Dresding Medical pom case study

8
DRESDING MEDICAL Group Members: Ashish Ladda (2010129) Eshita Batta (2010136) Harsh Agrawal (2010139) Komal Takavale (2010143) Pankaj Arora (2010153) Praveen Trivedi (2010156)

Transcript of Dresding Medical pom case study

Page 1: Dresding Medical pom case study

DRESDING MEDICAL

Group Members:Ashish Ladda (2010129)Eshita Batta (2010136)

Harsh Agrawal (2010139)Komal Takavale (2010143)

Pankaj Arora (2010153)Praveen Trivedi (2010156)

Page 2: Dresding Medical pom case study

Introduction – Existing Scenario• Dresding Medical (DM) is a company who manufacture and sell medical

products to clinics.

• Around 50 per cent of our total manufacturing is done in-house.

• core competence is an ability to understand the needs of clinicians and translate those into our products

• Around 70 per cent of all orders involved some form of customization from standard ‘base models’.

• Manufacturing would normally take around three months from receiving the specification to completing assembly.

• The manufacturing department was largely concerned with assembling, integrating and (most importantly) testing the equipment.

Page 3: Dresding Medical pom case study

Introduction – Future Scenario• DM need to change its operation strategy as it shifting its focus from Clinics

to clinics plus consumer markets.

• The primary dilemma DMI faces is how to satisfy the new direct consumer market without shunning their existing base market.

• The consumers value cost and speed, whereas the clinics value dependability and flexibility.

• DMI is also very deliberate in developing their products to the market. For example, it takes DMI over three years to develop a new base model. In order to adapt to evolving consumer demands, they’ll need to reduce those intervals to under 12 months.

• In pursuing the growing consumer market, DMI must become more agile in its product development and delivery.

Page 4: Dresding Medical pom case study

Product RangeCurrent Product range New Product Range

FLEXIBILITY in terms of Customization

Products were made on order (whenever PULLED) from clinics & they value this.

• Sufficient quantity to meet demands quicker • Develop separate types of operation to service the different markets

COST Relatively high cost Customers desire low – cost.

SPEED in terms of delivery

Time to market – over three years

• Decrease time to market to around 12months. This will be valuable for customers.• Underlying technology is changing fast

QUALITY of the products

Strict quality requirements & leading edge technology

Understand new capabilities & maintain control on production

DEPENDABILITY Clinics value this Maintain control on production

Page 5: Dresding Medical pom case study

Current Product Range - The Operations strategy matrix

Capacity

easy to increase /decrease capacity

Supply Network

50% of activities are in-house which needs quality, flexibility in supply

Process technology

Low process technology but high product technology

Development & OrganizationR&D, Mfg. and Sales all share common knowledge base. Incremental new product development

Quality ** * ***

Speed

Dependability

* *

Flexibility ** ***

Cost * *

Decision Areas

Per

form

ance

ob

ject

ive

Page 6: Dresding Medical pom case study

Thank you

Capacity Supply Network

Process Technology

Development and Organization

Quality *** **Speed ***Dependability

**

Flexibility *** *Cost *** ** *

* Some Importance

** MediumImportance

*** Very Important

• Quick adjustments according to demand

• High Cost of Adjustments

• New dependable Supply Network needed

• Speed is crucial

• New Processes for Volume Production

• Check on quality conformance of new suppliers

• Need more cost for organizing R&D and sales

• Quick time to market

New Product Range - The Operations strategy matrix

Page 7: Dresding Medical pom case study

DEPENDABILITY

QUALITY COST

SPEED

FLEXIBILITY

Polar Diagram

- - - - Old operation Strategy

New Operation strategy

Page 8: Dresding Medical pom case study

Thank You