DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.
-
Upload
alban-bradley -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.
![Page 1: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
DRAFTE-Tag Notification Presentation
NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013
Seattle, WA
![Page 2: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
E-Tag Notification
Feb 20-21 NAESB Motion 46“If a Confirmed transmission Reservation loses capacity due to Preemption or not exercising ROFR, all valid e-Tags using that Reservation will be notified thru the tagging software that an AREF on the tag has lost capacity due to Competition and will cite the specific AREF number.”
![Page 3: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
E-Tag Notification
Proposed Revised Motion XXReplacement for Motion 46 (withdrawn at Feb 2013 OS)
“When a Confirmed transmission Reservation loses capacity due to the Preemption and Competition process, all active (pending or confirmed) impacted e-Tags using that Reservation will be notified that an AREF on the tag has lost capacity and the notification will cite the specific AREF number.”
![Page 4: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
E-Tag Notification
Revised Motion XXDefinition - “impacted” means only e-Tag’s that include the interval recalled/displaced within their respective start/stop time.
Example 1: Only e-Tag’s for day-3 will receive a notification when 3-day AREF loses capacity on day 3.
– E-Tag’s flowing on days 1 and 2 will not receive a notification.
Example 2: e-Tag’s flowing only for H24 will not receive a notification when a 1-day AREF loses capacity for H1.
![Page 5: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
E-Tag Notification
PurposeHelps customers meet obligations to reserve and tag schedules within transmission capacity commercial rights
Protect all customers and the TSP from inadvertent e-Tag flow that could exceed reserved capacity
![Page 6: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
E-Tag Notification
IssuesMain areas of concern:
TSP Liability
Out of Scope of Competition
Software
![Page 7: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
E-Tag Notification
IssuesTSP Liability
Same liability as validating a new e-Tag.– Newly submitted e-Tag’s may go through a demand check
validation to ensure the value tagged is not above the available capacity of any AREF in the e-Tag.
TSP’s that confirm an e-Tag that exceeds the reservation rights are not held liable.
– The liability still resides with the customer to not schedule over their confirmed rights.
These same principles would apply to e-Tag notifications for loss of capacity due to competition.
![Page 8: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
E-Tag Notification
IssuesTSP Liability Con’t.
The TSP will be at no higher amount of liability for at Competition notification than they are currently for e-Tag approval.
TSP’s can have disclaimers that the customer is always liable for any potential penalties, even in the event of a notification failure.
![Page 9: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
E-Tag Notification
Issues Con’tScope of Competition
E-Tag notification for lost capacity is within the scope of Competition discussions, because the problem only exists due to the implementation of Competition
– Therefore lead role should fall under the NAESB OS.
– Resolution on this specific sort of notification should be lead and coordinated by NAESB OS Task Force.
» Work with another subcommittee (e.g. JESS) to determine specific information flow may be needed.
![Page 10: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
E-Tag Notification
Issues con’tSoftware
All motions passed will require software changes at some level.
Motion for e-tag notification will not limit mechanical flow or software design.
Motion will not limit which software products currently in use may be efficiently and effectively modified to enable e-tag notification.
![Page 11: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
E-Tag Notification
Propose Adopting Revised MotionRevised Motion XX
Replacement for Motion 46 (withdrawn at Feb 2013 OS)
“When a Confirmed transmission Reservation loses capacity due to the Preemption and Competition process, all active (pending or confirmed) impacted e-Tags using that Reservation will be notified that an AREF on the tag has lost capacity and the notification will cite the specific AREF number.”
![Page 12: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
E-Tag Notification
Revised Motion XXDefinition - “impacted” means only e-Tag’s that include the interval recalled/displaced within their respective start/stop time.
Example 1: Only e-Tag’s for day-3 will receive a notification when 3-day AREF loses capacity on day 3.
– E-Tag’s flowing on days 1 and 2 will not receive a notification.
Example 2: e-Tag’s flowing only for H24 will not receive a notification when a 1-day AREF loses capacity for H1.
![Page 13: DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072005/56649cc45503460f9498ddcf/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
E-Tag Notification
Next StepsConvene an OS lead task force
Coordinate w/ JESS to resolve any data needs
Review data already available in OASIS (e.g. WEQ-013)
Determine if any standard language or software specs exist that create a link between OASIS and e-Tag’s
Ask TSP’s if their software already includes this type of link?