Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30....

60
Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement

Transcript of Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30....

Page 1: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Driving Performance ThroughEmployee Engagement

Page 2: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

What We’ll Cover

1. What is employee engagement –why does it matter?

2. Results from a national survey3. Measuring and improving

engagement4. Creating an engagement culture

Page 3: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

CPS HR Consulting

Independent, self-supporting government agency Full range of integrated HR solutions – government

and nonprofits 100+ employees, 200+ project consultants 1,200 public and nonprofit sector clients

Page 4: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Page 5: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Key Take-Aways

Employee engagement

drives performance

Engaged employees find personal meaning

in work

Engagement should be

measured –Results acted on

Long-term Improvement =

culture of engagement

Page 6: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Context – Our Aging Workforce

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Under 30 30-39 40-49 50+

FederalStateLocalPrivate

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Page 7: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Department – Today

DirectorMgmt. Services

January 21, 1982

Deputy DirectorMay 10, 1981

DirectorProperty Services

June 26, 1999

DirectorEngineering

February 16, 1980

DirectorEquipment Services

April 17, 1978

DirectorWater TreatmentAugust 15, 1986

DirectorField Services

March 20, 1982

DirectorTransportation & Parking

March 2, 1980

DirectorSolid Waste & Recycling

December 12, 2001

DirectorAdministration

August 10, 1980

Chief EngineerJanuary 16, 2005

Page 8: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Same Department – 3 Years

RETIREDDirector Mgmt. Services

RETIREDDeputy Director

DirectorProperty Services

RETIREDDirector

Engineering

RETIREDDirector

Equipment Services

RETIREDDirector

Water Treatment

RETIREDDirector

Field Services

RETIREDDirector

Transportation & Parking

DirectorSolid Waste & Recycling

RETIREDDirector

Administration

Chief Engineer

Page 9: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Multiple Generations

Traditionalists (born before 1946) Boomers (1946-64) Gen Xers (1965-76) Millennials (1977-97) Gen 2020 (after 1997)

Page 10: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

So … What’s It All Mean?

Dramatic workforce

shiftsMore

complicated

Public sector feeling

effects first

Government must adapt

to talent market

Page 11: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Page 12: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

What is Employee Engagement?

Heightened Connection

Beyond Job Satisfaction

Personal Meaning

Pride

Discretionary Effort

Page 13: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Engaged Employees …

Have strong relationships in organization Go extra mile for customers Volunteer ideasWork hard – and smart Will stay – even for less money Recommend organization as good place to work Show up for work Get things done

Page 14: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Page 15: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Why Does Engagement Matter?

Page 16: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Page 17: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Page 18: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us June 20, 2018

Engagement Drives Results

-70% -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30%

Absenteeism

Turnover (high-turnover orgs))

Turnover (low-turnover orgs)

Lost or stolen inventory

Safety incidents

Customer scores

Productivity

Profitability

Key Performance Indicators Top- and Bottom-Quartile Work Groups

Source: Gallup

Page 19: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Federal Government65

8.910.47 0.73

37

11.73

1.4 2.150

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Goal Achievement Sick Leave Days EEO Complaints OSHA Lost Time Rate

Most Engaged Agencies Least Engaged Agencies

Federal agencies with engaged employees have better outcomes

Source: MSPB

Page 20: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

State and Local Government

86

59

72

61

37

50

32

21

28

I can impact customer service

I can impact cost

I can impact quality

Disengaged Moderately Engaged Highly EngagedSource: Towers Watson

% Who Agree

Page 21: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Engagement and Mission SuccessMy Organization is Successful at Achieving its Mission (% Agree)

Institute for Public Sector Employee Engagement

Page 22: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Engagement and Life SatisfactionOverall, How Satisfied are You With Your Life?

Institute for Public Sector Employee Engagement

Page 23: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

In Government, Engagement Also Links to:

InnovationCustomer service Employee retentionCollaboration and teamwork Safety

Page 24: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Engagement Value Chain

Improved engagement

Better performance

Higher citizen

satisfaction

More trust in

government

Page 25: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

It’s About Leadership

23%

51%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Engaged Not engaged Activelydisengaged

6%

Percentage of employees answering “yes” to the question: “If you could fire your current boss, would you do so or not?”

Source: Gallup

Page 26: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

… said they’d willingly forgo a substantial pay raise in exchange for seeing their direct supervisor fired

35% of U.S. workers polled…

It’s About Leadership

Page 27: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

… said they’d willingly forgo a substantial pay raise in exchange for seeing their direct supervisor fired

35% of U.S. workers polled…

Page 28: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Table Discussion1. Think of a successful work group, team

or project you led or were part of that had a high level of engagement

2. What created the engagement?

Page 29: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

How Engaged is the Workforce?

4330 30 28 31

3545 42 50 43

21 25 28 22 26

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Private Sector Govt Overall Federal Govt State Govt Local Govt

Fully Engaged Somewhat Engaged Not Engaged

Page 30: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Discussion

Why do you think engagement is low, especially in government?

Page 31: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Workplace Factors – Top Engagement Drivers

1. Leadership and Managing Change

2. Training and Development3. My Work

Private Sector and Government

Page 32: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Engagement Drivers – Level of Government

1. Leadership and Managing Change2. My Work3. Training and Development

Federal

1. Leadership and Managing Change2. Training and Development3. My Work

State

1. Leadership and Managing Change2. My Supervisor3. Training and Development

Local

Page 33: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Culture Factors – Top Engagement Drivers

1. Appreciation/Recognition2. Innovation3. Fairness/Inclusion

Private Sector and

Government

Page 34: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

What’s It Mean? Public sector less engaged than private sector 25% of government employees not engaged High engagement linked to perceptions of successful

organizational performance and well-being Key focus areas

• Leadership and managing change• Training and development• My supervisor• Appreciation/recognition

Page 35: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

How Do We Know If

Our Employees

are Engaged?

Page 36: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Ask Them

Page 37: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Why Survey?

Efficient and inclusiveConsistent dataConfidential Benchmark survey results

Page 38: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us June 20, 2018

Institute Employee Engagement Model

Page 39: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Table Discussion: Engagement Challenges

What are the barriers/challenges to improving engagement

in your organization?

Page 40: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

What Public-Sector OrganizationsHave Done to Improve Engagement

Page 41: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Building Engagement

Strategy

Leadership

Improved engagement

Better performance

Higher citizen satisfaction

More trust in government

Page 42: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us June 20, 2018

Strategy – Minneapolis

City government runs well and connects to the community it serves

Engaged and talented employees reflect our community, have the resources they need to succeed and are empowered to improve our efficiency and effectiveness

Goal: A City that works

Page 43: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The Miracle of MinneapolisNo other place mixes affordability, opportunity, and wealth so well. What’s its secret?

The Miracle of MinneapolisNo other place mixes affordability, opportunity, and wealth so well.

What’s its secret?

Page 44: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Strategic Goal #4

Napa, CA Sanitation District

Maintain a dynamic and skilled workforce through employee engagement, professional development and opportunities for advancement

Page 45: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us June 20, 2018

Strategy – Michigan

Works directly with all state departments to engage employees to improve government services for Michiganders

Aims to be the nation's leader in government customer service, employee engagement, fiscal responsibility and innovation

Office of Good Government

Page 46: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Michigan – Performance Results Client Services Center (Department of Technology

Management and Budget) answers phones 92% faster

Mortgage funding process shortened by 85% DNA test results received 59% faster Tax exemptions for private forest owners processed

66% faster

Page 47: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Strategy and Leadership – A Case Study

Page 48: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

FLRA “Best Places” Score Over Time

Page 49: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

What Did FLRA Do? “Year of the Employee” Strategic vision – “Revitalization, Reinvention, Re-engagement” Enhanced communication Town hall meetings Listening tourMore transparency – budget, performanceManagers involved in key decisions Employee work groups to review processesNew recognition programsHR back in-house

Page 50: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

FLRA Results

Reduced pending cases by 90% Eliminated overage cases Reduced average time to close cases from

250 to 50 days

Page 51: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Building Engagement – New Employee Onboarding

Page 52: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Building Engagement – Supervision

Make sure employees know what is expected and how work links to mission

Meet regularly with employees Provide opportunities to grow and develop Conduct at least semiannual discussions about performance,

strengths and developmental needs Hold employees accountable – deal with poor performance.

Manage performance effectively

Page 53: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us June 20, 2018

Management / Supervision

Select supervisors to supervise – and build

engagement

Provide training, resources and

support

Hold leaders

accountable for

engagement

Page 54: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us June 20, 2018

Building Engagement

Appreciate and recognize Communicate and listen –

“my opinion counts” Respect work/life balance Connect work to mission Involve unions

Improved engagement

Better performance

Higher citizen

satisfaction

More trust in

government

Page 55: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“I help send men to the moon”

Page 56: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Engagement Culture

Set of accepted organizational values,

behaviors, and practices that

promotes increasing levels of engagement

as a cultural norm

Page 57: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

cpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Engagement Culture

Engagement business case broadly understood

Leaders/managers work together to drive engagement

Engagement linked to mission, critical business outcomes

Engagement visible across organization (not just HR program)

Engagement regularly measured/analyzed – and action taken

HR components linked to engagement

Robust communication strategy, especially by leaders

Page 58: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Getting StartedGetting Started Make long-term commitment Communicate business case Get leaders, managers and supervisors on board Involve labor Plan and communicate strategy Survey employees Follow through

Page 59: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

October 18cpshr.comcpshr.us Oct 4, 2018

Key Take-Aways

Employee engagement

drives performance

Engaged employees find personal meaning

in work

Engagement should be

measured –Results acted on

Long-term Improvement =

culture of engagement

Page 60: Driving Performance Through Employee Engagement15%. 20%. 25%. 30%. 35%. 40%. 45%. 50%. Under 30. 30-39. 40-49. 50+ Federal. State. Local. Private. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Bob Lavigna608-395-8472

[email protected]