Dynamics Fem
-
Upload
alicia-hambure -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Dynamics Fem
8/9/2019 Dynamics Fem
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dynamics-fem 1/8
8/9/2019 Dynamics Fem
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dynamics-fem 2/8
"ynamics # $ro%ect 1 August &'1(
∫wρA ∂
2u
∂ t 2 dx +∫
∂w
∂ x ( EA ∂u∂x )dx=∫wbdx+w ´ p
8/9/2019 Dynamics Fem
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dynamics-fem 3/8
"ynamics # $ro%ect 1 August &'1(
Question &
A )arlerkin appro*imation was used on the weak form for transient linear elasticity
+shown in Question 1- This was used to discreti.e the problem in space, therefore
general e/uations for the relevant matrices for each of the elements is:
Two di0erent ewmark time schemes were implemented to solve the initial
boundary problem over a period of time- The general e*pressions for these time
schemes are:
The results using consistent mass matrices are as follows:
a Trape.oidal 2ule + β=
1
4, γ =
1
2¿
M e= ρ
e A
el
e∫ N
T Nd Ω
e
K e= E
e A
e
le ∫B
T BdΩ
e
F e= N
T Fd Ω
e
tart from:
M un+1+C un+1+ K un+1= F n+1
Assume e/uilibrium at n31
vn=un , n=un
un+1=un+! t vn+! t 2
2[ (1−2 β ) n+2 β n+1]
8/9/2019 Dynamics Fem
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dynamics-fem 4/8
"ynamics # $ro%ect 1 August &'1(
The trape.oidal rule seems to be unconditionally stable- Though a coarse
discreti.ation of time results in a poor value, the numbers are not growing
e*ponentially nor running away as the re4nement decreases- The di0erence
in the deflection of the bar when decreasing 5t by 1'' is appro*imately '-6 *
1'7(, which is &'8 error in using a coarse discreti.ation-
b 9entral di0erence method + β=0 , γ =
1
2¿
In comparison to the trape.oidal rule, the central di0erence method is
conditionally stable- This means that there is a ma*imum value for 5t, where
any larger 5t value will cause instability in the numerical implementation- At
5t 1-' * 1'7; s, the graph was still not generating and A values were
found in the matri* for the displacement- It is only around 5t < ;-= * 1'7>
s,that a valid solution appear-
The mass matrices were then lumped using the row7sum techni/ue-
c Trape.oidal 2ule + β=
1
4, γ =
1
2¿
!igure &: 5t '-''''1s!igure 1: 5t '-''1s +?steps
!igure (: 5t ;-== * 1' 7> s +?steps!igure @: 5t '-''1s +?steps
8/9/2019 Dynamics Fem
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dynamics-fem 5/8
"ynamics # $ro%ect 1 August &'1(
The lumped mass matrices and the consistent mass matrices results were
very similar- This shows that there is no di0erence between using a di0erent
mass matri* whilst using the trape.oidal rule-
d 9entral di0erence method + β=0 , γ =1
2¿
The critical time step for the central di0erence method had increased when
the mass matrices were lumped- It is more ecient to use a lumped mass
matri* when using 9"M since fewer time steps are re/uired to converge to a
good solution-
Bverall comments about the shape of the graph of a good solution shows that the
last element +from C '-D; # 1m, the deEection is constant- This is because thelast element has a much greater sti0ness than the rest of the bar- Also, only half of
the bar e*periences deEection +the half closest to the end sub%ected to the
concentrated and compressive end load- This can be due to the fact that the bar is
a 1m long and the force is relatively small-
!igure ;: 5t '-''1s +?steps !igure >: 5t '-''1s +?steps
!igure 6: 5t 1-11 * 1' 7; s +?steps !igure =: 5t 1-' * 1' 7; s +?steps
8/9/2019 Dynamics Fem
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dynamics-fem 6/8
"ynamics # $ro%ect 1 August &'1(
8/9/2019 Dynamics Fem
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dynamics-fem 7/8
"ynamics # $ro%ect 1 August &'1(
Question @
The bottom7left /uarter of a 1m * 1m s/uare plate that underwent transient thermal
conduction was modelled- The governing e/uation for transient thermal conduction
and the relevant elemental matrices for this particular are:
The problem is a parabolic e/uation- Fackward Guler was the chosen time scheme
used to model the problem because it is unconditionally stable however the MATCAF4le allows for this to be changed- The general e*pression for this time scheme is:
The results are as follows:
M T + KT = F
K e=" ∫B
T Bd Ω
e
M e= ρ
e# p∫ N
T Nd Ω
e
F e=∫ N
T $d Ω
e
M un+1+ K un+1= F n+1
un+1=un+! t v n+%
!igure 1':!igure D:
8/9/2019 Dynamics Fem
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dynamics-fem 8/8
"ynamics # $ro%ect 1 August &'1(
The heat evolution of the plate that has an initial temperature of 'H and a heat
source of s f oe7t increases to a ma*imum of appro*imately '-(@ H at 37'-=s-
Thereafter, the temperature shown in the graph seems to decay e*ponentially- Thisis to be e*pected as the heat source is e*ponentially decaying as time goes by-
!igure1&:!igure11: