Education Innovation Competitionlib.oup.com.au/he/Education/EIA/eia2014_ecewinner.pdf ·...
Transcript of Education Innovation Competitionlib.oup.com.au/he/Education/EIA/eia2014_ecewinner.pdf ·...
Designing Learning Spaces Early Years Classroom Design:
Early Years Outdoor Design:
Written-‐ Justification of Learning Spaces
Upon planning, researching and exploring for the design of my Early Years
Classroom, I grew in my ambition to create an indoor and outdoor space for
children that would thoughtfully and creatively endorse an enriched learning
environment. The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia (2009)
describes such an environment as flexible and welcoming, with aims to enrich
the lives of children through vibrant and supportive learning spaces. It also aims
to be responsive to the needs and interests of children, inviting for children as
well as families to raise questions, contribute ideas and embrace interests.
In particular, I have been inspired and informed by the Cai Guo-‐Qiang Exhibition
for kids at the Gallery of Modern Art (GOMA), and the innovative approaches to
learning GOMA has implemented to create enriched learning spaces for children.
While my design is not a replica of the Cai Guo-‐Qiang Exhibition for kids, it has
been inspired by the exhibition, as well as relevant literature and the Reggio
Emilia approach to classrooms for a Kindergarten.
At the entrance of the Kindergarten, parents and children are lead to the ‘Display
Corner’. Similar to the Cai Guo-‐Qiang Exhibition for kids, the ‘Display Corner’ is
an area where children have their work displayed upon easels, tables and walls.
In accordance with the ‘Narration’ dimension, this includes finished or
unfinished work, conversations, ideas, inquiry questions, thinking processes, and
a film of the children playing, exploring and creating. Bronwyn (2011) notes that
by displaying unfinished work, there remains a commitment, liveliness, an
invitation for a child or parent to pause, contemplate, imagine and observe the
not yet known and thought in progress. Regarding the space, Ceppi and Zini
(1998) suggest that the displayed materials create the presence of the children
despite their absence.
To the left of the ‘Display Corner’, I have created the ‘Listening Mat’. In
accordance with the Reggio Emilia philosophy, research suggests that listening
holds incredible value for early childhood learning, to create empathy, bonding,
respect, to abandon self in order to gain knowledge and create internal processes
(Ceppi & Zini 1998; Dahlbeg & Moss, 2005; Davies, 2000; Rinaldi, 2006). Further
to the left I have created the ‘Living Corner’, demonstrating ‘Osmosis’ a dimension
which relates the school to the outside world (Ceppi & Zini 1998). The ‘Living
Corner’ includes items that are real such as plates, vases, sofas, flowers and
clothes. Tarr (2001) notes that aspects of the home are in schools to provide
contexts of meaning and visual entities.
Furthermore, inspired by the Cai-‐Guo-‐Qiang Exhibition which had long desks set
in the middle of the room with ipads and art activities for children to choose to
engage in, I have created a space where children can engage in multimodal
learning experiences as well as a communal artistic space. The ‘Multimodal
Space’ offers a flexible space providing the ability for children to self-‐learn and
choose what they wish to engage in, which caters to their diverse needs,
interests and abilities (Ceppi & Zini 1998; Gandini, 2012). The ‘Creative Space’
offers a space where children gather to create with recycled, natural and
aesthetically rich materials such as flowers, wood, stones, feathers, sticks, shells,
sand to promote children’s imagination, a sense of interest, and exploration of
the open ended materials (Gandini, 2012). This is similar to the ‘Construct
Space’, where children use natural materials such as wood, bricks, cardboard, to
construct and build large entities such as boats, bridges or buildings. Topal and
Gandini (1999) suggest that materials are often used as expressions of the child’s
momentary feelings, and through restructuring and experimenting, children
modify, transform, adopt and observe ideas and explorations of others, which
creates meaningful and imaginative learning experiences of exploration.
The ‘Peaceful Corner’ and the ‘Soft Corner’ have been intentionally created in
accordance with the dimension of ‘Overall Softness’ and ‘Peace and Harmony’,
which provides spaces of privacy, peacefulness and pause, while retreating to a
world that breaks the rules and ridged routines of society (Ceppi & Zini 1998).
Similar to the Cai Guo-‐Qiang Exhibition which embraced an atmosphere of low
ceilings, soft lighting, community and peacefulness, The ‘Peaceful Corner’ is
made up of cushions a fish tank, plants, a small aquarium and Japanese features
such as a door, windows and lights. The ‘Soft Corner’ has abstract elements such
as white hexagonal cushions, limited windows, curtains, soft blue rugs, giant
books, torches to read and a light table, for children to explore the concept of
lights and shadows. This multisensory experience provides welcoming and
accepting notions of discovery and identity (Cadwell, 2003).
The outdoor Kindergarten space was also an environment in which I took much
joy in creating. Although the Cai Guo-‐Qiang Exhibition for kids did not display
outdoor learning areas, it did emphasise the activities on outdoor elements and
materials such as animals, lakes, trees, rocks, straw, and rocks. Thus I have
created the outdoor environment as a natural unstructured space, where
children can creatively play in a spacious and free environment.
The Queensland Kindergarten Learning Guidelines (2010) emphasise the
significance of children spending time in outdoor environments to enhance the
use of natural materials, social interaction and for children to engage in familiar
as well as new learning environments. In my design I have created a corner of
the outdoor environment with numerous tall, thick and large trees for children
to explore, titled ‘The Woods’. Galizio, Stoll & Hutchins (2009) emphasize the
multiple benefits for children beyond the standard playground. This includes the
development of physical skills, creative play, imaginative play, health related
benefits and motor skill development. Additionally, the Scandinavian approach
to outdoor learning environments include the ‘Forest Kindergartens’ where
children are free to self-‐learn, explore their natural surroundings, utilize solely
natural resources, deepen their understanding of the world as well as their
awareness of their natural environment (Neate, 2013)
I have also created a ‘Water Play’ area, where children can experiment with
water as a source of life, the ecosystem, and for aesthetic purposes. The area
includes a stream, rocks, water plants, a well, water buckets, a log and a
sprinkler. Using these materials, a Reggio Emilia approach is that children are
able to engage in child-‐directed inquiries related to sunlight, water schedules, life
cycles of plants, why the stream is high one day and lower the next, rain, insects
and water as a source of life (Clyde, Miller, Sauser & Liebert, 2006)
A child-‐directed inquiry may also be conducted in the ‘Green Zone’, which
includes a vegetable patch, a green house, a worm farm, compost bin and flower
walls. By inquiring into such natural environments, children are able to wonder,
question feel, experiment with have opened ended materials, make a deeper and
wider sense of their environment, and experience cognitive process in
familiarising with new concepts (Gillespie, 2000; Katz, 1998 & Seidel, 2001).
A ‘Yarning Circle’ is also available for children to engage in Indigenous Australian
cultural experiences. The circle is made by the gathering of logs to form a
communal space. Within the ‘Yarning Circle’ children may engage in traditional
indigenous stories, dances, music, conversation and art. The space is open for
family and members of the indigenous community to engage with, teach and
collaboratively learn with children. The dimension of ‘Sense of Community’ is
cultivated through child interaction between peers, adults, families and teachers,
where children feel that they belong and a sense of hierarchy is not present
(Ceppi & Zini, 1998). Evident in the ‘Yarning Circle’ the Reggio Emilia approach
to community learning is of children and their relationship with others, their
history and their societal and cultural surroundings as well as learning from
others (Rinaldi, 1993).
In conclusion, the design of my early years Kindergarten classroom and outdoor
environment has been inspired and informed by the Cai Guo-‐Qiang Exhibition for
Kids at GOMA, extensive research, and the Reggio Emilia approach to indoor and
outdoor physical environments. Through thoughtful and informed construction
of the learning environment, atmosphere, architecture, materials, resources and
natural elements, I have created an indoor and outdoor space that encourages
enriched learning experiences through the promotion of a child’s exploration,
inquiry, imagination, open ended learning abilities, diverse needs and play. Thus,
through the thoughtful creation of enriched learning spaces with emphasis on
relationship, aesthetics, pedagogy, culture and constructive learning
opportunities, I will continue creating and promoting positive learning spaces for
early years learning environments that align and endorse the environment as the
‘third teacher’ (Stonehouse, 2011).
References
Bronwyn, D. (2011). Open listening: Creative evolution in early childhood
settings. International Journal of Early Childhood, 43(2), 119-‐132.
Cadwell, L. (2003). Bringing learning to life: The reggio approach to early
childhood education. London: Teachers College Press.
Ceppi, G., & Zini, M. (Eds.). (1998). Children, spaces, relations: Metaproject for an
environment for young children. Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children.
Clyde, A., Miller, C., Sauser, S., & Liebert, K. (2006).Teachers and children inquire
into reggio emilia. (83 ed., Vol. 3, pp. 215-‐226). United States: National Council of
Teachers of English Conference on College Composition and Communication.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early
years learning framework for Australia. Australian Government Department of
Education, Employment and Workplace Relations for the Council of Australian
Governments.
Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education..
London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Davies, B. (2000). A body of writing 1989-1999. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.
Floorplanner. (2014)
Galizio, C., Stoll, J., & Hutchins, P. (2009). "We need a way to get to the other
side!" exploring the possibilities for learning. YC Young Children,64(4), 42-‐48.
Gandini, L. (2012). Connecting through caring and learning spaces. Cited in C.
Edwards, C., Gandini, L. Forman, G. (3rd Ed.) The hundred languages of children:
The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation. Santa Barbara, CA.: Praeger.
Gillespie, C. (2000). Six head start classrooms begin to explore the reggio emilia
approach. Young Children,55(1), 21-‐27.
Katz, L.G. (1998). What can we learn from reggio emilia?. In C. Edwards, L.
Gandini & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children (2 ed., pp. 27-‐45).
Westport: Ablex.
Neate, R. (2013). Campfire kids: Going back to nature with forest
kindergartens. Spiegel Online
Rinaldi, C. (1993). The emergent curriculum and social constructivism: An
interview with Lella Gandini. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (Eds.), The
hundred languages of children (2 ed., pp. 27-‐45). Westport: Ablex.
Rinaldi, C. (2006). Dialogue with reggio emilia. listening, researching and learning.
London: Routledge.
Seidel, S. (2001). Understanding documentation starts at home. In C. Guidici, C.
Rinaldi & M. Krechevsky (Eds.), Making learning visible: Children as individual
and group learners (pp. 304-‐311). Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children.
Stonehouse, A. (2011). The ‘third teacher’ creating child friendly learning spaces.
Putting Children First, 38, 12-‐14.
Tarr, P. (2001). Aesthetic codes in early childhood classrooms: What art
educators can learn from reggio emilia. Art Education, 54(3), 33-‐39.
The State of Queensland (Queensland Studies Authority) (2010) Queensland
Kindergarten Learning Guideline. Brisbane: QSA.
Topal, C. W., & Gandini, L. (1999). Beautiful stuffi learning with found materials.
Worcester, MA: Davis Publications.