EcoStructure
-
Upload
andrea-govi -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
4
description
Transcript of EcoStructure
ECOSTRUCTURE
6
MF3A
Franz Bittenbinder Mattia Di CarloAlberto GiacopelliAndrea GoviAntonio La Marca
Project developed with Politecnico di Milano School of Architecture and SocietyM.Sc. Architecture Town Planning design WorkshopProf. Stefano Boeri / Prof. Michele Brunello
February 2015
contacts:MF3A architectureVia Pacini 48 / Milan / [email protected]
7
Introduction
Concept
Path
Analysis
Structure
Biodiversity
Masterplan
Focus areas
Views
Installation
INDEX
8
10
12
22
24
30
34
36
42
44
8
In the history of our cities we can find a lot of different scenarios, which reveal the schizofrenic relationship of our built environment with nature: On the one hand cities are created to include nature employing the benefits of green spaces and using animals for our purposes, whereas on the other hand we need distance from it to be safe from its dangers and threats.
Important personalities of the 20th century devoted themselves to this ambiguious topic thinking about possible scenarios: The Florentine artist Giacomo Costa, for instance, is convinced that nature always wins out over the artiificial world conquering it ultimately. This is depicted in compositions like “Private Garden”.
The writer Italo Calvino on the other hand sees human kind able to choose about its ultimate fate: In his opinion we can choose to become a part of the surrounding hell we live in or to give more space to the things that we regard as worthy for ourselves.
The Ecostructure takes up this thought stating that biodiversity is one of these non-hell-things which needs to be fostered in our cities. By implementing a new superimposed structure to the city of Milan the project enriches the biodiversity serving both men and animals likewise.
INTRODUCTION “Architecture should have little to do with problem solving - rather it should create desiderable conditions and opportunities hitherto thought impossible.”
Cedric Price
right image - Giacomo Costa “Private Garden”
“L’inferno dei viventi non è qualcosa che sarà; se ce n’è uno, è quello che è già qui, l’inferno che abitiamo tutti i giorni, che formiamo stando insieme. Due modi ci
sono per non soffrirne. Il primo riesce facile a molti: accettare l’inferno e diventarne parte fino al punto di non vederlo più. Il secondo è rischioso ed esige attenzione
e apprendimento continui: cercare e saper riconoscere chi e cosa, in mezzo all’inferno, non è inferno,
e farlo durare, e dargli spazio.”
The hell of the living is not something that will be: if there is one, it is what is already here, the hell where we live every day, that we form by being together.
There are two ways to escape suffering it. The first is easy for many: accept the hell and become such a part of it that you can no longer see it. The second is risky and demands constant vigilance and learning: seek and be able to recognize who and
what, in the midst of the hell, are not hell, then make them endure, give them space.
Italo Calvino “The invisible cities”, 1972
9
10
The proposal for the Ecostructure is based on the believe that coexistence of men and nature can be achieved by the balance act between expedient proximity and indispensable distance by means of the superposition principle: human activities on the lower levels and habitats for animals on the upper ones where both spheres fade into each other.
The Ecostructure growes along a predetermined axis through Milan adapting to the given circumstances in the urban fabric, which can result in detachment but also in direct physical connection with existing buildings and public places. For this reason we employed the metaphor of the parasite that conqueres the space providing niches for biodiversity and human interaction. The mentioned axis which presets the route of the Ecostructure is derived from the idea to create an opposing system to the existing axis of Sempione, which represents a series of spaces and buildings in Milan that are related to the political past and the cultural presence of the city.
Placing the Ecostructure perpendicularily to Semprione axis, the project urges, in contrast to the cultural axis, for a new idea of the city, which includes not only antropocentric considerations but also the aspect of biodiversity.
CONCEPT
Yona Friedman, Sketch of Superstructure
right image - Francois Roche “Parasite composition”
Different layers of the city
The proposal comprises apart from the general rules for the parasite structure a series of spatial solutions for significant “foci” f.e. Piazza Duomo, Torre Galfa, Viale Luciano Gioa etc. along the new axis, that connects two important ecosystems of Milan - the Naviglio della Martesana and Naviglio Grande.
These foci are the result of an extensive analysis which was conducted using indicators for antropocentric and biodiversity aspects in order to determine the qualities and deficits as well as the urge of intervention along the Ecostructure.
11
12
PATH
21
22
ANALYSISThe mentioned analysis is based on an parametric approach in order to take into account as many signifant features of the context as possible. The outcome is used subsequently as a guideline, but by no means as an unquestioned modell of the development of the Ecostructure. It rather helps to understand the necessities and the level of urge along the given axis for intervention.
The idea is to define parameters for antropocentric and biodiversity matters that can be recorded in a quantitative way. Drawn along the axis these parameters serve the design process to define the key aspect of the parasite behavior: horizontal spread, vertical elevation, number of levels and degree of connectivity.
Horizontal spread
Weighted values (e.g. a1x 5) Weighted values (e.g. a1x 5) Weighted values (e.g. a1x 5) Weighted values (e.g. a1x 5)
indiCators alonGe X
DIM
ENSI
ON
OF
INTE
RVEN
TIO
NA
NA
LYSI
S IN
DICA
TORS
VertiCal eleVation nUMBer oF leVels deGree oF ConneCtiVitY
A ANTROPOCENTRIC INDICATORS B BIODIVERSITY INDICATORS A1. TRAFFIC A2. PUBLIC ACTIVITIES A3. BUILDING HEIGHTS A4. INTERSPACE A5. POINTS OF REFERENCE A6. UNDERGROUND LEVELS A7. EXISTING PARKING SPACE A8. EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AREA A9. EXISTING BICYCLE LANES
B1. GREEN SPACES B2. TREES SIZE B3. PRESENCE OF WATER B4. FLORA DIVERSITY B5. PRESENCE OF MAMMALS B6. PRESENCE OF INSECTS B7. PRESENCE OF BIRDS
a1 B1a7 B7a4 B4a2 B2a8a5 B5a3 B3a9a6 B6 a1 B1a7 B7a4 B4a2 B2a8a5 B5a3 B3a9a6 B6 a1 B1a7 B7a4 B4a2 B2a8a5 B5a3 B3a9a6 B6 a1 B1a7 B7a4 B4a2 B2a8a5 B5a3 B3a9a6 B6
e1 e7e4 e10 e11 e12 e13 e14 e15 e16 e17 e18 e19e20 e21 e22e2 e8e5e3 e9e6
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
5
10
2
- 3 - 3
5
3
54
0
5
- 4
3
1
3 3
- 2
5
0
- 5
0
3
10 0
1
3
-2- 1
-3
4
2
- 2
- 5- 5 1
- 3
0
- 3
3
- 2
00
- 4
23
- 2
0
- 5
0 00 0 0 0 0
- 3
01
- 5
2
- 5
23
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
TRAF
FIC
PUBL
IC A
CTIV
ITIE
S
BUIL
DING
HEI
GHT
INTE
RSPA
CE
POIN
TS O
F RE
FERE
NCE
UNDE
RGRO
UND
LVS
EX P
ARKI
NG
EX P
EDES
TRIA
N AR
EA
EX B
YCIC
LE L
ANE
URGE
INT
ERVE
NTIO
N
GREE
N SP
ACES
TREE
S SI
ZE
PRES
ENCE
OF
WAT
ER
FLOR
A DI
VERS
ITY
PRES
ENCE
MAM
MAL
S
PRES
ENCE
INSE
CTS
PRES
ENCE
BIR
DS
BIOD
IVER
SITY
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
TRAF
FIC
PUBL
IC A
CTIV
ITIE
S
BUIL
DING
HEI
GHT
INTE
RSPA
CE
POIN
TS O
F RE
FERE
NCE
UNDE
RGRO
UND
LVS
EX P
ARKI
NG
EX P
EDES
TRIA
N AR
EA
EX B
YCIC
LE L
ANE
URGE
INT
ERVE
NTIO
N
GREE
N SP
ACES
TREE
S SI
ZE
PRES
ENCE
OF
WAT
ER
FLOR
A DI
VERS
ITY
PRES
ENCE
MAM
MAL
S
PRES
ENCE
INSE
CTS
PRES
ENCE
BIR
DS
BIOD
IVER
SITY
TORINO
SANTA MARGHERITA
DUOMO
SCALA
TICINESE
XXIV MAGGIO
GENOVA
NAVIGLIO MARTESANA
GIOIA 1
MONTECATINI / TURATI
GALILEO
DUCA D’AOSTA
COLONNE
VIGEVANO
NAVIGLIO GRANDE 1
NAVIGLIO GRANDE 2
MANZONI
APPIANII
VIA PISANI
GALVANI
GIOIA 2
24
STRUCTUREThe structure is based on one of the inherent systems of nature which although not ultimately explored serves as essence of natural growth - the fractale behavior.
To be found in many organism on our planet a fractale is an object whose parts, at infinitely many levels of magnification, appear geometrically similar to the whole.To give an example the connection between fractals and leaves, for instance, is currently being used to determine how much carbon is contained in trees.
Employing this principle of nature the Ecostructure is based on a repetitive system of steel frames and rigid nodes that follows the analogy of a tree to produce a system that dissolves skywards with branches that split according to the specific ratio of the Fibonacci series.
In terms of featured functions the ecostructure hosts a broad range of activities serving animals, as well as men by means of four spatial modules, that are embedded into the general construction described above. These modules are: horizontal boards providing a ground to move, rest, sit etc.; shells to collect and contain water and soil; boxes giving shelter and protecting from the weather and finally the tube as a formal variant of the box allowing a better surface-volume ratio.
Paul Klee Fractal Behavior Piet Mondrian “Trees Paintings”
25
26
27
View from below the structure
SUM
MER
ACT
IVIT
IES
Walk area
Bike Lane
Sport activies
Indoor Sports
Relax
Urban Agricolture
Bird watching
Open air cinema
Party / Disco
Theatre
Dog area
Art workshop
Art exposition
Workshops
Co-working
0 12 246 18
WIN
TER
ACTI
VITI
ES
Walk area
Bike Lane
Sport activies
Indoor Sports
Ice skating
Snow activities
Bird watching
Christmas market
Dog area
Art workshop
Art exposition
Workshops
Co-working
0 12 246 18
28
POLLUTIONTREES WITH AIR POLLUTION ADSORBING CAPACITY
HIGHFraxinus excelsior
Fraxinus mandschurica
Acer platanoides
Acer rubrum
Acer saccharum
Betula pendula
MEDIUMMalus sp.
Prunus sp.
Ulmus macrocarpa
Tilia spp
Alnus incana
LOWAcer pseudoplatanus
Sorbus commixta
Sorbus aria
Quercus robur
Quercus rubra
Populus beroline
Populus simoniii
HOXYGEN
PURE AIR
LEAVES ADSORBS POLLUTION
CO2AIR POLLUTION
direct pollution absorption
Green acustic screen
Undirect pollution deviation
29
CO2
SMOG
PM10
30
Acer platanoides
Acer campestre
Pinus silvestris
Betula verrucosa
Carpinus betulus
Populus tremula
Fraxinus excelsior
Prunus avium
Ligistrium lucidum
Salix alba
Fagus silvatica
Juniperus communis
Juniperus communis
LE
VE
L 1
H >
18
M
LEVE
L 2
12 >
H >
18
MLE
VEL
3H
< 1
2 M
Quercus robur
Picea abies
Taxus baccata
Malva sylvestris Prunus padus
Sorbus aucuparia
BIODIVERSITYAs an important feature of the project there is of course the aspect of biodiversity, which marks the coming together of plants, animals and humans.
In terms of plants the idea is to use exclusively endemic plants that can generate an authentic environment for the arriving animals. Furthermore this approach is implemented to foster the conscience of humans towards their surroundings in Lombardy region.
The various levels and scales allow animals to choose among a big range of different habitats according to their size and prefered environment. Humans on the other hand have by nature a necessity for larger spaces and more elaborate accesses to ensure security etc. Latter are placed therefore more on the lower levels of the structure which are connected with stairs, elevators and ramps to the street level. Since nature determines the functions and activities in the project it is designed to offer sufficient possibilities in the warm as well in the cold seasons.
31
TREE SPECIES
Acer campestre
Berberis vulgaris
Fraxinus excelsiurs
Juniperus communis
Sambucus nigra
Acer platanoides
Cornonilla emenus
Fraxinus ornus
Ligustrum vulgarae
Viburnum opulus
Acer pseudoplatanus
Cornus mas
Ilex aquifolium
Lonicera caprifolium
Alnus glutionosa
Cornus sanguinea
Ostrja carpinifolia
Prunus padus
Castanea sativa
Daphne mezereum
Populus tremula
Rubus idaeus
Betula alba
Corylus avellana
Populus alba
Prunus spinoza
Celtis australis
Hedera helix
Prunus avium
Salix caprea
Carpinus betulus
Crataegus monogyna
Populus canescen
Phamnus catharticus
Fagus silvatica
Hippophaë rhamnoides
Prunus padus
Salix cinerea
SHRUB SPECIES
32
Ardea cinerea
Pelophylax sinklepton
Turdus merula
Canis familiaris
Apis mellifera
Carduelis carduelis
Natrix natrix
Passer italiae
Felis catus
Coccinella septempunct
Cygnus olor
Hierophis viridiflavus
Erithacus rubecula
Eptesicus serotinus
Musca domestica
Columba palumbus
Cornus sanguinea Podarcis muralis
Columba livia
Pipistrellus strellus
Monomorium pharaonis
Gallinula chloropus
Microtus arvalis
Blatta orientalis
Corvus cornix
Hirundo rustica
Vulpes vulpes
Papilio machaon
Anas platyrhynchos
Apodemus sylvaticus
Hyla intermedia
Fulica atra
Apus apus Falco tinnunculus
Rattus norvegicus
Bufo viridis
BIRDS
AMPHIBIA
REPTILES
MAMMALS
INSECTS
33
34
MASTERPLAN
35
36
GIOIA
37
38
DUOMO
39
40
APPIANI
41
GALFA
42
HUMAN’S VIEW
43
BIRD’S VIEW
44
INSTALLATIONIn the installation for the exhibition at the Museum of Natural History we decided to focus on one of the most important finding in the course of the design process of the Ecostructure: There are not only a big diversity of dimensions to be found in the project but also different perceptions of one and the same element. All depends on the point of view: wheather it is an insect, a bird or a human - the same element can represent a 1:1, a 1:20 or a 1:200 scale.
To show that in the given installation we created a system of frames that imply the general idea of the Ecostructure, how it grows similar to a parasite according to the surrounding context. In the structure you find a variety of images and objects which demonstrate the transition between the scales. Finally the object employs the spatial situation of the staircase, where you first see the 1:1 scale with birds in the cantilevering structure when you go up the stairs. Getting closer and seeing it from the other side of the balustrade you realize the variety of embedded scales to be discovered by moving around the object and looking at it from different heights and angles.
CORRIDOR
MASTERPLAN
ANIMALS‘ SCALESUPERPOSITION
MODEL SCALE
AXIS VIDEO
RENDERINGS
INSIDE
PIAZZA DUOMOPLAN
SECTIONRENDERING
BIRDS
BIRDSTOPVIEW
STAIRCASE
CORRIDOR STRUCTUREMODULES
HUMAN SCALEHABITAT
MEN‘S PERSPECTIVE
45