DRAPP 2012

Agenda Project Recap Lessons Learned (DRCOG) Results from the Survey Discussion of Final Thoughts for 2012 Discussion of the Upcoming 2014 Project Lessons Learned (Kucera) (11:30 to 12:00)

2012 Stats Who’s Involved?

50 Partners 8 DRCOG Member Counties

(only Arapahoe abstains)

27 DRCOG Member Cities 15 Regional Partners

(e.g. RTD, CDOT, USGS, United Power)

What’s the extent? 7,000 square miles

2012 Success Image Quality = High

Flights = On time, good weather, “to spec”

Cost = Low compared to previous years

Participation = On the high end

WMS = Well-received “stop gap” solution (Final on 12/20)

Deliverables = 76% by last deliverable date (1/15)

WMS Stats 80% of partners use it frequently

Lessons Learned Clarifications in the Statement of Work:

Better explanation of where vendors should pay close attention for tall buildings (building lean).

Draw more attention to the delivery/distribution responsibilities of both vendors.

Simplify the deliverables.

Process Improvements: Obtain Imagery and DAT approval at the SAME board

meeting in December/January. February is a little late. Reevaluate license agreement language to include

WMS.

Survey Results 34% response rate

Overall experience = 59% Very Good; 41% Good

DRCOG project management = 76% Very Good; 24% Good

Cost = 94% Reasonable; 6% Somewhat high

Survey Results Image Quality=

76% Very Good, 18% Good, 6% Fair

Communication= 71% Very Good, 29% Good

Delivery Times= 41% Very Good, 41% Good, 12% Fair, 6% Poor

Survey Results Interest in Add-ons (ranked):

1. Permanent WMS2. LIDAR Acquisition3. Planimetric Features4. Web Coverage Service5. Other: Impervious Service

Discussion

Comments on 2012?

Who ordered which projection?

SP CO Central, HARN (US Survey Feet) 8 SP CO Central, NAD 83 (US Survey Feet) 24 SP CO North, HARN (US Survey Feet) 10 SP CO North, NAD 83 (US Survey Feet) 5 UTM Z13 North, NAD 83 (Meters) 3

Could we standardize? Can you project on-the-fly with ArcMap?

What formats were ordered? Compressed GeoTIFF 6 Uncompressed GeoTIFF 21 JPG2000 27 MrSID 3 band 15 MrSID 4 band 4

Can we standardize? Are all these formats necessary? Does a permanent WMS or WCS change the

need for certain formats?

Permanent WCS If we had a permanent WCS, would

you consider not ordering imagery for the entire project area?

Comments on 2014?

LIDAR How much would it cost? What are our options? What could we get from it? Can you post-process by yourself?

Next Meeting August 28th

Gather requirements for DRAPP 2014 Form the RFP review and vendor interview

subcommittee

Kucera’s Lessons Learned

For more information, contact Ashley Summers at asummers@drcog.org or 303-

480-6746.