Economic Revival Packages - Pros & Cons

download Economic Revival Packages - Pros & Cons

of 3

Transcript of Economic Revival Packages - Pros & Cons

  • 8/9/2019 Economic Revival Packages - Pros & Cons

    1/3

    FINANCIAL STABILITY AND ECONOMICFINANCIAL STABILITY AND ECONOMICFINANCIAL STABILITY AND ECONOMICFINANCIAL STABILITY AND ECONOMIC

    STIMULUS PACKAGESTIMULUS PACKAGESTIMULUS PACKAGESTIMULUS PACKAGE....

    Prof. S. Moharana

    Director MFC,

    Department of Commerce

    Utkal University

    Financial Stability is considered to be the prime requisite for the accelerated and

    sustained economic development of a nation. The period from 2006-07 to 2008-09 was

    marked by the global financial instability of a magnitude not noticed since the 1930s great

    depression. The financial meltdown which started in the developed economies of the worldled by USA spreaded its tentacles to the developing and under developed economies. Indian

    economy experienced some amount of financial and economic instability including lower

    economic growth rate during the initial two years but due to a conservative economic policy

    of the government and comparatively lesser dependence of the real sector of the economy on

    the external market, the adverse impact did not continue for a long time.

    No welfare government can afford to allow the financial instability to continue for a

    long time. The financial instability at the macro level leads to bank runs and banking panics,

    security market instability, price level instability, currency instability, house hold debt crisis,

    corporate financial crisis and in extreme case sovereign debt crisis. There are cases when

    financial instability also leads to political instability. The greater the size of the economy,

    higher will be the destabilising impact of financial instability. The higher the linkage of the

    domestic economy with the global economy, faster will be the pace at which the financial

    crisis will spread from one sector to another and from one economy to another.

    Financial instability when accompanies by real sector crisis becomes very difficult to

    control. The traditional fire fighting tools available with the government, namely the

    monetary and fiscal policy instruments have always proved to be ineffective. The approach

    needs to be an integrated one with the combination of monetary policy, fiscal policy and trade

    related measures. More important is the innovation and non conventional approach to fight

    the economic crisis.

  • 8/9/2019 Economic Revival Packages - Pros & Cons

    2/3

    In the aftermath of the global financial crisis, like most other countries of the world,

    Indian government also announced a number of measures to shield the economy from the

    global crisis and to minimise its adverse impact. One type of measures was intended toward

    ensuring adequate liquidity in the economy. This includes the reduction in CRR, repo rate,

    etc which led to huge increases in the liquidity in the system. The second type of measures

    includes reduction in the Cenvat (from 14% to 8%) and Service tax (from 10% to 8%), which

    were aimed at the making production less costly and marketing move competitive in the

    recession affected world. The Government also increased its planned expenditures on

    different heads to improve the infrastructural facilities and more importantly increase the

    purchasing power in the hands of the consumer.

    The total cost of the economic stimulus packages is estimated at more than Rs. 4 Lakh

    Crores accounting for nearly 3 pc of the GDP. The fiscal deficit went up from 2.5pc of GDP

    in 2007-08 to around 6.8pc during 2009-10 which is the highest in the last 16 year. The Govt

    had a target of borrowing Rs 4.9 Lakh Crores during 2009-10 of which 85% is already

    exhausted till the first week of January 2010. The crowding out effect of huge Government.

    Borrowing has increased the cost of funds for the private corporate sector leading to slow

    down of the investment activities. It also increased the yield on Govt. Bonds which has gone

    up to 8pc by January 2010 end. The inflation is already at a record high level. The higher

    inflation weakens the currency and depresses the growth. The persistent high borrowing of

    Government has increased the debt servicing obligation. During 2009-10, the interestpayment as a percentage of revenue receipt is as high as 36.7pc. A higher interest burden eats

    up a large portion of Govt. Revenues leaving less for productive expenditure.

    Just before the presentation of budget in the parliament on 27th

    of February, there is

    increased debate going on in the intellectual circle both in the print and visual media, whether

    it is advisable for the Govt. to withdraw the economic stimulus package announced at

    different stages which has resulted in huge loss of revenue for the government.

    There are apprehensions in the minds of the economists and policy makers thatimmediate withdrawal of stimulus package will lead to a severe blow to the slow revival

    process that is already noticed in the economy. The Government is in a catch 22 situation. If

    the economic stimulus package is allowed to continue, fiscal consolidation which is so

    important for economic and financial stability will be difficult to achieve. Further, the

  • 8/9/2019 Economic Revival Packages - Pros & Cons

    3/3

    government cannot allow it to continue due to its adverse impact on the revenue side, Govt.

    Borrowings and on fiscal deficit.

    While any abrupt withdrawal of the package is not advisable, a gradual withdrawal

    will always be in the greater interest of the economy. It is my personal belief that to make the

    Indian Corporate sector competitive in the international economy, the Govt. Should go in for

    phased withdrawal of the economic stimulus package. The continuance of the package for a

    long period will lead to a dependency syndrome among the corporate sector. This was very

    much apparent during the period of controlled and regulated economic regime in India in the

    pre liberalisation period.

    At present, there is a positive trend in the growth rate of government revenue, exports,

    imports, outputs both in .manufacturing sector as also in the services sector. Due to arbitrage,

    huge amount of foreign investment is flowing to Indian economy prompting the RBI

    Governor to indicate the possibility of imposing capital control. In the near future,

    Government may also go for selected disinvestment in PSUs and 3G auction which will

    result in a significant increase in the revenue and lowering of fiscal deficit. The health of the

    banking sector in India can be considered to be very sound in spite of the requirement of

    more capital to shore up their capital base. Not a single bank needed bail out support from the

    Government. The security market is showing signs of stability. The investment activity is

    slowly getting revived. The only concern for the Government is huge liquidity in the system

    both in the banking sector also in the corporate sector. The Corporate are not taking any

    aggressive steps for capital investment waiting for more stability in the domestic and global

    market. The price level instability is posing the greatest .threat to the Government. The

    increase in commodity prices is something which does not have a short term solution. The

    general trend in the prices at the global market, increasing demand from consumers and a

    near stagnancy in growth of domestic production in agriculture might have contributed to this

    crisis. It needs a long tern approach and it is in the interest of the Government to seriously

    look at this problem.

    To conclude, I strongly feel that Govt. should withdraw the economic stimulus

    package in a phased manner by closely monitoring its impact on the economy. It is possible

    that the withdrawal may invite oppositions from industrialists and so called welfare

    economists. But this is a cost which we need to bear to enable the long term sustainability of

    the economic growth and to achieve a healthy and efficient financial system.