ECE 875: Electronic Devices
description
Transcript of ECE 875: Electronic Devices
ECE 875:Electronic Devices
Prof. Virginia AyresElectrical & Computer EngineeringMichigan State [email protected]
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Chp. 01
ConcentrationsDegenerateNondegenerate Effect of temperatureContributed by traps
Lecture 08, 27 Jan 14
}
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Example:Concentration of conduction band electrons for a nondegenerate semiconductor: n:
EE
E
C
C
dEEFENn
“hot” approximation of Eq’n (16)
3D: Eq’n (14)
Three different variables
(NEVER ignore this)
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
NC
The effective density of states at the conduction band edge.
MC
32
2
3
2
Cde Mm
dem
Answer:Concentration of conduction band electrons for a nondegenerate semiconductor: n:
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Answer:Concentration of conduction band electrons for a nondegenerate semiconductor: n:
n
NkTEE
kT
EENn
CFC
FCC
ln
exp
Nondegenerate: EC is above EF:
kT
EENn CF
C
exp
Sze eq’n (21)
Use Appendix G at 300K for NC and n ≈ ND when fully ionised
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
This part is called NV: the effective density of states at the valence band edge.
Typically valence bands are symmetric about : MV = 1
Lecture 07: Would get a similar result for holes:
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Similar result for holes:Concentration of valence band holes for a nondegenerate semiconductor: p:
p
NkTEE
kT
EENp
VVF
VFV
ln
exp
Nondegenerate: EC is above EF:
kT
EENp FV
V
exp
Sze eq’n (23)
Use Appendix G at 300K for NV and p ≈ NA when fully ionised
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
HW03: Pr 1.10:
Shown: kinetic energies of e- in minimum energy parabolas: KE E > EC.
Therefore:generic definition of KE as:
KE = E - EC
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Define: Average Kinetic Energy
EE
E
EE
E
C
C
C
C
C
Edn
EdnEE )(
HW03: Pr 1.10:
Single band assumption
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
EE
E
EE
E
C
C
C
C
C
dEEFEN
dEEFENEE
“hot” approximation of Eq’n (16)3D: Eq’n (14)
HW03: Pr 1.10:
Single band assumption
Average Kinetic Energy
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
EE
E
EE
E
C
C
C
C
C
dEEFEN
dEEFENEE
“hot” approximation of Eq’n (16)3D: Eq’n (14)
HW03: Pr 1.10:
Single band definition
Average Kinetic Energy
2/1
32
2
3
2)( C
Cde EEMm
EN Equation 14:
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Start: Average Kinetic Energy
Finish: Average Kinetic Energy
EE
E
EE
E
C
C
C
C
C
dEEFEN
dEEFENEE
“hot” approximation of Eq’n (16)3D: Eq’n (14)
kT2
3
Therefore: Use a Single band assumption in HW03: Pr 1.10:
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Reference:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function#Integration_problems
Some commonly used gamma functions:
n is always a positive whole number
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Consider: as the Hot limit approaches the Cold limit:“within the degenerate limit” ECEF
Ei
EV
Use:
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Dotted: nondegenerate
Will find: useful universal graph: from n:
Solid: within the degenerate limit
x-axis: how much energy do e-s need: (EF – EC) versus how much energy can they get: kT
y-axis:Fermi-Dirac integral: good for any semiconductor
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Concentration of conduction band electrons for a semiconductor within the degenerate limit: n:
EE
E
C
C
dEEFENn
3D: Eq’n (14)
Three different variables
(NEVER ignore this)
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Remember to also change the limits to bottom and top:
Change dE:
Next: put the integrand into one single variable:
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
F1/2(F)
No closed form solution but correctly set up for numerical integration
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Note:
F = (EF - EC)/kT is semiconductor-specific
F1/2(F) is semiconductor-specific
But: a plot of F1/2(F) versus F is universal
Could just as easily write this as F1/2(x) versus x
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Recall: on Slide 5 for a nondegenerate semiconductor: n:
EE
E
C
C
dEEFENn
“hot” approximation of Eq’n (16)
3D: Eq’n (14)
FCCF
C
FCC
NkT
EENn
kT
EENn
exp2
2exp
2
2
exp
F1/2(F)
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Dotted: nondegenerate
Useful universal graph:
Solid: within the degenerate limit
x-axis: how much energy do e-s need: (EF – EC) versus how much energy can they get: kT
y-axis:Fermi-Dirac integral: good for any semiconductor
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Shows where hot limit becomes the “within the degenerate limit”
EC
EF
Ei
EV
Around -1.0Starts to diverge
-0.35: ECE 874 definition of “within the degenerate limit”
Why useful: one reason:
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
F(F)1/2 integral is universal: can read numerical solution value off this graph for any semiconductor
Example: p.18 Sze:What is the concentration n for any semiconductor when EF coincides with EC?
Why useful: another reason:
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Answer:DegenerateEF = EC => F = 0Read off the F1/2(F) integral value at F = 0≈ 0.6
Why useful: another reason:
Appendix G
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
EC
EF
Ei
EV
0.9 kT
Example:What is the concentration of conduction band electrons for degenerately doped GaAs at room temperature 300K when EF – EC = +0.9 kT?
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
For degenerately doped semiconductors (Sze: “degenerate semiconductors”): the relative Fermi level is given by the following approximate expressions:
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Chp. 01
ConcentrationsDegenerateNondegenerate Effect of temperatureContributed by traps
Lecture 08, 27 Jan 14
}
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Nondegenerate: will show: this is the Temperature dependence of intrinsic concentrations ni = pi
ECE 474
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Intrinsic: n = p
Intrinsic: EF =Ei = Egap/2
Set concentration of e- and holes equal: For nondegenerate:
=
Correct definition of intrinsic:
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Substitute EF = Ei into expression for n and p.
n and p when EF = Ei are given name: intrinsic: ni and pi
ni = pi:pi =ni =
VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Substitute EF = Ei into expression for n and p.
n and p when EF = Ei are given name: intrinsic: ni and pi
ni = pi:
Units of 4.9 x 1015 = ? = cm-3 K-3/2
pi =ni =