Draft Policy 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer
description
Transcript of Draft Policy 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer
![Page 1: Draft Policy 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815ede550346895dcd7da3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Draft Policy 2011-10Remove Single Aggregate requirement from
Specified Transfer
![Page 2: Draft Policy 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815ede550346895dcd7da3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2011-10 - History1. Origin: ARIN-prop-144 (May 2011)2. AC Shepherds: Scott Leibrand, Stacy Hughes3. AC selected as Draft Policy (Aug 2011)4. Current version: 24 Aug 20115. Text and assessment online & in Discussion
Guidehttps://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/
2011_10.html
![Page 3: Draft Policy 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815ede550346895dcd7da3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2011-10 – Summary
This proposed policy would remove the phrase, "as a single aggregate” from the existing NRPM 8.3 policy thus allowing the transfer of multiple prefixes during an 8.3 transfer.
![Page 4: Draft Policy 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815ede550346895dcd7da3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2011-10 – Status at other RIRs
Nothing similar at the other RIRs
![Page 5: Draft Policy 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815ede550346895dcd7da3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2011-10 – Staff AssessmentStaff Comments: Issues/Concerns?
1. This would eliminate possible confusion and align the text with current implementation whereby transfers can involve multiple discontiguous IPv4 address ranges (in a single transaction with ARIN).
Implementation: Resource Impact? – Minimal (3 mos.)– Updated guidelines– Staff training
![Page 6: Draft Policy 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815ede550346895dcd7da3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2011-10 – Legal AssessmentCounsel affirmatively supports this suggested change. We do not see it as creating any additional legal liability. Given the myriad of factual situations that may arise, a single aggregate requirement could prove to be too rigid and could prohibit an overall good policy result.
![Page 7: Draft Policy 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815ede550346895dcd7da3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2011-10 – PPML Discussion• Little discussion of Draft Policy• A couple posts in support of the original proposal,
one against.
![Page 8: Draft Policy 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815ede550346895dcd7da3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Draft Policy 2011-10Remove Single Aggregate requirement from
Specified Transfer