Drinking Water Source Assessmentfor the Village of MetamoraSUMMARY

Source Water Assessment andProtection. The following report for theVillage of Metamora was compiled as partof the Source Water Assessment andProtection Program for Ohio. This programis intended to identify drinking waterprotection areas and provide information onhow to reduce the risk of contamination ofthe waters within those areas. The goal ofthe program is to ensure the long termavailability of abundant and safe drinkingwater for the present and future citizens ofOhio.

The Safe Drinking Water Act Amendmentsof 1996 established the national SourceWater Assessment and Protection Program,targeting drinking water sources for allpublic water systems in the United States. A public water system is a facility thatprovides drinking water to 15 or moreservice connections or that regularly servesat least 25 people a day for at least 60 daysa year, whether from an underground wellor spring, or from an above ground stream,lake, or reservoir. The requirement doesnot address residential wells or cisterns. InOhio there are approximately 5,800 publicwater systems.

Background. The Village of Metamoraoperates a community public water systemthat serves a population of approximately980 people. The source is surface watertaken from a tributary to Ten Mile Creek. The system’s treatment capacity isapproximately 220,000 gallons per day, butcurrent average production is about 95,000gallons per day.

Protection Areas. The drinking watersource protection area for the surface watersource is shown in the following figure. Thisreport includes the results of an inventory ofall known or identified potential contaminantsources within the drinking water protection

area. The inventory was conducted by OhioEPA with the assistance of Rick Meiring,Superintendent of the Village of MetamoraWater Treatment Plant. Possible threats tothe surface water source include agriculturalrunoff, transportation related spills, anddischarges from failing or improper homeseptic systems.

Protective Strategies. The ultimate goal ofsource water assessment is implementationof protective strategies that will betterprotect the drinking water source. Strategies for protecting Ten Mile Creekshould include controlling runoff fromagricultural areas, establishment of an earlywarning and emergency response plan forspills, controlling home and commercialseptic system discharges from failingsystems, and coordination with localemergency response agencies.

Ohio EPA encourages the jurisdictionswithin the Village of Metamora Public WaterSystem’s protection area to develop a localprotection plan to protect the source ofdrinking water or to update currentemergency management plans asapplicable. Local watershed planningefforts may already be underway to guidestream restoration and protection activities. These efforts can also serve to benefit theprotection of drinking water sources. Guidance on how to form a Drinking WaterProtection Team and protection plan isavailable from Ohio EPA by calling (614)644-2752.

For More Information. Additionalinformation on protective strategies and howthis assessment was completed is includedin the detailed Drinking Water SourceAssessment Report for the Village ofMetamora.

For information on how to obtain a copy ofthis report, please visit Ohio EPA’s Source

Summary Figure - Village of Metamora Drinking Water Source Protection (SWAP)Area and Corridor Management Zone (CMZ)

Water Assessment and Protection ProgramWeb page at http://www.epa.state.oh.us/ddagw/pdu/swap.html or contact the Villageof Metamora for a copy.

Current information on the quality of thetreated water supplied by the Village ofMetamora is available in the Consumer

Confidence Report (CCR) for the Village ofMetamora Public Water System. The CCRis distributed annually and reports the mostcurrent detected contaminants and anyassociated health risks from data collectedduring the past five years. ConsumerConfidence Reports are available from theVillage of Metamora.

Drinking Water Source Assessment

for the Village of Metamora

Public Water System # 2600711

Fulton County

Prepared by:Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Division of Surface WaterDivision of Drinking and Ground Waters

Northwest District Office

November, 2003

1

How to Use this Assessment

Clean and safe drinking water is essential to everyone. Protecting the source of drinking wateris a wise and cost effective investment. The purpose of this drinking water source assessmentis to provide information your community can use to develop a local Drinking Water ProtectionProgram. The Drinking Water Source Assessment benefits your community by providing thefollowing:

A basis for focusing limited resources within the community to protect the drinking watersource(s).

The assessment provides your community with information regarding activities within theDrinking Water Source Protection Area that directly affect your water supply sourcearea. It is within this area that a release of contaminants, from a spill or improper usage,may travel through the watershed and reach the surface water intake. By examiningwhere the source waters are most sensitive to contaminants, and where potentialcontaminants are located, the assessment identifies the potential risks that should beaddressed first.

A basis for informed decision-making regarding land use within the community.The assessment provides your community with a significant amount of informationregarding where your drinking water comes from (the source) and what the risks are tothe quality of that source. This information allows your community planning authoritiesto make informed decisions regarding proposed land uses within the protection area thatare compatible with both your drinking water resource and the vision of growthembraced by your community.

A start to a comprehensive plan for the watershed and source water area.This assessment can be the beginning of a comprehensive plan for the water resource,one that addresses all of the uses the water resource provides. An ecologically healthylake, stream and watershed will provide a stable, high quality resource for drinkingwater.

For information about developing a local Drinking Water Source Protection Program, pleasecontact the Ohio EPA Division of Drinking and Ground Waters at (614) 644-2752 or visit theDivision’s web site at http://www.epa.state.oh.us/ddagw/pdu/swap.html.

2

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The 1996 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act established a program for states toassess the drinking water source for all public water systems. The Source Water Assessmentand Protection (SWAP) Program is designed to help Ohio’s public water systems protect theirsources of drinking water from becoming contaminated.

The purpose of this assessment is to identify where and how the Village of Metamora's sourcewaters are at risk of contamination. The report• identifies the drinking water source protection area,• examines the characteristics of the watershed and the water quality,• inventories the potential contaminant sources within that area, and discusses the

susceptibility of the system to contamination.

Finally, the report suggests actions that the public water supplier and local community may taketo reduce the risk of contaminating their source of drinking water and ensure the long termavailability of abundant and safe drinking water resources.

Results and recommendations presented in this report are based on the information available atthe time of publication. Ohio EPA recognizes that additional information may become availablein the future that could be used to more accurately determine the drinking water sourceprotection area. Also, changes in land use may occur after Ohio EPA completes the potentialcontaminant source inventory. This report should be used as a starting point to develop a planto protect drinking water resources.

This report was prepared by Dana Martin-Hayden and Janet Hageman, Ohio EPA, Division ofSurface Water, Northwest District Office, and Amy Klei, Ohio EPA, Division of Drinking andGround Waters, Central Office.

2.0 PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

The Village of Metamora operates a community public water system that serves a population ofapproximately 980 people through 361 service connections. A community public water systemis a system that regularly supplies drinking water from its own sources to at least 15 serviceconnections used by year-round residents of the area or regularly serves 25 or more peoplethroughout the entire year. The water treatment system obtains its water from a Ten Mile Creektributary. The system's treatment capacity is approximately 220,000 gallons per day, butcurrent average production is 95,000 gallons per day. Water is pumped from a Ten Mile Creektributary into two above-ground reservoirs. The Village's water treatment system consists ofcoagulation, lime softening, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection.

3.0 DRINKING WATER SOURCE PROTECTION AREA

The Drinking Water Source Protection Area (protection area) for an inland stream is definedas the drainage area upstream of the point where the water is withdrawn from a surface sourcesuch as a stream, lake or reservoir. The protection area is subdivided into corridor andemergency management zones. An illustration of the protection area and corridor managementzone for the Village of Metamora Public Water System is shown in Figure 1. Note that a smallportion of the protection area extends over state boundaries into Michigan. The emergencymanagement zone is shown in Figure 2.

3

The Corridor Management Zone, (CMZ), is an area along streams and tributaries within thesource water assessment area that warrants delineation, inventory, and management. Typically, this zone runs a total of ten miles upstream from the intake, and includes thetributaries that drain into it. The zone is 1,000 feet wide on each side of the Ten Mile Creektributary.

The Emergency Management Zone, (EMZ), is defined as an area in the immediate vicinity ofthe surface water intake in which the public water system operator has little or no time torespond to a spill. The boundary of the emergency management zone is delineated incooperation with the water supplier. Figure 2 shows the boundary of the emergencymanagement zone for the Village of Metamora Public Water System. The Village ofMetamora’s Emergency Management Zone (EMZ) is an area in the immediate vicinity of theTen Mile Creek tributary intake structure and the upland reservoir. This zone is defined as asemi-circle that extends 500 feet upstream and 100 feet downstream of the intake.

The corridor and emergency management zones were the focus of field and windshield surveysto inventory potential contaminant sources. Information was also collected during interviewswith water treatment plant personnel.

4.0 HYDROLOGIC SETTING

A Ten Mile Creek tributary serves as the surface water source for the Village of Metamora. TenMile Creek is approximately 34.8 miles in length with a drainage area of 113.74 square milesand flows into the Ottawa River. The water system intake is located about 1.3 miles from themainstem of Ten Mile Creek. The protection area comprises approximately 5.4 square miles. The average fall of Ten Mile Creek is 4.7 feet per mile. Annual average precipitation in theprotection area is approximately 32 to 33 inches, of which approximately 10 inches becomesurface runoff.

Figure 3 shows the land use for the protection area. The predominant land uses are row cropsat 91.1% and pasture/hay at 7% of the total protection area. The percentage cover for otherland uses include: 1.0% forest, 0.8% wetlands, 0.2% open water, and 0.1% commercial/industrial/transportation.

Drinking Water Quality Monitoring SummaryAvailable chemical and biological water quality data collected from the streams in the protectionarea, and sampling results from finished water reported to Ohio EPA by the public watersupplier were evaluated to characterize water quality. A review of the Village of Metamoracompliance monitoring data (for treated surface water) from 1991-2002 revealed that the systemhad no health based or maximum contaminant level (MCL) violations. Table 1 listscontaminants where at least one result was above the level of detection, and does not includeall contaminants tested for by the public water system. The table also includes data from theVillage of Metamora's participation in Ohio EPA’s Pesticide Special Study (1995-1999). Severalpesticides (alachlor, atrazine, simazine, metolachlor, metribuzin, cyanazine) and nitrate havebeen detected at low levels, indicating an impact from land use activities within the watershed.

It should be recognized that sampling results presented in this report can only provideinformation on the quality of the water at the time the sample was collected. Water quality maychange over time due to a number of reasons. Therefore, it is recommended that the readeralso consult the most recent Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) for the Village of Metamorapublic water system. All public water systems are required to annually prepare and distribute

4

the CCR to their customers. The report is a good source of information on health effectsassociated with detected contaminants and contains information on the community's drinkingwater, including the source of the water, contaminants detected, the likely sources of detectedcontaminants, and the potential health effects of contaminants at levels above the drinkingwater standards. Biological and Chemical Monitoring in Ten Mile Creek and its TributariesThere are no existing water quality data for streams within the Metamora protection area. However, two water samples were collected in 1985-86 at the mouth of an unnamed tributary toTen Mile Creek, downstream from the water intake and Metamora’s protection area. Results ofthese samples are summarized in Table 2.

Samples were also collected from Metamora Reservoir #1 in 1992-93 as part of the InlandClean Lakes Program. Reservoir sample results are summarized in Table 3. Levels of copperexceeded Water Quality Standards in all reservoir samples.

5.0 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES

A review of available regulated facility data bases and a field survey of the corridor managementzone indicate that two potential contaminant sources are present in the drinking water sourceprotection area. The Village of Metamora Water Treatment Plant and a farm are located withinthe corridor management zone, but outside of the emergency management zone. Also,throughout the protection area are private residences which have onsite septic systems. Thelocations of the potential contaminant sources are shown in Figure 4 and listed in Table 4.

It is important to note that this inventory represents potential contaminant sources, and includesany source that has the potential to release a contaminant to surface or ground waters in theprotection area. It is beyond the scope of this study to determine whether any specific potentialsource is actually releasing a contaminant, or to what extent any potential source(s) may becontributing to the overall pollutant load.

The transportation network is a potential source of contamination through vehicular accidentsthat release hazardous materials. Approximately 10.8 miles of roads and 0.6 miles of rail linestraverse the protection area, creating a total of 10 road and one rail crossings of Ten Mile Creekor its tributaries. Approximately 0.54 miles of roads and 0.12 miles of rail are within 100 feet ofa stream. Ten of the road crossings and one of the rail crossings occur within the corridormanagement zone.

6.0 SUSCEPTIBILITY ANALYSIS

For the purposes of source water assessments, all surface waters are considered to besusceptible to contamination. By their nature surface waters are accessible and can be readilycontaminated by chemicals and pathogens, with relatively short travel times from source to theintake. Based on the information compiled for this assessment, the Village of Metamoradrinking water source protection area is susceptible to agricultural runoff, transportation relatedspills, and discharges from failing or improperly maintained home septic systems.

It is important to note that this assessment is based on available data, and therefore may notreflect current conditions in all cases. Water quality, land uses and other activities that arepotential sources of contamination may change with time. While the source water for the Villageof Metamora Public Water System is considered susceptible to contamination, historically, the

5

Village of Metamora Public Water System has effectively treated this source water to meetdrinking water quality standards.

7.0 PROTECTIVE STRATEGIES

Source water protection efforts for the Village of Metamora should focus on controllingagricultural runoff and runoff from cattle grazing pastures, with particular attention to sources ofpesticides, nitrates, phosphorus, and microorganisms such as fecal coliform bacteria. This canbe accomplished via educational efforts. County Extension agents are an excellent resource forassisting the agricultural community with controlling agricultural runoff, and staff from local andCounty health offices can instruct homeowners in proper maintenance of their septic systems.

Other source water protection efforts may include:

Education and Outreach: Informing people who live, work, or own property within theprotection area about the benefits of drinking water protection is very important. Although somecommunities develop their own educational outreach resources, assistance is available at nocost from various agencies. For example, staff from Ohio EPA’s Office of Pollution Preventioncan visit businesses (free of charge) and provide recommendations on how they can modifytheir processes, materials and practices to generate less pollution in a cost-effective andtechnically feasible manner. An effort should be made to educate homeowners and businessesof the potential threat their activities can pose to the water supply. Education could also focuson increasing public awareness of illegal dumping and drinking water protection.

Coordination with Existing Activities: Many local groups are engaged in programs thatcomplement a public water system’s drinking water source protection efforts. Working withgroups such as the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Soil and Water ConservationDistrict, the Ohio Farm Bureau, or a local watershed planning organization ensures coordinationof their respective programs.

Agricultural Activities: Provide education to local farmers on the use of best managementpractices to reduce agricultural and animal feedlot runoff, use of proper manure handlingfacilities, proper handling and road safety with agricultural chemicals, and other methods tocontrol or reduce impacts to surface waters.

Transportation Routes: There is a potential for spills along roads within the protection area.The Village of Metamora may want to consider contacting the local fire department and localemergency planning agency about the location of the drinking water source protection area, sothat strategies can be developed to prevent spilled materials from impacting Ten Mile Creek.

Emergency Response Planning: The Village of Metamora should prepare a plan that includesearly warning of spills and coordination of response and remediation activities for spills that mayenter Ten Mile Creek. This plan should include emergency response actions for Ten MileCreek, such as the placement of absorbent booms to control oil spills, or the ability tomechanically add oxygen to oxidize chemicals with a high oxygen demand. Different responseplans could be developed for different types of contamination. The emergency response planmay also contain strategies for dealing with unexpected levels of runoff containing chemicalssuch as fertilizers and pesticides from adjacent land uses. Though it may be less catastrophicthan a major spill, this kind of contamination is more prevalent and is harder to detect andcontain.

6

Water Quality Monitoring: Monitoring does not directly prevent contamination, but theprotection plan will be more effective if the Village of Metamora conducts periodic monitoring ofraw water quality and quantity from Ten Mile Creek. For example, monitoring data can be usedto (1) determine optimal conditions or seasons for pumping water to the reservoirs; (2) estimatetime-of-travel for a chemical to reach the water treatment intake from various locations in TenMile Creek; (3) track water quality trends; and (4) evaluate the effectiveness of selectedprotective strategies. Sampling locations and schedules could be modified on an emergencybasis to monitor spills or the runoff of contaminants that may enter the reservoirs.

Zoning Ordinances: A water protection zoning ordinance is a regulatory control that typicallyplaces some restrictions or standards on activities conducted within a specified zone (such asthe corridor management zone and/or the emergency management zone). Such ordinancesenable the municipality to require people who live or work in this area to avoid contaminating thesource of the municipality’s drinking water. Ordinances can help ensure best managementpractices are being employed at local businesses and can help reduce the volume ofcontaminants stored within the protection area. The Village of Metamora may want to considerworking with Fulton County and the townships in the protection area to develop zoning overlaysthat require specific standards for chemical storage, handling of waste materials, and othersource control strategies. Several communities in Ohio have enacted very successful drinkingwater source protection ordinances. Copies can be obtained by contacting Craig Smith at (614)644-2752.

Regulatory Compliance: Where possible, the Village of Metamora can monitor thecompliance of potential contaminant sources with existing regulations through inspectionsand/or contact with regulatory agencies. If routine inspections are a regulatory requirement,they provide an excellent opportunity to educate an important segment of the community aboutthe importance of drinking water source protection. Inspections also provide an opportunity toencourage improved materials handling procedures, hazardous materials training, waste anddisposal assessments, facility spill/contingency planning, and pollution prevention initiatives.

Ohio EPA encourages the Village of Metamora to incorporate the types of protective strategieslisted above into a written drinking water source protection plan. It is also highly recommendedthat the Village form a “Protection Team” to develop the plan. Two guidance documents areavailable from Ohio EPA to assist with development of a Drinking Water Source Protection Plan. “A Guide to Developing Local Watershed Action Plans in Ohio” is available on the internet atwww.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/hps/wsguide.pdf and “Developing Local Drinking Water SourceProtection Plans” in Ohio is available at www.epa.state.oh.us/ddagw/pdu/ swap_psdoc.pdf. Formore information on drinking water source protection, please contact the Drinking WaterProtection staff at (614) 644-2752.

7

References

Chow, Ven Te, et al. Handbook of Applied Hydrology, A Compendium of Water-ResourcesTechnology. McGraw-Hill, 1964. Page 21-10.

Gazetteer of Ohio Streams, Second Edition, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division ofWater. 2001.

Harstine, Leonard J.. 1991. Hydrologic Atlas for Ohio. Water Inventory Report No. 28. State ofOhio Department of Natural Resources. Columbus, Ohio.

Ohio EPA. 1992-1993. Division of Surface Water Clean Lakes Program Data for MetamoraReservoir #1.

8

Table 1. Water Quality Monitoring Summary of Treated Water Village of Metamora Public Water System

Ohio EPA Public Water System Compliance Monitoring Database (1991- 2002)Ohio EPA Pesticide Special Study (May 1995 - March 1999)

Contaminant(units)

LevelsFound

PrimaryMCL

MCLViolation 1 Typical Source

Inorganic Contaminants

Fluoride (mg/l) 0.11 - 0.22 4 No Erosion of natural deposits; Water additivewhich promotes strong teeth

Nitrate (mg/l) 0.2 - 7.8 10 No Runoff from fertilizer use; Leaching from septictanks, sewage; Erosion of natural deposits

Sulfate (mg/l) 63.0 none NA2

Erosion of natural deposits; decompositionproduct of organic matter; discharge frommining and industrial waters; detergents insewage; component of precipitation inmetropolitan areas

Radioactive Contaminants Beta/photon emitters (pCi/L) 5.31 - 6.1 AL=50 No Decay of natural and man-made depositsSynthetic Organic Contaminants including Pesticides and Herbicides

Alachlor 3 (µg/l) 0.05 - 1.04 2 No Herbicide runoff

Atrazine 3 (µg/l) 0.1 - 0.5 3 No Herbicide runoff

Metolachlor 3 (µg/l) 0.06 - 0.72 none NA Pesticide runoff

Metribuzin 3 (µg/l) 0.04 - 0.31 none NA Pesticide runoff

Simazine 3 (µg/l) 0.24 4 No Herbicide runoff

Cyanazine 3 (µg/l) 0.05 - 0.14 none NA Pesticide runoff

Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate(µg/l) 4.25 6 No Discharge from rubber and chemical factories

Volatile Organic Contaminants

Toluene (mg/l) 0.00054 1 No Discharge from petroleum factories

TTHMs [TotalTrihalomethanes] (µg/l) 45.0 80 No4 By-product of drinking water chlorination

Bromodichloromethane (µg/l) 4.59 - 23.0 none NA4 By-product of drinking water chlorination

Chloroform (µg/l) 34.7 - 176.2 none NA4 By-product of drinking water chlorinationBromoform (µg/l) 0.7 none NA4 By-product of drinking water chlorinationDibromochloromethane (µg/l) 0.5 - 4.2 none NA4 By-product of drinking water chlorination

Dichloroacetic Acid (µg/l) 18.3 none NA4 By-product of drinking water chlorinationTrichloroacetic Acid (µg/l) 2.5 none NA4 By-product of drinking water chlorinationMonochloroacetic Acid (µg/l) 3.4 none NA4 By-product of drinking water chlorination

MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level (AL = Action Level).

1 MCL set by federal or state drinking water standards. A sampling result that exceeds the MCL value does notnecessarily indicate a violation by the public water system. MCL violations for many contaminants are based ona running annual average.

9

Table 1 (Continued)

2 Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) for this parameter. SMCLs are non-health-related limits.3 Data includes Ohio EPA Pesticide Special Study results (1995-1999). For the study, samples were analyzed usingan immunoassay (IA) method and by USEPA Method 507, a gas chromatograph (GC) method. The immunoassayresults are only estimations of the actual concentration values. The IA test kits tend to overestimate concentrations,due to cross reactivity of chemically similar pesticides (e.g. atrazine and simazine).

4 Total Trihalomethanes (TTHMs): (MCL = 80 µg/l) calculated as the sum of the concentrations ofBromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, and Chloroform. Five Haloacetic Acids (HAA5): (MCL =60 µg/l) calculated as the sum of the concentrations of Monochloroacetic acid, Dichloroacetic acid, Trichloroaceticacid, Monobromoacetic acid, and Dibromoacetic acid.

Table 2. Summary of Water Quality Sampling Near the Metamora Protection Area

(Results are presented as a range of values. The number in parentheses is the number of samples analyzed)

Parameter Unnamed Tributary to Tenmile Creek at Mouth (RM 0.01)

Temp (°C) 9.3 - 22.0 (2)

D.O. (mg/l) 7.6 - 8.3 (2)

pH (S.U.) 7.10 - 7.15 (2)

Fecal coliform (# / 100ml) 3400 - 25000 (2)

Conductivity (mg/l) 802 - 880 (2)

TSS (mg/l) <5 - 20 (2)

BOD5 (mg/l) 1.0 - 4.3 (2)

Nitrate-Nitrite (mg/l) 0.34 - 2.12 (2)

Nitrite (mg/l) 0.06 - 0.08 (2)

Ammonia-N (mg/l) 0.13 - 0.55 (2)

TKN (mg/l) 0.80 - 1.5 (2)

Phosphorus-T (mg/l) 0.05 - 0.17 (2)

10

Table 3. Summary of Water Quality Sampling in Metamora Reservoir #1

(Samples were collected from the surface and from the bottom in August and September 1992 andagain in May 1993. Results from both samples are presented as a range of values.)

Parameter Surface (0.5 meters) Bottom (4.0 - 6.5 meters)

Temp (°C) 17.7 - 22.0 13.6 - 21.7

D.O. (mg/l) 9.3 - 11.0 6.1 - 17.8

pH (S.U.) 8.57 - 9.10 8.7 - 9.2

Alkalinity (mg/l) 110 - 118 111 - 131

Conductivity (mg/l) 430 - 550 385 - 550

TSS (mg/l) <5 - 6 5 - 6

Sulfate (mg/l) 67 - 81 64 - 80

BOD5 (mg/l) 1.4 - 2.4 2.2 - 3.6

Nitrate-Nitrite (mg/l) 7.37 - 10.2 6.39 - 9.88

Nitrite (mg/l) 0.04 - 0.07 0.02 - 0.07

Ammonia-N (mg/l) <0.05 <0.05 - 0.10

TKN (mg/l) 0.6 - 0.9 0.7 - 1.1

Phosphorus-T (mg/l) 0.009 - 0.010 0.010 - 0.011

Calcium (mg/l) 64 - 72 64 - 76

Magnesium (mg/l) 18 - 19 18 - 19

Hardness (mg/l) 234 - 258 234 - 268

Arsenic (ug/l) <2 <2

Cadmium (ug/l) <0.02 <0.02

Chromium (ug/l) <30 <30

Copper (ug/l) 139 - 384 142 - 360

Iron (ug/l) <50 <50 - 120

Lead (ug/l) <2 - 2 <2

Manganese (ug/l) <10 <10 - 13

Zinc (ug/l) <10 - 36 <10

Strontium (ug/l) 390 - 395 379 - 393

11

Table 4. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory for the Village of Metamora(Map ID corresponds to Figure 4)

MapID

Unique ID Source Type Data Source

1 SIM0614 Wastewater Treatment Plant PCS2 D260071101 Animal feedlots Field survey

Database Explanation

PCS Facilities that hold a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The NPDES permit program controls water pollution by regulating point sources such aspipes or man-made ditches that discharge pollutants into waters of the United States.

12

Figure 1 - Village of Metamora Drinking Water Source Protection (SWAP) Area and CorridorManagement Zone (CMZ)

13

Figure 2 - Village of Metamora Emergency Management Zone (EMZ)

14

Figure 3 - Land Use Within the Metamora Drinking Water Source Protection (SWAP) Area

15

Figure 4 - Potential Contaminant Sources in the Metamora Corridor Management Zone

16

Figure 5 - Road and Rail Stream Crossings in the Metamora Corridor Management Zone