DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001 1 US CMS US CMS Detector Project Overview Dan Green US CMS Project...
-
Upload
charla-clarke -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001 1 US CMS US CMS Detector Project Overview Dan Green US CMS Project...
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
1
US CMS US CMS
US CMS Detector Project Overview
Dan Green
US CMS Project Manager
DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
2
OutlineOutline
• Project Status - Financial– FY98+99 Closeout, 1 year “rolling”
closeout
• Schedule Changes (V31)– Installation -and Commissioning
• Technical Progress
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
3
US CMS - DOE, NSF ProfileUS CMS - DOE, NSF Profile
US CMS balance between DOE and NSF funds is roughly correct. We have modified I&C planning to match the CMS V31 schedule. NSF ends in FY03.
US CMS DOE Funding and Commitments
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05
Fiscal Year
Am
ount (A
Y $
M)
DOE Funding
Commitments
US CMS NSF Funding and Commitments
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05
Fiscal Year
Am
ount (A
Y $
M)
NSF Funding
Commitments
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
4
US CMS Detector ProjectUS CMS Detector Project
No trends are evident. No “divergence”.
Monthly Tracking
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Jun
-98
Se
p-9
8
De
c-9
8
Ma
r-9
9
Jun
-99
Se
p-9
9
De
c-9
9
Ma
r-0
0
Jun
-00
Se
p-0
0
De
c-0
0
Ma
r-0
1
AY
M$ Cum BCWS
Cum BCWP
Cum Obl
Tracking Monthly Performance
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Jun
-98
Se
p-9
8
De
c-9
8
Ma
r-9
9
Jun
-99
Se
p-9
9
De
c-9
9
Ma
r-0
0
Jun
-00
Se
p-0
0
De
c-0
0
Ma
r-0
1
BCWP/BCWS
ACWP/BCWP
Obl/BCWS
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
5
Financial Overview - I Financial Overview - I
• BCWS 84.0 AYM$
• BCWP 74.1
• Obligations 80.6
• Paid Actuals 64.6
• Obligations/BCWS 96 %
• BCWP/BCWS 88 %
• Paid Actuals/BCWP 87 %
We are getting the funds out to groups and we are getting the jobs under contract. There is some lag in schedule/reporting and in invoicing.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
6
% Complete at L2% Complete at L2
The CP is ~ completed up to progress payments. ECAL, EMU and HCAL are > 50% complete, while Tridas and FPIX are only ~ 25% complete
% Complete at L2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
EM
U
HC
AL
TRID
AS
EC
AL
FP
IX
CP
PO
SiT
rkr
% C
om
ple
te
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
7
CSC - Labor ExperienceCSC - Labor Experience
Early experience on
CSC assembly is
favorable. Now have ~ 35 of 148 CSC
Muon CMS Production Status at FNAL
Panels Production at Axxiom.
-100
400
900
1400
1900
2400
2900
1 12 23 34 45 56 67 78 89 100 111 122 133 144 155 166 177Week in production
Nu
mb
er
of
Pa
ne
ls
Shortage/surplus
DONE=1594
FY99 FY00 FY02FY01 FY03
Goal=2940 panels(420 chambers @ 7 panels/ch.)
Over 50% of Production Completed
Muon CMS Production Status at FNAL
Panels Production at GERBER
-100
400
900
1400
1900
2400
2900
1 12 23 34 45 56 67 78 89 100 111 122 133 144 155 166 177Week in production
Nu
mb
er
of
Pa
ne
ls
Shortage/surplus
DONE=1355
FY99 FY00 FY02FY01
Goal=2520 panels(420 chambers @ 6 panels/ch.)
Over 50% of Production Completed
CSC Production at MP9(ME234/2)
-40
0
40
80
120
Month in production
Nu
mb
er o
f Ch
amb
ers
Shortage
DONE
Goal = 148 Chambers
FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
8
HCAL - M&S Cost ExperienceHCAL - M&S Cost Experience
HB-1 pre-assembled at Felguera. Shipped to CERN . Megatiles will be inserted in bldg # 186. The mating of optics to absorber will begin at CERN in CY 2001.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
9
HB OPTICS - Labor ExperienceHB OPTICS - Labor Experience
Labor experience for CSC and for HCAL optics has been good. This is the bulk of US CMS labor costs.
M&S ~ OK, Labor ~ OK ==> worry about electronics (schedule) and installation (EDIA too).
CMS HCAL Production
01836547290
108126144162180198216234252270288306324342360378396414432450468486504522540558576594612630
week of
Me
ga
tile
s
Scintillator "Goal"
Final Assy. "Goal"
Covers "Goal"
Scintillator Machined
Covers Machined
Completed Megatiles
18 megatiles per layer
17 layers per wedge
18 wedges per HB
2 HB's
50% 306 tiles
60% 367 tiles
70% 428 tiles
80% 490 tiles
90% 551 tiles
100% 612 tiles
P r epar ed by: T odd Nebel week ending 4/28/01
( HB+ / HB-)Scint=507 82% (100% / 64%)Cover=540 87% (100% / 75%)Tile=478 77% (100% / 54%)
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
10
Closeout of Completed TasksCloseout of Completed Tasks
• FY96 - 99 completed tasks have been closed.
• The ACWP can be compared to the BCWS for CV on these tasks.
• In future tasks with end dates more than one year ago which are reported complete will be closed.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
11
Contingency Usage and PerformanceContingency Usage and Performance
We have 34 months of monthly reporting. CR can be followed at any level of detail needed. We need to watch contingency following the SiTrkr baselineing.
Contingency/ETC vs Percent Complete
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Jun-
98
Oct
-98
Feb
-99
Jun-
99
Oct
-99
Feb
-00
Jun-
00
Oct
-00
Feb
-01
BCWP/BAC
Cont/(BAC-BCWP)
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
12
Financial Overview - IIFinancial Overview - II
• TPC = Constant 167.25 (AYM$)
• BAC 138.2
• Contingency = TPC - BAC 29.0
• ETC = BAC - BCWP 64.1
• BCWP/BAC 54 %
• Contingency/ETC 45 %
We have a fixed total cost. We are 54 % complete and retain 45% contingency on the estimated cost to complete.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
13
US CMS Contingency UseUS CMS Contingency Use
We started with 48.7 M$ in contingency. We have used 19.7 M$, retain 29.0 M$, and we are 54% complete. Of the increase, ~ 7 M$ is due to scope increases, so we have used ~12.7 M$ on better estimates of > BCWP = 74.1 M$ tasks (<17 %).
US CMS Cost Increases
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
EM
U
HC
AL
TRID
AS
EC
AL
FP
IX
CP
PO
SiT
rkr
L2 Subsystem
AY
(M
$) Scope
EAC-Base
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
14
US CMS Revised ML1US CMS Revised ML1
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
15
LHC - V31LHC - V31
• Single beam in LHC 1/06
• 2 months LHC, then run 1 month
• shutdown - complete CMS 4/06
• start run at 10^33 for 10 fb-1 8/06
Planning for installation and commissioning uses V31 for scheduling and planning. Note that late B.O. in UX means increased US CMS costs.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
W. Mason, F. Feyzi - UW/PSL
Test of CSC Installation fixture
Fully balanced chamber can rotate to any angle Counterweight
Balance limits w/ or w/o chamber
Installation of CSCInstallation of CSC
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
17
HCAL Critical Path - V31HCAL Critical Path - V31ID ML? Task Name Start Duration Finish Slack1 HCAL System (WBS 1.2) Jan 04 '99 1465 days Aug 16 '04 NA2 M L3 HB: Start Absorber and Optics Production Jan 04 '99 0 days Jan 04 '99 NA
3 HB-1 Absorber Production Jan 04 '99 400 days Jul 14 '00 536 days
4 HB+1 Absorber Production Sep 01 '00 260 days Aug 30 '01 536 days
5 HB-1 Optical Production Jan 04 '99 360 days M ay 19 '00 446 days
6 HB+1 Optical Production M ay 22 '00 385 days Nov 09 '01 446 days
7 Install Optics into HB-1 M ay 15 '01 115 days Oct 22 '01 549 days
8 Install Optics into HB+1 Jan 04 '02 50 days M ar 14 '02 446 days
9 HB-1, HB+1: ODU Installation on Absorber M ay 26 '03 30 days Jul 04 '03 135 days
10 HB-1, HB+1: System Integration Jul 07 '03 20 days Aug 01 '03 135 days
11 Trial Insertion of HB-1/HB+1 in Vacuum Tank Feb 09 '04 10 days Feb 20 '04 NA
12 Assemble HE-1 & Install HE-1 Optics Apr 15 '02 62 days Jul 09 '02 293 days
13 HE-1: ODU Installation on Absorber Aug 25 '03 30 days Oct 03 '03 70 days
14 HE-1: System Integration Oct 06 '03 20 days Oct 31 '03 70 days
15 Assemble HE+1 & Install HE+1 Optics Sep 09 '02 100 days Jan 24 '03 250 days
16 HE+1: ODU Installation on Absorber Apr 22 '03 30 days Jun 02 '03 159 days
17 HE+1: System Integration Jun 03 '03 20 days Jun 30 '03 159 days
18 M L2 HO Optics Installation on YB Completed Dec 15 '03 30 days Jan 23 '04 37 days
19 M L1 Close Yoke and Start M agnet Test in SX5 M ar 17 '04 0 days M ar 17 '04 NA
20 M L3 HCAL Readout Box Production Start Apr 16 '01 0 days Apr 16 '01 NA
21 HB Readout Box Production (+ integration tests) Apr 16 '01 550 days M ay 23 '03 135 days
22 HE Readout Box Production (+ integration tests) Sep 17 '01 505 days Aug 22 '03 70 days
23 HO Readout Box Production (+ integration tests) Apr 05 '02 441 days Dec 12 '03 37 days
24 M L3 HCAL HPD Procurement & Testing Start Jan 07 '02 0 days Jan 07 '02 NA
25 HCAL HPD Deliver & Test @ UM inn, Ship to FNAL Jan 07 '02 460 days Oct 10 '03 82 days
26 Front-End Electronics Production Jan 04 '99 926 days Jul 22 '02 139 days
27 Front-end Electronics (Explicit Slack) Jul 23 '02 70 days Oct 28 '02 139 days
28 M L2 Complete Front-end Electronics Production Oct 31 '02 0 days Oct 31 '02 NA
29 ASIC Packaging and Testing Oct 29 '02 60 days Jan 20 '03 139 days
30 M ount ASIC's on Boards, Checkout and Burn-In Dec 03 '02 60 days Feb 24 '03 139 days
31 Assemble and Test ODU's, Ship to CERN Dec 31 '02 80 days Apr 21 '03 139 days
32 M L3 Start HE Absorber and Optical Production Jan 31 '00 0 days Jan 31 '00 NA
33 HE Absorber and Optical Production Dubna/Protvino Jan 31 '00 530 days Feb 08 '02 338 days
34 M L2 Start HO Optics Production Oct 01 '99 0 days Oct 01 '99 NA
35 HO Optical Production TATA-(India) Oct 04 '99 500 days Aug 31 '01 632 days
36 M L3 HF Absorber Production Start M ay 31 '01 0 days M ay 31 '01 NA
37 HF Absorber Production (ITEP-Russia) M ay 31 '01 437 days Jan 31 '03 164 days
38 HF Optical Fiber Stuffing (KFKI-Hungary) Nov 30 '01 500 days Oct 30 '03 202 days
39 HF Readout Box Production Nov 30 '01 500 days Oct 30 '03 202 days
40 HF PM T Procurement and Testing Oct 31 '01 500 days Sep 30 '03 164 days
41 Assemble HF Sectors into HF- and HF+ Oct 01 '03 60 days Dec 23 '03 164 days
42 Lower HF-1 IN UX5 Aug 10 '04 0 days Aug 10 '04 NA
43 Lower HF+1 IN UX5 Aug 16 '04 0 days Aug 16 '04 NA
Oct Mar Aug Jan Jun Nov Apr Sep Feb Jul Dec May Oct Mar Aug Jan Jun
99 00 01 02 03 04 05
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
18
WBS 1 - Endcap MuonWBS 1 - Endcap MuonFinal or next-to final Prototype Boards for all on-chamber electronics produced and tested.
CSC
CFEBCFEBCFEB CFEB
ALCT
CFEB
LVDB
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
19
Off-Chamber ElectronicsOff-Chamber Electronics
MPC
CCB
DMB
CLCT
TMB
VME
Control
DDU-99
DMB-99CLCT-99TMB-99
CCB-99
First Prototype Boards produced and tested (8.99)
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
20
Location of Peripheral CratesLocation of Peripheral Crates
YE2 walkway showing 600 sector of ME2 and VME crate
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
21
• Over 20,000 scintillator tiles built and measured
• RMS of fibers = 4.4%• RMS of tiles = 6.5%• RMS of wire/coll =
1.2%• RMS of average layer
light yield = 4.6%
WBS 2 - HCALWBS 2 - HCAL
Optical Production
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
22
HF - EDIA, FNAL -> RDMSHF - EDIA, FNAL -> RDMS
0.5 cm spacing, packing fraction, source tubes, edge chamfer design complete.
Redesign was US scope increase.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
23
HPD - Anti-ReflectionHPD - Anti-Reflection
Reflection at 510 nm
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
angle[deg]
R
Measured Reflectance of 14nm A-SiH on top of thin Al layer
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
400 450 500 550 600 650 700
Wavelength[nm]
Re
fle
cta
nc
e
Angular “acceptance” and numerical aperture. Wavelength “acceptance”
and photocathode response
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
24
QIE Status - OK QIE Status - OK
• Input Amplifiers/Splitters: design finished, layout done.
• Integrators: design finished, layout partially done.
• FADC: design finished, layout done
• Range comparators and ranging logic: not done
• Biasing network: not done
• State machine, timing: design being worked on now
• LVDS drivers, receivers: not done
• Other digital logic: not done
Total design submitted - on track so far - minor slippage.
Yarema group is on track with their schedule
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
25
WBS 3.1 TriggerWBS 3.1 Trigger
• TDR Finished and available as CERN/LHCC 2000-038, CMS TDR 6.1December 15, 2000
• Met Level 1 Milestone for submission to LHCC by end of 2000.
• Approved by LHCC, March, 2001
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
26
Calorimeter Trigger StatusCalorimeter Trigger Status(U. Wisconsin)(U. Wisconsin)
• Successful Prototyping Program– Crate, 160 MHz Backplane & Clock Card – Receiver & Electron Isolation Cards tested– Adder ASIC tested & production finished– 4 Gbit/sec Copper 20 m link system tested
• ASIC Prototypes– Tested* Phase & Boundary Scan delivered– Tested* Isolation & Sort delivered
• *Tested by Vitesse• Testing Program Plans
– Next generation Backplane finished– Next generation Receiver, Elect. Iso. Cards– Next generation Copper Link
• New Vitesse Chip (72147216)– Test delivered ASIC prototypes
• Simulation Program– New ORCA4 results verify performance
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
27
Muon Trigger System TestsMuon Trigger System Tests
• Muon Port Card (Rice) Sector Receiver (UCLA)– Data successfully sent from input of one MPC, through 100m of
optical cables, to output of SR• Sector Receiver Sector Processor (Florida)
– Data successfully sent from input of one SR, through custom backplane, into the SP
– Successfully sent data from three SRs connected to the SP to emulate an entire trigger sector
• Clock and Control Board prototype (Rice)– Distributed clock & control signals w/ programmable delays
• Port Card Sector Receiver Sector Processor– Successfully sent data from the input of two MPCs (representing
ME2 and ME3), through one SR, and reconstructed tracks correctly in the SP
– Complete chain test using simulated data from ORCA4
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
28
WBS 3.2 DAQWBS 3.2 DAQ
• The DAQ effort continues in an R&D phase - watching and evaluating commercial developments.
• The ML1 for DAQ is the TDR, due in 2002, postponed 1 year.
• Paris Sphicas is US CMS L2 DAQ manager and CMS L2 PRS manager. Much work on forming and launching the 4 PRS groups has been accomplished.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
29
WBS 4 - ECALWBS 4 - ECAL• Avalanche Photodiodes
– final structure selected.– Neutron Source operational.
• Front-End Electronics– FPPA pilot wafers back and under test.– Honeywell Bit-serializer dropped, moved to
CERN group.
• Monitor Laser– Preparation for shipping laser to CERN.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
30
FPPA2000 (UHF1x)FPPA2000 (UHF1x)
The FPPA is in final preproduction. The responsibility has shifted from Princeton to LBNL. Evaluation is in train.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
31
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
0 100 200 300 400 500Reverse Bias (V)
Lea
kag
e C
urr
en t
(A) Pixel Current
Guard Ring Current
After = 1x1014 p/cm2
increase in current after 300V(2-8)% noisy channels (PSI)With = 6x1014 p/cm2
same I with pixels at -100C
FPix. Sensors, 1st Subm.
Sensor Submission
Before irradiation90% of pixels have Vbrkdwn >300V
WBS 5 - FPIXWBS 5 - FPIX
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
32
VHDI for Row of 5 ROCs
Test Station
VHDI - PrototypeVHDI - Prototype
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
33
Assembly of Detectors;NIKON coord. meas.Need 672 units
Assembly of Butterflies;OMIS II meas. coord.Need 96 units
SiDet Assembly R&DSiDet Assembly R&D
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
34
150 m
= 14 mover pixel
Pixels at 20o to beam
150 m / 12 = 43 m = 46 mover pixel
Charge sharing vs position
Charge sharing vs position
Pixels normal to beam
150 m
D:\LHM\2001\Presentations\Plenary Presentations\For Dan \Cern Test Result.ppt
CERN Test Beam CERN Test Beam
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
35
WBS 8 - SiTrkrWBS 8 - SiTrkr
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
36
Preparation for Pre-ProductionPreparation for Pre-Production
Mock-up frames for training gantries
KSU Probe Station
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
37
WBS 6 - Common ProjectsWBS 6 - Common Projects
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001
38
Detector Project SummaryDetector Project Summary
• M&S cost experience has been good.• The labor for CSC and HCAL absorber has
been well estimated.• Contingency use has been good enough to allow
for modest scope increases - SiTrkr• Planning for I&C is in train, with cost increases
due to delay and re-estimations.