Dresding Medical pom case study
-
Upload
praveen-trivedi -
Category
Documents
-
view
945 -
download
22
Transcript of Dresding Medical pom case study
DRESDING MEDICAL
Group Members:Ashish Ladda (2010129)Eshita Batta (2010136)
Harsh Agrawal (2010139)Komal Takavale (2010143)
Pankaj Arora (2010153)Praveen Trivedi (2010156)
Introduction – Existing Scenario• Dresding Medical (DM) is a company who manufacture and sell medical
products to clinics.
• Around 50 per cent of our total manufacturing is done in-house.
• core competence is an ability to understand the needs of clinicians and translate those into our products
• Around 70 per cent of all orders involved some form of customization from standard ‘base models’.
• Manufacturing would normally take around three months from receiving the specification to completing assembly.
• The manufacturing department was largely concerned with assembling, integrating and (most importantly) testing the equipment.
Introduction – Future Scenario• DM need to change its operation strategy as it shifting its focus from Clinics
to clinics plus consumer markets.
• The primary dilemma DMI faces is how to satisfy the new direct consumer market without shunning their existing base market.
• The consumers value cost and speed, whereas the clinics value dependability and flexibility.
• DMI is also very deliberate in developing their products to the market. For example, it takes DMI over three years to develop a new base model. In order to adapt to evolving consumer demands, they’ll need to reduce those intervals to under 12 months.
• In pursuing the growing consumer market, DMI must become more agile in its product development and delivery.
Product RangeCurrent Product range New Product Range
FLEXIBILITY in terms of Customization
Products were made on order (whenever PULLED) from clinics & they value this.
• Sufficient quantity to meet demands quicker • Develop separate types of operation to service the different markets
COST Relatively high cost Customers desire low – cost.
SPEED in terms of delivery
Time to market – over three years
• Decrease time to market to around 12months. This will be valuable for customers.• Underlying technology is changing fast
QUALITY of the products
Strict quality requirements & leading edge technology
Understand new capabilities & maintain control on production
DEPENDABILITY Clinics value this Maintain control on production
Current Product Range - The Operations strategy matrix
Capacity
easy to increase /decrease capacity
Supply Network
50% of activities are in-house which needs quality, flexibility in supply
Process technology
Low process technology but high product technology
Development & OrganizationR&D, Mfg. and Sales all share common knowledge base. Incremental new product development
Quality ** * ***
Speed
Dependability
* *
Flexibility ** ***
Cost * *
Decision Areas
Per
form
ance
ob
ject
ive
Thank you
Capacity Supply Network
Process Technology
Development and Organization
Quality *** **Speed ***Dependability
**
Flexibility *** *Cost *** ** *
* Some Importance
** MediumImportance
*** Very Important
• Quick adjustments according to demand
• High Cost of Adjustments
• New dependable Supply Network needed
• Speed is crucial
• New Processes for Volume Production
• Check on quality conformance of new suppliers
• Need more cost for organizing R&D and sales
• Quick time to market
New Product Range - The Operations strategy matrix
DEPENDABILITY
QUALITY COST
SPEED
FLEXIBILITY
Polar Diagram
- - - - Old operation Strategy
New Operation strategy
Thank You