Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

21
Presented by Mark Ramrattan Brunel Business School eMail: [email protected]

Transcript of Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Page 1: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Presented by Mark RamrattanBrunel Business SchooleMail: [email protected]

Page 2: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

The Problem from LiteratureAim / Question of the ResearchContext of ResearchMethodologyDevelopment of Web-based ToolContribution to Knowledge

Page 3: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Persistent Problems in Web-based Development:

Internet Speed – development cycles for web-based development had tightened (Compared to Information System Development) to enable fast paced change.(Howell & Croft 2000, Baskerville et al 2003,Baskerville et al 2004)

Web Based Aesthetics – advanced graphics and multimedia features such as sound, animation and video streaming (Bansler et al. 2000, Carstensen et al. 2001, Holck 2002, Lang 2002, Murugesan et al. 2001, Vidgen 2002, Kautz & Norberg 2003, Kautz, Madsen & Nørbjerg 2007)

Baskerville, Pries-Heje & Ramesh (2007) ; Kautz, Madsen & Nørbjerg (2007) call for further research in this area to aid developers through theoretical and practical knowledge

Page 4: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Today's organisations driven by sudden and unexpected change (Structures / Processes / Resources)

“Emergent Organisation” is used to categorise this type of continuous change Truex et al (1999), Bello (2002), Clegg et al (2005).

Web-based Development ProjectMany methodologies, which is appropriate? Patel and Hackney (2008) The very act of modeling assumes it can be predicted. Need emergent characteristic development tools

Page 5: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Developing in and for emergent organisations when the web developer is under increased demand to design WBIS in a dynamically changing environment

(Bansler et al, 2000; Carstensen et al, 2001; Holck, 2002; Lang, 2002; Murugesan et al, 2001; Vidgen, 2002; Kautz & Norberg, 2003; Kautz, Madsen &Nørbjerg, 2007)

Researching this Problem: Motivated by the recognition that an organisation can be more deeply understood if the researcher is part of itArgyris et al (1985), Avison et al (1999), Baskerville, (1999), Bunning (1995), Checkland (1991), Elden and Chisholm (1993), Lewin (1948)

Page 6: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

This research aims to achieve one objective. It has been designed to develop an emergent web-based tool that aids both organisation and practioner when critical factors Internet Speed and Web-based aesthetics affect the web-based information system development process.

How does an emergent organisation develop web based information systems, with increased demand on the web developer for web based aesthetics at Internet Speed?

Page 7: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Developing web-based information systems: Chaplains: Multi religion faith centreEquality & DiversityOnline Student and Research HandbookStudent Services: Central place for student seeking advise

TFL (Transport for London) Student Travel + Virtual Map

Page 8: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Action Research (AR) – What is it? “AR is an interventionist approach to the

acquisition of scientific knowledge that has sound foundations in the post-positivist tradition.” (Baskerville and Wood-Harper 1996).

“The application focus of AR involves solving

organisational problems through intervention while at the same time contributing to knowledge.” (Davison et. al. 2004)

“AR aims to contribute both to the practical concerns of people in an immediate problematic situation and to the goals of social science by joint collaboration within a mutually accepted ethical framework.” (Susman and Evered, 1978)

Page 9: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Why AR? Intervention in the situation – not possible with

Case Study (except action case)Relevance to the real world (unlike experiments)

Cyclical framework of continuous improvement that is well-suited to organisational change linking theory and practice

Means of generating and immediately testing knowledge

Coghlan and Brannick (2005)

Page 10: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

The data collection adopts Coghlan and Brannick (2005) action research cycles as it composes of two different action research cycles.

The first is diagnosing, planning, taking action and evaluating in relation to the project.

The second reflection cycle reflects on the action research cycle.

Page 11: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

(Diagnosing) Problem in Development

(Planning Action) Action in Development

(Taking Action) Solution in Development

(Evaluating Action) What did I learn?

The manager proposed the problem of how to select appropriate features within the WBIS.

Many of the requirements had to be agreed with the different student services sections.

Based on the web developer ability to develop WBIS an agreement was made to pursue two different methods of initial development.

Agreement:The web developer experienceand knowledge ofmethodology’saffects the manager’s ability toincorporate the featuresRequired for WBISdevelopment. Disagreement: To test the applicability of thedesign requirement, it isnecessary to test it within itsactual environment.

Experiencing, Reflecting, Interpreting, Tacking Action

Experiencing, Reflecting, Interpreting, Tacking Action

Experiencing, Reflecting, Interpreting, Tacking Action

Experiencing, Reflecting, Interpreting, Tacking Action

Having this problem made the action researcher feel excited to have the opportunity to develop a WBIS for a wide audience.

The thought of the manager having to get a collective agreement with the different services made the web developer feel more focused and content with implementing the development process.

The web developer role had to incorporate aiding the decision on what can and cannot be developed. Apprehensive about this process the action researcher had to develop a web developer tool to overcome this problem.

Both web developer and manager felt it was necessary to develop a better way of understanding what stage the development process was currently at and what the web developer could contribute. Using a theory that models emergence process would enable the development of such a tool.

Page 12: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Ongoing cycle of reflectionDescription of EventProblems I SectionTheories / MethodologiesPotential ConflictsPossible Solutions Forth Coming Events / Preliminary Thoughts

http://celt.ust.hk/ideas/ar/intro.htm

Page 13: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

The action research project induces theory to practice and looks to extending that theory in order to develop an emergent development tool for web developers.

The rationale for invoking the Theory of Deferred Action (ToDA) (Patel, 2006) is to invoke a theory that generates ‘usable knowledge’ which incorporates the emergence design dimension.

The constructs from the Kadar matrix (Web-based Tool) are adapted from the gDRASS matrix.

Page 14: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

gDRASS Matrix (Patel, 2006)

Page 15: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

gDRASS Constructs (Patel, 2006)

gDRASS Constructs

Definition

Formalism Prescribes precise rules for creating structural forms to achieve set objectives.

Deferred Action Is concerned with enabling actual action as interrelation design with formal design.

Emergence (Emergent Organisation)

Is an unknowable and unpredictable social action.(Social Action that is organised but subject to emergence)

Diffusion Management

The joint responsibility of reflective and action designers to manage organisation and systems structure and operations.

gDRASS Design Types (Patel, 2006)

Types of Design Definition

Deferred Design Design by action designers within formal design to cope with unknowable emergence.

Autonomous Design

When design capability is afforded to intelligent machines by reflective designers that become autonomous of humans.

Real Design Design of structures and operations by rational design for enactment in emergent actuality and responsive to it in real time.

Specified Design Conducted by reflective designers from specification obtained from users

Page 16: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Kadar Matrix (Ramrattan and Patel, 2009)

Page 17: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Kadar Matrix Quadrants

Combination of Different Methodology Phases(Top Left Quadrant)

No Logical Methodology / Real World / Continuous Change (Top Right Quadrant)

High level of Continuous Change within the organisationWeb Developer knowledge and ability to implement a few methodologiesTime to market is high, increased demand to deliver the WBIS within a short development cycle.Demand for Web Aesthetics is Low - Medium

High level of Continuous Change within the organisationWeb Developer knowledge and ability to implement a few different methodologiesTime to market is high, increased demand to deliver the WBIS within a short development cycle.Demand for Web Aesthetics is High

Specific Methodology (Bottom Left Quadrant) Combination of Different Methodologies (Bottom Right Quadrant)

Low level of Continuous Change within the organisationWeb Developer knowledge limited to one or two methodologiesTime to market is low, resulting less pressure to develop WBIS on timeDemand for Web Aesthetics is low

Low level of continuous change within the organisationWeb Developer knowledge and ability to implement many different methodologiesTime to market is low – medium, less pressure to develop within a short development cycleDemand for Web Aesthetics is medium – high

Page 18: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

The research identifies WBIS development problems through literature and action research data, with an adaptation of the gDRASS matrix as a possible WBIS web developer tool (Kadar matrix) to help position the web developer potential contribution throughout the development process. With this knowledge the web developer can advise more accurately with the manager about meeting today’s volatile demands for WBIS development.

This research extends ToDA by utilising the constructs of the gDRASS matrix and adapting them for the purpose of developing a Web-based Information System development tool (Kadar matrix) that web developers use in actuality (emergent organisations).

The Action Research data reaffirms the Web-based development position of the web developer when using the Kadar matrix in an emergent organisation. This aids the web developer, manager and organisation by having a collective overall position.

Page 19: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Argyris, C. Putnam, R. & Smith, D.M. (1985) Action Science. San Francisoo, CA: Jossey-Bass Avison, D. E. and Fitzgerald, G. (2003a) Information Systems Development: Methodologies,

Techniques, and Tools, (3rd Edn), McGraw-Hill, London. Bansler, J. P., Damsgaard, J., Scheepers, R., Havn, E. & Thommesen, J. (2000), 'Corporate

Intranet Implementation: Managing Emergent Technologies and Organizational Practices', Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 1(Paper 10), pp. 1-39.

Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A critical perspective on actionresearch as a method for information systems research. Journal of InformationTechnology, 11, 235-246.

Baskerville et al(2007) The enduring contradictions of new software development approaches: a response to ‘Persistent Problems and Practices in ISD’

Information Systems Journal 17 (3) , 241–245 Bello M., Sorrentino M., Virili F., Web Services end emergent organizations: opportunities and challenges for IS development, Proceedings of ECIS 2002, European Conference on Information Systems, Gdansk (Poland), 2002. Bunning. C. (1995). Placing Action Learning and Action Research in Context. Brisbane,

Australia: International Management Centre. Carstensen, P. & Vogelsang, L. (2001), 'Design of Web-based Information Systems – New

Challenges for Systems Development?' Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Informaiton Systems, Bled, pp. 536-547.

Checkland, P. (1991). From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research. H. Nissen, H.K. Klien, & R. Hirschheim, eds. Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. New York, NY: North Holland, 397-403.

Clegg, C., Chu, C., Smithson, S., Henney, A., Willis, D., Jagodzinski, P. et al (2005) A sociotechnical study of e-business: grappling with an octopus. Journal of E-Commerce in Organizations, 3, 53-71.

Coghlan, D. and Brannick, T. (2005) Doing Action Research In Your Own Organisation. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-0246-5; ISBN 978-1-4129-0247-2

Davidson RM, Martinsons MG, Kock N (2004) Principals of canonical action research. Inf Syst J 14:65–86

Elden, M. & Chisholm, R.F. (1993). Emerging varieties of action research. Human Relations, 46(2), 121-141

Page 20: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Holck, J. (2002), '4 Perspectives on Web Information Systems', Proceedings of the 25th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia., K. Bødker, M. Kühn Pedersen, J. Nørbjerg, J. Simonsen and M. T. Vendelø, Copenhagen

Howcroft, D. & Carroll, J. (2000) A proposed methodology for web development. In: ECIS 2000, a Cyberspace Odyssey, Hansen, H.R., Bichler, M. & Mahrer, H. (eds). Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Information Systems, Vienna, 3–5 July.

Kautz, K., Madsen, S. & Nørbjerg, J. (2007) Persistent problems and practices in information systems development. Information Systems Journal, 17, 217–239.

Lang, M. “Hypermedia systems development: Do we really need new methods?,” in Proceedings of IS2002 Informing Science & IT Education Conference, 2002, Cork, Ireland, June 19–21 pp. 0883–0891.

Lewin, K. (1946), Action Research and Minority Problems, Resolving Social Conflicts, Lewin, G.W.(Ed), Harper & Row, New York, pp.201-216

Murugesan, S., Deshpande, Y., Hansen, S. & Ginige, A. (2001), 'Web Engineering: A New Discipline for Development of Web-Based Systems', WebEngineering2000, S. Murugesan, Y. Deshpande and S. Hansen, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 3-13.

Patel, N. V. (2006). Organization and Systems Design: Theory of Deferred Action. Palgrave Macmillan.  ISBN 13:978-1-4039-9164-5; ISBN 13: 1-4039-9164-2

Patel, N.V, and Hackney, R. (2008). Designing Information Systems Requirements in Context: Insights from the Theory of Deferred Action. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, May 25-26.

Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, (3rd Edn), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.

Susman G, Evered R (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm Sci Q 23:583–603

Truex, D. P., R. Baskerville, and H. Klein: 1999, ‘Growing systems in emergent organizations’. Communications of the ACM 42(8), 117–123.

Vidgen, R., Avison, D. E., Wood, R. and Wood-Harper, A. T. (2002) Developing web Information Systems : from strategy to implementation, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

Page 21: Doctoral Symposium Mark Ramrattan March 2009

Any questions, comments, queries or suggestions?eMail: [email protected]