East Side Elementary Data Overview
description
Transcript of East Side Elementary Data Overview
East Side ElementaryData Overview
Presented for East Side’s Faculty and Staff
Created by: Katie MauldinApril 15, 2014
What is the purpose?The purpose of this presentation is to inform you of East Side’s progress over the last 3 years on the CRCT.
We will discuss our school’s strengths, as well as, our weaknesses.
We will also make a plan for the future!
Student Demographics - 2013
Asian
Black
Pacifi
c Isl.
..
Hispan
ic
Mult
iracia
l
Cauca
sian
0100200300400500600700800
26363 1 66 55
846
Student Population East Side = 1,294
Student Ethnicity
Num
ber
of S
tude
nts
Staff Demographics – East SideAdministrators: 3, 2 females and 1 maleTeachers: 71, 66 females and 5 males
3
65
12
Race/Ethnicity
BlackWhiteHispanicAsian
4 Yr.
Bache
lor's
5 Yr.
Mas
ter's
6 Yr.
Spec
ialist
's
7 Yr.
Doctor
al0
10
20
30
40
2537
90
Certificate Level
Looking BackWe will look back at East Side’s CRCT scores
over the last three years and compare their scores against the county’s.
As we look at each slide think about the following:Do we have more students meeting and
exceeding the standards versus the county as a whole?
From year to year have we made progress with our 3rd and 5th graders?
Spring 2011 CRCT – 3rd Grade
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
7 9 16
4654 39
47 37 44
Cobb County
% of stu-dents ex-ceeding the standard% of stu-dents meet-ing the standard% of stu-dents not meeting the standard
Subject Area
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
1 1 525
4525
7454
70
East Side
Subject AreaPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
n = number of students testedReading n = 8,168
ELA n = 8,168Math n = 8,177
n = number of students testedReading n = 167
ELA n = 167Math n = 168
Spring 2011 CRCT – 5th Grade
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
7 5 9
51 54 39
42 4152
Cobb County
% of stu-dents ex-ceeding the standard% of stu-dents meet-ing the standard% of stu-dents not meeting the standard
Subject Area
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
2 1 5
32 40 28
66 59 67
East Side
Subject AreaPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
n = number of students testedReading n = 8,159
ELA n = 8,142Math n = 8,039
n = number of students testedReading n = 171
ELA n = 171Math n = 172
Spring 2012 CRCT – 3rd Grade
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
7 8 16
3750 32
5643 52
Cobb County
% of stu-dents ex-ceeding the standard% of stu-dents meet-ing the standard% of stu-dents not meeting the standard
Subject Area
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
1 2 519
33 20
8065 75
East Side
Subject AreaPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
n = number of students testedReading n = 7,948
ELA n = 7,980Math n = 8,022
n = number of students testedReading n = 192
ELA n = 192Math n = 193
Spring 2012 CRCT – 5th Grade
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
6 4 9
55 49 40
40 47 51
Cobb County
% of stu-dents ex-ceeding the standard% of stu-dents meet-ing the standard% of stu-dents not meeting the standard
Subject Area
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
1 2 326 23 27
73 76 69
East Side
Subject AreaPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
n = number of students testedReading n = 8,000
ELA n = 8,003Math n = 7,924
n = number of students testedReading n = 181
ELA n = 185Math n = 182
Spring 2013 CRCT – 3rd Grade
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
6 9 18
3449 32
6041 50
Cobb County
% of stu-dents ex-ceeding the standard% of stu-dents meet-ing the standard% of stu-dents not meeting the standard
Subject Area
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
2 3 519
3520
7961
75
East Side
Subject AreaPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
n = number of students testedReading n = 8,186
ELA n = 8,225Math n = 8,248
n = number of students testedReading n = 223
ELA n = 223Math n = 222
Spring 2013 CRCT – 5th Grade
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
5 4 7
51 49 37
44 47 56
Cobb County
% of stu-dents ex-ceeding the standard% of stu-dents meet-ing the standard% of stu-dents not meeting the standard
Subject Area
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
2 3 3
32 30 28
66 68 69
East Side
Subject AreaPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
n = number of students testedReading n = 8,146
ELA n = 8,139Math n = 8,064
n = number of students testedReading n = 184
ELA n = 186Math n = 189
Read-ing
ELA Math2 3 519
3520
7961
75
Spring 2013
Read-ing
ELA Math1 2 5
1933 20
8065 75
Spring 2012
Subject Area
Have we made progress in 3rd grade at East Side?
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
1 1 525
4525
7454
70
Spring 2011
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Read-ing
ELA Math2 3 332 30 28
66 68 69
Spring 2013
Read-ing
ELA Math1 2 3
26 23 27
73 76 69
Spring 2012
Subject Area
Have we made progress in 5th grade at East Side?
Read-ing
ELA Math0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
2 1 532 40 28
66 59 67
Spring 2011
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Where are East Side’s strengths and weaknesses?
With the implementation of Columbia’s Reading and Writing Workshop models over the last three years, we have seen an increase in our Reading and ELA scores.
Last year we saw a small decrease in the number of 5th grade students exceeding in Reading and ELA, however, we are still much higher than the county average.
We have made no change in our 3rd and 5th grade Math scores between Spring 2012 and 2013.
A closer look at Math CRCT - 2013
Third Grade Fifth Grade0
20
40
60
80
100
95% 97%
64%81%
Students Meeting and Exceeding in Math at East Side
All StudentsStudents with Disabil-ities
Grade Level
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Strand data for Math - 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade at East Side
0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100%
050
100150200250300350400
8 54112
292
2 28102
334
4 10 70
382
3 22 47
394Percentage Correct
Geometry
Mea-sure-ment
Numbers and Operations
Algebra
Percentage Correct
Num
ber
of S
tude
nts
East Side’s FocusWhat should our focus be next year?
Math!Within Math what areas do we need to improve?
Geometry and MeasurementHow are we going to make improvements?
Singapore Trainings, manipulative kits, and accurate
data collection and analysis
Looking ahead, how can we use this information to improve instruction here
at East Side?