Economics 1 2013-14

21
Economics 1 (EC107) 2013-14: Micro (Term 1) Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick 1 Economics 1 2013-14 (Lecture 1) Welcome!

description

Economics 1 2013-14. (Lecture 1) Welcome!. Economics 1. Accompanying Resources Module Website see various tabs (thumbprint, assessment, feedback) see links to slides and pod/webcasts/transcripts Module Manual (with reading list) Seminar Work and Problem Sets and e-forums - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Economics 1 2013-14

Page 1: Economics 1 2013-14

Economics 1 (EC107) 2013-14: Micro (Term 1)

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

1

Economics 12013-14

(Lecture 1)

Welcome!

Page 2: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

2

Economics 1Accompanying Resources

• Module Website – see various tabs (thumbprint, assessment, feedback)– see links to slides and pod/webcasts/transcripts

• Module Manual– (with reading list)

• Seminar Work and Problem Sets and e-forums

•Departmental Handbooks and Web-Sites

•MyEconomics Portal

Page 3: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

3

Economics 1

Organisation (see module manual for details)

• Lecture timetable

• Lecture notes/handouts

• Seminar/e-forum arrangements (from week 3)

• Personal Essays

• Examination and Assessment

Page 4: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

4

Economics

Readings (Micro)

• Besanko and Braeutigam, Microeconomics 4th Edition, Wiley, 2011

• Estrin, Laidler and Dietrich (ELD), Microeconomics, 2008

+ Many other textbooks plus other literature: see Module Manual

Page 5: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

5

Term 1: Micro Topics

• Introduction Scarcity and Trade; Markets

• Topic 1 Household behaviour

• Topic 2 Firm behaviour

• Topic 3 Product markets

• Topic 4 Factor markets

• Topic 5 Market Structure, Efficiency and Failure

Page 6: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

6

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

– Cause: excess of wants over ‘natural’ supply– Consequences:

(i) Choices over production

(ii) Trade-offs and opportunity costs

(iii) Rationing of distribution (Markets etc . . .)

Consider a 2-good economy:

Page 7: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

7

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Food

Defence

0 F-Max

D-Max The Production Possibility Curve

The Production Possibility Set

Page 8: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

8

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Food

Defence

0 F-Max

D-Max

. a

What can you say about points a, b and c?. b

. c

Page 9: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

9

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Food

Defence

0 F-Max

D-Max

. a

The MRT is the amount of one good (D) we have to give up in order to have an extra unit of the other good (F).

. b

. d

So the MRT is increasing in the case of the concave PPC. Why?

Page 10: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

10

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Food

Defence

0

The PPC shows us the trade-off that Society has to make between 2 goods.

Note also relationship to Opportunity Cost

What about the trade-off that the Society is prepared to make?

Page 11: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

11

Introduction

Food

Defence

0

The slope of the Indifference Curve shows us how much of one good the society is prepared to give up (‘trade off’) in order to have an extra unit of the other good:

This is the Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS).

Why might it be convex?

IC

Page 12: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

12

Introduction

Food

Defence

0

A set or family of Indifference Curves

IC1

IC2

IC3

Page 13: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

13

Introduction

Food

Defence

0

. a

‘a’ is not technically efficient.

‘b’ is.

So is ‘d’. So how can we choose between ‘b’ and ‘d’?

They are both ‘technically’ efficient.

But they are not both Allocatively Efficient . . .

. b

. d

Page 14: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

14

Introduction

Food

Defence

0

. a

. b

. d

On which IC would society like most to be?

At what point is this?

Where MRS = MRT.

Page 15: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

15

Introduction

Gains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

PPC-R

PPC-B

Who has an absolute advantage in producing X?

And Y?

Page 16: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

16

IntroductionGains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

To raise output of X by the amount dX, the required reduction in Y is smaller in Blue than in Red.

In other words, the Opportunity Cost of the extra X is lower in Blue than in Red.

We say that Blue has a Comparative Advantage in the production of X.

And Red has a Comparative Advantage in producing Y.

dX

dX

Page 17: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

17

Introduction

X

Y

Suppose initially, Blue is at point ‘a-B’ and Red is at ‘a-R’.

If Blue gives up one unit of Y, it raises output of X by dX.

Suppose that at the same time Red cuts production of X by the same amount, dX: then it can raise output of Y by 3 units.

So what is the total change in ‘World’ production of X?

And of Y?

dX

dXdY=1

dY=3

a-B

a-R

Page 18: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

18

Introduction

X

Y

So with an unchanged total production of X and a higher total production of Y, the countries could*:

Trade such that Blue exports dX to Red and, in return, Red exports 2 units of Y to Blue.

What would this look like in terms of each country’s PPC?

a-B

a-R

b-R

b-BdY=1

dY=1

Page 19: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

19

Introduction

Key Concepts

• Scarcity• Wants• Opportunity Cost• Trade-offs• Rationing• Markets• Efficiency• Equity• Constraints• Changes at the margin

Page 20: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

20

Introduction

Key Concepts

• Choices• Preferences• Constraints• PPC• MRS• MRT• Optimisation• Absolute advantage• Comparative advantage• Specialisation• Trade

Page 21: Economics 1 2013-14

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

21

Introduction

Self-study Questions

• Show and explain a PPC for a country

• What determines the position and shape of the PPC

• Explain the concept of the MRT

• Economists often argue that Choices depend on two key concepts: Preferences and Constraints. Explain this argument.

• Explain the concept of the MRS

• Define ‘trade-offs’ (in terms of both preferences and constraints) and ‘Opportunity Cost’ and explain their meanings in a diagram using the concept of the PPC.

• What is meant by Absolute Advantage?

• What is meant by Comparative Advantage? Explain how the concepts of comparative advantage and of opportunity cost are related.

• Show how trade and specialisation can lead to potential gains for both parties in a trade.