review Achievement of Pacific Students Student Underachievement Engaging with

Families/Whänau/Communities

Page 16: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200716

Areas of National Interest Proposed Term 2 2007

Mäori Student Achievement

Pacific Student Achievement

Student Underachievement

Pandemic Planning

Page 17: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200717

Areas of National Interest Proposed Terms 3 & 4 2007

Pandemic Planning

Provision for Gifted and Talented Students

Environments for Learning

Page 18: Education Review Office

Compliance Issues Strand

Board Assurance Statement (BAS)Attestation of compliance by principal and board chairperson

ERO checks BAS as part of scoping ERO asks about five specific areas to do

with student safety– Student emotional and physical safety– Student attendance– Stand downs and suspensions– Teacher registration

18NZPF Moot - 2007

Page 19: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200719

ERO’s Reports

Schools and early childhood services

National evaluation reports

Cluster reports

Good practice guides

Page 20: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200720

Everybody seems to hateexternal evaluation while nobody

trusts internal evaluation

- David Nevo

Page 21: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200721

Leadership in External Evaluation

Know about evaluation Promote the value of external review Know about ERO’s approach Acknowledge evaluation anxiety Contribute your own self-review

findings

Page 22: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200722

Leadership in Internal Evaluation

Self review is a requirement for schools

The aim of self review is improvement

Start self review with analysis of student achievement results

Use ERO’s Evaluation Indicators a a basis for self review

Page 23: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200723

Self Review Traps

Over sophisticated techniques Under sophisticated thinking Poor implementation of techniques

such as interviews Too much evidence Too little questioning of

assumptions

Page 24: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200724

Who Reviews ERO?

Parliament’s Select Committee The Minister responsible for ERO Treasury The State Services Commission The Education Sector The Public

Page 25: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200725

To te konahi tona kiteTo te hinengaro tona kiteTo te wairua tona kite

The eye, the mind, the soulEach has its own perspective

Page 26: Education Review Office

NZPF Moot - 200726

Frances SaltEducation Review Office

[email protected]