E85 Optimized Engine

Apoorv AgarwalFord Motor Company

Paul WhitakerAVL Powertrain Engineering Inc

Project ID#: ft_12_agarwal

March 20, 2009

This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information

2

Overview

• Total project funding– DOE share - $3.2 million– Ford share - $3.2 million

• Funding received in FY08– $1,217,847.80

• Funding received in FY09– $918,253.23 (invoiced)

• Funding for FY10– None

Timeline

Budget

Barriers

• AVL Powertrain Engineering Inc• Ethanol Boosting Systems LLC• Ford Motor Company (project lead)

Partners

• Project start date – Oct 2007• Project end date – Dec 2009• Percent complete – 65%

Targets

• Ethanol availability• Engine structure requirements• Emissions with E85

• 15-20% better FE for F-Series trucks• Meet 2012 HDGE emissions with

stretch target of ULEVII/Tier 2 Bin 5

3

Objectives

Since Last Year’s Merit Review

Develop and assess a dual fuel concept for on-demand direct injection of E85

Complete single and multi-cylinder engine design

− Cylinder heads, valvetrain, pistons, fuel system, air system

− Combustion system including ports, injectors, piston crown and combustion chamber

− Support with 1D performance simulation

Develop and verify combustion system using optical and single cylinder engine

Develop base models for vehicle performance and fuel economy prediction

Procure and build multi-cylinder hardware

Commence multi-cylinder development

4

MilestonesBudget Period 1 (Oct 1, 2007 to Aug 31, 2008)

Overall engine system definition including cylinder head architecture, boost system configuration, fuel injection system and engine structure

Analytical predictions of engine full load performance and vehicle fuel efficiency for FFV and E85 optimized dual fuel engines

Combustion system optimization for operation on E85 based on optical and conventional single cylinder testing

Budget Period 2 (Sep 1, 2008 to May 31, 2009)Completion of design and analysis of multi-cylinder engine components

Procurement and build of multi-cylinder engines

Base engine optimization based on multi-cylinder engine dynamometer development and modeling studies

Demonstrate full load torque capability and fuel efficiency at vehicle mapping points

Budget Period 3 (Jun 1, 2009 to Dec 31, 2009)Conduct base engine mapping and calibration optimization for fuel efficiency

Optimize cold starting strategy

Demonstrate overall program objectives at a vehicle level using vehicle simulation

5

1213141516171819202122232425262728

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500Engine Speed (rpm)

BM

EP (b

ar)

GTDI 91 RONETDI (FFV & Dual Fuel)

Combustion System Targets

Support flex and dual fuel operation• Address V8 residual imbalance issues• Minimize gasoline fuel enrichment at full load• Minimize cylinder wall wetting with fuel• Maximize low end torque with scavenging• Develop rapid catalyst heating strategies

6

Dual Fuel StrategyE85 provides significant octane benefit with DI due to high latent heat of vaporization and high octane rating

Allows knock-free operation at high CR and high BMEP with very high thermal efficiency

but…Low E85 heating value is a disadvantage

Dual fuel strategy uses E85 DI only as required to eliminate knock in a high CR gasoline engine.

Combines high load E85 octane benefit with part load gasoline heating value advantage

Provides maximum leveraging of available ethanol

7

Approach

Simultaneous use of detailed numerical simulations, optical, single and multi-cylinder engine investigations makes this a unique approach

1-D modeling (GT-Power) used to determine initial cam timings and turbocharger match.

3-D CFD modeling, optical engine testing, and conventional single cylinder engine testing used to optimize fuel spray, piston bowl geometry, and in-cylinder charge motion.

Use of multi-cylinder engine to develop cam event durations, variable cam timing strategy, compression ratio, turbocharger matching, cooled EGR system and air induction system.

Engine mapping used to develop vehicle level projections of performance and fuel economy for various driving cycles.

8

FY08 Technical Accomplishments

Completed optical and single cylinder investigations of fuel spray pattern, piston bowl geometry and in-cylinder charge motion

Completed design, procurement and build of multi-cylinder turbocharged dual fuel engines capable of 150 bar peak pressure

Installed and started testing a multi-cylinder engine in a dynamometer test cell

Completed preliminary vehicle level simulations of fuel economy and performance of single and E85 optimized dual fuel engines

9

High Tumble Port Development - LDA Rig

High tumble intake portLDA measurements at incremental valve lift

High tumble improves mixture preparation and provides combustion efficiency improvements

LDA measurement helps ensure tumble field is centered for symmetric flame propagation

10

Optical EngineOptical Investigation Techniques

Planar Double Sided LIF Image Flame Image

Pictures from Combustion Chamber after Measurement

1000rpm WOT, injector DT1, piston v1

Raw Image

Statistical Image

Evaluation

Glass liner

Piston Top

Glass liner framing

The optical engine is used to optimize mixture preparation, eliminate wall wetting and optimize catalyst heating and cold start

11

pV3iDT1_E85_2015hL

Optical Engine2000 rpm Full Load, Ethanol, LIF Images

0

1001

100

lowDensity

highFuel

Probability[%]

Mode

FLEtOH 7.0

Piston CO[% vol]

Speed[rpm]

2000

Valve Timing

20

SOI1[BTDC]

300

DOI1 [ms]

SA[BTDC]

-3

AIP [kPa]

180

Int.

-10

FRP [MPa]

15DT1 1.4-

EOI2[BTDC]

-

DOI2 [ms]

V 3

InjectorExh.

1.5

IMEP [MPa]

59

StD [kPa]

LIF

Optical Method

Fuel spray direction

Air intake flow

No wall wetting

Satisfactory full load mixture preparation even with increased E85 flow rates. Significant beneficial fuel spray/air motion interaction even at low speed where air motion is low leading to no wall wetting issues.

12

0

1001

100

FlameProbability

[%] Premixed Flame

Soot Flame

Optical Engine - Split Injection for Catalyst HeatingComparison of Gasoline & E85 Flame Images

Gasoline DI

E85 DI

Significantly reduced smoke with E85 (oxygenated fuel) more calibration freedom, increased efficiency

13

Single Cylinder EngineEthanol Full Load Benefits - E85 vs. RON91

E85RON91

2.5%

30°CA

150 bar

950°C

DI E85 operation permits MBT ignition (where not peak pressure limited) without requiring fuel enrichment even at much higher loads than gasoline. This leads to significant efficiency increase!

25%

MBT

14

Single Cylinder EngineDual Fuel E85 DI % sweep, Full Load, 9.3 CR

18 bar NMEP24 bar NMEP27 bar NMEP

2000 rpm 3500 rpm

150 bar

Less than 100% E85 DI required to hold MBT ignition at high BMEP – minimizes E85 consumption increasing E85 range. Reduced E85 requirement when Pmax limited at higher speeds.

70-75% E85req’d for MBT 55-60% E85 req’d

MBT

18 bar NMEP24 bar NMEP26 bar NMEP

15

Cycle Simulation ResultsDual Fuel Optimized E85 Engine vs. Competitors –F-Series Preliminary Results Based on Estimated Fuel Maps

+ 530 mpg E85+ 860 mpg Urea

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Metro Highway Fuel Economy Improvement (%)

Max

Gra

de in

6th

Gea

r at 6

5 m

ph (%

)

5.0l GTDI 91 RON5.0l GTDI FFV E855.0l Dual Fuel (gasoline mpg only)NA Gasoline Baseline 91 RONDiesel Target

Heating Value DisadvantageDownsizing/Downspeeding

Benefit

+3 Compression Ratio Increase, Advanced Combustion Phasing BenefitsGasoline Displaced By E85 At High Load

16

Future Work

Cam timing and turbocharger matching optimization by completing multi-cylinder engine dynamometer development for both FFV and dual fuel engines

Multi-cylinder full load performance and fuel efficiency at vehicle mapping points for FFV and E85 optimized dual fuel engines

– Dual fuel evaluation at 12:1 compression ratio

Cold starting strategy for E85 optimized dual fuel engine

Mapping the FFV and E85 optimized dual fuel engines

Evaluation of vehicle level attributes for the FFV and E85 optimized dual fuel engines

17

Summary

The E85 optimized engine provides improved efficiency via higher compression ratio and increased BMEP which allows greater levels of down-sizing and down-speeding.

The dual fuel concept significantly leverages the use of available ethanol in reducing gasoline consumption.

The project is on track technically. All deliverables for BP1 have been completed and those for BP2 will be completed by May 31.

The E85 optimized engine and the dual fuel concept are logical extensions of Ford’s “EcoBoost” strategy.

Plans for 2009 include completion of multi-cylinder engine development and projection of vehicle level fuel economy and performance.

E85 Optimized EngineOverviewObjectives��Since Last Year’s Merit ReviewMilestonesSlide Number 5Dual Fuel StrategyApproachFY08 Technical AccomplishmentsSlide Number 9Optical Engine�Optical Investigation Techniques Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Single Cylinder Engine�Ethanol Full Load Benefits - E85 vs. RON91Single Cylinder Engine�Dual Fuel E85 DI % sweep, Full Load, 9.3 CRCycle Simulation Results�Dual Fuel Optimized E85 Engine vs. Competitors – �F-Series Preliminary Results Based on Estimated Fuel MapsFuture WorkSummarySlide Number 18Responses to Previous Year Reviewers’ Comments [1/3]Responses to Previous Year Reviewers’ Comments [2/3]Responses to Previous Year Reviewers’ Comments [3/3]Publications and PresentationsCritical Assumptions and Issues