Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive,...
Transcript of Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive,...
![Page 1: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of
punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures
Ann M RocheNational Centre for Education and Training on Addiction
Flinders University
Second Annual Conference of the International Society for the Study of Drug Policy
3-4 April, 2008Lisbon, Portugal
![Page 2: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Full report:
Drug Testing in Schools:
Evidence, impacts and alternatives.Ann Roche, Ken Pidd, Petra Bywood, Vinita Duraisingam, Tania
Steenson, Toby Freeman, Roger Nicholas
We attempted to synthesise a diverse array of complex, conflicting and sensitive information in a balanced manner.
![Page 3: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Comprehensive coverage of relevant issues
1. available data on drug use by school-aged children and, in particular, high-risk groups
2. evidence of the effectiveness of biometric and psychometric tests
3. evidence on the effectiveness of tests to deter or reduce drugs and any associated potential adverse outcomes
4. 5. cost implications of the implementation of various forms of testing
6. ethical, legal and practical implications of testing school-aged children
7. incorporated the views and perspectives of professionals, parents and community members through a submissions process and an online survey
8. addressed the range of alternative strategies available to tackle drug use among school-aged children and the evidence base of effectiveness.
![Page 4: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
A Public Health ModelThe public health model applied in the present review involved:
• assessing the epidemiology of a targeted problem (i.e. patterns and prevalence of use)
• identifying risk and protective factors associated with the development of the problem
• applying interventions known to reduce these risk factors and enhance protective factors that buffer against the effects of risk
• monitoring the impact of these interventions on the incidence and prevalence of the targeted disease and disorder
(Hawkins, Catalano & Arthur, 2002).
![Page 5: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Aims/rationale for drug testing
• Drug testing is sometimes viewed as an appealing strategy to deal with drug use among school-age children as it is assumed to: – deter initiation of drug use and encourage cessation– detect users in order to refer them to
treatment/counselling– reduce drug-related harm by improving young
people’s physical and psychological wellbeing, reduce truancy and behavioural problems, and improve educational outcomes.
![Page 6: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What drug testing does not purport to do
• provide a measure of intoxication or impairment• determine the quantity, frequency or context of
drug use• distinguish between experimental, occasional or
one-off users and those with problematic drug use
• distinguish between similar metabolites found in over-the-counter or legally prescribed medications and illicit drugs.
![Page 7: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1.
Approaches to drug detection and screening
There are a number of different approaches that can be employed to address the use of drugs in a school environment.
These include: 1. biometric measures of drug use (e.g. biological
assays of urine, saliva, sweat, hair)2. psychometric measures of drug use (e.g. self- report survey, questionnaires or interviews)3. devices for detection of drugs or drug
paraphernalia (e.g. sniffer dogs, search of lockers or belongings).
![Page 8: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Assumptions underlying drug testing
Assumption #1 Criminological theory and
the power of surveillance
Surveillance is used as a tool for social control. If their behaviour is open to scrutiny, young people will avoid deviant acts
(Foucault, 1980).
LimitationsSurveillance alone is inadequate unless accompanied by: Social consensus about what defines deviant
behaviourDrug testing will reduce drug use only if young people believe they will experience stigma or negative consequences of their drug use if discovered. Individuals with pro-drug attitudes and little respect for societal norms are less likely to reduce drug use and may view a positive drug test as status.
Capacity to apply negative sanctions or punishmentWithout a negative sanction (e.g. exclusion, punishment from parents), drug testing is unlikely to deter future use. For example, athletes may view exclusion from competition as undesirable, but schoolchildren may welcome exclusion from classes.
Capacity to handle concealment (e.g. masking)Individuals may use masking agents, avoid providing a sample (e.g,. absence from school if they expect to be tested), or switch to less detectable, and potentially more harmful, drugs or alcohol.
![Page 9: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Assumptions underlying drug testing cnt.
Assumption #2 Early identification and intervention
• Identification of drug use at an early stage may reduce the likelihood of developing into a drug ‘problem’.
LimitationsTeenage drug use does not lead inevitably to problematic drug use.
While screening is sensible for health issues that predictably lead to deterioration (e.g. cancers), this is not so for teenage drug use. The relevance of early identification applies only to a very small number of students
![Page 10: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Assumptions underlying drug testing cnt.
Assumption #3Capacity to bolster resistance to
drugs
Drug testing programs give students a reason to say ‘No’ when they
encounter drug use.
LimitationsRoutes to drug use differ.
Not all young people are pressured by their peers to start using drugs. Young people may also select their friends on the basis of similar interests, including drug-using behaviour.
![Page 11: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Prevalence of Drug Use Declining
• Between 1996 and 2005 there was a significant decrease in cannabis use by 12-17 year olds (the most commonly used illicit drug among this age group) .
• (e.g. lifetime use for 12-15 year olds in 1996 28% adn 13% in 2005. Among 16-17 year olds 52% vs 31%).
![Page 12: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Effectiveness of tests
• Sensitivity (>90%)
• Specificity (>90%)
• Accuracy (>95%)
• Standard tests would result in a minimum of 10% false positives
![Page 13: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Cost
Urine
• Universal $302Mil• Random sample $91mil• Targeted groups $47.9mil• For cause $11.7mil
Saliva
• Universal $355Mil• Random sample $110mil• Targeted groups $58mil• For cause $15.9mil
![Page 14: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Effectiveness in Deterrence
• Little evidence to support it
• Eg., Yamaguchi´s study of 323 schools and 94,000 students
![Page 15: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Potential Adverse Consequences
• Breakdown in parent- child and/or school-child relationship
• stigamisation• Increase in school exclusions
or truancies• Reduced participation in
healthy extracurricular activities
• Diversion to other substances not tested for, or less detectable
• Unwarranted invasion of privacy
• Breach of confidentiality
• False sense of a drug-free environment
• Lack of developmentally appropriate adolescent treatment/interventions after testing positive
• School time and resruoces used on drug testing, incl. Opportunity costs
• Ambiguous role for schools• Penalities for drug use
imposed on schools
![Page 16: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
MORE ADVOCACYTHAN
EVIDENCE
![Page 17: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Ethical and Legal Issues
• Duty of care
• Right to bodily inviolability
• Right of the child
• Drug testing as a deterrence strategy
• Similarities and difference with Workplaces and workplace testing
![Page 18: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Ethical Perspectives
• Principalist Theory of Ethics
Employs values such as:
o Respect for personso Justiceo Beneficence
• Consequentialist Ethics
Justifications based on consequences, not principles
![Page 19: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1.
4 major motivations underlying the development of drug use problems
1. To escape developmental distress. 2. To self-manage body and spirit. 3. To conform to social norms. 4. To create individual identity.
![Page 20: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Drug use problems are not wholly influenced by individual choices.
They are also shaped by a range of macro-economic factors, including the economic, social and physical environment.
“Trying to shift the whole responsibility on to the user is clearly an inadequate response. This blames the victim, rather than addressing the complexities of the social circumstances that generate drug use. Effective drug policy must therefore be supported by the broad framework of social and economic policy”
(Wilkinson and Marmot (2003;p.25).
![Page 21: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Alternative, evidence-based roles for schools
1. Support and foster connectedness between school and students
2. Provide targeted early and brief interventions
3. Õffer family strengthening interventions
![Page 22: Drug Testing in Schools and Workplaces: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures Ann M Roche National.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062620/551aa5ab550346856e8b47c0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Copy of the report is available from:
• www.nceta.flinders.edu.au
• www.ancd.org.au