EAPI 2016 in Numbers EAPI 2016 World Map Table...

2
1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 EAPI Score EAPI Score AVG = Average EAPI score Global EAPI ranking EAPI 2016 AVERAGE = 0.60 Advanced Economies AVG = 0.69 Switzerland Norway Sweden France Denmark Austria Spain New Zealand Portugal Finland Slovenia United Kingdom Italy Ireland Germany Iceland Slovak Republic Canada Czech Republic Luxembourg Belgium Singapore Netherlands Greece United States Japan Australia Korea, Rep. Israel Estonia Malta Cyprus 2 55 1 3 4 5 6 7 9 11 12 15 16 22 23 24 26 28 30 31 33 34 50 48 43 37 36 53 58 60 65 66 AVG = 0.66 40 44 14 17 18 19 27 35 41 74 93 Emerging and Developing Europe Latvia Albania Croatia Hungary Romania Lithuania Turkey Poland Bulgaria Serbia Bosnia and Herzegovina AVG = 0.62 Colombia Uruguay Costa Rica Peru Paraguay Brazil Chile Argentina Panama El Salvador Mexico Cuba Dominican Republic Ecuador Guatemala Nicaragua Bolivia Honduras Venezuela Jamaica Trinidad and Tobago Haiti Latin America and the Caribbean 42 47 62 8 10 13 20 25 21 38 39 49 64 70 69 73 86 78 88 98 110 123 AVG = 0.59 80 32 45 46 52 56 57 72 96 118 85 84 Commonwealth of Independent States Azerbaijan Tajikistan Georgia Russian Federation Armenia Kazakhstan Ukraine Republic of Moldova Uzbekistan Belarus Kyrgyz Republic Turkmenistan AVG = 0.55 Emerging and Developing Asia 51 54 61 67 79 89 87 90 94 102 106 109 115 Indonesia Sri Lanka Philippines Thailand Vietnam Malaysia Brunei Darussalam India China Cambodia Bangladesh Mongolia Nepal AVG = 0.53 91 68 29 75 77 76 81 95 97 100 101 108 105 116 119 120 121 122 Congo, Rep. Namibia Ghana South Africa Zambia Cameroon Kenya Zimbabwe Botswana Cote d’Ivoire Mozambique Senegal Nigeria Togo Tanzania Ethiopia Benin Eritrea Sub-Saharan Africa AVG = 0.51 Middle East, North Africa and Pakistan Morocco Tunisia Algeria Libya Egypt, Arab Rep. Sudan Iraq Pakistan United Arab Emirates Qatar Kuwait Jordan Oman Saudi Arabia Iran, Islamic Rep. Yemen, Rep. Lebanon Bahrain 59 63 82 71 83 92 99 104 103 111 107 112 113 114 126 117 125 124 The surge in unconventional oil and gas production has created a highly competitive and secure energy sector, with energy imports declining to 15% of energy use. United States Vast energy resources in the Russian Federation contribute to its energy security and economy. The drop in global oil and gas prices and fuel price distortion have prompted a fall in the ranking relative to recent years. Alternative energy and nuclear energy have remained stable at 9% of the energy mix over the last seven years. Russian Federation India is facing a vast array of challenges in the power sector while looking to meet its growth targets. Despite these challenges, electrification rates have progressed well over the years. India Sub-Saharan Africa achieves one of the lowest average regional scores. Low energy access rates and poor quality of supplies continue to adversely impact energy access and security. Sub-Saharan Africa The region achieves mixed results and has some high performers; Colombia, a notable example, boasts high scores on the three sub-indexes and particularly in environmental sustainability. Latin America and the Caribbean Again this year, Switzerland is the top performer on the index, with some of the most balanced scores across the energy triangle. Many European countries are among the highest performers on the global index. Europe Brazil is the highest-performing among the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia Federation, India and China), reflecting a diversified energy mix and a growing domestic oil and gas sector. The country has a considerable share of low-carbon energy within its mix; however, trends also show that the energy system has faced challenges in recent years. Brazil China now imports 12.7% of the energy consumed, compared to 8% in 2009. Overall, some good signals are apparent, such as the government’s efforts to curb pollution levels and strong progress in providing energy access. People's Republic of China South-East Asia has experienced high growth in energy demand over the last two decades. While every country in the region faces distinct challenges, some common areas to address include energy intensity, import dependence and fossil-fuel dependency. Singapore received the highest score in the region. South-East Asia EAPI 2016 in Numbers EAPI 2016 World Map Regional Rankings Economic growth and development 1 0 Average CO 2 emissions from electricity generation Environmental sustainability countries’ energy systems assessed 126 Top perf Selected indicators 84/123 87/126 number of net importers Elec quality Energy access and security 0.79 0.81 EAPI avg 0.60 0.59 OECD 0.70 0.68 2016 2009 2009 2016 2009 2016 2009 2016 2009 2016 4.72/7 4.21 6.23 4.73/7 4.10 6.25 EAPI avg $8.31 $6.03 BRICS Adv eco $8.99 EAPI avg $9.12 $6.67 BRICS Adv eco $10.55 EAPI avg CO 2 /kWh 436g Adv eco CO 2 /kWh 393g BRICS CO 2 /kWh 585g EAPI avg CO 2 /kWh 418g Adv eco CO 2 /kWh 355g BRICS CO 2 /kWh 577g EAPI avg BRICS Adv eco EAPI avg BRICS Adv eco Table of Rankings 0-10% 10-20% 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100% EAPI Percentile Rank High performers Low performers Not covered Switzerland Norway Sweden France Denmark Austria Spain Colombia New Zealand Uruguay Portugal Finland Costa Rica Latvia Slovenia United Kingdom Albania Croatia Hungary Peru Paraguay Italy Ireland Germany Brazil Iceland Romania Slovak Republic Congo, Rep. Canada Czech Republic Azerbaijan Luxembourg Belgium Lithuania Singapore Netherlands Chile Argentina Turkey Poland Panama Greece Bulgaria Tajikistan Georgia El Salvador United States Mexico Japan Indonesia Russian Federation Australia Sri Lanka Korea, Rep. Armenia Kazakhstan Israel Morocco Estonia Philippines Cuba Tunisia Dominican Republic Malta Cyprus Thailand Namibia Ecuador Guatemala Algeria Nicaragua Serbia Ghana South Africa Zambia Bolivia Vietnam Republic of Moldova Libya Egypt, Arab Rep. Uzbekistan Belarus Honduras Malaysia Venezuela Brunei Darussalam India Kenya Sudan Bosnia and Herzegovina China Zimbabwe Kyrgyz Republic Botswana Jamaica Iraq Cote d’Ivoire Mozambique Cambodia Pakistan United Arab Emirates Senegal Bangladesh Qatar Nigeria Mongolia Trinidad and Tobago Kuwait Jordan Oman Saudi Arabia Nepal Togo Iran, Islamic Rep. Turkmenistan Tanzania Ethiopia Benin Eritrea Haiti Yemen, Rep. Lebanon Bahrain (+1) (-1) (+1) (-1) (+1) (+3) (+5) (+3) (+4) (+16) (+3) (-5) (-3) (+4) (+5) (-1) (+17) (+13) (+14) (-1) (+2) (+2) (+2) (-8) (-17) (-9) (+14) (+4) (+1) (-2) (+7) (+15) (+6) (-5) (-8) (+1) (-16) (+18) (+16) (+4) (+2) (-2) (-8) (+8) (+21) (-4) (+3) (+5) (+11) (-28) (+11) (-16) (+8) (+4) (-9) (+1) (+2) (-10) (+13) (-9) (+3) (-17) (-14) (+19) (+5) (+5) (+8) (+8) (-4) (-7) (-17) (+6) (+23) n/a (+12) (+10) (+4) (+2) (+19) (+9) (-8) (-15) (-4) n/a (-11) (+15) (-3) (-19) (-4) (+2) (-3) n/a (-3) (+1) (-2) (-28) (-3) (+19) n/a n/a (-23) (-10) (+14) (+9) (-7) (-2) (+7) (-8) (-26) (-4) (-3) (+6) (-13) (-9) (-4) (+5) (-10) (-4) (-17) (-5) (-1) (-18) (-13) (-1) (-6) (-4) 0.79 0.72 0.76 0.88 0.78 0.65 0.74 0.95 0.76 0.61 0.80 0.89 0.76 0.60 0.80 0.88 0.76 0.67 0.70 0.91 0.75 0.64 0.74 0.88 0.75 0.65 0.74 0.87 0.75 0.74 0.67 0.84 0.75 0.59 0.75 0.90 0.74 0.69 0.73 0.81 0.73 0.60 0.74 0.85 0.73 0.53 0.78 0.87 0.73 0.68 0.76 0.75 0.71 0.61 0.72 0.81 0.71 0.56 0.72 0.87 0.71 0.60 0.66 0.89 0.71 0.65 0.80 0.69 0.71 0.63 0.67 0.82 0.70 0.58 0.73 0.81 0.70 0.75 0.65 0.70 0.70 0.66 0.81 0.63 0.70 0.58 0.67 0.84 0.70 0.64 0.65 0.80 0.70 0.58 0.63 0.87 0.69 0.59 0.70 0.79 0.69 0.36 0.90 0.81 0.69 0.63 0.67 0.77 0.69 0.52 0.73 0.82 0.69 0.76 0.76 0.55 0.69 0.57 0.61 0.88 0.68 0.55 0.62 0.88 0.68 0.68 0.57 0.79 0.68 0.68 0.62 0.75 0.68 0.49 0.72 0.83 0.68 0.57 0.71 0.76 0.68 0.68 0.55 0.81 0.68 0.51 0.64 0.88 0.67 0.60 0.60 0.81 0.66 0.68 0.59 0.72 0.66 0.57 0.63 0.79 0.66 0.64 0.55 0.78 0.66 0.65 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.56 0.60 0.81 0.65 0.54 0.66 0.76 0.65 0.46 0.82 0.67 0.65 0.48 0.75 0.71 0.65 0.51 0.72 0.71 0.64 0.54 0.50 0.89 0.64 0.59 0.60 0.74 0.64 0.53 0.56 0.84 0.64 0.56 0.64 0.71 0.64 0.55 0.58 0.79 0.64 0.64 0.40 0.88 0.64 0.64 0.66 0.60 0.63 0.55 0.52 0.84 0.63 0.47 0.71 0.71 0.63 0.57 0.54 0.78 0.63 0.56 0.50 0.81 0.62 0.54 0.57 0.75 0.62 0.54 0.57 0.76 0.62 0.56 0.63 0.67 0.62 0.74 0.49 0.62 0.61 0.43 0.62 0.79 0.61 0.62 0.56 0.64 0.60 0.64 0.56 0.61 0.60 0.58 0.57 0.65 0.60 0.48 0.53 0.78 0.59 0.57 0.74 0.46 0.59 0.49 0.60 0.68 0.58 0.46 0.73 0.56 0.58 0.43 0.56 0.76 0.58 0.31 0.64 0.79 0.58 0.44 0.72 0.58 0.58 0.49 0.53 0.71 0.57 0.59 0.69 0.43 0.57 0.56 0.53 0.62 0.57 0.49 0.89 0.33 0.57 0.39 0.59 0.72 0.57 0.42 0.59 0.69 0.57 0.38 0.61 0.70 0.57 0.52 0.78 0.40 0.55 0.46 0.48 0.73 0.55 0.42 0.52 0.71 0.55 0.42 0.56 0.66 0.54 0.36 0.62 0.66 0.54 0.39 0.71 0.54 0.54 0.32 0.49 0.82 0.54 0.32 0.61 0.68 0.54 0.45 0.43 0.73 0.53 0.51 0.49 0.61 0.53 0.42 0.82 0.35 0.53 0.43 0.77 0.39 0.53 0.45 0.52 0.62 0.53 0.45 0.42 0.71 0.53 0.41 0.76 0.41 0.53 0.22 0.74 0.61 0.53 0.57 0.56 0.45 0.52 0.39 0.56 0.62 0.52 0.53 0.29 0.75 0.52 0.44 0.72 0.39 0.51 0.37 0.90 0.27 0.51 0.51 0.69 0.33 0.51 0.45 0.49 0.59 0.51 0.45 0.28 0.80 0.50 0.44 0.57 0.49 0.50 0.63 0.43 0.45 0.50 0.47 0.25 0.78 0.49 0.42 0.72 0.35 0.49 0.38 0.49 0.60 0.49 0.35 0.42 0.70 0.49 0.46 0.18 0.83 0.49 0.40 0.39 0.68 0.48 0.40 0.27 0.77 0.48 0.40 0.21 0.82 0.48 0.42 0.67 0.33 0.47 0.34 0.78 0.30 0.47 0.30 0.36 0.76 0.47 0.29 0.35 0.77 0.47 0.39 0.78 0.23 0.45 0.29 0.88 0.19 0.44 0.40 0.61 0.32 0.44 0.32 0.63 0.38 0.44 0.41 0.69 0.23 0.44 0.59 0.32 0.40 0.43 0.38 0.39 0.53 0.38 0.16 0.24 0.73 Emerging and developing Europe Latin America and the Caribbean Advanced economies Commonwealth of Independent States Emerging and developing Asia Sub-Saharan Africa Middle East, North Africa and Pakistan Country Country 2009-16 trend 2 2016 score 1 2009-16 trend 2 2016 score 1 Economic growth and development Energy access and security Environmental sustainability 1 13 25 37 49 7 19 31 43 55 64 76 88 100 112 70 82 94 106 118 4 16 28 40 52 10 22 34 46 58 61 67 79 91 103 115 73 85 97 109 121 124 2 14 26 38 50 8 20 32 44 56 65 77 89 101 113 71 83 95 107 119 5 17 29 41 53 11 23 35 47 59 62 68 80 92 104 116 74 86 98 110 122 125 3 15 27 39 51 9 21 33 45 57 66 78 90 102 114 72 84 96 108 120 6 18 30 42 54 12 24 36 48 60 63 69 81 93 105 117 75 87 99 111 123 126 Ukraine Cameroon 1 EAPI 2016 score on scale from 0 to 1 2 Change in ranking versus benchmark 2009

Transcript of EAPI 2016 in Numbers EAPI 2016 World Map Table...

Page 1: EAPI 2016 in Numbers EAPI 2016 World Map Table …reports.weforum.org/global-energy-architecture...0EAA AEPA AEIA AE A AE2A AE1A AE6A AEVA AERA AE0A AEAA 0EAA AEPA AEIA AE A AE2A AE1A

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

0.10

0.00

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

0.10

0.00

EA

PI S

core

EA

PI S

core

AVG = Average EAPI score Global EAPI ranking

000

EAPI 2016 AVERAGE = 0.60

Advanced Economies

AVG = 0.69

Switz

erla

ndN

orw

aySw

eden

Fran

ceD

enm

ark

Aust

riaSp

ain

New

Zea

land

Portu

gal

Finl

and

Slov

enia

Uni

ted

King

dom

Italy

Irela

ndG

erm

any

Icel

and

Slov

ak R

epub

licC

anad

a

Cze

ch R

epub

licLu

xem

bour

gBe

lgiu

mSi

ngap

ore

Net

herla

nds

Gre

ece

Uni

ted

Stat

esJa

pan

Aust

ralia

Kore

a, R

ep.

Isra

elEs

toni

aM

alta

Cyp

rus

2

55

13 4 5 6 7 9 11 12

15 16 22 23 24 26 28 30 31 33 34504843

373653 58 60 65 66

AVG = 0.6640 44

14 17 18 19 2735 41

74

93

Emerging and Developing Europe

Latv

iaAl

bani

aC

roat

iaH

unga

ryRo

man

iaLi

thua

nia

Turk

eyPo

land

Bulg

aria

Serb

ia

Bosn

ia a

nd H

erze

govin

a

AVG = 0.62

Col

ombi

aU

rugu

ayC

osta

Ric

aPe

ruPa

ragu

ayBr

azil

Chi

leAr

gent

ina

Pana

ma

El S

alva

dor

Mex

ico

Cub

a

Dom

inic

an R

epub

licEc

uado

rG

uate

mal

aN

icar

agua

Boliv

iaH

ondu

ras

Vene

zuel

aJa

mai

ca

Trin

idad

and

Tob

ago

Hai

ti

Latin America and the Caribbean

42 4762

8 10 1320 2521

38 3949

647069 73

8678

88 98110

123

AVG = 0.5980

3245 46 52 56 57

72

96

118

8584

Commonwealth of Independent States

Azer

baija

nTa

jikist

anG

eorg

ia

Russ

ian

Fede

ratio

nAr

men

iaKa

zakh

stan

Ukr

aine

Repu

blic

of M

oldo

vaU

zbek

istan

Bela

rus

Kyrg

yz R

epub

licTu

rkm

enist

an

AVG = 0.55

Emerging and Developing Asia

51 54 61 6779

8987 90 94102 106 109 115

Indo

nesia

Sri L

anka

Philip

pine

sTh

aila

ndVi

etna

mM

alay

sia

Brun

ei D

arus

sala

mIn

dia

Chi

naC

ambo

dia

Bang

lade

shM

ongo

liaN

epal

AVG = 0.5391

68

29

75 7776 8195 97 100 101

108105116 119 120 121 122

Con

go, R

ep.

Nam

ibia

Gha

naSo

uth

Afric

aZa

mbi

aC

amer

oon

Keny

aZi

mba

bwe

Bots

wan

aC

ote

d’Iv

oire

Moz

ambi

que

Sene

gal

Nig

eria

Togo

Tanz

ania

Ethi

opia

Beni

nEr

itrea

Sub-Saharan Africa

AVG = 0.51

Middle East, North Africa and Pakistan

Mor

occo

Tuni

siaAl

geria

Liby

a

Egyp

t, Ar

ab R

ep.

Suda

nIra

qPa

kist

an

Uni

ted

Arab

Em

irate

sQ

atar

Kuw

ait

Jord

anO

man

Saud

i Ara

bia

Iran,

Isla

mic

Rep

.Ye

men

, Rep

.Le

bano

nBa

hrai

n

59 63

8271

8392 99 104103

111107 112 113 114

126

117125124

0-10%

10-20%

20-30%

30-40%

40-50%

50-60%

60-70%

70-80%

80-90%

90-100%

EAPI Percentile RankHigh performers

Low performersNot covered

The surge in unconventional oil and gas production has created a highly competitive and secure energy sector, with energy imports declining to 15% of energy use.

United States

Vast energy resources in the Russian Federation contribute to its energy security and economy. The drop in global oil and gas prices and fuel price distortion have prompted a fall in the ranking relative to recent years. Alternative energy and nuclear energy have remained stable at 9% of the energy mix over the last seven years.

Russian Federation

India is facing a vast array of challenges in the power sector while looking to meet its growth targets. Despite these challenges, electrification rates have progressed well over the years.

India

Sub-Saharan Africa achieves one of the lowest average regional scores. Low energy access rates and poor quality of supplies continue to adversely impact energy access and security.

Sub-Saharan Africa

The region achieves mixed results and has some high performers; Colombia, a notable example, boasts high scores on the three sub-indexes and particularly in environmental sustainability.

Latin America and the Caribbean

Again this year, Switzerland is the top performer on the index, with some of the most balanced scores across the energy triangle. Many European countries are among the highest performers on the global index.

Europe

Brazil is the highest-performing among the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia Federation, India and China), reflecting a diversified energy mix and a growing domestic oil and gas sector. The country has a considerable share of low-carbon energy within its mix; however, trends also show that the energy system has faced challenges in recent years.

Brazil

China now imports 12.7% of the energy consumed, compared to 8% in 2009. Overall, some good signals are apparent, such as the government’s efforts to curb pollution levels and strong progress in providing energy access.

People's Republic of China

South-East Asia has experienced high growth in energy demand over the last two decades. While every country in the region faces distinct challenges, some common areas to address include energy intensity, import dependence and fossil-fuel dependency. Singapore received the highest score in the region.

South-East Asia

EAPI 2016 in Numbers EAPI 2016 World Map

Regional Rankings

Econ

omic

gro

wth

an

d de

velo

pmen

t

10

Average CO2 emissions from electricity generation

Envi

ronm

enta

l su

stai

nabi

lity

countries’ energy systems assessed

126 Top perf

Selected indicators

84/12387/126

number of net importers Elec quality

Ener

gy a

cces

s an

d se

curit

y

0.790.81

EAPI avg 0.600.59

OECD 0.700.68

20162009

2009 2016

2009 2016

2009 20162009 2016

4.72/7 4.21

6.234.73/7 4.10

6.25

EAPI avg

$8.31$6.03

BRICSAdv eco

$8.99

EAPI avg

$9.12$6.67

BRICSAdv eco

$10.55

EAPI avgCO2/kWh436g

Adv ecoCO2/kWh393g

BRICSCO2 /kWh585g

EAPI avgCO2/kWh418g

Adv ecoCO2/kWh355g

BRICSCO2 /kWh577g

EAPI avg BRICS

Adv eco

EAPI avg BRICS

Adv eco

Table of Rankings

0-10%

10-20%

20-30%

30-40%

40-50%

50-60%

60-70%

70-80%

80-90%

90-100%

EAPI Percentile RankHigh performers

Low performersNot covered

The surge in unconventional oil and gas production has created a highly competitive and secure energy sector, with energy imports declining to 15% of energy use.

United States

Vast energy resources in the Russian Federation contribute to its energy security and economy. The drop in global oil and gas prices and fuel price distortion have prompted a fall in the ranking relative to recent years. Alternative energy and nuclear energy have remained stable at 9% of the energy mix over the last seven years.

Russian Federation

India is facing a vast array of challenges in the power sector while looking to meet its growth targets. Despite these challenges, electrification rates have progressed well over the years.

India

Sub-Saharan Africa achieves one of the lowest average regional scores. Low energy access rates and poor quality of supplies continue to adversely impact energy access and security.

Sub-Saharan Africa

The region achieves mixed results and has some high performers; Colombia, a notable example, boasts high scores on the three sub-indexes and particularly in environmental sustainability.

Latin America and the Caribbean

Again this year, Switzerland is the top performer on the index, with some of the most balanced scores across the energy triangle. Many European countries are among the highest performers on the global index.

Europe

Brazil is the highest-performing among the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia Federation, India and China), reflecting a diversified energy mix and a growing domestic oil and gas sector. The country has a considerable share of low-carbon energy within its mix; however, trends also show that the energy system has faced challenges in recent years.

Brazil

China now imports 12.7% of the energy consumed, compared to 8% in 2009. Overall, some good signals are apparent, such as the government’s efforts to curb pollution levels and strong progress in providing energy access.

People's Republic of China

South-East Asia has experienced high growth in energy demand over the last two decades. While every country in the region faces distinct challenges, some common areas to address include energy intensity, import dependence and fossil-fuel dependency. Singapore received the highest score in the region.

South-East Asia

SwitzerlandNorwaySwedenFranceDenmarkAustriaSpainColombiaNew ZealandUruguayPortugalFinlandCosta RicaLatviaSloveniaUnited KingdomAlbaniaCroatiaHungaryPeruParaguayItalyIrelandGermanyBrazilIcelandRomaniaSlovak RepublicCongo, Rep.CanadaCzech RepublicAzerbaijanLuxembourgBelgiumLithuaniaSingaporeNetherlandsChileArgentinaTurkeyPolandPanamaGreeceBulgariaTajikistanGeorgiaEl SalvadorUnited StatesMexicoJapanIndonesiaRussian FederationAustraliaSri LankaKorea, Rep.ArmeniaKazakhstanIsraelMoroccoEstoniaPhilippinesCubaTunisia

Dominican RepublicMaltaCyprusThailandNamibiaEcuadorGuatemalaAlgeria

NicaraguaSerbiaGhanaSouth AfricaZambiaBoliviaVietnamRepublic of Moldova

LibyaEgypt, Arab Rep.UzbekistanBelarusHondurasMalaysiaVenezuelaBrunei DarussalamIndiaKenyaSudanBosnia and HerzegovinaChinaZimbabweKyrgyz RepublicBotswanaJamaicaIraqCote d’IvoireMozambiqueCambodiaPakistanUnited Arab EmiratesSenegalBangladeshQatarNigeriaMongoliaTrinidad and TobagoKuwaitJordanOmanSaudi ArabiaNepalTogoIran, Islamic Rep.TurkmenistanTanzaniaEthiopiaBeninEritreaHaitiYemen, Rep.LebanonBahrain

(+1)

(-1)

(+1)

(-1)

(+1)

(+3)

(+5)

(+3)

(+4)

(+16)

(+3)

(-5)

(-3)

(+4)

(+5)

(-1)

(+17)

(+13)

(+14)

(-1)

(+2)

(+2)

(+2)

(-8)

(-17)

(-9)

(+14)

(+4)

(+1)

(-2)

(+7)

(+15)

(+6)

(-5)

(-8)

(+1)

(-16)

(+18)

(+16)

(+4)

(+2)

(-2)

(-8)

(+8)

(+21)

(-4)

(+3)

(+5)

(+11)

(-28)

(+11)

(-16)

(+8)

(+4)

(-9)

(+1)

(+2)

(-10)

(+13)

(-9)

(+3)

(-17)

(-14)

(+19)

(+5)

(+5)

(+8)

(+8)

(-4)

(-7)

(-17)

(+6)

(+23)

n/a

(+12)

(+10)

(+4)

(+2)

(+19)

(+9)

(-8)

(-15)

(-4)

n/a

(-11)

(+15)

(-3)

(-19)

(-4)

(+2)

(-3)

n/a

(-3)

(+1)

(-2)

(-28)

(-3)

(+19)

n/a

n/a

(-23)

(-10)

(+14)

(+9)

(-7)

(-2)

(+7)

(-8)

(-26)

(-4)

(-3)

(+6)

(-13)

(-9)

(-4)

(+5)

(-10)

(-4)

(-17)

(-5)

(-1)

(-18)

(-13)

(-1)

(-6)

(-4)

0.79 0.72 0.76 0.88

0.78 0.65 0.74 0.95

0.76 0.61 0.80 0.89

0.76 0.60 0.80 0.88

0.76 0.67 0.70 0.91

0.75 0.64 0.74 0.88

0.75 0.65 0.74 0.87

0.75 0.74 0.67 0.84

0.75 0.59 0.75 0.90

0.74 0.69 0.73 0.81

0.73 0.60 0.74 0.85

0.73 0.53 0.78 0.87

0.73 0.68 0.76 0.75

0.71 0.61 0.72 0.81

0.71 0.56 0.72 0.87

0.71 0.60 0.66 0.89

0.71 0.65 0.80 0.69

0.71 0.63 0.67 0.82

0.70 0.58 0.73 0.81

0.70 0.75 0.65 0.70

0.70 0.66 0.81 0.63

0.70 0.58 0.67 0.84

0.70 0.64 0.65 0.80

0.70 0.58 0.63 0.87

0.69 0.59 0.70 0.79

0.69 0.36 0.90 0.81

0.69 0.63 0.67 0.77

0.69 0.52 0.73 0.82

0.69 0.76 0.76 0.55

0.69 0.57 0.61 0.88

0.68 0.55 0.62 0.88

0.68 0.68 0.57 0.79

0.68 0.68 0.62 0.75

0.68 0.49 0.72 0.83

0.68 0.57 0.71 0.76

0.68 0.68 0.55 0.81

0.68 0.51 0.64 0.88

0.67 0.60 0.60 0.81

0.66 0.68 0.59 0.72

0.66 0.57 0.63 0.79

0.66 0.64 0.55 0.78

0.66 0.65 0.66 0.66

0.66 0.56 0.60 0.81

0.65 0.54 0.66 0.76

0.65 0.46 0.82 0.67

0.65 0.48 0.75 0.71

0.65 0.51 0.72 0.71

0.64 0.54 0.50 0.89

0.64 0.59 0.60 0.74

0.64 0.53 0.56 0.84

0.64 0.56 0.64 0.71

0.64 0.55 0.58 0.79

0.64 0.64 0.40 0.88

0.64 0.64 0.66 0.60

0.63 0.55 0.52 0.84

0.63 0.47 0.71 0.71

0.63 0.57 0.54 0.78

0.63 0.56 0.50 0.81

0.62 0.54 0.57 0.75

0.62 0.54 0.57 0.76

0.62 0.56 0.63 0.67

0.62 0.74 0.49 0.62

0.61 0.43 0.62 0.79

0.61 0.62 0.56 0.64

0.60 0.64 0.56 0.61

0.60 0.58 0.57 0.65

0.60 0.48 0.53 0.78

0.59 0.57 0.74 0.46

0.59 0.49 0.60 0.68

0.58 0.46 0.73 0.56

0.58 0.43 0.56 0.76

0.58 0.31 0.64 0.79

0.58 0.44 0.72 0.58

0.58 0.49 0.53 0.71

0.57 0.59 0.69 0.43

0.57 0.56 0.53 0.62

0.57 0.49 0.89 0.33

0.57 0.39 0.59 0.72

0.57 0.42 0.59 0.69

0.57 0.38 0.61 0.70

0.57 0.52 0.78 0.40

0.55 0.46 0.48 0.73

0.55 0.42 0.52 0.71

0.55 0.42 0.56 0.66

0.54 0.36 0.62 0.66

0.54 0.39 0.71 0.54

0.54 0.32 0.49 0.82

0.54 0.32 0.61 0.68

0.54 0.45 0.43 0.73

0.53 0.51 0.49 0.61

0.53 0.42 0.82 0.35

0.53 0.43 0.77 0.39

0.53 0.45 0.52 0.62

0.53 0.45 0.42 0.71

0.53 0.41 0.76 0.41

0.53 0.22 0.74 0.61

0.53 0.57 0.56 0.45

0.52 0.39 0.56 0.62

0.52 0.53 0.29 0.75

0.52 0.44 0.72 0.39

0.51 0.37 0.90 0.27

0.51 0.51 0.69 0.33

0.51 0.45 0.49 0.59

0.51 0.45 0.28 0.80

0.50 0.44 0.57 0.49

0.50 0.63 0.43 0.45

0.50 0.47 0.25 0.78

0.49 0.42 0.72 0.35

0.49 0.38 0.49 0.60

0.49 0.35 0.42 0.70

0.49 0.46 0.18 0.83

0.49 0.40 0.39 0.68

0.48 0.40 0.27 0.77

0.48 0.40 0.21 0.82

0.48 0.42 0.67 0.33

0.47 0.34 0.78 0.30

0.47 0.30 0.36 0.76

0.47 0.29 0.35 0.77

0.47 0.39 0.78 0.23

0.45 0.29 0.88 0.19

0.44 0.40 0.61 0.32

0.44 0.32 0.63 0.38

0.44 0.41 0.69 0.23

0.44 0.59 0.32 0.40

0.43 0.38 0.39 0.53

0.38 0.16 0.24 0.73

1 EAPI 2016 score on scale from 0 to 12 Change in ranking versus benchmark 2009

Emerging and developing Europe

Latin America and the Caribbean

Advanced economies

Commonwealth of Independent States

Emerging and developing Asia

Sub-Saharan Africa Middle East, North Africa and Pakistan

Country Country2009-16trend2

2016score1

2009-16trend2

2016score1

Economic growth and development

Energy access and securityEnvironmental sustainability

1

13

25

37

49

7

19

31

43

55

64

76

88

100

112

70

82

94

106

118

4

16

28

40

52

10

22

34

46

58

61

67

79

91

103

115

73

85

97

109

121

124

2

14

26

38

50

8

20

32

44

56

65

77

89

101

113

71

83

95

107

119

5

17

29

41

53

11

23

35

47

59

62

68

80

92

104

116

74

86

98

110

122

125

3

15

27

39

51

9

21

33

45

57

66

78

90

102

114

72

84

96

108

120

6

18

30

42

54

12

24

36

48

60

63

69

81

93

105

117

75

87

99

111

123

126

Ukraine

Cameroon

1 EAPI 2016 score on scale from 0 to 12 Change in ranking versus benchmark 2009

Page 2: EAPI 2016 in Numbers EAPI 2016 World Map Table …reports.weforum.org/global-energy-architecture...0EAA AEPA AEIA AE A AE2A AE1A AE6A AEVA AERA AE0A AEAA 0EAA AEPA AEIA AE A AE2A AE1A

Industry Agenda

Global Energy Architecture Performance Index Report 2016

New Energy Architecture Report SeriesKey Findings from the EAPI 2016

The EAPI 2016 reveals strengths and weaknesses across regions as major economies struggle to take the lead:

– Analysis of this year’s top performers demonstrate that there are no clear-cut ‘winners’ or perfect energy architectures. The strong scores of the top performers reveal balance across the energy triangle, but room for improvement is still significant.

– High-performing countries are not confined to a single region. The EAPI points to the strengths of countries beyond the usual suspects, with for example Albania (17th) and Paraguay (21st) boasting fully decarbonised electricity generation.

– Low oil prices are forcing or accelerating subsidy reforms to restore fiscal balance in countries reliant on oil revenues.

– The world’s largest economies still struggle to achieve balanced high performance in their energy systems. With the exception of France (4th), none of the 12 largest countries by GDP made it into the top 10 performers.

Diversification to new energy sources is creating new risks and opportunities that will require market changes and government mechanisms to ensure security of supply and access:

– Expansion of primary energy sources is demonstrated by year-over-year improvements in EAPI scores for diversification of energy supplies in many countries. Denmark, for example, has improved supply diversity by 15%.

– The trend is driven in part by expansion of renewable energy sources. Globally, renewable electric power capacity has skyrocketed this past decade to account for approximately 6% of generation.

– Progress on distributed renewable energy is opening up new avenues for providing access to electricity for people so far deprived thereof.

Digital disruption will bring new complexities to energy security as well as new benefits:

– Big data can mitigate traditional risks by pinpointing areas of risk and vulnerability, and digital technologies are enabling the decentralization and management of energy architectures.

– The convergence of digital and physical infrastructures also creating new forms of insight and control that can enhance energy security.

– New capabilities are required to manage a more complex, interconnected energy system, requiring new investment in capabilities for risk protection.

A new distribution of powers and energy trade flows will create challenges and opportunities:

– The emergence of giant economies in Asia, accounting for 35% of fuel trades in 2014, and unconventional oil production in North America, which has added over 8 million barrels per day to the market, have led to a re-balancing of supply, demand and power across the world.

– More actors are becoming relevant – non-state organizations, individual citizens, corporations and new coalitions – which could strengthen or threaten international security arrangements.

As major forces prompt transformations across global energy systems, governments and industry together play critical roles in achieving successful energy transitions:

– Governments shall be receptive to new opportunities and risks to energy security resulting from developments in the energy sector.

– Companies play a critical role because investors, owners and operators of energy infrastructure will be essential to reaping the benefits of new technologies.

– New approaches to governance for physical and technological estates will be required, creating a need for increased collaboration between operators, policy makers and national and international entities.

Since 2011, the World Economic Forum has been working on the New Energy Architecture initiative, in collaboration with Accenture, to better understand the changes under way in the global energy system, and how to enable the transition to a more affordable, sustainable and secure energy architecture. A core part of this work has been the development of the Energy Architecture Performance Index, which was first issued in 2013. An overview follows of related reports previously issued:

Global Energy Architecture Performance Index Report 2014

The second edition of the index benchmarked and ranked 124 countries on how well their energy systems deliver across the three dimensions of the energy triangle, while providing in-depth analysis across different regions.

Global Energy Architecture Performance Index Report 2015

The third edition of the index benchmarked and ranked 125 countries on how well their energy systems deliver across the three dimensions of the energy triangle, while providing in-depth analysis on energy reforms in major emerging economies.

Global Energy Architecture Performance Index Report 2013

The first edition of the index benchmarked and ranked 105 countries on how well their energy systems deliver economic growth and development, environmental sustainability, and energy access and security.

New Energy Architecture: Enabling an effective transition (2012)

The way energy is produced, distributed and consumed around the world is currently undergoing fundamental change of almost unprecedented scale. This report looked at pathways to create a more effective transition towards a new energy architecture.

Acknowledgements

The global Energy Architecture Performance Index is conducted under the World Economic Forum’s Energy Industry Partnership, with support from the Global Competitiveness and Risks team and done in collaboration with Accenture. A panel of independent experts has provided input and guidance. The project team would like to thank the chief expert advisers involved in this year’s edition of the report: David Victor, Professor of International Relations and Director, Laboratory on International Law, University of California, San Diego; Morgan Bazilian, Lead Energy Specialist, World Bank; Eirik Wærness, Chief Economist and Vice-President, Statoil and Giuseppe Montesano, Head, European Energy Policies and Analysis, Enel. Thanks also go to our data partners and contributors: the International Energy Agency, the World Bank, the World Trade Organization and the German Federal Enterprise for International Cooperation.

About the World Economic Forum The World Economic Forum is an international institution committed to improving the state of the world through public-private cooperation in the spirit of global citizenship. It engages with business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971 and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the Forum is independent, impartial and not tied to any interests. It cooperates closely with all leading international organizations.

World Economic Forum91-93 route de la CapiteCH-1223 Cologny/GenevaSwitzerland

Tel.: +41 (0)22 869 1212Fax: +41 (0)22 786 2744Email: [email protected]

About the Energy Architecture Performance Index

The global Energy Architecture Performance Index (EAPI) provides a tool for decision-makers to holistically benchmark nations’ energy systems. The EAPI aims to support governments and other stakeholders along the energy value chain in identifying the relative performance of elements of their energy systems, in order to determine areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. The EAPI is a composite index that measures the energy system performance of 126 countries. At its core are 18 indicators covering three main dimensions of energy systems: i) economic growth and development, ii) environmental sustainability, and iii) energy access and security. The EAPI provides a transparent and easily comparable set of measures that can help track progress and open new perspectives on the specific challenges faced by individual countries. In addition to global benchmarking, the EAPI puts the spotlight each year on a topical issue related to the index. The 2016 edition includes a special chapter on energy security.

The full methodology behind the EAPI is available online at http://wef.ch/eapimethodology.

Fuel exports(% GDP)

Super gasoline -

level of price

distortion through

subsidy or tax

level of price

distortion through

subsidy or tax

Fuel imports(% GDP)

per unit ofGDP produced

energy use

Supp

orts

/det

ract

sfro

m g

row

thIn

tens

ity

Affordability

Diesel -for industryElectricity prices

Alternative andnuclear energy

N 2O emissions

in energy sector/

total population

CO2 emissionsfrom electricity

production

CH 4 em

ission

s

from en

ergy s

ector/

total pop

ulation

emiss

ions

PM2.

5

Aver

age

fuel

econ

omy

for

pass

enge

r car

s

Ratio

of l

owca

rbon

fuel

sin

the

ener

gym

ix

Emissions impact

Diversif

ication

of import

Quality of

electricity supply

rate

Electrification

Population using

solid fuels forcooking

Ener

gy im

ports

(% o

f ene

rgy

use)

Dive

rsity

of t

otal

prim

ary

ener

gy s

uppl

y

coun

terpart

s

Self-sufficiencyDiversityof supply

Level and quality of a

cces

s

Energy Architecture Performance

Index

Economic growth and development

This sub-index measures the extent to which a country’s energy architecture adds or detracts from economic growth

This sub-index measures the environmental impact of energy supply and consumption

Environmental sustainability

This sub-index measures the extent to which an energy supply is secure, accessible and diversified

Energy access and securityEconomic growth and development

This sub-index measures the extent to which a country’s energy architecture adds or detracts from economic growth

This sub-index measures the environmental impact of energy supply and consumption

Environmental sustainability

This sub-index measures the extent to which an energy supply is secure, accessible and diversified

Energy access and securityEconomic growth and development

This sub-index measures the extent to which a country’s energy architecture adds or detracts from economic growth

This sub-index measures the environmental impact of energy supply and consumption

Environmental sustainability

This sub-index measures the extent to which an energy supply is secure, accessible and diversified

Energy access and security

World Economic Forum®

© 2016 – All rights reserved.

No part of this publication may be reproduced or Transmitted in any form or by any means, including Photocopying and recording, or by any information Storage and retrieval system.

REF 101215