Economic Outlook - The Credit Research Foundation · •The housing market is anticipated to...
Transcript of Economic Outlook - The Credit Research Foundation · •The housing market is anticipated to...
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
1
Economic Outlook
William Strauss
Senior Economist
and Economic Advisor
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
CRF Credit & A/R ForumSan Antonio, TXMarch 20, 2018
•The outlook is for the U.S. economy to expand at a
pace around trend through 2020
What I said last October
•Employment growth is expected to slow with the
unemployment rate remaining below the natural rate
•Inflation is forecast to rise to the Fed’s inflation target this year
•Manufacturing output is expected to increase at a rate
below its trend in 2018
•The housing market is anticipated to continue to improve
at a modest pace through 2018
•Vehicle sales are anticipated to edge lower in 2018
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
2
GDP expanded by 2.5% over the past year
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17
Real gross domestic product
percent
Quarterly change (saar)
Percent change from a year earlier
‐5.0
‐4.0
‐3.0
‐2.0
‐1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97'98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16'17 '18
Monthly
Chicago Fed National Activity Index
Three month average
The Chicago Fed National Activity Index 3-monthis just above zero
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
3
The real value of the stock market is very high
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Real S&P 500 stock indexIndex: 1990 = 100
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) expectsGDP to grow somewhat above trend this year
and then around trend in 2019 and 2020
‐5
‐4
‐3
‐2
‐1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20
Real gross domestic product
percent change from a year earlier
FOMC
FOMC Central Tendency (December 2017)
2018 2.2 – 2.62019 1.9 – 2.32020 1.7 – 2.0
Longer run 1.8 – 1.9
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
4
Compared with the December FOMC view,the March Blue Chip Forecast calls for stronger growth
for this year and next year
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
2000 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
Real gross domestic product
percent
Quarterly change (saar)
Percent change from a year earlier Q4‐2017
Blue Chip GDP Forecast
Actual Forecast 2017 208 20192.5 2.7 2.3
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
‐8 ‐6 ‐4 ‐2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34
Business cycle recovery pathindex ‐ business cycle trough = 100
1981‐82
2008‐09
1974‐75
quarters before trough quarters after trough
The path of the current recovery is restrainedcompared with past deep recession recovery cycles
average annualized growth: 4.3%
average annualized growth: 4.3%
average annualized growth: 2.2%
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
5
The probability of recession in the next quarter has eased
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Probablility of a recession ‐ one quarters ahead (Survey of Professional Forecasters)percent
The same is true for the chances of a recessionover the next two quarters
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Probablility of a recession ‐ two quarters ahead (Survey of Professional Forecasters)percent
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
6
The index of leading indicators continues to rise
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1960 '65 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Composite Index of 10 Leading IndicatorsIndex (2016=100)
Household employment has on average been 8.5 million more than establishment employment
50
75
100
125
150
175
1960 '65 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Employment
mil lions
Establishment employment
Household employment
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
7
Household and establishment employment hasbeen growing at roughly the same rate
and the growth rates have a correlation of 92.3%
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
1960 '65 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Employment
mil lions
Establishment employment
Household employment
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Total employment
percent
Monthly change (saar)
Percent change from a year earlier
Employment increased by over 2.2 million jobsover the past 12 months
8.7 million workers lost their jobs,6.3% of the employed
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
8
U.S. population growth has continued to slow with immigration growth matching native born growth
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1950 '60 '70 '80 '90 '00 '10
Population growthpercent
native births
population
immigration
The prime working age population is rising slower than the overall adult population growth due to extended lifespans
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1960 '65 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Population growth (16 and over)percent
16 and over
"Prime Workforce" 16‐64
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
9
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97'98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16'17 '18
Unemployment ratepercent
The unemployment rate has fallen to 4.1%
Employment
Show chart of unemployment rate
Feb 2018 Rate
1.4
2.0
4.1
4.4
5.1
8.2
Alternate Measures of Labor Utilization
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
10
All measurements of the labor unemploymentcontinue to move lower
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1994 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16
Unemploymentrate
percent
U‐3
U‐6
U‐5
U‐4
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20
Unemployment ratepercent
FOMC
The FOMC forecasts that the unemployment ratewill be below the natural rate through 2020
FOMC Central Tendency (December 2017)
2018 3.7 – 4.02019 3.6 – 4.02020 3.6 – 4.2
Longer run 4.4 – 4.7
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
11
The March Blue Chip Forecast calls for a lower unemployment rate than the December FOMC forecast
for this year and 2019
0
2
4
6
8
10
2000 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
Unemployment rate
percent
Unemployment rate
percent
Q4‐2017
Blue Chip Forecast
After falling to lowest level since 1977, the labor force participation rate has been ticking higher
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
1950 '55 '60 '65 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Labor force participation ratepercent
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
12
Civilian Labor Force Participation Rateand Population Share 16 and Older
by Age Category, United States, 2007 and 2017
Labor Force Participation Rate (%) Population Share (%)Change Change
2017 2007 ‘07-’17 2017 2007 ‘07-’17Population16 and older 62.9 66.1 -3.2 100.0 100.0 0.0
16 to 24 55.5 59.4 -3.9 15.1 16.1 -1.125 to 34 82.1 83.3 -1.2 17.1 17.1 -0.135 to 44 82.7 83.8 -1.1 15.6 18.3 -2.745 to 54 80.3 82.0 -1.7 16.6 18.8 -2.255 to 64 64.5 63.8 0.7 16.2 14.0 2.265 plus 19.3 16.0 3.3 18.8 15.6 3.2
Most of the decline in the participation rateshas come from the youth
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1950 '60 '70 '80 '90 '00 '10
55‐64
Labor force participation rate by age groupspercent
16‐19
45‐54
35‐44
25‐34 20‐24
75+
70‐74
65‐69
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
13
Wages and benefit costs continue to increaseat a very slow rate,
although it may finally be picking up some its pace
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17
Employment cost indexpercent change from year ago
benefit costs
wages and salaries
There is a very strong correlation between 9-month lead NFIB: planning to raise compensation and
Employment Cost Index: wages and salaries
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1986 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18
Empolyment cost index ‐ wages and salaries and
NFIB: Companies planning to raise wages and salaries
% of frims
ECI: wages and salaries(private industry workers) ‐ right scale
NFIB: Companies planning to raise worker compensation(9 month lead) ‐ left scale
% y/y
Correlation = 0.85
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
14
Education matters
‐4
‐3
‐2
‐1
0
1
2
3
4
1992 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18
Employment change from a year earlier (25 years or older)
mil lions
high school graduate or less than high school diploma (32.7%)
More than high school degree (67.3%)
percentages in parenthesis are the share of total workers 25 years or older in 2017
Education matters
‐10
‐5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1992 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18
Employment change from January 1992 (25 years or older)
mil lions
high school graduate or less than high school diploma (32.7%)
More than high school degree (67.3%)
percentages in parenthesis are the share of total workers 25 years or older in 2017
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
15
Education matters
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
1992 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18
Employment share of just high school diploma and less than high school diploma (25 years or older)percent
Slow productivity growth helps explain why relatively strong employment growth has not translated into higher wages
‐1
0
1
2
3
4
5
1950 '55 '60 '65 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Productivtypercent change (20‐qtr rate)
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
16
A large part of the weakness in productivity growthhas been the weak pace of investment,
although it increased at a solid pace during 2017
‐30
‐20
‐10
0
10
20
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17
Real private nonresidential fixed investment
percent
Quarterly change (saar)
Percent change from a year earlier
This may help explain the productivitygrowth improvement over the past year
‐3
‐2
‐1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1950 '55 '60 '65 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Productivtypercent change from a year earlier
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
17
‐2
‐1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1990'91 '92 '93'94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17'18
Personal consumption expenditure ‐ chain price index
percent change from a year earlier
Inflation has been edging higher to the Fed target of 2%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1970 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Real West Texas Intermediate oil pricedol lars per barrel, 2016 dollars
In large part inflation has been followingthe pattern of energy prices
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
18
The rig count has been moving higher
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
1990'91'92'93'94'95'96'97'98'99'00'01'02'03'04'05'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18
U.S. rig count
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1994'95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Real natural gas pricedol lars per mmbtu, 2016 dollars
Natural gas prices remain low
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
19
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1960 '65 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Energy goods and services expenditures as a share oftotal consumptionpercent
Expenditures on energy arewell below the historical average
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1960 '65 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Energy goods and services expenditures as a share oftotal consumptionpercent
60s
70s
80s
90s 00s
1960‐2017
10s
The FOMC anticipates that PCE inflation will be aroundits two percent target beginning this year
‐2
‐1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1990 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18 '20
Personal consumption expenditure ‐ chain price index
percent change from a year earlier
FOMC
FOMC Central Tendency (December 2017)
2018 1.7 – 1.9 2019 2.0 2020 2.0 – 2.1
Longer run 2.0
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
20
0
1
2
3
4
5
1990 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18 '20
Personal consumption expenditure ‐ less food and energy ‐
chain price indexpercent change from a year earlier
FOMC
The FOMC anticipates that “core” PCE inflationwill get close to two percent this year
FOMC Central Tendency (December 2017)
2018 1.7 – 1.92019 2.0 2020 2.0 – 2.1
The Blue Chip Forecast has inflation rates remaining relatively unchanged over through next year
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
2000 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
Consumer price index
percent
Quarterly change (saar)
Percent change from a year earlier
Q4‐2017
Blue Chip CPI Forecast
Actual Forecast 2017 2018 20192.1 2.3 2.2
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
21
Inflation Exchange Rate
Real GDP % change Against Interest Rates
% change Annual US Dollar 3‐Month
Annual Consumer Prices End of Year End of Year
2017 2018 2019 2017 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019
United States 2.3 2.8 2.5 2.1 2.4 2.2 ‐ ‐ 1.86 2.58
Canada 3.0 2.1 1.8 1.6 2.0 2.0 1.26 1.25 1.90 2.51
Mexico 2.1 2.2 2.3 6.0 4.4 3.8 19.05 18.59 7.04 6.11
Japan 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.5 1.0 1.1 110.0 109.0 ‐0.02 0.03
South Korea 3.1 2.9 2.7 1.9 1.8 2.0 1,070 1,072 1.87 2.10
United Kingdom 1.8 1.5 1.4 2.7 2.5 2.1 1.38 1.40 0.83 1.16
Germany 2.6 2.5 2.0 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.24 1.25 ‐0.23 0.12
France 1.8 2.1 1.8 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.24 1.25 ‐0.23 0.12
Euro Zone 2.3 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.24 1.25 ‐0.23 0.12
Brazil 1.0 2.6 2.9 3.4 3.7 4.2 3.36 3.37 6.74 7.34
Russia 1.8 1.8 1.7 3.7 3.6 4.1 58.1 58.8 7.35 7.15
China 6.9 6.5 6.3 1.6 2.3 2.4 6.42 6.46 3.60 3.71
India 6.7 7.3 7.4 3.5 4.9 4.9 65.1 65.3 6.59 6.60
Blue Chip Economic Indicators Forecast March 10, 2018
Blue Chip International Consensus Forecasts
Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Se p-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18
Globa l 53.0 52.7 52.6 52.6 52.7 53.1 53.3 53.5 54.1 54.5 54.4 54.2
Unite d Sta te s 53.3 52.8 52.7 52.0 53.3 52.8 53.1 54.6 53.9 55.1 55.5 55.3
Ca na da 55.5 55.9 55.1 54.7 55.5 54.6 55.0 54.3 54.4 54.7 55.9 55.6
Me xico 51.5 50.7 51.2 52.3 51.2 52.2 52.8 49.2 52.4 51.7 52.6 51.6
Eurozone 56.2 56.7 57.0 57.4 56.6 57.4 58.1 58.5 60.1 60.6 59.6 58.6
Germany 58.3 58.2 59.5 59.6 58.1 59.3 60.6 60.6 62.5 63.3 61.1 60.6
France 53.3 55.1 53.8 54.8 54.9 55.8 56.1 56.1 57.7 58.8 58.4 55.9
Ita ly 55.7 56.2 55.1 55.2 55.1 56.3 56.3 57.8 58.3 57.4 59.0 56.8
Spa in 53.9 54.5 55.4 54.7 54.0 52.4 54.3 55.8 56.1 55.8 55.2 56.0
UK 54.2 57.3 56.7 54.2 55.3 56.7 56.0 56.3 58.2 56.2 55.3 55.2
Russia 52.4 50.8 52.4 50.3 52.7 51.6 51.9 51.1 51.5 52.0 52.1 50.2
Japan 52.4 52.7 53.1 52.4 52.1 52.2 52.9 52.8 53.6 54.0 54.8 54.1
China 51.2 50.3 49.6 50.4 51.1 51.6 51.0 51.0 50.8 51.5 51.5 51.6
India 52.5 52.5 51.6 50.9 47.9 51.2 51.2 50.3 52.6 54.7 52.4 52.1
Bra zil 49.6 50.1 52.0 50.5 50.0 50.9 50.9 51.2 53.5 52.4 51.2 53.2
Manufacturers’ Purchasing Managers Indexes
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
22
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
1965 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
United States
Homeownership ratepercent
Midwest
The forecast calls for a continuationof the very gradual recovery in housing
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
1980 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Housing starts
thousands
Blue Chip Housing StartsForecast (thousands)
Actual Forecast 2017 2018 20191,207 1,291 1,338
‐40
‐30
‐20
‐10
0
10
20
30
40
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Industrial production ‐ manufacturing
percent
Monthly change (saar)
Percent change from a year earlier
Manufacturing output is increasingafter being unchanged for the past couple of years
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
23
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97'98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16'17 '18
Capacity utilization ‐ manufacturingpercent
Capacity utilization has been movinghigher over the past year,
but is still below full utilization
Manufacturing employment increased by 224,000 workersover the past 12 months
‐25
‐20
‐15
‐10
‐5
0
5
10
15
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Manufacturing employment
percent
Monthly change (saar)
Percent change from a year earlier
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
24
After setting a record in 2016,light vehicles sales fell by 1.4% in 2017
89
10111213141516171819202122
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Light vehicle salesmil lions of units (saar)
2017 light truck sales were 5.0% higher,while passenger car sales are 11.4% lower
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Passenger car and light truck salesmil lions of units (saar)
light trucks
passenger cars
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
25
Light truck market share set a record high in January
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
1990'91'92'93 '94'95'96'97'98'99'00'01 '02'03'04'05'06'07'08 '09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16 '17'18
Light truck share of light vehicle market salespercent
Alternative powered vehicles (including hybrids)are a very small fraction of total vehicle sales
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Power‐Typepercent of total sales
Alternative
Gasoline and Diesel
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
26
Alternative powered vehicles (including hybrids)market share remains very low
0
1
2
3
4
5
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Alternative Powered Vehiclespercent of total sales
Vehicle sales are anticipated todecline this year and edge lower next year
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1980 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10 '15
Vehicle sales
mil lions of units
Blue Chip Light‐VehicleSales Forecast
Actual Forecast 2017 2018 201917.1 17.0 16.8
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
27
Current 3 Month Moving Average Growth is:Above Trend and Accerating
Above Trend and DeceleratingBelow Trend and AcceleratingBelow Trend and Decelerating
Contracting but ImprovingContracting and Deteriorating
5-year Trend 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Manufacturing 1.1%
Wood Products 3.4%
Nonmetallic Mineral Products 3.2%
Primary Metals -0.9%
Fabricated Metal Products 0.4%
Machinery -0.5%
Computer and Electronic Components 3.0%
Electrical Eqpt, Appliances & Components 1.2%
Motor Vehicles and Parts 5.4%
Aerospace & Misc. Transport Equip 0.3%
Furniture and Related Products 1.2%
Miscellaneous Durable Goods -1.7%
Food, Beverages, and Tobacco 1.6%
Textile and Product Mills 0.9%
Apparel and Leather Goods -5.1%
Paper -1.4%
Printing and Related Support Activities -0.3%
Chemicals 0.7%
Petroleum and Coal Products -0.5%
Plastics and Rubber Products 1.5%
The industrial sector output growthhas been strong over the past several months
Manufacturing Industries Activity ChartGrowth (3-month moving average)
compared with the most recent 5-year trend
The supply managers’ composite indexhas surged over the past year
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Purchasing managers' index ‐ compositenet percent reporting increases
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
28
Industrial production is forecast to improveat a pace slightly below its historical rate this year
‐25
‐20
‐15
‐10
‐5
0
5
10
2000 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
Total industrial production
percent
Quarterly change (saar)
Percent change from a year earlier
Q4‐2017
Blue Chip IP ForecastActual Forecast 2017 2018 20193.5 2.6 2.3
Credit spreads between Corporate High Yield securitiesand Corporate Aaa securities remains very low
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
29
The yield curve remains well above zero
‐1
0
1
2
3
4
1990'91'92'93 '94'95'96'97'98'99'00'01 '02'03'04'05'06'07'08 '09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16 '17'18
Yield curve ‐ 10‐year Treasury note yield minus
3‐month Treasury bill yieldpercent
Blue Chip expects the yield curve to continueto flatten through next year, but not invert
‐1
0
1
2
3
4
2000 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
10‐year T‐Note to 3‐month T‐Bill spread
percent
Q4 ‐2017
percent
Blue Chip Forecast
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
30
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1990'91 '92'93 '94 '95 '96 '97'98 '99'00 '01 '02 '03 '04'05 '06'07 '08 '09 '10 '11'12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Fed Funds ratepercent
The Federal Reserve increased the Federal Funds rate by 1.25% since December 2015
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1990'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20
Target Federal Funds Ratepercent
FOMC
The Federal Funds Rate is expected to bearound the neutral rate by the end of 2019
FOMC Central Tendency (December 2017)
2018 1.9 – 2.42019 2.4 – 3.12020 2.6 – 3.1
Longer run 2.8 – 3.0
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
31
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Assets of the Federal ReserveBi l lions of dollars
Term Auction Credit
Securities Held Outright
Central Bank Swaps
Maiden Lane II & III
Commercial Paper Facility
2007 2008 2009
Term Asset‐Backed SecuritiesLoan Facility
AIG Support
Maiden Lane
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
The Fed’s balance sheet has remained flat for several years and the Fed began reducing it in October 2017
•The outlook is for the U.S. economy to expand at a pace
above trend in 2018 and around trend in 2019 and 2020
Summary
•Employment is expected to rise moderately with the
unemployment rate remaining little changed and very low
•Inflation is forecast rise to the Fed’s Inflation target this year
•Vehicle sales are anticipated to edge lower this year
•Manufacturing output is expected to increase at a rate
just below trend in 2018
•Housing is predicted to improve at a modest pace
William Strauss, Senior Economist and Economic AdvisorFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago
32
www.chicagofed.org www.federalreserve.gov