Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth. N. Sangma - SMCTEsmcte.ac.in/pdf/AQAR2014/annexure2.pdf · 2017. 4. 20. · Dr....
11
Annexure – II STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014 Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth. N. Sangma Teaching: Core Paper II - Educational Psychology and Statistics Core Paper IV - Educational Technology and Management The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students: Qs Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth N. Sangma (83) A % B % C % D % 1 58 69.88 24 28.92 1 1.20 0.00 2 48 57.83 31 37.35 4 4.82 0.00 3 64 77.11 17 20.48 2 2.41 0.00 4 46 55.42 34 40.96 3 3.61 0.00 5 41 49.40 39 46.99 3 3.61 0.00 6 48 57.83 31 37.35 4 4.82 0.00 7 24 28.92 54 65.06 6 7.23 0.00 8 47 56.63 36 43.37 1 1.20 0.00 9 53 63.86 29 34.94 2 2.41 0.00 10 51 61.45 31 37.35 1 1.20 0.00 The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students: Excellent Good Satisfactory Not satisfactory 61.45 37.35 1.20 0.00 Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth N. Sangma - Overall
Transcript of Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth. N. Sangma - SMCTEsmcte.ac.in/pdf/AQAR2014/annexure2.pdf · 2017. 4. 20. · Dr....
Annexure – II
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014
Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth. N. Sangma
Teaching: Core Paper II - Educational Psychology and Statistics
Core Paper IV - Educational Technology and Management
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students
present on the day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all
students:
Qs
Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth N. Sangma (83)
A % B % C % D %
1 58 69.88 24 28.92 1 1.20 0.00
2 48 57.83 31 37.35 4 4.82 0.00
3 64 77.11 17 20.48 2 2.41 0.00
4 46 55.42 34 40.96 3 3.61 0.00
5 41 49.40 39 46.99 3 3.61 0.00
6 48 57.83 31 37.35 4 4.82 0.00
7 24 28.92 54 65.06 6 7.23 0.00
8 47 56.63 36 43.37 1 1.20 0.00
9 53 63.86 29 34.94 2 2.41 0.00
10 51 61.45 31 37.35 1 1.20 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
61.45
37.35
1.20 0.00
Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth N. Sangma - Overall
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014
Ms. Dianghun Shullai
Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of Khasi
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who
had taken Khasi as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:
Qs
Ms. D. Shullai (37)
A % B % C % D %
1 22 59.46 13 35.14 1 2.70 1 2.70
2 18 48.65 15 40.54 1 2.70 1 2.70
3 19 51.35 18 48.65 0.00 0.00
4 21 56.76 15 40.54 1 2.70 0.00
5 10 27.03 23 62.16 2 5.41 1 2.70
6 12 32.43 24 64.86 1 2.70 0.00
7 10 27.03 26 70.27 0.00 1 2.70
8 12 32.43 23 62.16 2 5.41 0.00
9 18 48.65 17 45.95 2 5.41 0.00
10 17 45.95 20 54.05 0.00 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Not satisfactory
45.95
54.05
0.00 0.00
Ms. Dianghun Shullai - Overall
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014
Ms. Darihun Kharnongrum
Teaching: Core Paper IV - Educational Technology and Management
Elective Paper VII - Guidance and Counselling
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students
present on the day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all
students:
Qs
Ms. Darihun Kharnongrum (83)
A % B % C % D %
1 23 27.71 41 49.40 17 20.48 3 3.61
2 26 31.33 34 40.96 21 25.30 2 2.41
3 17 20.48 32 38.55 26 31.33 6 7.23
4 15 18.07 38 45.78 26 31.33 4 4.82
5 18 21.69 36 43.37 23 27.71 7 8.43
6 17 20.48 38 45.78 19 22.89 9 10.84
7 23 27.71 40 48.19 19 22.89 1 1.20
8 18 21.69 39 46.99 20 24.10 6 7.23
9 13 15.66 36 43.37 27 32.53 7 8.43
10 14 16.87 45 54.22 21 25.30 3 3.61
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
16.87
54.22
25.30
3.61
Ms. Darihun Kharnongrum
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014
Mrs. Alfa Mary Kurbah
Teaching: Core Paper III - Development of Educational System in India
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students
present on the day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all
students:
Qs
Mrs. A. Kurbah (85)
A % B % C % D %
1 71 83.53 14 16.47 0.00 0.00
2 61 71.76 23 27.06 1 1.18 0.00
3 56 65.88 25 29.41 4 4.71 0.00
4 59 69.41 24 28.24 2 2.35 0.00
5 50 58.82 31 36.47 3 3.53 1 1.18
6 39 45.88 40 47.06 5 5.88 1 1.18
7 42 49.41 39 45.88 3 3.53 1 1.18
8 39 45.88 41 48.24 4 4.71 1 1.18
9 53 62.35 29 34.12 3 3.53 0.00
10 53 62.35 29 34.12 2 2.35 1 1.18
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Not satisfactory
62.35
34.12
2.35 1.18
Mrs. Alfa Mary Kurbah - Overall
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014
Mrs. Calmy Kharlukhi
Teaching: Core Paper I - Teacher in Emerging Society Elective Paper VII - Environmental Education Methodology of Teaching of Physical Science and Life Science The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students
present on the day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all
students:
Qs
Mrs. Calmy Kharlukhi (86)
A % B % C % D %
1 66 76.74 19 22.09 1 1.16 0.00
2 62 72.09 23 26.74 1 1.16 0.00
3 64 74.42 20 23.26 1 1.16 0.00
4 59 68.60 25 29.07 2 2.33 0.00
5 51 59.30 31 36.05 4 4.65 0.00
6 46 53.49 38 44.19 2 2.33 0.00
7 43 50.00 42 48.84 1 1.16 0.00
8 51 59.30 32 37.21 3 3.49 0.00
9 60 69.77 23 26.74 3 3.49 0.00
10 60 69.77 24 27.91 2 2.33 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
69.77
27.90
2.33 0.00
Mrs. Calmy Kharlukhi - Overall
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014
Mrs. Inrilin Marwein
Teaching: Elective Paper VII – Computer in Education
Methodology of Teaching of History and Social Studies
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students present
on the day who had opted for any of the three Papers taken by the Lecturer:
Qs
Mrs. I. Marwein (64)
A % B % C % D %
1 50 78.13 14 21.88 0.00 0.00
2 46 71.88 18 28.13 0.00 0.00
3 37 57.81 24 37.50 3 4.69 0.00
4 41 64.06 22 34.38 1 1.56 0.00
5 28 43.75 34 53.13 2 3.13 0.00
6 19 29.69 38 59.38 6 9.38 1 1.56
7 20 31.25 37 57.81 7 10.94 0.00
8 21 32.81 40 62.50 3 4.69 0.00
9 32 50.00 28 43.75 3 4.69 1 1.56
10 32 50.00 31 48.44 1 1.56 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Not satisfactory
50.00 48.44
1.56 0.00
Mrs. Inrilin Marwein - Overall
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014
Ms. Kathleen G. Nengnong
Teaching: Core Paper I- Teacher in Emerging Society Core Paper II - Educational Psychology and Statistics Methodology of Teaching of Health and Physical Education The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students
present on the day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all
students:
Qs
Ms. K. G. Nengnong (84)
A % B % C % D %
1 47 55.95 34 40.48 3 3.57 0.00
2 46 54.76 35 41.67 3 3.57 0.00
3 52 61.90 28 33.33 4 4.76 0.00
4 44 52.38 34 40.48 5 5.95 1 1.19
5 41 48.81 31 36.90 12 14.29 0.00
6 45 53.57 33 39.29 4 4.76 1 1.19
7 35 41.67 42 50.00 7 8.33 0.00
8 31 36.90 44 52.38 9 10.71 1 1.19
9 40 47.62 37 44.05 5 5.95 2 2.38
10 38 45.24 41 48.81 5 5.95 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
45.2448.81
5.95
0.00
Ms. Kathleen G. Nengnong - Overall
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014
Dr. (Mrs.) Sutapa Sengupta
Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of Geography (Part-Time)
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who
had taken Geography as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:
Qs
Dr. (Mrs.) S. Sengupta (5)
A % B % C % D %
1 3 60.00 2 40.00 0.00 0.00
2 1 20.00 4 80.00 0.00 0.00
3 2 40.00 3 60.00 0.00 0.00
4 2 40.00 3 60.00 0.00 0.00
5 2 40.00 3 60.00 0.00 0.00
6 2 40.00 2 40.00 0.00 0.00
7 2 40.00 3 60.00 0.00 0.00
8 1 20.00 4 80.00 0.00 0.00
9 1 20.00 4 80.00 0.00 0.00
10 2 40.00 3 60.00 0.00 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Not satisfactory
40.00
60.00
0.00 0.00
Dr. (Mrs.) Sutapa Sengupta - Overall
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014
Dr. (Ms) Jaya. G. Choudhury
Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of Mathematics (Part-Time)
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who
had taken Mathematics as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:
Qs
Dr. (Ms.) J. G. Choudhury (7)
A % B % C % D %
1 7 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 1 14.29 6 85.71 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 6 85.71 1 14.29 0.00
4 0.00 4 57.14 3 42.86 0.00
5 0.00 6 85.71 1 14.29 0.00
6 1 14.29 3 42.86 3 42.86 0.00
7 1 14.29 5 71.43 1 14.29 0.00
8 2 28.57 3 42.86 2 28.57 0.00
9 3 42.86 2 28.57 1 14.29 1 14.29
10 0.00 6 85.71 1 14.29 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
0.00
85.71
14.29
0.00
Dr. (Ms.) Jaya G. Choudhury - Overall
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2014
Mrs. Sharmistha Purkayastha
Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of English (Part-Time)
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who
had taken English as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:
Qs
S. Purkayastha
A % B % C % D %
1 1 50.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00
2 1 50.00 1 50.00 0 0.00 0.00
3 2 100.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
4 2 100.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
5 2 100.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
6 2 100.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
7 1 50.00 1 50.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
8 2 100.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
9 2 100.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
10 2 100.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Not satisfactory
100.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
Mrs. Sharmistha Purkayastha - Overall
Feedback from the Alumni:
Through meetings held with the Alumni, they realised that the course conducted by the college has
brought tremendous change in the field of teaching profession for their career. They appreciated the
dedication and hard work of the teachers and the management as a whole. They realised that the
training programme has equipped them well to face classroom challenges. Their sense of appreciation
is identified with their readiness to organise and participate in different activities of the college both
scholastic and co-scholastic.
The testimonies of appreciation can be understood from their expression: “I have learned from SMCTE
that teaching is not a mere job but true vocation”. “I have learned to improve my teaching skill in
SMCTE”. “SMCTE taught me to teach effectively”. “SMCTE has taught me to unearth the hidden
capabilities within myself”. “SMCTE has prepared me to face the modern students with the help of
technology”.
Feedback from Parents:
Through parents meeting, the college could gather a sense of appreciation for the college in promoting
quality education, and the efforts made to cater to the needs and interests of each and every individual
student.
Feedback from Employers:
The employers of the college highly appreciated the services rendered by the teaching and non-
teaching staff. Their dedication to their work is unquestionable.
