Dr Paper Document Template€¦ · Web viewThis project was conducted to test student...
Transcript of Dr Paper Document Template€¦ · Web viewThis project was conducted to test student...
Increasing Student Understanding of Proportions
Michelle McLendon-Eslick
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
EDCI 6348
Dr. Garcia
September 20, 2017
1
Proportions
Table of Contents
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………3
Rationale……………………………………………………………………………………..……4
Purpose………………………………………………………………………………………...…..5
Learning Standard…………………………………………………………………………………5
Research Questions……………………………………………………………………………..…5
Literature Review………………………………………………………………………………….5
Grit………………………………………………………………………………………...6
Methods to Support Content Acquisition…………………………………………………8
Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….……10
Procedures…………………………………………………………………………………...…...10
Participants………………………………………………………………………………….……11
Design……………………………………………………………………………………………12
Pre/Post Test Assessment………………………………………………………………..13
Data Analysis: Pre-Test……………………………………………………………………….…16
Data Analysis: Post Test…………………………………………………………………………16
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….18
Annotated Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………19
2
Proportions
Abstract
This project was conducted to test student understanding of proportions and proportional
reasoning, more specifically, will using hands-on, project based learning, along with the use of
cooperative learning groups and increased understanding of student grit, will students perform
better on a pre/posttest involving proportions and proportional reasoning.
In this paper, you will be introduced to research on the benefits of project based learning
as well as how grit can enhance student achievement levels. You will also learn about
cooperative learning groups and the benefits they can have on increasing student achievement
levels. During the course of this research, I implemented all three into my classroom and the
results were as expected. Not only did cooperative learning groups increase the amount of
mathematical discussions going on in the classroom, but peer tutoring began and turned out to be
highly successful. When you have a classroom full of ELL students, sometimes they are more
comfortable talking to someone who speaks their language and they can, of course, understand
information better in their native language.
As an educator, I want to find the best way to present information to my students so that
they can reach the highest level of achievement possible, and this study has pointed me in the
right direction. If I can continue following the model I used for this lesson, I believe I can get
closer to reaching my goal of reaching every student that walks through my classroom door. I
want all of my students to be and feel successful in mathematics.
3
Proportions
Increasing Student Understanding of Proportions
Rationale
I am lucky to teach in a district that gives me free reign on how I teach my class. At the
beginning of the year I am given the standards for my state and as a department we make a
curriculum map/pacing guide that shows me about how long each unit should take. After that, I
get to present and teach information any way I choose. As long as I fit all of my standards in by
the end of the year then I am good to go. My first year teaching I relied very heavily on my
textbooks. Almost everything came out of the textbook, as it did when I was in middle school all
those years ago, and it baffled me that my students were not performing where I thought they
should be. That summer I really reflected over my year and decide that since my students could
not seem to learn in my traditional teaching style, I ditched my old ways and went a completely
different route my second year. I ditched the textbook, for all of my math courses, and started
doing mini-lessons along with project-based learning. One key idea to making this idea work,
was grit. Grit from me, and from my students. I had to teach them that having a positive growth-
mindset while being persistent in their learning, great things could happen.
More specifically, I chose to focus on proportions because that is a huge part of my 7th
grade mathematics curriculum. In years past, students have struggled to understand proportional
relationships, how to set up proportion problems, and how to solve them. The second focus on
this study is to see how a student’s level of grit affects their overall academic achievement. Grit
has been a huge focus in my district over the course of this school year. Over the summer I
researched on the importance of grit in the classroom and how to foster an atmosphere of a
positive growth mindset and encouraging grit in my students. The final focus of this paper is to
see the effects of project based learning in the classroom as it relates to proportional
4
Proportions
relationships.
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to find out a couple of things. First, what does a students’
overall level of grit play on student achievement in mathematics. Second, given the different
learning styles found within my classroom, would project based learning be an effective method
of teaching proportions? Third, by putting students in cooperative learning groups where they
can have open mathematical discussion, will this help to improve understanding of proportions?
Learning Standard
Oklahoma Academic Standards (OAS) Mathematics 7th Grade: 7.A.2.1-Represent
proportional relationships with tables, verbal descriptions, symbols, and graphs; translate from
one representation to another. Determine and compare the unit rate (constant of proportionality,
slope, or rate of change) given any of these representations.
Research Questions
The questions I will be asking are: Will students be able to accurately represent a
proportional relationship in a variety of ways? What role does grit play in the academic success
of my students? Does project based learning increase student’s abilities to represent proportions
in a variety of ways?
Literature Review
In many classroom across the country over the last year or two, there have been a few key
terms or ideas that have appeared. We have been hearing ideas like growth-mindset, positive
attitude, and grit. These ideas have caused a whole movement in the way teachers,
administrators, and students perceive their educational experience. “Mathematics education in
America’s public schools has been heavily influenced by both the traditionalist and
5
Proportions
constructivists theories. It is important to understand, though, that whatever the viewpoint, the
aim has always been the same; to enhance students achievement in mathematics,” (Carter, 15).
In my personal classroom, I take more of the constructivist approach, and working on those three
components has been an ongoing process. I have started my second year using the Positive
Pledge by John Gordon to help my students realize that our outlook and attitude can play a huge
part in our success or failures. Using Joan Boaler and Carols Dweck’s research on the effects of a
fixed-mindset versus a growth-mindset, I have implemented more open ended, thought
provoking lessons and activities that will help solidify student understanding.
As a 7th grade mathematics teacher in Oklahoma, one objective my students really
struggle with is representing and understanding proportional relationships. “It is well known that
teaching and learning fractions, ratio, and proportionality in the middle grades are very complex
processes,” (Adjiage and Pluvinage, 151). While complex, they are major concepts in
mathematics that needs to be studied and understood on a conceptual level. As we know, each
concept in mathematics builds upon previous objectives that have been taught and learned. While
we know that a fraction is a ratio between two numbers, do our students understand that? My
students see a fraction and automatically shut down because, as a student put it last week,
“fractions are the devil.” If teaching fractions, ratios, and proportionality are done in a scaffolded
way, where we can show the correlation between all of these components, then students will
develop a stronger and deeper conceptual understanding of the objective and then be apply to
apply their learning in a meaningful way.
Grit
One powerful predictor of student success is grit. Grit is a person’s “ability to work hard,
endure struggle, fail, and try again,” (Williams) which can be essential to long-term success.
6
Proportions
While grit sounds like an amazing thing for a person to have, this raises even more questions.
How does one get grit? What are the effects of grit on an individual basis? As an educator, how
can I build grit in my classroom? Since grit is described as perseverance and passion towards
one’s goals, we need to make sure our students have a goal. If we want them to work for
something, they need something worth working for. “Some research observations indicate the
relative importance of these character strengths, as perseverance, persistence, and grit appear to
be strong indicators for success and achievement,” (Hokanson, 110). If we can help teach
students the importance of setting goals and how to stick with it, then grit will begin to grow in
those students. According to Erik Laursen, we can begin teaching grit to our students by reading
about it. “Another way to help students learn about grit is to ask them to research and report on
people who have demonstrated perseverance in the face of hardship,” (Laursen, 22). So, now our
students know what grit is, but how can we develop this perseverance in our students? “To
develop grit in our students, Duckworth says we first need to develop interest,” (McGlynn and
Kelly, 24). Interest, which can be difficult sometimes, especially when you teach math to middle
schoolers who have already decided they do not like mathematics. “Having a purpose in life
entails a commitment to an ultimate life goal that serves to organize and plan the individual’s
daily and long-term activities, and individuals oriented towards a set of life goals tend to
demonstrate consistency to their choices over several years,” (Hill, Burrow, Bronk, 258). This is
just further proof that setting goals and having a purpose is such a powerful indicator or grit. This
is where using hands-on learning can help. Also, by using real-life math examples, students can
see that mathematics has real applications. Grit is what can help students push through the
struggles of fractions, ratios, and proportions.
Another item of concern that greatly influences student achievement is motivation.
7
Proportions
“Educators readily confess that they are confused and ill prepared to address what they regard as
student disinterest and lack of effort,” (Turner et al, 719). When students are coming to the
classroom unmotivated, lacking grit, with a negative and fixed mindset, it is easy to feel like
teachers are fighting a losing battle, but it all comes back to setting goals and making the
learning authentic and real for the students. To increase student motivation we must foster
student competence, autonomy, and belongingness as well as making sure students are aware of
the meaningfulness of mathematics (Turner et al, 720).
Methods to Support Content Acquisition
Let us explore the idea of real-life application and interest in mathematics. One way to
make mathematics more interesting is my exploring the idea of project-based learning. “PBL is
defined as students working collaboratively to design solutions for authentic and meaningful
questions and problems in the real world,” (Holes and Hwang, 449). While project based
learning may be harder to implement for younger children, but for secondary aged students who
are working on strengthening their problem solving skills, project based learning will help
students understand the real life applications of mathematics. It makes math feel real instead of it
just being something they have to do inside of a classroom an nowhere else. In order to spark
interest we have to make mathematics real to our students. We have to show them that
mathematics is all around us and that with grit, we can all be good at mathematics.
One of the main struggles I see is a child walking into my classroom whom has had bad
mathematical experiences in the past, and they feel defeated before we even begin. In Dweck’s
book, Mindset, she identified two types of mindsets; the fixed mindset and growth mindset. A
fixed mindset is when a person looks at a problem and thinks they cannot do it so why even try.
They have a predetermined idea about their abilities and tend to not take any risks because they
8
Proportions
are too afraid of failing. A person with a growth mindset sees a challenge or mistakes as a
learning experiences. These are the students with grit, perseverance, and determination. Dweck,
along with Joan Boaler, worked on Mathematical Mindset which applied the idea of fixed and
growth mindset to the mathematics classroom. The book describes how there is not a math gene.
We are not born good or bad at math. In fact, anyone can be good at mathematics if they have the
right mindset and put the work into it. It also outlines several learning activities to help inspire
growth mindset and help students’ gain conceptual understanding of mathematics. Fostering a
growth mindset is not something that will happen overnight, just like building grit in a student,
but if we can start planting those seeds early, and sew them over the years, then the result will be
stronger, more confident, and capable mathematics students.
One strategy I have started using in my classroom are what I call a learning co-op, or
learning pairs. It is no real shock to any teacher this day and age when someone says they have a
class filled with 30 plus students, outdated textbooks, if any at all, IEPs, behavior issues, and
ELL students. This is happening every single day in classrooms across the country. In any given
classroom we have a variety of learning styles and levels. You have the students who are high
achievers and catch on to lessons quickly, and we also have those who require a lot of
remediation and extra help. With all of this going on in a single classroom, how do we engage all
learners and ensure they are all getting what they need? “Many mathematics teachers have
adopted cooperative group work as a daily classroom practice, along with standards-based
mathematics curricula and pedagogies based on constructivist view of learning,” (Esmonde,
247). When students work in a cooperative learning group, they have the opportunity to talk
about mathematics and learn from each other. There have been many times when I have tried to
teach a lesson and have it fall upon a few deaf ears. Then I would ask another student who had
9
Proportions
mastered the objective to help their peer and then like magic, the student understood it. “The
equitable implementation of cooperative learning in mathematics classrooms depends not just on
what teachers do; students’ learning depends on how they interact with one another,” (Esmonde,
248). In order for cooperative learning groups to be successful, proper communication must be
taught and there must be mutual respect amongst those in the classroom. I always tell my
students that I do not expect everyone to be best friends, but in side this classroom we are a
family. We will respect each other and their contributions to the classroom environment and we
will speak to each other in a way that we would want to be spoken to. Everyone’s opinion is
valued. Everyone’s learning is valued. Equity must be found within the classroom in order for
cooperative learning to be successful.
Conclusion of Literature Review
In short, in order for students to truly understand proportions, fractions, and ratios, we
need to encourage growth mindset, grit, student motivation, and cooperative learning groups. If
we can grow our students in these areas, then they will truly be unstoppable. It starts with
positive mathematical experiences from a young age, providing meaningful and authentic
learning experiences where students can learn the importance of mathematics, and encouraging
mathematics discussions in the classroom. When students can do that, then we have truly made a
difference in their lives and in the world.
Procedures
I came up with this project design because I know that for the last two years my students
have struggled with understanding proportionality. Students have had a very difficult time
understanding fractions and ratios, which directly link to proportionality and slope of a line. In
the past, I did mostly lecture style teaching while students took notes, and then students would
10
Proportions
practice solving proportion problems, first as a class and then on their own. So, you could say, I
had a traditionalist view of teaching at that point in time, but I quickly noticed that style was not
working for my students. This year, I have decided to try and take a more constructivist
approach, where students are working for their learning. I wanted to make the learning more
meaningful for them, more authentic and engaging.
To implement the project, I started by going in depth about what a fraction is, and it
surprised me that students really could not explain a fraction beyond “there is a numerator and a
denominator.” Students did not seem to realize that a fraction was a ratio or comparison between
two numbers. They also did not know that a fraction is merely a division problem. Needless to
say, I had to spend more time on my proportions lesson than I had originally planned because we
went back to the beginning, the basics, because students lacked the conceptual understanding
needed to fully comprehend proportionality.
Participants
The study is being conducted in a 7th grade mathematics classroom. I am one of nine
math teachers for the 7th grade in a school with over 1,000 7th grade students. I have fifty-two 7th
grade, on-level mathematics students and each student was given the pre-test before we got into
the proportions unit.
I administered a pre-test over representing proportions to my 7th grade, on-level
mathematics student, as I suspected, their scores were low. I have a total of 53 on-level students,
meaning they are taking traditional 7th grade mathematics, non-advanced course. Of those 53
students, 39.6% are Limited English Proficient (LEP), 1.9% are gifted, 3.8% have a 504 or an
IEP, and 20.8% are in a school program for at-risk youth to keep students off of the streets and
out of trouble and provides extra tutoring and homework help for those students as well as life
11
Proportions
skill courses, anger management, etc. which we call the Carrera program. The ratio of male to
female students is 1:1, and various ethnic backgrounds and over 60% of our students are on the
free and reduced lunch plan.
I am sure some of you are wondering why my 504/IEP percentage is so low. I teach in a
school district of 16,000 students where we average about 1,200 students per grade level. WE
have thirteen elementary schools that all feed into my building, the 6/7th Grade Center. In my
building, teachers and students are put on teams. Each team contains a core teacher for math,
science, geography, and language arts. Students stay on their own team all day with the
exception of elective courses, which students have two of those per day. The way teams are set
up, we have one team that takes care of our emotionally disturbed students, and one that takes
care of the English Language Learner Sheltered students. I happen to be on the ELL Sheltered
Team, and as Newcomers test out, they transition into Sheltered where they spend a year or two
before moving into a mainstream classroom setting. I do not usually have IEP students unless
they are also ELL. Let me also add, just because I am on the ELL team, it does not mean I have
all of our ELL students. Those who have been moved into the mainstream classes can be found
on any of the nine teams in 7th grade and they are pulled in for ALA resources from outside of
their team.
Design
The instrument used to collect the needed data is shown in diagram 1.1 and 1.2. It was
designed to dig deeper into student understanding of proportionality. The tool consists of six
questions which show proportions in different ways, as the 7th grade math standard requests. This
tool was designed by myself and some fellow colleagues, other teachers in my math department,
and we have made all of our test follow this same pattern for the year. Students are given a
12
Proportions
problem and they must decide if it represents a proportion or not. Then we take their knowledge
further and students must explain their answer choices. Having students explain their reasoning
is what truly lets me know if they comprehend the objective or if they just had a “lucky guess.”
When a student can explain their reasoning, put their thinking into words, that is how we can
know a child truly understands what has been put in front of them. A student can get lucky
guessing a multiple choice question, but they cannot guess at an accurate explanation and
representation of the work it takes to find that answer.
13
Proportions
Diagram 1.1- This is page one of the pre/post assessment for proportionality. Each question is followed by an
answer. Students must decide if the answer is correct or incorrect and then back up their answer choice using their
work and mathematical knowledge.
14
Proportions
Diagram 1.2- This is page two of the pre/post assessment for proportionality. Each question is followed by an
answer. Students must decide if the answer is correct or incorrect and then back up their answer choice using their
work and mathematical knowledge.
15
Proportions
Data Analysis: Pre-Test
The data found in my spreadsheet and table indicates that my students are starting with
little to no concept of proportional reasoning or how to display proportions. I expected this to be
the case since, in Oklahoma, 7th grade is usually the first time students are formally exposed to
proportions. My one gifted student performed quite well, which also reaffirmed my theory that
she could be in my advanced mathematics course, but that is a whole other story. Overall, my
students scored where I expected them to on this pre-test.
The results are that 2% of students passed the pre-test with a score of 70% or higher with
no proportion lessons before this course. Another 15% scored a “D” (60-69%) on the pre-test.
83% of the students tested had a 50% or less on the pre-test. Of the students that failed, 13 of
them scored a 0%. All of my LEP students failed the pre-test and 57% of my Carrera children
scored a D or higher on the pre-test.
Diagram 1.3- This is a graphical representation of the pre-test scores for the 53 students tested on representing
proportions. Scores are mostly on the failing side.
Data Analysis: Post-test
When comparing the pre-test and posttest scores, there is a drastic change in scores.
Everyone showed improvement from pre to post testing. If you look at the graph below, you can
see the comparison of scores for each student tested along with the Paired t test results. Of the 53
16
Proportions
students tested, 92% of them scored an 80% or higher, and 100% of students showed growth in
their understanding of proportions and proportional relationships
Diagram 1.4- This is a graphical representation of the comparison between pre and posttest scores. As you can see,
there were great improvements across the board.
Paired t test resultsP value and statistical significance: The two-tailed P value is less than 0.0001 By conventional criteria, this difference is considered to be extremely statistically significant.
Confidence interval: The mean of Group One minus Group Two equals -61.28 95% confidence interval of this difference: From -66.99 to -55.57
Intermediate values used in calculations: t = 21.5250 df = 53 standard error of difference = 2.847
Review your data: Group Group One Group Two
Mean 28.74 90.02SD 23.67 11.93
SEM 3.22 1.62N 54 54
The paired t test results shows there is a statistically significant relationship between
student achievement and the use of project-based learning, grit, and cooperative learning groups.
17
Proportions
I am confident that student scores will meet or exceed my expectations. Just by monitoring my
students, I am hearing more mathematical discussion about proportions and proportional
relationships and they are showing to have a deeper understanding of the content than I have
seen in years past I have not only scaffolded instruction, but I have put students into cooperative
learning pairs as well as provide many opportunities for hands-on learning and lots of discussion
to take place. We have also talked about grit in the classroom and have worked on working
through the problems and not giving up, and I have seen my students persevere through some of
the challenges put before them where in the past they would have quit.
Conclusion
Through the course of this study, it has been proven that by providing meaningful, hands-
on, project based learning, along with the use of cooperative learning groups and increased levels
of student grit, student understanding of proportional reasoning can be obtained. This level of
student understanding is rarely seen in my building, so these results lead me to believe that this
type of instruction and support can drastically increase student achievement in mathematics.
Student responses to learning about grit, and building grit have been fantastic and I have seen
that continue with them even outside the four walls of my classroom.
18
Proportions
References
Adjigage, R., Pluvinage, F. (2007) An Experiment in Teaching Ratio and Proportion.
Educational Studies in Mathematics. 65(2), 149-175. Retrieved from https://link-springer-
com.ezhost.utrgv.edu/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10649-006-9049-x.pdf
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students’ Potential Through Creative
Math, Inspiring Messages, and Innovative Teaching. Josey-Bass. San Francisco.
Carter, S. (2016). Traditional vs. project-based learning: The effects on student performance and
motivation in honors level mathematics courses (Order No. 10149282). Available from
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1831570276). Retrieved from
http://ezhost.utrgv.edu:2048/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezhost.utrgv.edu/
docview/1831570276?accountid=7119
Cresswell, J. (111). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research. Fifth Edition. Retrieved from
https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/9780133570847/cfi/6/20!/
4/2/6/2/14/20/2@0:100
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset. New York, NY: Ballantine.
Esmonde, Indigo. “Mathematics Learning in Groups: Analyzing Equity in Two Cooperative
Activity Structures.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, 2009, pp. 247–
284. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/27736762
Hill, P., Burrow, A. Brong, K. (2014). Persevering with Positivity and Purpose: An Examination
of Purpose Commitment and Positive Affect as Predictors of Grit. Journal of Happiness
Studies, 17(1), 57-269. Retrieved from
https://link-springer-com.ezhost.utrgv.edu/article/10.1007%2Fs10902-014-9593-5
19
Proportions
Hokanson, B., Karlson, R. (2013). Borderlands: developing character strengths for a knowmadic
world. On the Horizon, 21(2), 107-103. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121311323003
Holmes, V., Hwang, Y. (2016) Exploring the effects of project-based learning in secondary
mathematics education. The Journal of Educational Research. 109(5), 449-463. Retrieved
from
http://www-tandfonline-com.ezhost.utrgv.edu:2048/doi/full/10.1080/00220671.2014.979911
?scroll=top&needAccess=true
Laursen, E. K. (2015). The power of grit, perseverance, and tenacity. Reclaiming Children and
Youth, 23(4), 19-24. Retrieved from http://ezhost.utrgv.edu:2048/login?url=https://search-
proquest-com.ezhost.utrgv.edu/docview/1655359246?accountid=7119
McGlynn, K., & Kelly, J. (2017). Breaking the cycle: Thoughts about building grit in the
classroom. Science Scope, 41(1), 24-27. Retrieved from http://ezhost.utrgv.edu:2048/login?
url=https://search-proquest-com.ezhost.utrgv.edu/docview/1933232690?accountid=7119
Turner, J., Warzon, K., Christensen, A. (2011) Motivating Mathematics Learning. American
Educational Research Journal. 48(3), 718-762. Retrieved from
http://journals.sagepub.com.ezhost.utrgv.edu:2048/doi/pdf/10.3102/0002831210385103
Williams, J. (2015). What Is Grit Why Kids Need It, and How You Can Foster It. A Fine
Parent. Website. https://afineparent.com/building-character/what-is-grit.html
20