Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of...

47
Accepted manuscripts are peer-reviewed but have not been through the copyediting, formatting, or proofreading process. Copyright © 2017 the authors This Accepted Manuscript has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. Research Articles: Development/Plasticity/Repair Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via the canonical SMAD pathway TL Follansbee 1 , KJ Gjelsvik 1 , CL Brann 1 , AL McParland 1 , CA Longhurst 2 , MJ Galko 3 and GK Ganter 1 1 Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach Road, Biddeford, Maine, USA, 04005 2 Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 53792 3 Department of Genetics, Division of Basic Science Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA, 77030 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3458-16.2017 Received: 8 November 2016 Revised: 24 June 2017 Accepted: 27 July 2017 Published: 2 August 2017 Author contributions: T.L.F., K.J.G., C.L.B., A.L.M., M.J.G., and G.K.G. designed research; T.L.F., K.J.G., C.L.B., and A.L.M. performed research; T.L.F., K.J.G., C.L.B., A.L.M., C.L., M.J.G., and G.K.G. analyzed data; T.L.F., K.J.G., C.L.B., A.L.M., C.L., M.J.G., and G.K.G. wrote the paper. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests. The authors gratefully acknowledge NIH/NIGMS award 1P20GM103643-01A1 to I. Meng, NIH/NINDS award 1R15NS095195-01 to G. Ganter, Peter Caradonna and the UNE Microscope Core Facility supported by NSF 0116398 and 1125672. The authors thank Daniel Cox for assistance with morphometric approaches and for fly lines; Ian Meng for critical comments on the manuscript; Volkhard Lindner for the p-mad antibody; Rema Weston and Cody Barba for technical support. Stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) were used in this study. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Corresponding author: Geoffrey K Ganter, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach Road, Biddeford, Maine, USA, 04005, [email protected] Cite as: J. Neurosci ; 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3458-16.2017 Alerts: Sign up at www.jneurosci.org/cgi/alerts to receive customized email alerts when the fully formatted version of this article is published.

Transcript of Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of...

Page 1: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

Accepted manuscripts are peer-reviewed but have not been through the copyediting, formatting, or proofreadingprocess.

Copyright © 2017 the authors

This Accepted Manuscript has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.

Research Articles: Development/Plasticity/Repair

Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via thecanonical SMAD pathway

TL Follansbee1, KJ Gjelsvik1, CL Brann1, AL McParland1, CA Longhurst2, MJ Galko3 and GK Ganter1

1Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach Road,Biddeford, Maine, USA, 040052Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue,Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 537923Department of Genetics, Division of Basic Science Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston, Texas, USA, 77030

DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3458-16.2017

Received: 8 November 2016

Revised: 24 June 2017

Accepted: 27 July 2017

Published: 2 August 2017

Author contributions: T.L.F., K.J.G., C.L.B., A.L.M., M.J.G., and G.K.G. designed research; T.L.F., K.J.G.,C.L.B., and A.L.M. performed research; T.L.F., K.J.G., C.L.B., A.L.M., C.L., M.J.G., and G.K.G. analyzed data;T.L.F., K.J.G., C.L.B., A.L.M., C.L., M.J.G., and G.K.G. wrote the paper.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

The authors gratefully acknowledge NIH/NIGMS award 1P20GM103643-01A1 to I. Meng, NIH/NINDS award1R15NS095195-01 to G. Ganter, Peter Caradonna and the UNE Microscope Core Facility supported by NSF0116398 and 1125672. The authors thank Daniel Cox for assistance with morphometric approaches and for flylines; Ian Meng for critical comments on the manuscript; Volkhard Lindner for the p-mad antibody; Rema Westonand Cody Barba for technical support. Stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIHP40OD018537) were used in this study. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Corresponding author: Geoffrey K Ganter, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach Road, Biddeford, Maine,USA, 04005, [email protected]

Cite as: J. Neurosci ; 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3458-16.2017

Alerts: Sign up at www.jneurosci.org/cgi/alerts to receive customized email alerts when the fully formattedversion of this article is published.

Page 2: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

Title: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via the canonical

SMAD pathway

Abbreviated title: Drosophila BMP and nociceptive sensitization

Authors: Follansbee TL1, Gjelsvik KJ1, Brann CL1, McParland AL1, Longhurst CA2,

Galko MJ3, Ganter GK1

Affiliations: 1Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of New

England, 11 Hills Beach Road, Biddeford, Maine, USA, 04005

2Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison,

600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 53792

3Department of Genetics, Division of Basic Science Research, University of Texas MD

Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA, 77030

Corresponding author: Geoffrey K Ganter, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach

Road, Biddeford, Maine, USA, 04005, [email protected]

Figs Tables multimedia 3D models

Abstract (Words)

Intro (Words)

Discussion (Words)

9 1 0 0 204 634 1496

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements: The authors gratefully acknowledge NIH/NIGMS award

1P20GM103643-01A1 to I. Meng, NIH/NINDS award 1R15NS095195-01 to G. Ganter,

Peter Caradonna and the UNE Microscope Core Facility supported by NSF 0116398

and 1125672. The authors thank Daniel Cox for assistance with morphometric

approaches and for fly lines; Ian Meng for critical comments on the manuscript; Volkhard

Lindner for the p-mad antibody; Rema Weston and Cody Barba for technical support.

Page 3: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

1

Stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537)

were used in this study. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Page 4: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

2

Abstract: 1

Nociceptive sensitization is a common feature in chronic pain, but its basic cellular 2

mechanisms are only partially understood. The present study utilized the Drosophila 3

melanogaster model system and a candidate gene approach to identify novel 4

components required for modulation of an injury-induced nociceptive sensitization 5

pathway presumably downstream of Hedgehog. This study demonstrates that RNAi 6

silencing of a member of the Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) signaling pathway, 7

Decapentaplegic (Dpp), specifically in the class IV multidendritic nociceptors, 8

significantly attenuated ultraviolet (UV) injury-induced sensitization. Furthermore, 9

overexpression of Dpp in class IV neurons was sufficient to induce thermal 10

hypersensitivity in the absence of injury. The requirement of various BMP receptors and 11

members of the SMAD signal transduction pathway in nociceptive sensitization was also 12

demonstrated. The effects of BMP signaling were shown to be largely specific to the 13

sensitization pathway and not associated with changes in nociception in the absence of 14

injury nor with changes dendritic morphology. Thus, the results demonstrate that Dpp 15

and its pathway play a crucial and novel role in nociceptive sensitization. Because the 16

BMP family is so strongly conserved between vertebrates and invertebrates, it seems 17

likely that the components analyzed in this study represent potential therapeutic targets 18

for the treatment of chronic pain in humans. 19

20

Significance Statement: 21

This report provides a genetic analysis of primary nociceptor mechanisms that promote 22

sensitization in response to injury. Drosophila melanogaster larvae whose primary 23

nociceptors have reduced levels of specific components of the BMP signaling pathway 24

were injured and then tested for nocifensive responses to a normally sub-noxious 25

Page 5: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

3

stimulus. Results suggest that nociceptive neurons use the BMP2/4 ligand, along with 26

identified receptors and intracellular transducers to transition to a sensitized state. 27

These findings are consistent with the observation that BMP receptor hyperactivation 28

correlates with bone abnormalities and pain sensitization in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans 29

Progressiva (Kitterman et al., 2012). Since nociceptive sensitization is associated with 30

chronic pain, these findings indicate that human BMP pathway components may 31

represent targets for novel pain-relieving drugs. 32

33

Introduction: 34

Chronic pain, perpetuated by the neuroplastic process of nociceptive sensitization, 35

affects millions of people worldwide (Gaskin and Richard, 2012). Sensitization in 36

response to tissue damage can produce a reduction in nociceptive thresholds that in 37

some cases can outlast the initial injury. A more detailed knowledge of the pathways that 38

lead to nociceptor sensitization may allow for the identification of novel targets for the 39

treatment of chronic pain. It has been estimated that 75% of known human disease 40

genes have relatives in the Drosophila genome (Reiter et al., 2001), allowing the 41

genetically tractable fly to serve as a relevant model for human ailments including 42

neurological disorders (Pandey and Nichols, 2011; Wangler et al., 2015). 43

44

Previous studies have used ultraviolet (UV) induced tissue damage to sensitize 45

nociceptors in Drosophila larvae. A defined dose of UV irradiation was delivered to 46

anaesthetized animals and 24 hours later, wild-type animals demonstrated an increase 47

in sensitivity to a light touch with a thermal probe at a normally subthreshold temperature, 48

referred to as thermal allodynia (Babcock et al., 2009). Using this model, three pathways 49

have been identified; Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (Babcock et al., 2009; Jo et al., 2017), 50

Page 6: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

4

Hedgehog (Hh; Babcock et al., 2011), and Tachykinin (TK; Im et al., 2015), that are 51

required for communication amongst the injured epidermis, the underlying nociceptors 52

and the central nervous system to bring about the observed thermal allodynia. The 53

Drosophila Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) Decapentaplegic (Dpp) lies downstream 54

of Hh, yet its involvement in the sensitization of nociceptors remains unknown. 55

56

Dpp, a fly ortholog of mammalian BMP2 (Ozkaynak et al., 1990) and BMP4 (Jones et al., 57

1991), is a member of the Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β) superfamily of 58

signaling proteins (Padgett et al., 1993) and binds to receptors (Massagué and Like, 59

1985) in the serine/threonine kinase family (Lin et al., 1992). Dpp’s primary receptor 60

Punt (Put; Letsou et al., 1995), orthologous to type II TGF-β receptors, activates Thick 61

Veins (Tkv; Ruberte et al., 1995) and Saxophone (Sax; Nellen et al., 1994; Xie et al., 62

1994), both orthologous to type I TGF-β receptors. In turn, the type I receptors modify 63

the intracellular transducer Mothers Against Decapentaplegic (Mad; Sekelsky et al., 64

1995) by phosphorylation and subsequent translocation to the nucleus (Newfeld et al., 65

1997) as a complex with Medea (Med; Wisotzkey et al., 1998). Mad and Med are 66

members of the SMAD group named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 67

1974) and D. melanogaster Mad. As examples of the strong conservation between 68

mammalian and Drosophila BMP components, prior studies have shown that Dpp can 69

induce endochondral bone formation in mice (Sampath et al., 1993), and human BMP4 70

DNA sequences inserted into the fly genome rescue Dpp deficient larvae to normal 71

development (Padgett et al., 1993). 72

73

In the Drosophila larva, four classes of primary afferent neurons, referred to as dendritic 74

arborization neurons, innervate the body wall. Classification is based on increasing 75

Page 7: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

5

levels of dendritic arborization (Grueber et al., 2012). Class IV dendritic arborization 76

neurons, referred to as nociceptive neurons in this report, have the most elaborate sub-77

epidermal arbors of naked dendrites and respond to noxious mechanical and thermal 78

(heat) stimulation (Tracey et al., 2003). These neurons express nocisensitive ion 79

channels such as Painless, a Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) channel orthologous to 80

mammalian TRPA1 (Tracey et al., 2003); Pickpocket (Ppk), a degenerin-like 81

mechanosensory channel (Adams et al., 1998); the Drosophila dTRPA1, sensitive to 82

electrophiles (Kang et al., 2010) and heat (Neely et al., 2011); and the mechanosensor 83

Piezo (Kim et al., 2012). 84

85

In this study, cell-specific RNAi suppression of BMP pathway components in nociceptive 86

neurons was used to demonstrate that BMP signaling via a canonical pathway is 87

required for UV-injury induced allodynia. Because of the high degree of functional 88

conservation between mammalian and Drosophila BMP components, components of the 89

human BMP pathway may represent new leads with potential therapeutic value. 90

91

Materials and Methods: 92

Fly Stocks and Genetics: 93

Flies were maintained in 6 oz stock bottles on sucrose-cornmeal-yeast medium at a 94

temperature of 25 C with a humidity of 50%-60%. Stock bottles were kept in Percival 95

Scientific Incubators (Perry, Iowa) with a 12-hour light, 12-hour dark cycle. The arbitrary 96

dawn time for the incubators was set to 9:00 AM. The GAL4/UAS system was used to 97

drive expression of UAS-inverted repeat (IR) RNAi transgenes targeting specific genes 98

of interest. The driver in all experiments was Ppk1.9-Gal4, which expresses GAL4 99

Page 8: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

6

specifically in the class IV multidendritic nociceptive neurons (Ainsley et al., 2003). The 100

Ppk1.9-Gal4 line used also contained a Ppk-GFP element, allowing direct visualization 101

of morphology of these neurons (generous gift from Daniel Cox). All other flies were 102

obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC) in Bloomington, Indiana. 103

The transgenic UAS-RNAi lines used, featuring Inverted Repeat (IR) construction for 104

RNAi suppression, were as follows: DppIR (BDSC#35214, 25782), PutIR (BDSC#35195, 105

27514), TkvIR (BDSC#35166, 35653), SaxIR (BDSC#55865, 36131), MadIR 106

(BDSC#35648, 43183), MedIR (BDSC#31928, 43961). Additionally, a UAS-Dpp line 107

(BDSC#1486; Ward and Berg, 2005) was used to overexpress Dpp. Animals were 108

included without regard to sex. 109

110

UV Injury: 111

A method of UV induced allodynia was applied (Babcock et al., 2009). Third instar 112

larvae were collected four days after egg laying, rinsed and anesthetized with diethyl 113

ether. Anesthetized larvae were gently adhered dorsal side up to double-sided tape on a 114

microscope slide and were subjected to 12-15 mJ/cm2 of UV light delivered in 115

approximately two to five seconds in a Spectronics Corporation Spectrolinker XL-1000 116

ultraviolet crosslinker. The larvae were then placed in a small vial containing ~ 1 ml of 117

sucrose-cornmeal-yeast media and allowed to recover for 24 hours before assays were 118

performed. 119

120

Thermal Nociception Assay: 121

To test nociceptive behavior the larvae were assayed with a thermal probe (Pro-Dev 122

Engineering, Houston, Texas, USA) 24 hours after UV exposure. The probe tip was 123

Page 9: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

7

gently applied to the dorsal side of the larvae and held on abdominal segments 2-4 for a 124

maximum of 20 seconds. To test for allodynia, the larvae were subjected to 41°C, the 125

highest temperature that did not elicit a behavioral response in our hands (Fig 2). The 126

larval response consisted of a nocifensive 360° lateral rolling that larvae only exhibit in 127

response to a noxious stimulus (Tracey et al., 2003). The latency for response was 128

recorded and categorized as follows: fast was 0-6 s (indicated by black regions on 129

graphs), slow was from 6-20 s (gray) and no response if the 20 s cutoff was reached 130

(white). To assay normal nociceptive function (Fig 10), larvae were tested at 45°C and 131

the time to respond was recorded and presented as average response latency. The 132

probe operator was blinded to the UV treatment and genotype, and all groups contained 133

a sample size of at least 90 animals. 134

135

Quantification of Dendritic Morphology: 136

Class IV multidendritic neurons were analyzed for total dendritic length and number of 137

dendritic branches (Iyer et al., 2013). Third instar larvae were anesthetized with CO2 and 138

placed on a microscope slide with a halocarbon-ether mixture (2:1). Larvae were imaged 139

with a Leica SP5 confocal laser microscope using a 20X objective. ddaC neurons, the 140

most dorsal pair of class IV nociceptors (Grueber et al., 2012), were imaged from 141

abdominal segments 4-6 and z-stacks were taken with a 0.76 μm step size to capture 142

the whole dendritic field. Images were taken with a resolution of 1024x1024. Images 143

were skeletonized and analyzed for parameters of dendritic length and dendritic 144

branching in the open source image-processing package Fiji (https://imagej.net/Fiji). 145

146

Immunohistochemistry Conditions and Imaging: 147

Page 10: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

8

Third instar larvae bearing Ppk-GFP to specifically visualize the nociceptive neurons 148

were filleted longitudinally by incision along the ventral midline without anesthesia, and 149

all tissues internal to the muscular body wall were removed. The body wall was pinned 150

flat on a silicone (Sylgard) surface, fixed 20 minutes in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde in 151

phosphate buffered saline (PBS), washed in PBS 0.1% Triton X-100 (PBS-T), and 152

blocked overnight at 4°C with 5% normal goat serum (NGS) in PBS-T. The intensity of 153

BMP receptor and transducer immunoreactivity were compared in control and UAS-154

RNAi-expressing animals. Primary antibodies to Put (Abcam 14680, 1:100) were 155

incubated one hour at room temperature, then overnight at 4°C washed in PBS-T and 156

visualized with fluorescently-conjugated secondary antibodies (Alexafluor 568, Abcam) 157

at 1:500, incubated for 2 hours at room temperature followed by washing with PBS-T. 158

Suitable antibodies to Med, Sax, and Tkv were not available. The Mad antibody was 159

raised against mammalian p-Smad1/5/8 (generous gift from Volkhard Lindner; Maine 160

Medical Center Research Institute) and used at 1:500. Animals were analyzed 0, 2, 4, 8, 161

16, and 24 hours after UV injury. For each BMP component, eight larvae were analyzed. 162

The ddaC nociceptive neurons in abdominal segments 4-6 were identified by eGFP 163

fluorescence and studied for a total of 10-12 cells per component, and analyzed by 164

confocal microscopy. Images were collected using a Leica SP5 Scanning Confocal 165

Microscope using a 40x oil objective. All images were resolved at 1024x1024 and a Z-166

stack was collected to ensure that the entire cell was analyzed. The Z-stacks were 167

collapsed into maximum projections and the relative intensity of staining was analyzed 168

using Fiji (https://imagej.net/Fiji). For immunohistochemistry results, mean integrated 169

density was measured as the product of the area of the region of interest and the mean 170

gray value in the desired channel. All images were obtained with the same exposure 171

and camera conditions to compare integrated densities. 172

Page 11: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

9

173

Visualization of BMP Receptor Expression by GFP-Tagging: 174

Because suitable antibodies to Sax and Tkv were not available, a GFP-tagging approach 175

was employed (Venken et al., 2011). MiMIC lines were produced by the Gene Disruption 176

Project, in which a GFP coding sequence was inserted intronically such that target 177

genes produce the cognate protein translationally fused to GFP, thus making the protein 178

directly visible via GFP fluorescence. Two MiMIC lines were selected, MI05726 and 179

MI08515, corresponding to Sax and Tkv, respectively. Before use in imaging, the 180

normal function of the GFP-modified genes was confirmed by determining their ability to 181

complement deficient alleles (sax5 and tkv4). GFP/deficient flies developed successfully 182

in both cases. 183

184

Statistical Analysis: 185

To estimate the predicted probability of reacting for the different treatment groups in 186

sensitization experiments, the response variable (reaction time) was collapsed into a 187

binary variable and a generalized linear mixed model (with a logistic link function) was fit 188

to the data for each pathway component using the lme4 package (version 1.1.7; (Bates 189

et al., 2014) in R 3.1.3 (R Core Team, 2015) where larvae batch was modeled as a 190

random effect (Mixed Logistic Regression (MLR) analysis). To estimate the 99% 191

confidence intervals for the various contrasts found in Table 1 a parametric bootstrap 192

(10,000 iterations) was performed using the corresponding models fit to the data. To 193

test if the differences between the post injury reaction probabilities were significant, 194

bootstrap confidence intervals were constructed (at the α=0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 levels) 195

and inverted to test the significance of various comparisons at the 196

Page 12: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

10

corresponding α level. In graphs depicting results of allodynia experiments, whiskers 197

indicate standard error of the mean of at least three groups of larvae. For normal 198

nociceptive behavior and morphometry, a Welch’s t-test was performed. 199

Immunoreactivity was compared using a One-Way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer Multiple 200

Comparisons Test. * represents p= 0.05-0.01, ** represents p<0.01-0.001, *** represents 201

p<0.001. 202

203

Results: 204

In order to optimally assay the nociceptive behavior of Drosophila larvae, a thermal dose 205

response study was performed on a standard control genotype (w1118). Beginning at 206

39°C the temperature of the thermal probe was increased in 1°C increments and at each 207

temperature, 90 larvae were assayed for behavioral response. The response latency of 208

each larva to its particular test temperature was recorded. From 39 to 41°C, most larvae 209

did not respond. However, beginning at 42°C there was a steady increase in 210

responsiveness with temperature, continuing to 50°C (Fig 2). Because no animals 211

responded at 41°C and a statistically significant number responded at 42°C (MLR), 41°C 212

was selected as the maximum innocuous temperature at which to test for allodynia in 213

this study. 214

215

To test for the development of thermal allodynia following injury, control flies (w1118) were 216

divided into two groups: a UV irradiated group and a non-UV irradiated group. In the 217

non-UV irradiated group very few animals responded to 41°C stimulation, whereas a 218

significantly greater number of animals responded at this temperature after exposure to 219

UV irradiation (p<0.001, MLR, Fig 3A). The possibility that UV irradiation affects the 220

dendritic architecture of nociceptive neurons was examined in animals bearing a Ppk-221

Page 13: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

11

GFP transgene that causes expression of GFP specifically in these cells. Nociceptor 222

dendritic branching and length (Fig 3B) were measured after either UV treatment (right 223

bars) or mock treatment (left bars). Neurons were analyzed at 24 hours post injury, the 224

time of peak development of allodynia (Babcock et al., 2009). No statistically significant 225

differences were observed between treatment groups (MLR). 226

227

Using inverted repeat (IR) transgenics to trigger RNAi-mediated knockdown of Dpp 228

expression in the nociceptors, we observed that suppressing the availability of the Dpp 229

reduced the development of thermal allodynia. Compared to controls, the DppIR animals 230

demonstrated a strong attenuation of allodynia (p<0.001, MLR, Fig 4A). It was 231

previously observed that overexpression of TNF-α by the epidermal cells can induce 232

allodynia via paracrine signaling in the absence of injury (Babcock et al., 2009) as was 233

induce autocrine activation of Hh signaling (Babcock et al., 2011) and TK signaling (Im 234

et al., 2015). In a similar experiment, UAS-Dpp was used to drive overexpression of 235

Dpp in the nociceptive neurons to determine whether increased Dpp availability was 236

sufficient to induce thermal allodynia without prior injury via UV irradiation (p<0.001, 237

MLR, Fig 4B). Uninjured larvae with elevated Dpp expression showed significantly 238

higher sensitivity to the 41°C probe, compared to control animals (p<0.001, MLR, Fig 239

4B). 240

241

Several membrane receptors have been implicated in transducing Dpp signals. These 242

are Punt (Put; Letsou et al., 1995), Thick veins (Tkv; Ruberte et al., 1995) and 243

Saxophone (Sax; Nellen et al., 1994; Xie et al., 1994). The various receptors for Dpp 244

can be detected via immunohistochemistry and protein-tagging in the nociceptive 245

neurons (Fig 5,6). The expression of these Dpp receptors was suppressed to test for 246

Page 14: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

12

their requirement in nociceptive neurons for the formation of allodynia following UV 247

irradiation. Significant reduction (Fig 5D,E) in the level of Put expression was confirmed 248

by immunocytochemistry. Expression of Sax and Tkv in the somata and dendrites of 249

nociceptive neurons and other cells was observed using a GFP-tagging approach (Fig 6). 250

Very faint Sax expression, but not Tkv expression, was observed in axon terminals (data 251

not shown). Injury did not alter the expression pattern of either Tkv or Sax (data not 252

shown). Larvae in which each receptor, Punt (Put; Fig 7A), Saxophone (Sax; Fig 7B), or 253

Thick Veins (Tkv; Fig 7C) was individually suppressed showed strong attenuation in the 254

formation of allodynia (p<0.001,MLR). Similar reductions in sensitization were observed 255

in animals in which Dpp, Put, Tkv and Sax were individually suppressed using RNAi 256

lines independent from and non-overlapping with those shown above, indicating that the 257

effects observed are not due to off-target suppression (data not shown). 258

259

To test for the requirement of canonical SMAD signaling downstream of these receptors, 260

the expression of Mad in nociceptive neurons was suppressed through Ppk1.9-Gal4-261

mediated expression of a UAS-RNAi transgene targeting Mad, MadIR. Larvae with 262

suppressed Mad demonstrated significantly less injury-induced sensitization compared 263

to relevant controls (p<0.001, MLR, Fig 8A). When the coSMAD Med was suppressed, 264

the larvae again demonstrated significantly less injury-induced sensitization (p<0.001, 265

MLR, Fig 8B) compared to the no UAS control group (Ppk1.9-Gal4>y1v1). Mad 266

activation by the type I BMP receptors Tkv and Sax following UV injury was quantified by 267

immunohistochemistry using an antibody specific to the phosphorylated form of Mad 268

(anti-pSmad1/5/8) at various times after UV damage. Eight hours after injury, 269

predominantly nuclear basal p-Mad immunoreactivity was increased by 125.53 percent 270

Page 15: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

13

(p < 0.001, Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test) and returned to normal levels by 271

24 hours (Fig 9). 272

273

In order to confirm that larvae in which BMP components were suppressed maintained 274

their ability to respond to noxious stimulation, nociceptive responses of uninjured 275

animals to a suprathreshold temperature (45°C) were examined. The behavioral 276

response latencies to this noxious thermal stimulus for all of the knockdown groups were 277

not significantly different from both control groups (Fig 10, Welch’s t-test). 278

279

The suppression of Dpp or the BMP receptors Tkv and Sax in nociceptive neurons did 280

not result in any changes in dendritic length or in total dendritic branches. Suppression 281

of Put, Mad or Med resulted in small increases in dendritic branching (Put p<0.007, Mad 282

p<0.022 and Med p<0.04, Welch’s t-test) but no significant changes to dendritic length 283

were observed (Fig 11). Larvae overexpressing Dpp in the nociceptive neurons showed 284

a statistically significant reduction in length (p<0.04, Welch’s t-test) and dendritic 285

branching (p<0.025, Welch’s t-test). 286

287

Discussion: 288

This study demonstrates a requirement for the BMP signaling pathway, particularly the 289

components immediately downstream of Dpp, for the formation of thermal allodynia in 290

Drosophila larvae in response to UV-induced tissue injury. BMPs are known to play 291

important roles in developmental contexts including Drosophila imaginal discs (Affolter 292

and Basler, 2007) and bone formation in vertebrates (Wisotzkey et al., 1998). These 293

roles include control of cell proliferation and specification of cell fate. The BMP pathway 294

Page 16: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

14

has been implicated in neural and synaptic development in vertebrates and invertebrates 295

(Guha et al., 2004; James et al., 2014). BMP functions are well conserved across 296

species, and particularly strong orthology exists between mammalian BMP 2/4 and 297

invertebrate Dpp (Sampath et al., 1993; Padgett et al., 1993). This report describes a 298

novel role for BMP signaling in nociceptive sensitization. 299

300

In previous studies performed in Drosophila and other animals, the Dpp signaling 301

pathway has been well elucidated (Affolter and Basler, 2007; Liu and Niswander, 2005). 302

Exogenous Dpp has been shown to specify cell fates, for example in the developing 303

wing, by binding its type II receptor Put. Put then activates either of two type I receptors, 304

Tkv (ortholog of mammalian ALK3/6) or Sax (ortholog of mammalian ALK1/2). In many 305

mammalian contexts, BMPs act as morphogens that trigger the specification of bone 306

(Urist, 1965). With regard to roles in sensory processes, BMPs (Ai et al., 1999) and 307

another member of the TGF-β superfamily, activin (Xu et al., 2007), are known to 308

increase expression of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) in sensory neurons. 309

TGF-β is known to regulate opioid transmitter synthesis (Kamphuis et al., 1997), and 310

mice deficient in a TGF-β signaling inhibitor, BAMBI, are hyposensitive to noxious stimuli 311

(Tramullas et al., 2010). 312

313

Previous studies have shown that upon cutaneous tissue injury by UV exposure and 314

subsequent TNFα signaling by the apoptotic epidermal cells (Babcock et al., 2009), 315

Hedgehog (Hh) is released from nociceptive neurons in response to Tachykinin (TK) 316

signaling from the central nervous system (Im et al., 2015). Hh activation of its receptor 317

Patched (Ptc), located on nociceptive neurons, produces allodynia (Babcock et al., 318

2011). The observation that allodynia requires Dpp is consistent with previous data 319

Page 17: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

15

demonstrating Hh upregulation of Dpp expression in developmental contexts (Hooper 320

and Scott, 2005). This study establishes that Dpp is necessary for injury-induced 321

sensitization of nociceptors. Furthermore, experimental overexpression of Dpp in 322

nociceptors produces allodynia in the absence of injury, supporting the conclusion that 323

Dpp is sufficient for the formation of allodynia. Lastly, knockdown of Dpp does not alter 324

normal nociceptive function, indicating that Dpp signaling is specific for nociceptor 325

sensitization. 326

327

The requirement of BMP components in nociceptors to produce sensitization was 328

investigated by suppressing their expression in these neurons using Ppk1.9-Gal4 to 329

drive expression of gene-specific inverted repeat (IR) RNAi constructs, which trigger the 330

destruction of the matching endogenous mRNA, specifically in the nociceptive neurons. 331

Results indicate that Dpp, its type II primary receptor Put and the type I receptors Tkv 332

and Sax are all necessary in the nociceptive neuron for the formation of allodynia. This 333

suggests but does not confirm the possibility that the Dpp nociceptive sensitization 334

pathway involves an autocrine signaling strategy. Because suppression of either Dpp or 335

its receptors specifically in the nociceptors produces a blockade of injury-induced 336

thermal allodynia, it may be that Dpp is produced in the nociceptive neuron following 337

epithelial tissue damage, then is released and interacts with that same nociceptor’s Dpp 338

receptors. BMPs are known to signal through autocrine mechanisms at the 339

neuromuscular junction (James et al., 2014), but a role for autocrine BMP signaling in 340

sensory neurons has not been previously reported. 341

342

The effects of BMP signaling on nociception are specific to nociceptor sensitization, as 343

supported by the finding that manipulation of receptor expression via RNAi did not alter 344

Page 18: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

16

behavioral responses to noxious thermal stimulation. In order to demonstrate that the 345

results of manipulating BMP signaling are specific to the sensitization pathway and not a 346

general loss of nociceptive functioning in these neurons, uninjured RNAi-suppressed 347

larvae were tested at the normally noxious 45°C (Babcock et al., 2009; Babcock et al., 348

2011). No changes to normal nociception were observed. 349

350

The necessity of both type I receptors, Sax and Tkv, for the formation of allodynia 351

suggests that Dpp binds as a dimer, as has been demonstrated in prior studies of TGF-ß 352

members (Daopin et al., 1992), to trigger the allodynia-producing pathway in this cell. 353

Both type I receptors are independently necessary and thus both must be activated in 354

order to produce allodynia. Perhaps this mechanism of sensitization suggests a reason 355

why congenital type I BMP receptor ALK2 hyperactivation in human patients suffering 356

from Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva increases the incidence of neuropathic pain 357

and allodynia (Kitterman et al., 2012). 358

359

The type I BMP receptors are known to activate the canonical SMAD signaling protein 360

Mad (Raftery et al., 1995) through phosphorylation to form phospho-Mad (p-Mad). Then 361

p-Mad forms a complex with the co-SMAD Med, homolog of human SMAD4 (Wisotzkey 362

et al., 1998), which translocates to the nucleus to regulate gene expression. Upon 363

suppression of Mad and Med, the formation of allodynia was significantly attenuated, 364

demonstrating that the canonical pathway is required for the manifestation of allodynia. 365

Furthermore, immunolocalization of p-Mad, following UV induced tissue damage 366

revealed that nuclear p-Mad levels were nominally elevated by four hours after injury, 367

reached a statistically significant peak eight hours after injury, and returned to baseline 368

Page 19: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

17

at 24 hours following injury. This time course is consistent with the onset of 369

hypersensitivity (Babcock et al., 2009). 370

371

Morphometric analysis was performed to determine if the induction of allodynia following 372

UV mediated tissue damage was accompanied by changes to the dendritic architecture 373

of the nociceptors. No significant morphological differences between the neurons of UV-374

irradiated larvae and those of unirradiated controls were found, indicating that the 375

observed hypersensitivity following UV damage is a result of intrinsic mechanisms of 376

sensitivity, rather than changes in dendritic morphology. This also suggests that the 377

morphological changes observed in some RNAi manipulations may be the result of a 378

developmental effect of BMP perturbation. 379

380

In some experimental groups, there were some differences in dendritic morphology that 381

may indicate a separate role for BMP signaling in these peripheral tissues (Fig 11). First, 382

Put knockdown resulted in a significant increase in the amount of dendritic branching. 383

The direction of this effect is opposite from what might be expected given the observed 384

failure of UV injury to produce allodynia in this manipulated animal. Similarly, when Dpp 385

was upregulated in the nociceptive neurons, a decrease in both dendritic branching and 386

overall dendritic length of these nociceptors was observed. The direction of these 387

effects is also in opposition to the formation of injury-independent allodynia. These 388

inconsistencies between the results of a genetic manipulation on dendritic morphology 389

and allodynia suggest that some factor other than the degree of dendritic arborization 390

connects BMP signaling to the development of allodynia. The literature describing the 391

role of BMP signaling in plasticity of the neuromuscular junction (James and Broihier, 392

2011; James et al., 2014) suggests that the effect of BMP signaling on injury-induced 393

Page 20: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

18

allodynia could be to produce changes in synaptic strength at the central terminals of the 394

nociceptive neurons in the ventral nerve cord, where connections are made with the first-395

order interneurons of the central nociceptive circuitry (Ohyama et al., 2015). 396

397

It has been reported that BMP released from epithelial tissues acts to control the degree 398

of sensory neuron innervation through density of terminal fields and total number of 399

neurons in the dorsal root ganglia of mice (Guha et al., 2004). Inhibition of dendritic 400

growth by epithelially-derived Dpp could explain why the RNAi manipulations of BMP 401

receptor Put resulted in an increase in total dendritic branching. This model is consistent 402

with our observation that in animals with Dpp suppressed in nociceptors, normal 403

dendritic morphology was observed. In this case, Dpp knockdown in the nociceptors 404

would not be expected to have any effect on the pool of Dpp that might be released from 405

the epithelial cells, however the nociceptors of such animals still have intact receptor 406

machinery to perceive and transduce the epithelial-derived Dpp signal, thus resulting in 407

normal dendritic architecture. On the other hand, upregulating Dpp in the nociceptor 408

would lead to an increase in Dpp signaling around that neuron and would increase the 409

inhibitory signal, cuing a decrease in dendritic growth, as observed. 410

411

In summary, this report demonstrates that Dpp expression in the nociceptor is both 412

necessary and sufficient for the production of thermal allodynia. Dpp signals to the 413

primary type II receptor Put, in turn activating type I receptors Tkv and Sax which then 414

activate the canonical signaling pathway by phosphorylating Mad to ultimately produce 415

allodynia (Fig 1). Suppression of these components has no observed effect on the 416

normal nociceptive functioning of these cells and only minor effects on their dendritic 417

morphology. Due to the high degree of conservation of the BMP system between 418

Page 21: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

19

vertebrates and invertebrates, the pharmacological manipulation of BMP pathways might 419

offer an effective avenue for the treatment of chronic pain in humans. 420

421

References: 422

Adams CM, Anderson MG, Motto DG, Price MP, Johnson WA, Welsh MJ (1998) Ripped 423

pocket and pickpocket, novel Drosophila DEG/ENaC subunits expressed in early 424

development and in mechanosensory neurons. J Cell Biol 140(1):143-52. PMID 425

9425162. 426

427

Affolter M, Basler K (2007) The Decapentaplegic morphogen gradient: from pattern 428

formation to growth regulation. Nat Rev Genet 8:663–674. PMID 17703237. 429

430

Ai X, Cappuzzello J, Hall AK (1999) Activin and bone morphogenetic proteins induce 431

calcitonin gene-related peptide in embryonic sensory neurons in vitro. Mol Cell Neuroscs 432

14:506–518. PMID 10656256. 433

434

Ainsley JA, Pettus JM, Bosenko D, Gerstein CE, Zinkevich N, Anderson MG, Adams 435

CM, Welsh MJ, Johnson WA (2003) Enhanced locomotion caused by loss of the 436

Drosophila DEG/ENaC protein Pickpocket1. Curr Biol 13(17):1557-63. PMID 10656256. 437

438

Babcock DT, Landry C, Galko MJ (2009) Cytokine signaling mediates UV-induced 439

nociceptive sensitization in Drosophila larvae. Curr Biol 19:799–806. PMID 19375319. 440

441

Page 22: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

20

Babcock DT, Shi S, Jo J, Shaw M, Gutstein HB, Galko MJ (2011) Hedgehog signaling 442

regulates nociceptive sensitization. Curr Biol 21:1525–1533. PMID 21906949. 443

444

Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, WalkerS. (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models 445

using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-6. http://CRAN.R project.org/package=lme4 446

447

Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1):71-94. PMID 448

4366476. 449

450

Daopin S, Piez KA, Ogawa Y, Davies DR (1992) Crystal structure of transforming growth 451

factor-β2: An unusual fold for the superfamily. Science 257 (5068):369-373. PMID 452

1631557. 453

454

Gaskin DJ, Richard P (2012) The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain Off 455

J Am Pain Soc 13:715–724. PMID 22607834. 456

457

Grueber WB, Jan LY, Jan YN (2002) Tiling of the Drosophila epidermis by multidendritic 458

sensory neurons. Development 129(12):2867-78. PMID 12050135. 459

460

Guha U, Gomez WA, Samanta J, Gupta M, Rice FL, Kessler JA (2004) Target-derived 461

BMP signaling limits sensory neuron number and the extent of peripheral innervation in 462

vivo. Development 131:1175–1186. PMID 14973275. 463

464

Page 23: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

21

Hooper JE, Scott MP (2005) Communicating with Hedgehogs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 465

6:306–317. PMID 15803137. 466

467

Im S, Takle K, Jo J, Babcock DT, Ma Z, Xiang Y, Galko MJ (2015) Tachykinin acts 468

upstream of hedgehog signaling during nociceptive sensitization in Drosophila. eLife 4. 469

PMID 26575288. 470

471

Iyer SC, Ramachandran Iyer EP, Meduri R, Rubaharan M, Kuntimaddi A, Karamsetty M, 472

Cox DN (2013) Cut, via CrebA, transcriptionally regulates the COPII secretory pathway 473

to direct dendrite development in Drosophila. J Cell Sci Oct 15;126(Pt 20):4732-45. 474

PMID 23902691. 475

476

James RE, Broihier HT (2011) Crimpy inhibits the BMP homolog Gbb in motoneurons to 477

enable proper growth control at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Development 478

138(15):3273-86. PMID 21750037. 479

480

James RE, Hoover KM, Bulgari D, McLaughlin CN, Wilson CG, Wharton KA, Levitan ES, 481

Broihier HT (2014) Crimpy enables discrimination of presynaptic and postsynaptic pools 482

of a BMP at the Drosophila neuromuscular Junction. Dev Cell 31:586–598. PMID 483

25453556. 484

485

Jo J, Im SH, Babcock DT, Iyer SC, Gunawan F, Cox DN, Galko MJ (2017) Drosophila 486

caspase activity is required independently of apoptosis to produce active TNF/Eiger 487

during nociceptive sensitization. Cell Death Dis 8(5): e2786. PMID 28492538. 488

489

Page 24: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

22

Jones CM, Lyons KM, Hogan BL (1991) Involvement of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 490

(BMP-4) and Vgr-1 in morphogenesis and neurogenesis in the mouse. Development 491

111(2):531-42. PMID 1893873. 492

493

Kamphuis S, Kavelaars A, Brooimans R, Kuis W, Zegers BJ, Heijnen CJ (1997) T helper 494

2 cytokines induce preproenkephalin mRNA expression and proenkephalin A in human 495

peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Neuroimmunol 79(1):91-9. PMID 9357452. 496

497

Kang K, Panzano VC, Chang EC, Ni L, Dainis AM, Jenkins AM, Regna K, Muskavitch 498

MAT, Garrity PA (2012) Modulation of TRPA1 thermal sensitivity enables sensory 499

discrimination in Drosophila. Nature 481:76-90. PMID 22139422. 500

501

Kim SE, Coste B, Chadha A, Cook B, Patapoutian A (2012) The role of Drosophila Piezo 502

in mechanical nociception. Nature 483(7388):209-12. PMID 22343891. 503

504

Kitterman JA, Strober JB, Kan L, Rocke DM, Cali A, Peeper J, Snow J, Delai PL, 505

Morhart R, Pignolo RJ, Shore EM, Kaplan FS (2012) Neurological symptoms in 506

individuals with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Neurol 259(12):2636-43. PMID 507

22752062. 508

509

Letsou A, Arora K, Wrana JL, Simin K, Twombly, V, Jamal J, Staehling-Hampton K, 510

Hoffmann FM, Gelbart WM, Massague J, O'Connor MB (1995) Drosophila Dpp signaling 511

Page 25: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

23

is mediated by the punt gene product: a dual ligand-binding type II receptor of the TGF 512

beta receptor family. Cell 80(6):899-908. PMID 7697720. 513

514

Lin HY, Wang XF, Ng-Eaton E, Weinberg RA, Lodish HF (1992) Expression cloning of 515

the TGF-beta type II receptor, a functional transmembrane serine/threonine kinase. 516

Cell 68(4):775-85. PMID 1310899. 517

518

Liu A, Niswander LA (2005) Bone morphogenetic protein signalling and vertebrate 519

nervous system development. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:945–954. PMID 16340955. 520

521

Massagué J, Like B (1985) Cellular receptors for type beta transforming growth factor. 522

Ligand binding and affinity labeling in human and rodent cell lines. J Biol Chem 523

260(5):2636-45. PMID 2982829. 524

525

Neely GG Keene AC, Duchek P, Chang EC, Wang QP, Aksoy YA, Rosenzweig 526

M, Costigan M, Woolf CJ, Garrity PA, Penninger JM (2011) TrpA1 regulates thermal 527

nociception in Drosophila. PLoS ONE 6, e24343. PMID 21909389. 528

529

Nellen D, Affolter M, Basler K (1994) Receptor serine/threonine kinases implicated in the 530

control of Drosophila body pattern by decapentaplegic. Cell 78(2):225-37. PMID 531

8044837. 532

533

Page 26: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

24

Newfeld SJ, Mehra A, Singer MA, Wrana JL, Attisano L, Gelbart WM (1997) Mothers 534

against Dpp participates in a DDP/TGF-beta responsive serine-threonine kinase signal 535

transduction cascade. Development 124(16):3167-76. PMID 9272957. 536

537

Ohyama T, Schneider-Mizell CM, Fetter RD, Aleman JV, Franconville R, Rivera-Alba M, 538

Mensh BD, Branson KM, Simpson JH, Truman JW, Cardona A, Zlatic M (2015) A 539

multilevel multimodal circuit enhances action selection in Drosophila. Nature 540

520(7549):633-9. PMID 25896325. 541

542

Ozkaynak E, Rueger DC, Drier EA, Corbett C, Ridge RJ, Sampath TK, Oppermann H 543

(1990) OP-1 cDNA encodes an osteogenic protein in the TGF-beta family. EMBO J 544

9(7):2085-2093. PMID 2357959. 545

546

Padgett RW, Wozney JM, Gelbart WM (1993) Human BMP sequences can confer 547

normal dorsal-ventral patterning in the Drosophila embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 548

90:2905–2909. PMID 8464906. 549

550

Pandey UB, Nichols CD (2011) Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and 551

the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol Rev 63(2):411-36. PMID 552

21415126. 553

554

R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R 555

Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/. 556

557

Page 27: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

25

Raftery LA, Twombly V, Wharton K, Gelbart WM (1995) Genetic screens to identify 558

elements of the Decapentaplegic signaling pathway in Drosophila. Genetics 139(1):241-559

54. PMID 7705627. 560

561

Reiter LT, Potocki L, Chien S, Gribskov M, Bier E (2001) A systematic analysis of human 562

disease-associated gene sequences In Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res 563

11:1114–1125. PMID 11381037. 564

565

Ruberte E, Marty T, Nellen D, Affolter M, Basler K (1995) An absolute requirement for 566

both the type II and type I receptors, Punt and Thick Veins, for Dpp signaling in vivo. Cell 567

80(6):889-97. PMID 7697719. 568

569

Sampath TK, Rashka KE, Doctor JS, Tucker RF, Hoffmann FM (1993) Drosophila 570

transforming growth factor β superfamily proteins induce endochondral none formation in 571

mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:6004–6008. PMID 8327474. 572

573

Sekelsky JJ, Newfeld SJ, Raftery LA, Chartoff EH, Gelbart WM (1995) Genetic 574

characterization and cloning of mothers against Dpp, a gene required for 575

Decapentaplegic function in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139(3):1347-58. PMID 576

7768443. 577

578

Tracey WD Jr, Wilson RI, Laurent G, Benzer S (2003) painless, a Drosophila gene 579

essential for nociception. Cell 113:261–273. PMID 12705873. 580

Page 28: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

26

581

Tramullas M, Lantero A, Díaz A, Morchón N, Merino D, Villar A, Buscher D, Merino R, 582

Hurlé JM, Izpisúa-Belmonte JC, Hurlé MA (2010) BAMBI (bone morphogenetic protein 583

and activin membrane-bound inhibitor) reveals the involvement of the transforming 584

growth factor-beta family in pain modulation. J Neurosci 30(4):1502-11. PMID 20107078. 585

586

Urist MR (1965) Bone: Formation by autoinduction. Science 150:893–899. PMID 587

5319761. 588

589

Venken KJ, Schulze KL, Haelterman NA, Pan H, He Y, Evans-Holm M, Carlson JW, 590

Levis RW, Spradling AC, Hoskins RA, Bellen HJ (2011) MiMIC: a highly versatile 591

transposon insertion resource of engineering Drosophila melanogaster genes. Nat 592

Methods 8(9): 737-43. 593

594

Wangler MF, Yamamoto S, Bellen HJ (2015) Fruit flies in biomedical research. Genetics 595

199(3):639-53. PMID 25624315. 596

597

Ward EJ, Berg CA (2005) Juxtaposition between two cell types is necessary for dorsal 598

appendage tube formation. Mech Dev 122(2):241-255. PMID 15652711. 599

600

Wisotzkey RG, Mehra A, Sutherland DJ, Dobens LL, Liu X, Dohrmann C, Attisano L, 601

Raftery LA (1998) Medea is a Drosophila Smad4 homolog that is differentially required 602

to potentiate DPP responses. Development 125(8):1433-45. PMID 9502724. 603

604

Page 29: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

27

Xie T, Finelli AL, Padgett RW (1994) The Drosophila Saxophone gene: a serine-605

threonine kinase receptor of the TGF-beta superfamily. Science 263(5154):1756-9. 606

PMID 8134837. 607

608

Xu P, Hall AK (2007) Activin acts with nerve growth factor to regulate calcitonin gene-609

related peptide mRNA in sensory neurons. Neuroscience 150(3):665-74. PMID 610

17964731. 611

612

Page 30: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

28

Figure and Table Legends: 613

614

Figure 1. Model illustrating the BMP signaling components found to be necessary 615

for pain sensitization in Drosophila larval nociceptive neurons. Decapentaplegic 616

(Dpp: orthologous to BMP2/4) ligand binds to its primary type II receptor, Punt (Put: 617

orthologous to the type II TGFβ receptor). Subsequent activation of type I receptors 618

Thick Veins (Tkv: orthologous to ALK3/6) and Saxophone (Sax: orthologous to ALK1/2) 619

leads to phosphorylation of the SMAD transducer Mothers Against Decapentaplegic 620

(Mad: co-founder of SMAD family), which then binds Medea (Med: orthologous to 621

SMAD4). 622

623

624

Figure 2: Thermonociception response of wild-type animals. The percentage of 625

wild-type (w1118) animals that responded to the thermal probe increased with increasing 626

probe temperature from 39°C to 50°C. Forty-two degrees Celsius was the lowest 627

temperature for which there was a statistically significant proportion of animals 628

responding, therefore in this study 41°C, the highest innocuous temperature, was 629

selected for use in subsequent allodynia testing. Larvae responding with a nocifensive 630

roll were classified as fast (<6 s, black area), slow (between 6 and 20 s, gray area), or 631

nonresponders if they did not respond within 20 s (white area). Whiskers indicate SEM 632

of at least three groups of larvae. Distributions were compared using Fisher’s Exact 633

Test. n=90 for each group. 634

635

Page 31: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

29

Figure 3: UV injury results in allodynia without altering gross dendritic 636

morphology of nociceptive neurons. (A) UV injury leads to allodynia. Twenty-four 637

hours after UV exposure there was a statistically significant increase in the number of 638

animals that responded to a previously innocuous stimulus, 41°C. Response latencies 639

were recorded in seconds (s) and categorized as follows: fast (<6 s, black area), slow 640

(between 6 and 20 s, gray area), or nonresponders if they did not respond within 20 s 641

(white area). n=90-117 and distributions were compared using Mixed Logistic 642

Regression analysis (MLR). Whiskers indicate SEM of at least three groups of larvae. 643

(B and C) Dendritic morphology of nociceptive neurons of normal animals (Ppk1.9-644

Gal4>y1v1) exposed to UV injury is similar to that of uninjured controls. The total number 645

of dendritic branches (B) and total dendritic length (C) were compared in neurons 646

visualized via Ppk-GFP. Analysis of larvae not subjected to UV injury (left) and those 647

subjected to UV injury (right) shows no significant changes in morphology. Skeletons 648

were constructed in Fiji and total dendritic length and the total numbers of branches 649

were calculated. Data were analyzed Welch’s t-test. n=18 for each group. 650

651

Figure 4: Manipulation of Dpp level in the primary nociceptive neurons affects 652

production of allodynia. (A) Knockdown of Dpp using a Ppk1.9-Gal4>UAS-inverted 653

repeat (IR) RNAi genotype resulted in a failure to produce allodynia, compared to control 654

genotypes. Following mock treatment (-) or UV-injury (+), larvae were assayed by gentle 655

touch with a thermal probe set to 41°C. Response latencies were recorded in seconds 656

(s) and categorized as follows: none (>20 s, white area), slow (between 6 s and 20 s, 657

gray area) and fast (<6 s, black area). Whiskers indicate SEM of at least three groups of 658

larvae, total n=90-117. (B) Overexpression of Dpp in Ppk1.9-Gal4>UAS-Dpp larvae 659

caused hypersensitivity in the absence of UV injury (p<0.001). The probability of a 660

Page 32: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

30

nocifensive response at 41°C was calculated for each group by Mixed Logistic 661

Regression (MLR) analysis, and was seen to increase significantly compared to control 662

genotypes no Gal4 (w1118>UAS-IR) and no-UAS (Ppk1.9-Gal4>y1v1). Significant 663

differences are indicated by asterisks. n=90 for each group 664

665

Figure 5. Localization of BMP receptor Put in nociceptive neurons. Nociceptive 666

neurons were identified by GFP expression in larvae expressing GFP under the control 667

of the pickpocket promoter (green: A, C, D). Fillets were incubated with antibodies 668

recognizing Put and fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (red: B, C, D) and 669

visualized by confocal microscopy. Put expression was observed in somata and major 670

dendritic branches (C inset) of nociceptive neurons as well as other cells. Compared to 671

controls, the expression of Put in nociceptive neurons was significantly reduced (D, E: 672

p<0.02, Student’s t-test) by cell-specific RNAi suppression. 673

674

Figure 6. Localization of BMP receptors Tkv and Sax in nociceptive neurons. Tkv 675

(A, B, C) and Sax (D, E, F) expression in nociceptive neurons was confirmed by 676

colocalization of GFP-tagged Sax or Tkv (green: B, C, E, F) and nociceptive neuron 677

specific expression of red fluorescent protein (red: A, C, D, F). Using the MiMIC method, 678

fluorescently tagged Sax and Tkv were observed in the somata and major dendritic 679

branches of nociceptive neurons, as well as in other unidentified cells. 680

681

Figure 7: BMP receptors are required in nociceptive neurons for injury-induced 682

allodynia. Ppk1.9-Gal4>UAS-inverted repeat (IR) RNAi genotypes targeting Put (A), 683

Sax (B) or Tkv (C) were prepared. Following mock treatment (-) or UV-injury (+), larvae 684

Page 33: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

31

were assayed by gentle touch with a thermal probe set to 41°C. Response latencies 685

were recorded in (s) and categorized as follows: none (>20 s, white area), slow (between 686

6 s and 20 s, gray area) and fast (<6 s, black area). Larvae of all three genotypes failed 687

to produce allodynia after injury. Probability of response was compared to control 688

genotypes no Gal4 (w1118>UAS-IR) and no-UAS (Ppk1.9-Gal4>y1v1) by Mixed Logistic 689

Regression analysis. Whiskers indicate SEM of at least three groups of larvae, total 690

n=83-103. 691

692

Figure 8: Canonical intracellular transducers are required in nociceptive neurons 693

for injury induced allodynia. Knockdown of Mad (A) or Med (B) using Ppk1.9-694

Gal4>UAS-inverted repeat (IR) RNAi genotypes resulted in a failure to produce allodynia, 695

compared to control genotypes no Gal4 (w1118>UAS-IR) and no-UAS (Ppk1.9-Gal4>y1v1). 696

Following mock treatment (-) or UV-injury (+), larvae were assayed by gentle touch with 697

a thermal probe set to 41°C. Response latencies were recorded in (s) and categorized 698

as follows: none (>20 s, white area), slow (between 6 s and 20 s, gray area) and fast (<6 699

s, black area). Whiskers indicate SEM of at least three groups of larvae, total n = 82-103. 700

Allodynia in larvae with suppressed Med was significantly different from one of its 701

controls, Mad suppression resulted in allodynia significantly reduced compared to both 702

controls. 703

704

Figure 9: Mad phosphorylation in nociceptive neurons increases after injury. 705

GFP expression indicates nociceptive neurons (green; A,C and E) and anti-phospho-706

Mad immunoreactivity (red; B, D and F). Cell bodies of the nociceptive neurons are 707

shown outlined in white. A and B are representative images of staining immediately 708

following UV injury. (C) and (D) are representative images of staining 8 hours after UV 709

Page 34: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

32

injury. (D) and (F) are representative images of staining 24 hours following UV injury, at 710

the time of peak allodynia. (G) shows the average calculated mean intensities of 711

phospho-Mad signaling in the nuclei of the nociceptive neurons at 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 712

hours after injury. n>9 for each group. Asterisks indicate significant increase in anti-713

phospho-Mad immunofluorescence detected at 8 hours. Data were analyzed with one-714

way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test. 715

716

Figure 10: Nociception of larvae of RNAi and control genotypes is similar at 717

normally noxious temperature of 45oC. Normal nociceptive responses were tested to 718

determine the normal nociception behavior of uninjured larvae. These data show that 719

uninjured animals bearing inverted repeat (IR) RNAi genotypes reducing expression of 720

BMP components are as capable of responding to normally noxious thermal stimuli as 721

are the controls. Probe temperature was set to 45oC. n=90 for all groups. In no case did 722

an RNAi genotype show a significant difference from both no-UAS (Ppk1.9-Gal4>y1v1) 723

controls (Welch’s t-test). 724

725

Figure 11: Morphology of nociceptive neuron dendritic fields of larvae in which 726

BMP components were manipulated compared to that of normal larvae. 727

Morphological parameters measured were the total number of dendritic branches (A) 728

and total dendritic length (B). Larvae in which Dpp was suppressed in nociceptive 729

neurons by inverted repeat (IR) triggered RNAi exhibited no significant differences in 730

dendritic branching compared to control genotype Ppk1.9-Gal4>y1v1, nor did larvae in 731

which Tkv or Sax were similarly suppressed. Nociceptive neuron branching was 732

increased in larvae in which Put (p<0.007), Mad (p<0.022) or Med (p<0.04) was 733

suppressed (A), but no RNAi manipulation significantly altered overall dendritic length 734

Page 35: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

33

(B). Overexpression of Dpp in the nociceptive neurons (rightmost bar in A and B) 735

significantly decreased dendritic branching (p<0.025) and dendritic length (p<0.04), 736

compared with control genotype Ppk1.9-Gal4>w1118. Skeletons were constructed in Fiji 737

and total dendritic length and total number of branches was calculated. Data were 738

analyzed using Welch’s t-test. n=18-30. 739

740

741

Table 1. P-values corresponding to Mixed Logistic Regression analysis. 742

The table represents the estimated difference in the probability of reacting to a stimulus 743

post UV sensitization for the various treatment group pairs. The lower and upper bounds 744

represent the bounds to the 99% confidence interval about the estimated difference and 745

the final column represents the p-value of the estimated difference in reaction 746

probability. The differences, confidence bounds and p-values were all found via 747

parametric bootstrapping (10,000 iterations) using the MLR models fit to the data. 748

749

Page 36: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 37: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 38: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 39: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 40: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 41: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 42: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 43: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 44: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 45: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 46: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)
Page 47: Drosophila nociceptive sensitization requires BMP signaling via … · 2017-08-03 · 67 members of the SMAD grou p named after the small C. elegans SMA mutant (Brenner, 68 1974)

1

Genotype Control Difference Lower Upper P-value w1118(UV+) w1118(UV-) 0.64 0.51 0.75 <.001

DppIR No UAS 0.58 0.42 0.72 <.001 DppIR No Gal4 0.6 0.44 0.74 <.001

DppIR-2 No UAS 0.43 0.26 0.59 <.001 DppIR-2 No Gal4 0.6 0.44 0.74 <.001 PutIR No UAS 0.67 0.53 0.79 <.001 PutIR No Gal4 0.3 0.14 0.46 <.001

PutIR-2 No UAS 0.48 0.32 0.63 <.001 PutIR-2 No Gal4 0.38 0.2 0.55 <.001 TkvIR No UAS 0.53 0.37 0.68 <.001 TkvIR No Gal4 0.43 0.26 0.6 <.001

TkvIR-2 No UAS 0.57 0.41 0.72 <.001 TkvIR-2 No Gal4 0.47 0.3 0.63 <.001 SaxIR No UAS 0.71 0.57 0.82 <.001 SaxIR No Gal4 0.35 0.2 0.5 <.001

SaxIR-2 No UAS 0.55 0.39 0.7 <.001 SaxIR-2 No Gal4 0.41 0.23 0.57 <.001 MadIR No UAS 0.56 0.41 0.71 <.001 MadIR No Gal4 0.28 0.11 0.45 <.001 MedIR No UAS 0.49 0.32 0.65 <.001 MedIR No Gal4 0.12 -0.06 0.3 >.05

UAS-dpp No UAS 0.28 0.12 0.43 <.001 UAS-dpp No Gal4 0.27 0.1 0.43 <.001