DYNAMIC PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: Strategies to Guide and Assess Teacher Growth
description
Transcript of DYNAMIC PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: Strategies to Guide and Assess Teacher Growth
DYNAMIC PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: Strategies to Guide and Assess Teacher Growth
Jane Gawronski, Nadine Bezuk, and Steve KlassNational Council of Teachers of Mathematics - Annual Conference, April 2008
2
Today’s Session
Welcome and introductions Who we are What we do in our professional development Impact of our work on student achievement
and teacher practice Questions and discussion
3
Who We Are
San Diego State University Professional Development Collaborative (PDC)
http://pdc.sdsu.edu Supported by a $5.1M grant from to Improve Student
Achievement in Mathematics (ISAM).
4
2000-2001Grades 4-6 low-performing schools
(San Diego Unified School District)
Grades 4-6 team teachers(SDUSD)
Grades 4-6 teachers(SDUSD)
Grades K-3 teachers(SDUSD)
2006-presentTeachers from multiple districts K-12
History of Our Professional Development Work
5
Professional Development
Face-to-face– San Diego Unified School District (K-12)
– Lemon Grove School District (K-8)*
– Ramona Unified School District (K-12)
– Sweetwater Union High School District (7-12)
*Blended online and face-to-face sessions Math Specialist Certificate Program (MSCP)
6
What Makes it Dynamic? PD leaders jointly plan and conduct
sessions– The “math content leader” looks at the
goals through a mathematics lens.– The “math ed leader” looks at the goals
through a instructional practice lens. Constant revision based on needs of
participants– One size does NOT fit all!
7
Impact on Student Achievement and Teacher Practice
Student AchievementTeacher GrowthContentPedagogy
8
Student Achievement State-mandated test: CA Standards Test
(CST) Matched-pairs study in Year 6 (2006)
Students taught by MSCP teacher were paired with students taught by teacher without MSCP 22 teachers 580 pairs of students
9
Matched Pairs Study
Major criteria for matching Same grade level Same initial raw score on CST
mathematics section School with same Academic
Performance Index (API)
10
Matched Pairs Results
Mean score of students with MSCP teacher was significantly greater than mean score of students with non-MSCP teacher
Students in lower API schools were impacted more than students in higher API schools
11
Assessing and GuidingTeacher Growth
Mathematics content knowledge and pedagogy
Informal assessment using “Try-it-on” Embedded assessments Changes reported by teachers Impact on practice
12
Mathematics Content and Pedagogy
San Diego State University developed assessments Including University of Michigan Items
Embedded assessments
13
Impact on Teachers’ Content Knowledge
Pre- and post-tests Number and operations Rational numbers Geometry
In every cohort the mean scores increased from pre-test to post-test
14
Guiding Teacher Knowledge Through “Try-it-on” Tasks
Tasks developed for teachers to implement with their students
Teachers bring student work to subsequent PD sessions for analysis with colleagues
Teacher sharing informs PD leaders
15
Try-It-On Task – Grades 3-5
“Most said it means to find the answer.”◼“Many students were shocked to see this, and I know it was part of the 4th grade curriculum.”◼“I had a lot of students go OOOOOHHH, that’s right.”
8 + 4 = + 5
16
Try-It-On Task – Grades 6–8 Proportional reasoning:
Punch Problem: If a gallon of punch will serve 12 people, how much punch would you prepare for a party at which you will have 50 guests? (Lamon, p. 111)
Most students did not use a proportion to solve this, though the procedure had been “taught”.
Teachers expressed surprise and conjectured that even though their students could solve a proportion, they may not be reasoning proportionally.
17
Try-It-On Task – Grades K-3 Triangle or Not a Triangle
Fall: case study presented to teachers, and student pre-assessments in identifying triangles carried out by teachers
Winter: discussions during PD sessions designed to increase teacher content knowledge about triangles; teachers return to classrooms with try-it-on task for students using concept cards developed by teachers.
Spring: geometry project; student post-assessments; teacher analysis and discussion of results in PD sessions.
19
Embedded Assessments
Assessment items embedded into professional development sessions
Minimized testing time taken from instruction during PD sessions
Springboard for instruction - linked to PD More authentic feel for teachers
20
Assessing Teacher Knowledge Through Embedded Assessments
Tasks developed for teachers of Grades 6 – Algebra I Jay’s Lesson Qualitative graph
21
Jay’s Lesson Jay was talking with Allison, his 9th grade
student, They were talking about the following word problem:
Suppose you have a large piece of fish that weighs
4 pounds. You are making servings from this large
fish. Each serving will weigh of a pound. How
many servings can you make from the fish?
€
35
Allison drew the following picture to help her solve the problem:
Jay: How many servings do we have? Alison: 6 and 2 left over. So each serving is and then… , right? Jay: 6 is the answer?Alison: I’m thinking ‘cause there’s two left over out of 5.
How would you respond to this student? 22
Jay’s Lesson
€
35
€
25
€
25
23
Qualitative Graph Write a story about a journey that could be
represented by the following graph. Make sure to tell what happened in each lettered section.
24
Changes Reported by TeachersQuestion: “As a result of this program, . . .”
% Responding
“Yes”
Do you have a better understanding of mathematics?
94%
Has your mathematics teaching changed? 98%
Have your beliefs changed? 87%
Have your expectations of what students should know and be able to do mathematically changed?
85%
25
Impact on Teachers’ Instructional Practices
Teachers report that they now:
Try new strategies in their classrooms; Select among many tools including the
textbook, the pacing guide, and CGI principles; and
Recognize good mathematical problems from the text that will help students meet the standards.
26
One Teacher’s Comments About Our Impact on Her Teaching
“I feel my knowledge and understanding of mathematics has been expanded to the point where I will never teach math the same again. I know too much about group/partner work, using manipulatives; reflective writing, student-directed teaching, student responsibility. In short, I feel enlightened. I feel I finally understand math.”