Dupilumab)is)associated)with)disease)worsening)or ... · Background+&+Objec1ves+ • Initial...

1
Background & Objec1ves Methods Table 1. Pa1ent Characteris1cs and response to dupilumab Figure 1: Case 5 Clinical Photographs Possible mechanisms Conclusions Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal an1body that binds the interleukin4 receptor alpha (IL4Rα) subunit and inhibits signaling of IL4 and IL13. It was approved by the Food and Drug Administra1on for the treatment of moderatetosevere atopic derma11s (AD) in adults and adolescents with efficacy in reducing pruritus. 1 The two most common subtypes of cutaneous Tcell lymphoma (CTCL) are mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS). MF/SS and AD are similarly driven by Thelper 2 (TH2) cytokine profiles 2 and may present with similar morphology (i.e. erythema, lichenifica1on, fissuring) with pruritus, 3 disrup1on of the skin barrier, and impe1giniza1on. Thus, it has been hypothesized that dupilumab may be effec1ve in trea1ng CTCL. 4 We aimed to assess the effects of dupilumab on the disease course of pa1ents diagnosed with CTCL. Cutaneous Tcell lymphoma progression on dupilumab: 67yearold man with a history of mycosis fungoides IIIB A) prior to receiving dupilumab and B) worsened erythroderma aYer 3 months on dupilumab. We performed chart reviews of 7 pa1ents who were treated with dupilumab and diagnosed with CTCL following ini1al diagnosis of AD, or experienced rapid progression of previously diagnosed CTCL. Case Sex/ Age (yr) Diagnosis Prior to dupilumab Total treatment 1me on dupilumab (mo) Length of 1me improved (months); Type of improvement Worsening on dupilumab CTCL diagnosis upon dupilumab discon1nua1on 1 M/64 Presumed AD (retrospec1vely diagnosed as CTCLNOS Stage IB) 8 1; Decrease in BSA (40% to 32%) and pruritus Increased erythroderma, palmoplantar desquama1on, impe1giniza1on with S. aureus CTCLNOS Stage IIIA 2 M/72 Presumed AD 4 1.5; Decrease in BSA (80% to 60%) and pruritus Thickening of plaques with superimposed papules MF Stage IB 3 F/59 Presumed AD 27 8; Decrease in BSA neck down (40% to 5%), decreased pruritus Enlargement of facial plaque and onset of fa1gue and weight loss MF Stage IA 4 F/40 Presumed AD 15 4; Decrease in BSA (unclear %) Development of erythroderma, blepharoconjunc1vi1s, worsening pruritus MF Stage IIIA 5 M/67 MF, Stage IIIB 3 2; Decrease in BSA (80%+ to 60%+), decreased pruritus Increased erythroderma, palmoplantar desquama1on, LAD, worsening pruritus, impe1giniza1on with S. aureus MF/SS Stage IVA and death. 6 M/58 MF, Stage IIA 3 1.75; Improved asthma and mild decrease in BSA (15%+ to 13%+) Increased erythroderma, LAD, worsening pruritus MF/SS Stage IVA and death. 7 F/77 MF, Stage IB 3 0; N/A Increased erythroderma, LAD, worsening pruritus MF/SS Stage IVA References Dupilumab is associated with disease worsening or unmasking of cutaneous Tcell lymphoma Maria L Espinosa BS 1 ; Morgan T Nguyen BA 1 ; Amaia Saenz Aguirre MD 1 ; Maria Estela Mar1nez Escala MD,PhD 1 ; Jane Kim, RN 1 ; Chris1na J Walker MD 1 ; David S Pontes BS 1 ; Jonathan I Silverberg MD, PhD, MPH 2 ; Jaehyuk Choi MD, PhD 1,3,4 ; Barbara Pro MD 5 ; Laura B Pincus MD 6 ; Joan Guitart MD 1 ; Xiaolong Alan Zhou MD, MSc 1 1 Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Chicago, IL, USA. 2 Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University, Washington D.C., USA. 3 Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 4 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular GeneMcs Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 5 Division of Hematology/ Oncology Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 6 Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. The ini1al improvement may be from the transient blockage of Th2 inflamma1on with shiYing to a Th1 tumorsuppressive effect via secre1on of interferonγ, however the nature of subsequent events is unknown. 5 One theory behind the worsening could be from the progression of the malignant Tcell clone being directly linked to the deple1on of tumorsuppressive, tumor infiltra1ng lymphocytes. Alterna1vely, tumor cells may also escape targe1ng by dupilumab and lead to emergence of a dupilumabresistant clone. We postulate that some CTCL cells may be resistant to IL4 and IL13 blockade, and it is possible that our cohort happened to be a selec1ve subset of CTCL pa1ents that were largely resistant to the IL13 and IL4 blockade. While dupilumab seems to temporarily relieve pruritus and erythema, our experience suggests that longterm use leads to worsening or progression of CTCL. Our observa1ons highlight the need for cau1on when using dupilumab in pa1ents with atypical derma11s presenta1ons without prior exclusion of CTCL via skin biopsy, tes1ng for TCR gene rearrangement, and flow cytometry of the blood. Warning signs sugges1ve of CTCL for pa1ents with presumed atopic derma11s while on dupilumab therapy include new eczematous plaques in loca1ons different than original sites, worsening pruritus, lymphadenopathy and new onset moderatesevere “atopic derma11s” in the elderly. As dupilumab becomes more commonplace in the treatment of AD and atopic disease, we an1cipate seeing a greater number of cases of unmasked CTCL in pa1ents ini1ally diagnosed with atypical AD. 1. Gooderham MJ, Hong HCh, Esh1aghi P , Papp KA. Dupilumab: A review of its use in the treatment of atopic derma11s. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2018;78:S28 S36. 2 Saulite I, Hoetzenecker W, Weidinger S, Cozzio A, Guenova E , Wehkamp U. Sezary Syndrome and Atopic Derma11s: Comparison of Immunological Aspects and Targets. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:9717530. 3. Serrano L, Mar1nezEscala ME, Zhou XA , Guitart J. Pruritus in Cutaneous TCell Lymphoma and Its Management. Dermatologic Clinics 2018;36:24558. 4. GusmanYassky E, Bissonnese R, Ungar B, SuarezFarinas M, Ardeleanu M, Esaki H et al. Dupilumab progressively improves systemic and cutaneous abnormali1es in pa1ents with atopic derma11s. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019;143:15572. 5. Krejsgaard T, Lindahl LM, Mongan NP, Wasik MA, Litvinov IV, Iversen L et al. Malignant inflamma1on in cutaneous Tcell lymphomaa hos1le takeover. Seminars in immunopathology 2017;39:26982.

Transcript of Dupilumab)is)associated)with)disease)worsening)or ... · Background+&+Objec1ves+ • Initial...

Page 1: Dupilumab)is)associated)with)disease)worsening)or ... · Background+&+Objec1ves+ • Initial improvement: from Th2 suppression, as well as rise in Th1 tumor suppressive effect via

Background  &  Objec1ves  

•  Initial improvement: from Th2 suppression, as well as rise in Th1 tumor suppressive effect via secretion of interferon-γ.4,5

•  Subsequent worsening: from progression of malignant T-cell (Red Circle) clone due to depletion of the “inflammatory” yet tumor-suppressive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (Blue Circle).

Methods  

Table  1.  Pa1ent  Characteris1cs  and  response  to  dupilumab  

Figure  1:  Case  5  Clinical  Photographs   Possible  mechanisms  

Conclusions  

Dupilumab   is   a   fully   human   monoclonal   an1body   that   binds   the   interleukin-­‐4   receptor  alpha  (IL-­‐4Rα)  subunit  and  inhibits  signaling  of  IL-­‐4  and  IL-­‐13.  It  was  approved  by  the  Food  and  Drug  Administra1on  for  the  treatment  of  moderate-­‐to-­‐severe  atopic  derma11s  (AD)  in  adults  and  adolescents  with  efficacy  in  reducing  pruritus.1  The  two  most  common  subtypes  of   cutaneous   T-­‐cell   lymphoma   (CTCL)   are  mycosis   fungoides   (MF)   and   Sézary   syndrome  (SS).    MF/SS   and  AD   are   similarly   driven   by   T-­‐helper   2   (TH2)   cytokine   profiles2   and  may  present   with   similar   morphology   (i.e.   erythema,   lichenifica1on,   fissuring)   with   pruritus,3  disrup1on   of   the   skin   barrier,   and   impe1giniza1on.   Thus,   it   has   been   hypothesized   that  dupilumab  may  be  effec1ve  in  trea1ng  CTCL.4  We  aimed  to    assess  the  effects  of  dupilumab  on  the  disease  course  of  pa1ents  diagnosed  with  CTCL.  

Cutaneous   T-­‐cell   lymphoma  progression  on  dupilumab:   67-­‐year-­‐old  man  with   a  history  of  mycosis  fungoides  IIIB  A)  prior  to  receiving  dupilumab  and  B)  worsened  erythroderma  aYer  3  months  on  dupilumab.  

We   performed   chart   reviews   of   7   pa1ents   who   were   treated   with   dupilumab   and  diagnosed  with  CTCL  following  ini1al  diagnosis  of  AD,  or  experienced  rapid  progression  of  previously  diagnosed  CTCL.  

Case   Sex/  Age  (yr)  

Diagnosis  Prior  to  dupilumab  

Total  treatment  1me  on  dupilumab  (mo)  

Length  of  1me  improved  (months);  Type  of  improvement  

Worsening  on  dupilumab   CTCL  diagnosis  upon  dupilumab  discon1nua1on  

1   M/64   Presumed    AD  (retrospec1vely  diagnosed  as    CTCL-­‐NOS  Stage  IB)  

8   1;  Decrease  in  BSA  (40%  to  32%)  and  pruritus  

Increased  erythroderma,  palmoplantar  desquama1on,  impe1giniza1on  with  S.  aureus  

CTCL-­‐NOS  Stage  IIIA  

2   M/72   Presumed  AD  

4   1.5;  Decrease  in  BSA  (80%  to  60%)  and  pruritus  

Thickening  of  plaques  with  superimposed  papules    

MF  Stage  IB  

3   F/59   Presumed    AD  

27   8;  Decrease  in  BSA  neck  down  (40%  to  5%),  decreased  pruritus  

Enlargement  of  facial  plaque  and  onset  of  fa1gue  and  weight  loss  

MF  Stage  IA  

4   F/40   Presumed  AD   15   4;  Decrease  in  BSA  (unclear  %)  

Development  of  erythroderma,  blepharoconjunc1vi1s,  worsening  pruritus  

MF  Stage  IIIA  

5   M/67   MF,  Stage  IIIB   3   2;  Decrease  in  BSA  (80%+  to  60%+),  decreased  pruritus  

Increased  erythroderma,  palmoplantar  desquama1on,  LAD,  worsening  pruritus,  impe1giniza1on  with  S.  aureus  

MF/SS  Stage  IVA  and  death.  

6   M/58   MF,  Stage  IIA   3   1.75;  Improved  asthma  and  mild  decrease  in  BSA  (15%+  to  13%+)  

Increased  erythroderma,  LAD,  worsening  pruritus      

MF/SS  Stage  IVA  and  death.  

7   F/77   MF,  Stage  IB   3   0;  N/A   Increased  erythroderma,  LAD,  worsening  pruritus   MF/SS  Stage  IVA  

References  

Dupilumab  is  associated  with  disease  worsening  or  unmasking  of  cutaneous  T-­‐cell  lymphoma    

Maria  L  Espinosa  BS1;  Morgan  T  Nguyen  BA1;  Amaia  Saenz  Aguirre  MD1;  Maria  Estela  Mar1nez-­‐  Escala  MD,PhD1;  Jane  Kim,  RN1;  Chris1na  J  Walker  MD1;  David  S  Pontes  BS1;    Jonathan  I  Silverberg  MD,  PhD,  MPH2;  Jaehyuk  Choi  MD,  PhD1,3,4;  Barbara  Pro  MD5;  Laura  B  Pincus  MD6;  Joan  Guitart  MD1;  Xiaolong  Alan  Zhou  MD,  MSc1  

 

1Department  of  Dermatology,  Northwestern  University  Chicago,  IL,  USA.  2Department  of  Dermatology,  The  George  Washington  University,  Washington  D.C.,  USA.  3Robert  H.  Lurie  Comprehensive  Cancer  Center  of  Northwestern  University,  Chicago,  IL,  USA.  4  Department  of  Biochemistry  and  Molecular  GeneMcs  Northwestern  University,  Chicago,  IL,  USA.  5Division  of  Hematology/  Oncology  Northwestern  University,  Chicago,  IL,  USA.6  Department  of  Dermatology,  University  of  California,  San  Francisco,  San  Francisco,  CA,  USA.    

 

The   ini1al   improvement   may   be   from   the   transient   blockage   of   Th2  inflamma1on  with  shiYing  to  a  Th1  tumor-­‐suppressive  effect  via  secre1on  of  interferon-­‐γ,   however   the   nature   of   subsequent   events   is   unknown.5   One  theory  behind  the  worsening  could  be  from  the  progression  of  the  malignant  T-­‐cell   clone   being   directly   linked   to   the   deple1on   of   tumor-­‐suppressive,  tumor   infiltra1ng   lymphocytes.   Alterna1vely,   tumor   cells   may   also   escape  targe1ng   by   dupilumab   and   lead   to   emergence   of   a   dupilumab-­‐resistant  clone.  We  postulate  that  some  CTCL  cells  may  be  resistant  to  IL-­‐4  and  IL-­‐13  blockade,  and  it  is  possible  that  our  cohort  happened  to  be  a  selec1ve  subset  of  CTCL  pa1ents  that  were  largely  resistant  to  the  IL-­‐13  and  IL-­‐4  blockade.    

While   dupilumab   seems   to   temporarily   relieve   pruritus   and   erythema,   our  experience  suggests  that  long-­‐term  use  leads  to  worsening  or  progression  of  CTCL.  Our  observa1ons  highlight  the  need  for  cau1on  when  using  dupilumab  in  pa1ents  with  atypical  derma11s  presenta1ons  without  prior  exclusion  of  CTCL   via   skin   biopsy,   tes1ng   for   TCR   gene   rearrangement,   and   flow  cytometry  of   the  blood.  Warning  signs  sugges1ve  of  CTCL   for  pa1ents  with  presumed   atopic   derma11s   while   on   dupilumab   therapy   include   new  eczematous   plaques   in   loca1ons   different   than   original   sites,   worsening  pruritus,   lymphadenopathy   and   new   onset   moderate-­‐severe   “atopic  derma11s”  in  the  elderly.  As  dupilumab  becomes  more  commonplace  in  the  treatment  of  AD  and  atopic  disease,  we  an1cipate  seeing  a  greater  number  of  cases  of  unmasked  CTCL  in  pa1ents  ini1ally  diagnosed  with  atypical  AD.     

1.   Gooderham  MJ,   Hong  HC-­‐h,   Esh1aghi   P   ,   Papp   KA.   Dupilumab:   A   review   of   its   use   in   the  treatment  of  atopic  derma11s.  Journal  of  the  American  Academy  of  Dermatology  2018;78:S28-­‐S36.  2  Saulite  I,  Hoetzenecker  W,  Weidinger  S,  Cozzio  A,  Guenova  E  ,  Wehkamp  U.  Sezary  Syndrome  and   Atopic   Derma11s:   Comparison   of   Immunological   Aspects   and   Targets.   Biomed   Res   Int  2016;2016:9717530.  3.  Serrano  L,  Mar1nez-­‐Escala  ME,  Zhou  XA  ,  Guitart  J.  Pruritus  in  Cutaneous  T-­‐Cell  Lymphoma  and  Its  Management.  Dermatologic  Clinics  2018;36:245-­‐58.  4.   Gusman-­‐Yassky   E,   Bissonnese   R,   Ungar   B,   Suarez-­‐Farinas  M,   Ardeleanu  M,   Esaki   H   et   al.  Dupilumab   progressively   improves   systemic   and   cutaneous   abnormali1es   in   pa1ents   with  atopic  derma11s.  J  Allergy  Clin  Immunol  2019;143:155-­‐72.  5.   Krejsgaard   T,   Lindahl   LM,   Mongan   NP,   Wasik   MA,   Litvinov   IV,   Iversen   L   et   al.   Malignant  inflamma1on  in  cutaneous  T-­‐cell  lymphoma-­‐a  hos1le  takeover.  Seminars  in  immunopathology  2017;39:269-­‐82.