DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/doretrieved-dt-08-07-2014 1/40

RCA No. 24/14

08.07.2014

Present: Appellant with counsel Sh. Johri Mal.

Sh. L.C. Singla Ld. counsel for the respondent.

Reply to the applications U/o 41 rule 5 r.w.s.

151 of CPC and U/o 41 rule 27 r.w.s. 151 of CPC filed.

The same be taken on record. Copy supplied.

TCR be called for 05.08.14.

(Satish Kumar)

ADJ-2, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi

08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.653/14

08.07.2014

Present: Ld. counsel for the parties.

WS as well as the reply to the application U/o

39 rule 1 and 2 of CPC filed. The same be taken on

record. Copy supplied.

Arguments heard on the application U/o 39

rule 1 and 2 of CPC.

Be put up on 09.07.14 for orders on the

aforesaid application.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.719/14

08.07.2014


Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the

defendant. The same be taken on record.

WS as well as the reply of the interim

application has not been filed. Adjournment sought to

file the same. Heard. Allowed.

Be put up on 21.07.14 for filing of the WS as

well as the reply to the interim application.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.63/14

08.07.2014

Present: Plaintiff with counsel Sh. Sudhir Kumar.

Clerk of the counsel for defendant.

The defendant as well as his counsel not

available today.

Today this case is fixed for cross examination

of PW-1 who is very much present in the court today.

Adjournment sought on behalf of the

defendant. Heard. Allowed subject to cost of Rs.5,000/-

to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff.

Be put up on 07.08.14 for cross examination of

PW-1 and for payment of cost.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.428/14

08.07.2014

Present: Plaintiff with counsel Ms. Naz.

Sh. Lalit son of the defendant


of PW-1 who is very much present in the court today.

Ld. counsel for the defendant not available

today.





PW-1 and for payment of cost.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


Abhishek Aggarwal Vs. Sanjeev Rana

CS No.462/14

08.07.2014

PW-1: Abhishek Aggarwal S/o Sh. G.K. Aggarwal R/o

Flat No.102, Guru Apartments, Plot no.9, Sec.14, Rohini, Delhi-85.

On S.A.

That I tender my evidence by way of affidavit which is

Ex.PW-1/A bearing my signatures at point A and B. I relied upon

the document i.e. photocopy of cheque Ex.PW-1/1 (now de-

exhibited and marked) as mark-A, photocopy of passbook

Ex.PW-1/2 (OSR), photocopy of legal demand notice dtd.01.12.2011

Ex.PW-1/3 (now de-exhibited and marked) as mark-C, postal

receipt Ex.PW-1/4 (now de-exhibited and marked) as mark-D,

computer generated copy of relevant extract Ex.PW-1/5 (colly). I

further states that all the contents of my affidavits are true and

correct.

XXXXXXXXX by Sh. Avdhesh Kumar Ld. counsel for the defendant.

Deferred.

RO & AC

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


Aseem Gupta Vs. Magnum International

CS No.226/14

08.07.2014

Present: Sh. Hitender Nahta Ld. counsel for the

plaintiff.

Sh. Anil Sharma Ld. counsel for the defendant.


of DW-1 who is absent.

It is submitted by the counsel for the defendant

that compromise talks are going on between the parties

but the counsel for the plaintiff submitted that he has no

knowledge about the same and he is ready to cross

examine the DW-1, who is absent today.





DW-1 and for payment of cost.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


Suresh Gupta Vs. Girish Mittal & Ors.

CS No.629/14

08.07.2014

Present: None for the plaintiff despite repeated calls.

The court notice issued against the plaintiff

received back unserved, it appears that the plaintiff is no

more interest to pursue his suit, hence the suit of the

plaintiff is hereby dismissed in default.

File be consigned to record room after due

compliance.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.454/14

08.07.2014

Present: Plaintiff with counsel Sh. Ali Anwar.

Defendant with counsel Sh. P.R. Sharma.

An application for waiving of cost filed on

behalf of the defendant.

In view of the submission made by the counsel

for the defendant the cost imposed upon the defendant of

Rs.1,000/- is waived off and remaining cost of Rs.1,000/-

has been paid by the defendant today itself in the court

to the plaintiff.

Arguments heard on the application U/o 14 (5)

of CPC.

Be put up on 09.07.14 for orders.

(Satish Kumar)

ADJ-2, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No. 145/14

08.07.2014

Present: Sh. B.P. Sharma Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.

None for the defendant No.1.

Ms. Renu Gupta Ld. counsel for the defendant

No.2.

Adjournment sought on behalf of the plaintiff

to file the replication to the WS of the defendant No.1.

Heard. Allowed.

Deficient court fees have been filed by the

plaintiff. The same be taken on record.

Be put up on 20.08.14 for replication,

admission/denial of documents and for framing of issues.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


Mukesh Singhal Vs. Mukesh Associates

CS No.308/14

08.07.2014

Present: Ld. counsel for the parties along with parties.

Heard. File perused.

It is submitted by the counsel for the parties that

there is possibility of compromise and request that the case

be refer to Mediation Center.

In view of the submissions made case is referred to

Mediation Center, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi for 25.07.14 at

12:00noon.

Parties are directed to appear in person before the

Mediation Center on 25.07.14 at 12:00noon.

Be put up before this court on 31.07.14.

Ahlmad of this court is directed to send this

file complete in all respect in the Mediation Center

forthwith.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


Arora Finance Co. Vs. Dinesh Singh

ARB No.113/14

08.07.2014

Present: Both the parties in person.

Heard. File perused.

It is submitted by the parties that there is

possibility of compromise and request that the case be refer to

Mediation Center.

In view of the submissions made case is referred to

Mediation Center, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi for 19.07.14 at

12:00noon.

Parties are directed to appear in person before the

Mediation Center on 19.07.14 at 12:00noon.

Be put up before this court on 30.07.14.

Ahlmad of this court is directed to send this

file complete in all respect in the Mediation Center

forthwith.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


Abhishek Aggarwal Vs. Sanjeev Rana

CS No.462/14

08.07.2014

Present: Parties along with counsel.

Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal tender his evidence by

way of affidavit and examined himself as PW-1 and his

cross examination is deferred on the request of the

counsel for the defendant.

No other PW present.


PW-1/RPE.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No. 491/14

08.07.2014

Present: Ms. Farzana Ld. Proxy counsel for the counsel

for plaintiff.

Deficient court fees filed. The same be taken

on record.

The suit is U/o XXXVII of CPC based upon a

cheque. The original cheque has been filed. The same be

taken on record.

Issue summons of the suit to the defendant in

prescribed proforma on filing of PF, RC, Speed Post and

through Courier as well for 11/08/14. PF be filed within

3 days.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.600/14

08.07.2014

Present: Plaintiff in person.

Defendant with counsel.

Reply of the application U./o 14 rule 5 of CPC

filed. The same be taken on record. Copy supplied.

Be put up on 22.08.14 for arguments on the


(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.214/14

08.07.2014

Present: Plaintiff in person.

Sh. Piyush Ld. Proxy counsel for the defendant

No.1 and 2.

Sh. Sachin Ld. Proxy counsel for the counsel

for defendant No.3.

Neither the main counsel for the defendant No.

3 nor the AR of defendant No.3 company is present for

last several dates and no progress has been made in this

case. Inasmuch as direction was issued to the defendant

to remove the structure which was constructed upon the

land of the plaintiff and it appears that the defendant No.

3 tried to prolong the proceedings of this suit by this way

or the other.

Perusal of the records reveals the an

application U/o 39 rule 10 of CPC is pending.Be put up on 11.07.14 for arguments on the


(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.477/14

08.07.2014

Present: Plaintiff with counsel.

Sh. Ravinder Singh son of the defendant in

person.

Ld. counsel for the defendant not available. No

reply of the application U/o 7 rule 14 (3) of CPC of the

plaintiff filed by the defendant. Adjournment sought to

file the same. Heard. Allowed subject to cost of Rs.

5,000/- to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff.

Be put up on 13.08.14 for reply and arguments

on the aforesaid application.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.195/14

08.07.2014


Defendant No.2 with counsel Sh.Raman Singh.

Defendant No.5 in person.

All the defendants were proceeded ex-parte on

the last date.

WS was filed by the defendant No.2. on the last

date of hearing.

Defendant No.2 and 5 are directed to move an

appropriate application for setting aside the ex-parte

order passed against them.

Be put up on 25.08.14 for F/P.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.387/14

08.07.2014

Present: Plaintiff with counsel Sh. Rakesh Sharma.

Defendant have been served by substituted

service through publication in the newspaper dated

09.06.14

Be awaited, put up at 12:30pm.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

It is 1:15pm.

Present: Plaintiff with counsel Sh. Rakesh Sharma.

None for the defendant despite repeated calls

and despite substituted service through publication in

the newspaper dated 09.06.14, hence the defendant is

hereby proceeded ex-parte.

Be put up on 04.08.14 for ex-parte PE.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.327/14

08.07.2014


Defendant No.2 in person.

Today case is fixed for cross examination of

PW-1 who is very much present but the counsel for the

defendant is not available today.


defendant. Heard. Allowed.


PW-1.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.402/14

08.07.2014

Present: Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.

Defendant No.1 has already been proceeded ex-

parte.

Relief against the defendant No.2 and 3 has

already been satisfied.

At request, be put up on 26.08.14 for ex-parte

PE.

(Satish Kumar)


8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.666/14

08.07.2014


Fresh vakalatnama on behalf of the defendant

filed. The same be taken on record.

WS not filed. Adjournment sought to file the

same on the ground that the plaintiff has not supplied

the complete set of documents. The same has been

supplied today itself in the court.

Be put up on 14.08.14 for filing of WS.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.426/14

08.07.2014

Present: Plaintiff with counsel Sh. Nitin Gupta.

Defendant in person.

The defendant has filed the reply of the

application U/o 12 rule 6 of CPC of the plaintiff and the

defendant was asked to engage his counsel but he has

submitted that he himself shall argue on the aforesaid

application.

Arguments heard on the applications U/o 12

rule 6 of CPC of the plaintiff and application U/o 7 rule

11 of CPC of the defendant.

Be put up on 11.07.14 for orders on the

aforesaid applications.

(Satish Kumar) ADJ-2, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi

08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.540/14

08.07.2014


Defendant with counsel.

Heard.

In view of the submission made, the cost of Rs.

2,000/- is waived off to Rs.1,000/-, hence the defendant

is directed to make the payment of Rs.1,000/- to the

plaintiff but the defendant make the payment of Rs.500/-

and submits that he shall make the payment of Rs.500/-

on the next date of hearing.

Part cross examination of PW-1 recorded.

Be put up on 26.08.14 for further cross

examination of PW-1 and for payment of Rs.500/-.

(Satish Kumar)


8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


CS No.674/14

08.07.2014


Arguments heard on the application U/s 65 &

66 of the Evidence Act.

Be put up on 18.07.14 for orders.

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


Ex No.1/14

08.07.2014

File taken up today on an application U/s 151

of CPC for seeking modification in the order dtd.31.05.14.

Present: Sh. Anil Kumar Ld. counsel for the DH.

Heard. Petition perused.

Perusal of the record shows that inadvertently

it has been mentioned that issue warrant of attachment

instead of issue of warrant of possession. Hence the

same is hereby modified with the direction that issue

warrant of possession against the JD on filing of fresh PF.

DH is directed to appear before Ld. ACJ on 25.07.14.

Be put up on 08.08.14 for report.

Previous date given stands cancelled.

(Satish Kumar)


8/12/2019 DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014


Vs.

CS No.

08.07.2014

Present:

Be put up on

(Satish Kumar)


08.07.2014

DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014

Documents

Transcript of DO_Retrieved Dt 08-07-2014