Economics 1 2013-14
description
Transcript of Economics 1 2013-14
Economics 1 (EC107) 2013-14: Micro (Term 1)
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
1
Economics 12013-14
(Lecture 1)
Welcome!
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
2
Economics 1Accompanying Resources
• Module Website – see various tabs (thumbprint, assessment, feedback)– see links to slides and pod/webcasts/transcripts
• Module Manual– (with reading list)
• Seminar Work and Problem Sets and e-forums
•Departmental Handbooks and Web-Sites
•MyEconomics Portal
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
3
Economics 1
Organisation (see module manual for details)
• Lecture timetable
• Lecture notes/handouts
• Seminar/e-forum arrangements (from week 3)
• Personal Essays
• Examination and Assessment
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
4
Economics
Readings (Micro)
• Besanko and Braeutigam, Microeconomics 4th Edition, Wiley, 2011
• Estrin, Laidler and Dietrich (ELD), Microeconomics, 2008
+ Many other textbooks plus other literature: see Module Manual
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
5
Term 1: Micro Topics
• Introduction Scarcity and Trade; Markets
• Topic 1 Household behaviour
• Topic 2 Firm behaviour
• Topic 3 Product markets
• Topic 4 Factor markets
• Topic 5 Market Structure, Efficiency and Failure
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
6
Introduction
• The fundamental problem of scarcity
– Cause: excess of wants over ‘natural’ supply– Consequences:
(i) Choices over production
(ii) Trade-offs and opportunity costs
(iii) Rationing of distribution (Markets etc . . .)
Consider a 2-good economy:
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
7
Introduction
• The fundamental problem of scarcity
Food
Defence
0 F-Max
D-Max The Production Possibility Curve
The Production Possibility Set
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
8
Introduction
• The fundamental problem of scarcity
Food
Defence
0 F-Max
D-Max
. a
What can you say about points a, b and c?. b
. c
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
9
Introduction
• The fundamental problem of scarcity
Food
Defence
0 F-Max
D-Max
. a
The MRT is the amount of one good (D) we have to give up in order to have an extra unit of the other good (F).
. b
. d
So the MRT is increasing in the case of the concave PPC. Why?
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
10
Introduction
• The fundamental problem of scarcity
Food
Defence
0
The PPC shows us the trade-off that Society has to make between 2 goods.
Note also relationship to Opportunity Cost
What about the trade-off that the Society is prepared to make?
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
11
Introduction
Food
Defence
0
The slope of the Indifference Curve shows us how much of one good the society is prepared to give up (‘trade off’) in order to have an extra unit of the other good:
This is the Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS).
Why might it be convex?
IC
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
12
Introduction
Food
Defence
0
A set or family of Indifference Curves
IC1
IC2
IC3
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
13
Introduction
Food
Defence
0
. a
‘a’ is not technically efficient.
‘b’ is.
So is ‘d’. So how can we choose between ‘b’ and ‘d’?
They are both ‘technically’ efficient.
But they are not both Allocatively Efficient . . .
. b
. d
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
14
Introduction
Food
Defence
0
. a
. b
. d
On which IC would society like most to be?
At what point is this?
Where MRS = MRT.
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
15
Introduction
Gains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:
X
Y
PPC-R
PPC-B
Who has an absolute advantage in producing X?
And Y?
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
16
IntroductionGains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:
X
Y
To raise output of X by the amount dX, the required reduction in Y is smaller in Blue than in Red.
In other words, the Opportunity Cost of the extra X is lower in Blue than in Red.
We say that Blue has a Comparative Advantage in the production of X.
And Red has a Comparative Advantage in producing Y.
dX
dX
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
17
Introduction
X
Y
Suppose initially, Blue is at point ‘a-B’ and Red is at ‘a-R’.
If Blue gives up one unit of Y, it raises output of X by dX.
Suppose that at the same time Red cuts production of X by the same amount, dX: then it can raise output of Y by 3 units.
So what is the total change in ‘World’ production of X?
And of Y?
dX
dXdY=1
dY=3
a-B
a-R
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
18
Introduction
X
Y
So with an unchanged total production of X and a higher total production of Y, the countries could*:
Trade such that Blue exports dX to Red and, in return, Red exports 2 units of Y to Blue.
What would this look like in terms of each country’s PPC?
a-B
a-R
b-R
b-BdY=1
dY=1
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
19
Introduction
Key Concepts
• Scarcity• Wants• Opportunity Cost• Trade-offs• Rationing• Markets• Efficiency• Equity• Constraints• Changes at the margin
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
20
Introduction
Key Concepts
• Choices• Preferences• Constraints• PPC• MRS• MRT• Optimisation• Absolute advantage• Comparative advantage• Specialisation• Trade
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick
21
Introduction
Self-study Questions
• Show and explain a PPC for a country
• What determines the position and shape of the PPC
• Explain the concept of the MRT
• Economists often argue that Choices depend on two key concepts: Preferences and Constraints. Explain this argument.
• Explain the concept of the MRS
• Define ‘trade-offs’ (in terms of both preferences and constraints) and ‘Opportunity Cost’ and explain their meanings in a diagram using the concept of the PPC.
• What is meant by Absolute Advantage?
• What is meant by Comparative Advantage? Explain how the concepts of comparative advantage and of opportunity cost are related.
• Show how trade and specialisation can lead to potential gains for both parties in a trade.