Ecological Footprint of Bleach

download Ecological Footprint of Bleach

of 14

Transcript of Ecological Footprint of Bleach

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    1/14

    Ecological Footprint

    Household Bleach

    Kristen Meidt

    March 3, 2011

    ABSTRACT: Household bleach was evaluated in depth at each phase of its resource stream. Human

    health risks and environmental impacts were assessed for the extraction of raw materials,

    manufacturing and production, distribution, domestic use and disposal. The purpose of the Ecological

    Footprint paper is to understand the environmental impacts associated with an everyday product such

    as bleach and the common activity of cleaning.

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    2/14

    2

    TITLE PAGE

    Introduction ........................................................................................................................................3

    Extraction of Sodium Chloride ..........................................................................................................3-4

    Manufacturing and Production ..........................................................................................................4-6

    Distribution ........................................................................................................................................6

    Household Usage ...............................................................................................................................7-8

    Disposal..............................................................................................................................................8-9

    Conclusion .........................................................................................................................................9-10

    Appendix ............................................................................................................................................11

    Bibliography ......................................................................................................................................12-14

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    3/14

    3

    INTRODUCTION

    Since the discovery of chlorine in the late 1700s, household bleach has become an

    important cleaning commodity around the world. The active ingredient in chlorine bleach is

    sodium hypochlorite. It is a powerful agent for denaturing microbial proteins and is therefore an

    effective disinfectant against bacteria and viruses. Household bleach is an important product for

    cleaning and preventing disease control, but its environmental impacts are evident throughout its

    resource stream. The ecological footprint of household chlorine bleach was assessed to

    determine the environmental impacts at each stage. An in depth evaluation of sodium

    hypochlorite reveals significant implications for human and environmental health, from the

    extraction of raw materials to the disposal of bleach down the drain.

    EXTRACTION OF SODIUM CHLORIDE

    The resource stream of sodium hypochlorite begins with the extraction of sodium

    chloride, commonly referred to as halite or rock salt. Rock salt exists in underground deposits

    that were formed from the precipitation of salts as ancient waters evaporated. Areas in the

    United States with commercially significant salt mines are Avery Island in Louisiana and

    Detroit, Michigan (World Lingo Translations, 2011). Sodium chloride is extracted using room

    and pillar or solution mining techniques (Salt Manufacturers Association).

    Room and pillar mining is a method of underground mining that excavates caverns of

    rock and leaves a system of pillars or columns in place to prevent the risk of subsidence

    (Squillace, 2009). Solution mining involves pumping water into a bore hole to create a brine

    solution that is then pumped out. The amount of freshwater needed for solution mining must be

    exorbitant. The environmental impacts of mining are far reaching and include land subsidence-

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    4/14

    4

    with associated damages to the land surface, erosion, pollution of waterways, acid mine drainage

    and leaching of toxic metals such as arsenic, lead, and mercury (Withgott and Brennan 2008).

    Mining negatively impacts the local ecology by physically destroying habitats and exposing flora

    and fauna species to a wide array of pollutants.

    MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION

    Sodium chloride is necessary to generate the sodium hydroxide, referred to as caustic

    soda, and chlorine needed to produce sodium hypochlorite. Chlorine and caustic soda producers

    are referred to as the chlor-alkali industry and are of the largest electrochemical technologies in

    the world (Bommaraju, Orosz, & Sokol, 2001). In 2006, the electrolytic process consumed 2400

    billion kWh to produce 59 million metric tons of chlorine and caustic soda (Bommaraju, Orosz,

    & Sokol, 2001). The consumption of 2400 billion kWh hours of electricity produces 5520 billion

    pounds of carbon dioxide each year.

    To manufacture bleach, the extracted rock salt is first removed of impurities and broken

    down at a chemical plant by electrolysis to form end products that can be used for the production

    of sodium hypochlorite. The sodium chloride is first dissolved in an aqueous solution to

    disassociate the sodium and chloride ions (Advameg, Inc. , 2011). When the ions are dissolved in

    water, the electrolytic process is used to create sodium hydroxide, also known as caustic soda,

    and chlorine (Bommaraju, Orosz, & Sokol, 2001). An electrolytic cell passes an electric current

    through the solution and creates an oxidation-reduction reaction. Chlorine is formed by oxidation

    at the anode and sodium hydroxide is reduced at the cathode (Bommaraju, Orosz, & Sokol,

    2001).

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    5/14

    5

    There are three main types of electrolytic cells used to produce chlorine and caustic soda.

    84% of the total amount of chlorine produced in the world in 2006 was by diaphragm and

    membrane cells and 13% was produced using mercury cells (Bommaraju, Orosz, & Sokol,

    2001). In the 1970s, the most commonly used cells were mercury and diaphragm cells

    (Committee on Biologic Effects of Environmental Pollutants, 1976).

    Mercury cells have since been partially phased out due to the release of mercury

    emissions into the air and waste waters (Noyes, 1993). Mercury causes neurological damage in

    humans and air pollutants containing mercury deposit into water bodies (United States

    Environmental Protection Agency, 2010). In water, mercury is transformed into methyl mercury

    where it bioaccumulates and biomagnifies in animal tissues and has toxic effects on organisms

    (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2010). In 2007, the emission standards have

    been reduced to 1.0g Hg per tonne of Hg cell chlorine capacity from a maximum of

    1.9g/year/tonne of chlorine (Bommaraju, Orosz, & Sokol, 2001).

    Diaphragm cells use asbestos as a separator which may be discharged in the waste stream

    of the power plant (Noyes, 1993). In 2007, the chlor-alkali industry was exempt from the

    banning of asbestos (Bommaraju, Orosz, & Sokol, 2001). Mercury and diaphragm cells each use

    large quantities of water, but diaphragms use nearly four times the amount of water that is used

    for mercury cells (Noyes, 1993). The chlorine manufacturing plants that use the electrolytic cells

    also produce air pollution such as hydrogen, carbon monoxide and chlorine dioxide (Noyes,

    1993).

    After chlorine is produced it undergoes a liquefaction process that can potentially emit

    significant quantities of gaseous chlorine (Committee on Biologic Effects of Environmental

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    6/14

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    7/14

    7

    HOUSEHOLD USAGE

    Chlorine bleach is one of the most common household cleaning products used today. It is

    used around the world for disinfecting surfaces as it destroys pathogens such as bacteria and

    viruses. The total amount of household and institutional bleach sold in the United States in 2005

    amounted to 553 million gallons (Zoller & Sosis, 2009). Although the cleaning power of bleach

    is extensive, there are serious health risks associated with its use.

    Household bleach can have adverse health effects if ingested and if it is mixed with

    acidic cleaners (Bates, 2007). Ingestion can cause irritation to the gastrointestinal tract, damage

    to the esophagus, stomach corrosion, electrolyte disturbance of the body due to increased acid

    levels, and aspiration (Bates, 2007). If bleach is used in combination with an acid based cleaner,

    such as an ammonia product, chlorine gas is produced. Inhalation of chlorine gas can result in

    respiratory issues, pulmonary edema, chemical pneumonitis, and possible death in extreme cases

    (Bates, 2007).

    In a 2008 study of household cleaning products containing chlorine bleach, Odabasi

    discovered that sodium hypochlorite can produce halogenated volatile organic compounds

    (VOCs) when mixed with soap or surfactants. Chloroform and carbon tetrachloride are among

    the fifteen volatile organic compounds that may possibly be formed by the reaction of household

    bleach and other cleaning products (Odabasi, 2008). The EPA claims that carbon tetrachloride is

    a probable carcinogen in humans and primarily affects the central nervous system, liver and

    kidneys (2000). Odabasi states that carbon tetrachloride is also a powerful greenhouse gas that

    was banned for household use by the U.S. Food and Drug administration (2008). Carbon

    tetrachloride also contributes to ozone depletion and during 1992; 28 tons were emitted from the

    storage of household bleach (Cahn, 1994). Storage of household sodium hypochlorite also

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    8/14

    8

    released 12 tons of chloroform (Cahn, 1994). Chloroform is identified by the EPA as a probable

    carcinogen as it is carcinogenic to animals (EPA, 2000). It also affects central nervous system

    and liver functions in humans (EPA, 2000).

    DISPOSAL

    The Clorox Company claims that their bleach products have a completely sustainable

    cycle and publicly state that 95 percent to 98 percent of household bleach rapidly breaks down

    into salt and water. The remaining by-products are largely removed through the wastewater

    treatment process of most cities and water districts. No dioxins are formed. No by-products with

    the ability to build up over time in organisms are formed. At the end of the cycle, household

    bleach has returned to the salt from which it was originally produced in a sustainable cycle.

    (The Clorox Company, 1998-2006).

    The remaining two to five percent of sodium hypochlorite from household use that is not

    immediately broken down into salt and water amounts to 11.06 to 29.65 million gallons, based

    on the total production of bleach in the United States. Although it may be improbable for

    household bleach to reach waterways after passing through wastewater treatment facilities,

    people may improperly dispose of bleach solutions outside. A 0.01 mg/L concentration of

    sodium hypochlorite can be extremely toxic to aquatic life (Cahn, 1994).

    An important example of the byproducts produced by the disposal of sodium

    hypochlorite is organochlorines. Organochlorines, such as dioxin, are formed in the environment

    when the chlorine in bleach reacts with naturally occurring compounds (Labour Environmental

    Society , 2005). Dioxin is a highly toxic chemical compound that does not easily break down. It

    is carcinogenic, bioaccumulative and can cause developmental disorders, as well as

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    9/14

    9

    neurological, immune system and reproductive issues (eHow Inc., 1999-2011). The molecular

    strength of dioxin causes it to be a persistent toxin that travels throughout all areas of the

    environment.

    Dioxin is most commonly associated with the bleaching process in paper and pulp mills,

    but can also form due to the disposal of household bleach products. Although the Clorox

    Company states that chlorine bleach is a complete cycle with no formation of byproducts, they

    understate the possibility of harmful toxins to form in the environment.

    CONCLUSION

    Household bleach creates many environmental issues at every stage of its resource

    stream. Mining and extraction of sodium chloride can result in degraded landscapes and

    environmental damage. The physical destruction of land and the transportation of exposed

    chemicals into hydrologic systems highly impact ecology. Electrolysis of sodium chloride and

    chlorine is an energy intensive process that releases a myriad of pollutants. Sodium hypochlorite,

    or household bleach, travels far distances across the United States and results in large quantities

    of carbon emissions. Bleach is also a hazardous product due to its reactivity with other cleaners

    and should not be used as an everyday cleaning product. Finally, disposed of sodium

    hypochlorite has the capability of forming highly toxic and persistent chemicals in the

    environment, such as dioxin.

    Some of environmental impacts of cleaning with bleach have been examined in this

    paper. Although bleach is an important cleaning product for the disinfection of surfaces and

    prevention of disease control, its use is not necessary for regular cleaning. There are many

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    10/14

    10

    effective methods of cleaning with natural ingredients or naturally derived cleansers that have do

    not have the dramatic ecological footprint of household bleach.

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    11/14

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    12/14

    12

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Advameg, Inc. . (2011). How Bleach is Made. Retrieved march 3, 2011, from How Products areMade: http://www.madehow.com/Volume-2/Bleach.html

    American Chemistry Council, Inc. (2005-2010). Chlorine Production FAQs. Retrieved march 3,2011, from american chemistry:

    http://www.americanchemistry.com/s_chlorine/sec_content.asp?CID=2183&DID=9226&CTYPEI

    D=109

    Bates, N. (2007, March). Poisoning with household cleaners. color photograph , p. 4.

    Bommaraju, T. V., Orosz, P. J., & Sokol, E. A. (2001). Brine Electrolysis. Retrieved march 3, 2011,from Electrochemistry Encyclopedia: http://electrochem.cwru.edu/encycl/art-b01-brine.htm

    Cahn, A. (1994). Proceedings of the 3rd World Conference on Detergents: Global Perspectives.Montreux: AOCS press.

    Carbonfund.org. (2011). Carbon calculators. Retrieved march 3, 2011, fromhttp://www.carbonfund.org/site/pages/individuals/individual_business_carbon_offsets

    CDAIC. (n.d.). Frequently Asked Global Change Questions. Retrieved march 3, 2011, from CarbonDioxide Information Analysis Center: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/pns/faq.html

    Committee on Biologic Effects of Environmental Pollutants. (1976). Chlorine and HydrogenChloride. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

    eHow Inc. (1999-2011). Effects of Chlorine Bleach on Aquatic Life. Retrieved march 3, 2011, fromeHow: http://www.ehow.com/list_6531968_effects-chlorine-bleach-aquatic-life.html

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    13/14

    13

    Electrolytic Cells. (n.d.). Retrieved march 3, 2011, from Bodner Research Web:http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch20/faraday.php

    Labour Environmental Society . (2005). Toxins in Household Products. Retrieved march 3, 2011,from Labour Environmental Society : http://www.leas.ca/toxins-in-household-products.htm

    Noyes, R. (1993). Pollution prevention technology handbook. Park Ridge: Noyes Publications.

    Odabasi, M. (2008). Halogenated Volatile Organic Compounds from the Use of Chlorine-Bleach-Containing Household Products. Environmental Science & Technology, 1445-1451.

    Salt Manufacturers Association. (n.d.). environmental impact of salt manufacture and supply.Retrieved march 3, 2011, from Salt Association: http://www.saltsense.co.uk/aboutsalt-

    env01.php

    Squillace, M. (2009). Chapter 2: The Environmental Effects of Strip Mining. Retrieved march 3,2011, from The Strip Mining Handbook:

    http://sites.google.com/site/stripmininghandbook/chapter-2-1

    The Clorox Company. (1998-2011). Careers. Retrieved march 3, 2011, from The Clorox Company:http://www.thecloroxcompany.com/careers/careerareas.html

    The Clorox Company. (1998-2006). Clorox bleach: salt of the earth. Retrieved march 3, 2011,from the clorox company:

    http://www.thecloroxcompany.com/community/ourprodspgs/bleach_salt.html

    United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2010). Fate and Transport and EcologicalEffects of Mercury. Retrieved march 3, 2011, from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:

    http://www.epa.gov/hg/eco.htm

  • 8/7/2019 Ecological Footprint of Bleach

    14/14

    14

    Withgott, J., & Brennan, S. (2008). Environment The Science Behing the Story. San Francisco:Pearson Education, Inc.

    World Lingo Translations. (2011). Sodium Chloride. Retrieved march 3, 2011, from World Lingo:http://www.worldlingo.com/ma/enwiki/en/Sodium_chloride

    Zoller, U., & Sosis, P. (2009). Handbook of detergents: production. Boca Raton: CRC Press.