Duke Doctor of Physical Therapy - The Impact of ... › files › Team_5_Manual_Therapy...bias...
Transcript of Duke Doctor of Physical Therapy - The Impact of ... › files › Team_5_Manual_Therapy...bias...
• Option2studiesconsistentlyproducedlargerSMDsthanOption1;Option3notpresentineachstratificationforanalysis.
• PEDroscoresforOption3(7.2+ 1.1)significantlyhigherthanOption1(6.4+ 1.2, p=0.03)andOption2(6.2+ 1.4,p=.003)
• Single- modeinterventions(e.g.mobilization/manipulation)morelikelytobeperformedinOption1studies(p=.01)
• PublicationtrendsshowanincreaseofOption1and2studiesandadecreaseinOption3studies
Background&Purpose
TheImpactofMeasurementBiasonEffectSizeinManualTherapiesoftheSpine
AndreaRawley,SPT,MeghanO’Hara,SPT,KimberlyKurtz,SPT,LeighMartino,SPT,LisaCole,SPT,MatthewO’Connell,SPT,JoshuaStaggs,SPT,JackFriesen,SPT,MichaelP.Reiman,PT,DPT,OCS,SCS,ATC,FAAOMPT,CSCS,CharlesSheets,PT,OCS,SCS,DipMDT
Mobilizationsandmanipulationsarecommonlyusedtreatmentsinthemanagementofbackpain.Theeffectivenessoftheseskilledinterventionsisdependentontheexpertiseofthetreatingclinician,creatingpotentialforbias.Quantifyingdifferencesinpainoutcomesandinternalvaliditybasedonthenumberoftreatingcliniciansandthenumberofinterventionstheyeachperform willgivebetterunderstandingtothispotentialbias.Thissystematicreviewaimstoexaminebiasandinternalvaliditywithinrandomizedcontrolledtrials(RCTs)utilizingmobilizationandmanipulationofthespine.Hypothesis:Singleclinicianstudieswillshowinflatedeffectsizesforpainoutcomesandgreaterrisktointernalvalidity.
RCTsfromPubMedandCochranedatabasesidentifiedandincludedorexcludedbasedonreviewcriteria.Eachstudycategorizedbyoptionchoice.Dataextractionperformedandcrosscheckedbyallauthors.PEDroscorespulledwhenavailable,orscoredbyCS.
• Standardmeandifferences(SMDs),95%confidenceintervals(CIs)calculatedfromextracteddatawithRProjectforStatisticalComputing(stratifiedbyregionofspineandfollowuptimeframe)
• AnalysisofPEDroscoresperformedusingone-wayANOVA• Chisquaredteststocompareexperimentalinterventionswithin
optionchoices• Examinationofpublicationtrendsovertime
• Singletherapistbiasdoesnotappeartodrivepainoutcomes• Differencesbetweenoptionchoicesarepresentandsignificant
regardinginternalvalidity,typeofintervention,andpublicationrate;differencesnotinfavorofanyparticularoptionchoice
• Extremeheterogeneitymakesanyextrapolationchallenging• Additionalresearchneededtobetterunderstandthispotential
biaswithinphysicaltherapystudies
PEDro ScoresStratifiedbyOptionChoice
Pain ScoreSMDsStratifiedbyFollowUpTime&RegionofSpine
Option n SMD(95%CI)ImmediateCervical
1 9 0.32 (-.22,.87)2 4 0.67(.25,1.08)3 2 0.16 (-.12,.45)
Non-immediateCervical1 11 0.11 (-.27,.50)2 19 0.34 (.05,.62)3 13 0.59 (.21,.97)
ImmediateLumbar1 4 0.32 (.07,.56)2 4 0.60(-.07,1.28)
Non-immediateLumbar1 6 0.20(-.09,.48)2 28 0.34(.10,.58)3 15 0.23(.03,.43)
ImmediateCervical
Non-immediateLumbarNon-immediateCervical
ImmediateLumbar
OptionChoicesOption1 One clinicianperformingexperimentalandcontroltreatmentinterventions
Option2 Multiple cliniciansperformingonetreatmentinterventiononly
Option3 Multiple cliniciansperformingexperimentalandcontroltreatmentinterventions
WethankourmentorsCharlesSheetsandDr.MichaelReimanfortheirguidanceandexpertiseinclinicalresearch.WealsothankLeilaLedbetterforherassistancewithoursearchesandherexpertiseinsearchenginesandopen-sourcereferencemanagementsoftware.
Methods
Analysis
Results
Conclusions&ClinicalRelevance
Acknowledgements