Supreme

Allied

Commander

Transformation

LGEN Karlheinz Viereck DCOS Joint Force Trainer

Education and Training

in the context of the

Connected Forces Initiative

04 OCT 2012

www.e-NATO.net

2

Education, Training,

Exercises Budget

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2009 2010 2011 2012

M EUR

Does not include ACO costs; no overheads

CFI

3

Key Achievements

• No detailed Direction & Guidance • Developed SACEUR’s Annual

Guidance on ETEE 1 (SAGE)

• Exercise planning only

• Developed Training Integration Plan:

• Training & Education

Programming

• 3 Boards

• Training Synchronisation

Conference (TSC)

2009 2012

• NATO Training Group (NTG):

• 18 Standing Groups

• NTG: 5 Standing Groups with more

focused scope & limited duration

• NATO Partner Education and

Training Network (NEPTN)

• Information / Social Grouping

• Deleted NEPTN

• Partner fully integrated in E&T

1 ETEE = Education, Training, Exercises & Evaluation

4

Key Achievements

• Training Providers:

• 4 NATO Education & Training

Facilities (NETF)

• 2 Centres of Excellence (COE)

• 10 Partnership Training and

Education Centres (PTEC)

• Training Providers:

• 4 NETFs

• 16 COEs

• 24 PTCs

• 3 National E&T Institutions

(Norway, Latvia, Italy)

• ISAF Pre-Deployment Training:

28% participation

• ISAF Pre-Deployment Training:

69% participation

2009 2012

• Advanced Distributed Learning

(ADL) • e-Learning

• Concept

• SCORM Standard (Industry)

5

Resident Courses and ADL

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

2009 2010 2011 2012

Resident CoursesParticipants

ADL Accounts

6

Accumulated ADL Accounts ISAF Pre-Deployment Training

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

29 065

+ 1 025

This month

7

Chicago Defence Package

NATO Defence Planning Process (NDPP):

Enhance, associate Smart Defence and CFI

Connected Forces Initiative (CFI)

Education, Training and Exercises

ACT to make recommendations

Practical cooperation with UN, AU, EU

Commitment to transparency

Technology

CNAD and C3B to make recommendations

Partner Association

DPPC to make recommendations

Measures:

Increase inclusion of partners

Including the NRF

Expectation of reprocity

8

Expanded

Education & Training

Coherent command & control structure.

Fully exploit NATO’s existing education and training

resources: NETFs, COEs, PTECs & NATO Training

Centres (NTC).

Validate and certify the NATO education and training

provided.

9

Increased Exercises

Complement Allies’ national training through spectrum of conflict, to

high intensity and large scale (live) exercises, in line with NATO’s

Level of Ambition.

Streamline and simplify the management of exercises:

• Maximise NATO’s Exercise Support capacity (JWC / JFTC).

• Allow the NCS (deployable and static elements) and the NFS (those

nominated to complement the NCS) to conduct more NATO-led

exercises.

• Maximise linkages between NATO and national exercises.

• Enhance Partnership nations training within existing activities.

• Provide a venue for evaluations as required by ACO.

10

Enhanced Education and

(Individual) Training Budget

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

2009 2010 2011 2012

M EUR

+ e-ITEP

+ e-Learning

+ e-ITEP

+ ETOC

+ e-Learning

– NTG

– NEPTN

– e-Learning

– TMS

– Streamline KLT 1

1 KLT = Key Leader Training

11

Enhanced Education &

Training

Programming Structure established.

Education and Training Management: • Planning cycle established.

• e-ITEP supporting tool Initial Operating Capability (Oct12) online

• Education and Training Opportunities Catalogue Set Up.

International Educational Standards,

Quality Assurance (QA) and Accreditation: • Initial Educational Goals, Standards and QA Criteria established.

• QA Trial with CIMIC COE, HUMINT COE, NMIOTC, Turkish PFP

Training Centre and CASPOA.

• e-Learning world standards established.

• Immersive Learning online (won People’s Choice Award on I/ITSEC1)

1 I/ITSEC = Interservice/Industry Simulation & Education Conference

12

Education & Training

Programming

Training Requirements Analysis

(Operationalization)

Training Needs Analysis

Strategic Training Plan

New

Capabilities

or

Operational

Shortfalls

Training Management System

Political / Military Direction & Guidance

Requirements

Authority

Department

Head

13

MC Endorse- ment &

NAC Approval

of Non NATO Entities’

Activities

Jun P

rog

ram

min

g B

oard

I

Sep /

Oct

Pro

gra

mm

ing

Bo

ard

II

Nov/

Dec

Pro

gra

mm

ing

Bo

ard

III

Mar

Training Synch Conf

Jan /

Feb

Development + Programming Approval

Training Integration Plan

Requirements Definition

SA

CE

UR

’s A

nn

ua

l

Gu

ida

nc

e o

n E

TE

E

Jul

Bi-

SC

Co

ord

ina

tio

n

Apr

SACT’s

MTEP

Jul

Ide

nti

fy R

eq

uir

em

en

ts

May - Jun

Part

ner

Co

ord

inati

on

May/Jun

NF

S C

oo

rdin

ati

on

May/Jun

Exercise Planning

15

Subject CIMIC Gender Joint Planning

Module Situational

Awareness

Strategic Operational

Planning

Operations

Assessment

Course Course Course

NSO

(Oberammergau) Approved

Course

Department Head

CIMIC COE

(Enschede)

Department

Head

NCGMO

(Stockholm)

Department

Head

Approved Course

FINCENT

(Helsinki)

Approved Course

Norwegian Staff

College (Oslo)

Approved Course

LNDA

(Riga)

Approved Course

Education & Training

Management

16

Partner Education & Training

Key Principles

x + n Contribution

Capability Building

Means for Dialogue

Parity

Political Guidance

KEY PRINCIPLES

17

Expanded Exercises Budget

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2009 2010 2011 2012

M EUR

+ Scenario Development

+ Visible Assurance / Article 5

– Stop updating RSO-Scenario

– Exercise Streamlining

– Senior Mentors / Senior Advisors

18

Expanded Exercises

Management of exercises transferred to SACT IOC (August 2012) / FOC (December 2012).

New Exercise Programming Cycle (ACT lead) started last week, Board I.

MTEP online, real-time December 2012.

Revised MTEP Programming Coherent MTEP cycle

All players involved from the beginning

Incorporates NFS HQs

Increased linkages between NATO and national exercises

Collective Training Support Programme of Work (to be deleted)

Annual Major Exercise Support Capacity increased

(from 2 to 3-5 exercises)

New naming convention

Enhance Partner contribution to training

19

Consequence Management

Level of Ambition Compliance

Increased Live Exercises

Framework for NFS

Framework for National Exercises

?

20

Exercising NATO towards

“NATO 2020”

Goal: Able to fight side by side and maintain at high level

Steady loss of operational capability to be compensated

New forms of division-of-labour

Task sharing

Reliance on

NFS is fundamental

Maximize NATO national exercises

CFI: more exercises to be conducted

NATO common funding enabler

Keep adaptive to support shared activities

Increased strategic/live exercises =

increased budget requirements