Economic Potential of Amish Dairy Systems Penn State Cooperative Extension Roland P. Freund Farm...
-
Upload
preston-parker -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of Economic Potential of Amish Dairy Systems Penn State Cooperative Extension Roland P. Freund Farm...
Economic Potential of Amish Dairy Systems
Penn State Cooperative ExtensionRoland P. Freund Farm Management Agent - Retired
Mary Beth Grove Dairy Agent – Lancaster Co.
In cooperation with
Aaron King, Timothy Fritz – King’s Agriseed
Bruce Kreider – White Oak Mills
Penn State is committed to affirmative action, equal opportunity, and diversity of its workforce. Where trade names appear, no discrimination is intended, and no endorsement by Penn State Cooperative Extension is implied
Purpose of Study
• Compare the economic potential of four Amish dairy production systems.
• Evaluate feasibility of young Amish families getting started in the dairy business.
• Compare findings with other systems research.
Four Systems
Conven Hybrid Intensive Seasonal -tional Grazing Jerseys
Cows 48 48 60 75
Milk Kpounds 24/21 21 21/18 13
Heifers raised 17/15 14 15/13 30
Calv.Int.Mo. 14 13.5 13.5 12.5
Cull Rate% 35/31 29 25/20 25
Horses 6 6 4 2
Four Systems
Conven Hybrid Intensive Seasonal
-tional Grazing Jerseys
Rented Facilities:Barn/stalls Tie/44 CurtTie/44 40x150 BedPack
Milk Parlor NewZeal Swing”6”
See Text for details
Four Systems
Conven Hybrid Intensive Seasonal -tional Grazing Jerseys
Corn Sil. 20ac 15ac Buy No
Ear Corn 5ac
RyeSil.D.C. 20ac 3.7ac
Alfalfa 20ac 10
Sacrif.lot 5ac 1 1 1
Int.Pasture 0 24 49 49
Capital Investment
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
$ T
ho
usa
nd
s
Conventnl. Hybrid Int.Grazing Seas.Jersey
Cattle,dairy
Equip,horses
Fence,water
Capital Investment
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Conventnl. Hybrid Int.Grazing Seas.Jersey
$ T
ho
usa
nd
s
Fence,water
Equip,horses
Cattle,dairy
Profit with $12 / cwt milk price
111.4 100.7 94.2111.9 104.8 117
5.355.35 5.1
3.93.9
3.430.3
23.7 30.5
46.331.3
34.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Conv24K
Conv21K
Hyb21
K
Int 2
1K
Int 1
8K
S.Jer
s13K
$ T
ho
usa
nd
s
Profit
Depcn
Expens
Profit with $12 / cwt milk price
30.323.7
30.5
46.3
31.3 34.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Conv24K
Conv21K
Hyb21
K
Int 2
1K
Int 1
8K
S.Jer
s13K
$ T
ho
usa
nd
s
Profit
Grazing systems focus more on cattle than machinery are more profitable
30.323.7
30.5
46.3
31.3 34.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Conv24K
Conv21K
Hyb21
K
Int 2
1K
Int 1
8K
S.Jer
s13K
$ T
ho
usa
nd
s
Profit
Buying corn silage more profitable than growing it.
• Budget figures show:Conventional farms grow silage for $15 / T.Grazers buy it for $27 / T.
• 12 more cows made $22,000 more than growing corn silage.
• Contracting to buy corn silage will be a key to survival of small dairy farms.
Cash Flow $12 milk 100% crops
15.3 15.2 15.4 17.1 15.3 15.4
18.1 18.1 16.4 16.4 16.4 17.8
7.91.5
8.9
21.9
8.610.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Conv24K
Conv21K
Hyb21
K
Int 2
1K
Int 1
8K
S.Jer
s13K
$ T
ho
usa
nd
s
Surplus
DebtPmt
FamLiv
Net Cash Flow $12 milk 100% cropsAll systems pay cattle/machinery in 7yrs.
7.9
1.5
8.9
21.9
8.6 10.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
$ T
ho
usan
ds
Surplus
Maintaining production level is vital in any dairy system
7.9
1.5
8.9
21.9
8.6 10.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
Conv24K
Conv21K
Hyb21
K
Int 2
1K
Int 1
8K
S.Jer
s13K
$ T
ho
usa
nd
s
Surplus
Break-even Milk Price 100% crops
12 12.63 11.9 10.86 11.913.98
11.66
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
$ p
er
CW
T
$/CWT
Profit per Cow- Return to Labor+Managment
632494
635772
521 460
0100200300400500600700800900
$ p
er
Co
w
$/Cow
Profit per Acre
607475
609
926
625 690
0100200
300400500600700
800900
1000
$ p
er
Acre
$/Acre
Profit per $1 invested
$0.20$0.16
$0.21
$0.32
$0.22 $0.23
$0.00
$0.05
$0.10
$0.15
$0.20
$0.25
$0.30
$0.35
Per
$1 i
nveste
d
Per$1
Milk sold per worker
741 690826
1,015 921732
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Th
ou
san
d #
per
wo
rker
#/Worker
Ending Net Worth – 7 years
195144
193
293
197 220
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
$ T
ho
usan
ds
$,000
No system could pay for startup and real estate at the same time.
Even with optimum yields:
• Conventional farms failed to meet cash flow by $23,000 and 29,000 annually.
• Intensive grazing at 21k milk failed by $6,000.
Budget based on Real Estate loan at 5% for 20 years and cattle/machine 5.5% for 7 years.
Farm purchase potential yr.8Buy 52 ac. with house - $500,000, buildings at cost
-21
-32
-17
2
-19-14
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
$ T
ho
usan
ds
$,000
Amish may not pay for land at present
prices. Buy 52 ac. with house - $500,000, buildings at cost
-21
-32
-17
2
-19-14
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
$ T
ho
usan
ds
$,000
Cash Flow $12 milk 80% crops
0.05
-6.3
0.97
14.4
1.083.3
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20C
on
v24K
Co
nv2
1K
Hyb
21K
Int
21K
Int
18K
S.J
ers1
3K
$ T
ho
usa
nd
s
Surplus
Break-even Milk Price 80% crops
12 12.63 11.9 10.86 11.913.98
11.66
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
$ p
er
CW
T
$/CWT
Profit per Cow- DAFOSYM Comparison
632494
319
635772
521 536 460 426
0100200300400500600700800900
$ p
er C
ow
$/Cow
DAFconv
DAFgrz
DAFseas
Conclusion
• Choose the system that best meets your abilities and resources.
• Prepare your own budget before getting started in the dairy business.
• Use conservative crop yields for planning purposes, but aim for the Potential.
“Farm Decisions” (Roland P. Freund) Contact Information
• Phone: 717-245-0479.
• Mail: 382 Petersburg Road
Carlisle, PA 17013
• Email: [email protected]