Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs...

113
Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1 Report of the 12 th Meeting of the e-Navigation Committee 24 – 28 September, 2012 Executive Summary 99 members, from 24 countries and 4 sister organisations, attended this meeting of the e-NAV Committee, of which 22 members were new and 2 were observers; The Committee considered 94 input papers; 36 Output papers included: - 2 draft revised Recommendations, one with 3 Annexes; - 2 draft Guidelines; - draft revised MRCP and WWRNP; - updated e-Navigation FAQ; - 1 draft model course; - 2 Council Information Papers; - 1 workshop proposal; - 12 Liaison notes. The previous Working Group on Portrayal has been merged with Working Group 1 (Operations). Working Groups 3 (AIS) and 4 (Communications) are now merged and a new Data Modelling and Interfacing Working Group (Working Group 6) established; Two statements were made by IMO (e-Navigation Platform Suite – section 5.1.4 and SMCP – section 5.10); A statement was made by IMPA (Portable Pilot Units - e-NAV12/output/4); Repeated call for IALA representation at ITU relevant meetings (paragraph 10.3); 1 Please comment by

Transcript of Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs...

Page 1: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Report of the 12th Meeting of the e-Navigation Committee24 – 28 September, 2012

Executive Summary

99 members, from 24 countries and 4 sister organisations, attended this meeting of the e-NAV Committee, of which 22 members were new and 2 were observers;

The Committee considered 94 input papers;

36 Output papers included:

- 2 draft revised Recommendations, one with 3 Annexes;

- 2 draft Guidelines;

- draft revised MRCP and WWRNP;

- updated e-Navigation FAQ;

- 1 draft model course;

- 2 Council Information Papers;

- 1 workshop proposal;

- 12 Liaison notes.

The previous Working Group on Portrayal has been merged with Working Group 1 (Operations). Working Groups 3 (AIS) and 4 (Communications) are now merged and a new Data Modelling and Interfacing Working Group (Working Group 6) established;

Two statements were made by IMO (e-Navigation Platform Suite – section 5.1.4 and SMCP – section 5.10);

A statement was made by IMPA (Portable Pilot Units - e-NAV12/output/4);

Repeated call for IALA representation at ITU relevant meetings (paragraph 10.3);

Four inter-sessional meetings are being requested:

- WG2 (PNT) to review and update IALA recommendation R-121 (paragraph 8.2);

- WG3/4 (AIS & Communications) to progress the discussion paper on AIS and VDE and further develop the inputs to ITU WP5B (paragraph 9);

- WG5 (Technical Architecture) on developing the structure of the Maritime System Portfolios and the e-Navigation Suite (paragraph 11.1).

- WG6

1

Please comment by 12 October

Page 2: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Changes were proposed to the Work Programme (e-NAV12/output/2).

2

Page 3: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Table of Contents

Table of Contents 2

Report of the 12th Session of the IALA e-NAV Committee 5

General 5

1 Agenda 6

2 Review of Action Items from e-NAV11 6

3 Review of input papers & inter-sessional Working Group reports 6

4 Reports from other bodies 6

4.1 IALA Council 53rd session 6

4.2 Report of PAP23 7

4.3 Report of MSC90 7

4.4 Report of NAV58 7

4.5 Report from VTS35 8

4.5.1 Operational 8

4.5.2 Technical 9

4.5.3 Personnel and Training 9

4.5.4 Rapporteur between VTS and e-NAV Committees 10

5 Presentations 10

5.1 ACCSEAS 10

5.2 Portrayal of AtoN information on ENCs 11

5.3 Canadian implementation of e-Navigation 11

5.4 The e-Navigation Suite 12

5.5 The Structure of Maritime Service Portfolios (MSPs). 12

5.6 ISIS – A system for Standardised Data Exchange. 13

5.7 How can IALA adopt S-100 for Product Specification 13

5.8 IALA World-Wide Academy (WWA) update 13

5.9 Testbed Portal 14

5.10 Statement by IMO 14

5.10.1 Workshop notification 14

6 Establish Working Groups 15

7 Working Group 1 – Operations 15

7.1 Monitor and co-ordinate input on Strategy & Operations to the IMO process (Task1*) 15

7.1.1 Report of the IMO Correspondence Group on e-Navigation 15

7.2 Review and update IALA Strategy for e-Navigation (Task 2*) 15

3

Page 4: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

7.3 Maintain and update user requirements (in co-ordination with the VTS Committee) (Task 3*) 16

7.4 Monitor developments in navigation for the polar regions (Task 4*) 16

7.5 Update Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 16

7.6 Update the IALA NAVGUIDE 16

7.7 Liaison note to the EEP Committee 16

7.8 Liaison note to the ANM Committee 17

7.9 Discussion on the use of AIS as an aid to navigation 17

7.10 Prepare recommendations and guidelines on Maritime Information Systems (in co-ordination with the VTS Committee) (Task 25*) 17

7.11 Prepare recommendations and guidelines on the portrayal of information (Task 26*) 17

7.12 Monitor developments in ECDIS, INS, and ENCs (Task 27*) 18

8 Working Group 2 – PNT (WG2) 18

8.1 Review and update the World Wide Radio Navigation Plan (Task 5*) 18

8.2 Prepare Recommendations and Guidelines on PNT systems and radar AtoN (Task 6*) 18

8.3 Co-ordinate input to IMO, ITU and IEC on PNT systems (Task 7*) 19

8.4 Prepare a Guideline on establishment and operation of navigation systems in polar regions (Task 8*) 19

8.5 Monitor developments in satellite and terrestrial EPFSs and non-radionavigation systems (Task 9*) 19

8.6 Prepare a Guideline on recommended measures for disaster recovery (Task 10*) 19

8.7 Monitor developments in radar technology and their effect on racons (Task 11*) 19

8.8 Additional Items 19

9 Working GroupS 3/4 – AIS & COMMUNICATIONS 20

9.1 Review and update documentation on AIS (M.1371; A-124, A-126) (Task 12*) 20

9.2 Co-ordinate input to IMO, ITU, and IEC on AIS (Task 13*) 20

9.3 Monitor and contribute to development of AIS, including the next generation of AIS (Task 14*) 21

9.4 Monitor developments in the technical definition of AIS stations at IEC, satellite detection of AIS, and terrestrial long range AIS (Task 15*) 21

9.5 Monitor developments in GMDSS and LRIT (Task 21*) 21

10 Communication 21

10.1 Review and update IALA Maritime Radio Communications Plan (Task 17*) 21

10.2 Prepare Recommendations and Guidelines on communications (Task 18*) 22

10.3 Co-ordinate input to ITU, IMO, and IEC on communications (Task 19*) 22

10.4 Prepare a Guideline on the establishment and operation of communications systems in polar regions (Task 20*) 22

4

Page 5: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

10.5 Monitor developments in GMDSS and LRIT (Task 21*) 23

11 Working Group 5 – Technical Architecture (WG5) 23

11.1 Develop and maintain shore-based e-Navigation architecture (Task 22*) 23

11.2 Prepare Recommendations and Guidelines on e-Navigation architecture (Task 23*) 24

11.3 Co-ordinate input to IMO, ISO, and IEC on e-Navigation architecture (Task 24*) 24

12 Working Group 6 – DATA Modelling and Interfacing (WG6) 25

12.1 Terms of Reference 25

12.2 Participation in the IHO GI registry 25

12.3 Preparing an S-100 Product Specification 25

12.3.1 S-100 Workshop 26

12.4 Prepare recommendation and guidelines on data modelling 26

12.5 Support/advise the IALA Domain Manager in managing the IALA Domain, according to IHO standards S-100 & S-99 (TASK 32*) 26

12.6 Ownership and development of S-100 GI Registry Product Specifications. 27

12.7 Working Papers 27

13 Monitor and report progress on related systems (Task 28*) 27

14 Liaise with other IALA Committees and other bodies (Task 29*) 27

14.1 NAVGUIDE 2014 27

15 Prepare a combined IALA e-Navigation Plan (all Committees) (Task 30*) 27

16 Consider the regulatory process for e-Navigation and recommend the best approach (Task 31*) 27

17 Future Work Programme (2014 – 2018) 28

18 Review of output and working papers 28

18.1 Changes to the current Work Programme 28

19 Any Other Business 28

19.1 Working Group Terms of Reference (ToR) 28

20 Review of session report 29

21 Date and venue of next meeting 29

22 Closing of the meeting 29

23 List of Annexes to the report 29

ANNEX A Agenda 31

ANNEX B List of Participants 34

ANNEX C Working Group Participants 53

ANNEX D List of Input Papers 59

5

Page 6: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

ANNEX E List of Output and Working Papers 63

ANNEX F Action items 66

6

Page 7: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

e-NAV Committee

12th Session 28 September, 2012

Report of the 12th Session of the IALA e-NAV Committee

GENERAL

The 12th meeting of the e-Navigation Committee was held from 24 – 28 September, 2012 at IALA, with Bill Cairns as Chairman and Nick Ward as Vice-Chairman. The Secretary for the meeting was Mike Hadley.

Apologies were received from:

Name Organisation Country

Jorge Arroyo USCG USA

Peter Blackhurst INMARSAT

David Blevins Sperry-Marine USA

Michael Bergman Jeppesen Norway

Steve Guest Kongsberg Norcontrol IT Norway

Jarle Hauge NCA Norway

Bill Kautz USCG USA

Paul Kirchner IMPA

Albrecht Kramer IMPA

James Langley ICS

Pierre-Yves Martin CETMEF France

Andy Norris NI

Christian Rissone ITU

Brian Tretrault US Army Corps of Engineers USA

Robert Ward IHO

Opening

Bill Cairns welcomed both newcomers and those returning to IALA. He then remarked that the Secretary-General was absent on duty but expected to be able to join the Committee by 28

7

Page 8: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

September. Noting the extensive list of apologies, he noted that several other international meetings were also happening during the week.

The Secretary then provided a Safety and Administrative brief and drew attention to some Late and Very Late papers, which had been posted to the ftp server and Committee website.

1 AGENDA

The draft agenda (e-NAV12/1 rev8) was adopted.

2 REVIEW OF ACTION ITEMS FROM e-NAV11

Paper e-NAV12/2 refers. It was noted that the action items from e-NAV11, for the IALA Secretariat, were complete, although output papers 5, 6 and 12 had been returned by the Council, due to an overall need for more information about the resource implications of participating in and implementing S-100.

For members’ actions, the following comments were made:

Action 39 – Complete. A paper has been provided (e-NAV12/65).

Action 40 – Complete. A workshop on data exchange is being planned to be held in Norway and there were presentations made at VTS2012.

Action 41 – Complete. See INF paper e-NAV12/58.

Action 42 – On-going.

Action 43 – On-going

Action 44 – Complete. The Harmonisation Group on Data Modelling was established at MSC90.

Action 46 – Complete. A website is being set up to host examples, of which there are already 18.

Action 47 – Complete. See paper e-NAV12/68.

3 REVIEW OF INPUT PAPERS & INTER-SESSIONAL WORKING GROUP REPORTS

Papers e-NAV12/3 rev10 and e-NAV12/4 refer.

The Chairman asked the Chairs of Working Groups (WG) to report the activities of their groups, including inter-sessional meetings during the proceedings of their working groups. Agreement was reached on which WGs papers would be sent to and which WG would take the lead, where a response was required. WG Chairmen also outlined their expectations for the meeting.

4 REPORTS FROM OTHER BODIES

4.1 IALA Council 53rd session

The report (e-NAV12/49) was noted, in particular, the:

statements that e-Navigation and VTS are key elements for the IALA work and that participation in IHO S-100 Registry is a key link to e-Navigation but that the type and amount of work is still unclear, as well as the resources needed;

Committees should prepare separate input papers to Council when changes are requested in a Committee’s Work Programme;

8

Page 9: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

comments in section 9.2 (e-Navigation);

approval to revise the Annual Questionnaire;

approval of the draft Guideline on the sharing of maritime data (IALA Guideline No. 1086);

approval of the draft Guideline on standard format for electronic exchange of AtoN information (IALA Guideline No. 1085);

comment that the ANM Committee may take over operational aspects of e-Navigation.

9

Page 10: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

4.2 Report of PAP23

The Committee noted the report (e-NAV11/4/2). Specifically:

the potential changes to the structure of the e-NAV Committee;

the increasing evidence of cross-Committee collaboration / co-operation;

preparing for the 2014 – 2018 Work Programme;

concerns about technical competence within Committees with regard to the IHO registry;

the wish, on the part of ANM, for close co-operation with the e-NAV Committee.

4.3 Report of MSC90

Paper e-NAV12/94 refers. The Committee noted:

the remarks about LRIT;

the new agenda item for NAV regarding the performance standards for multi-system shipborne navigation receivers;

the approval for:

- the formation of the Harmonisation Group on Data Modelling;

- current overarching e-navigation architecture;

- proposed way forward for developing a Common Maritime Data Structure (CMDS);

- use of the IHO's S-100 standard as the baseline for creating a framework for data access and services under the scope of SOLAS; and

- proposed joint plan of work on e-navigation for the COMSAR, NAV and STW Sub-Committees for the period 2012-2014.

the comments concerning the Marine Electronic Highway (MEH), leading to comments that:

- the S-100 standard could be extended and further developed to meet the emerging requirements of e-navigation;

- the MEH project was an excellent example of close regional cooperation to improve maritime safety and environmental protection; and

- the development of MEH should draw from aspects of e-navigation and vice versa, e.g. systems, architecture and the S-100 standard, to generate maximum synergies.

The Norwegian plan to hold a test in Polar regions;

The recommendations for the e-NAV Committee.

4.4 Report of NAV58

Paper e-NAV12/61 refers. The Committee noted:

10

Page 11: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

the comments concerning the development of e-Navigation and the report of the IMO Correspondence group on e-Navigation;

the agreement that the e-Navigation solutions should be goal based and their descriptions should be kept generic;

the agreement with the further developments of Maritime Service Portfolios, of guidelines for usability evaluation of navigational equipment, and of guidelines for the harmonization of test beds;

the comments concerning the development of policy and new symbols for AIS AtoN

the comments regarding ITU and AIS matters.

The Chairman concluded discussion on the IMO reports by thanking Jean-Charles Leclair for producing such comprehensive reports.

4.5 Report from VTS35

The 35th session of the Committee was held from 3-7 September 2012 in Istanbul/Turkey. The meeting was preceding IALAs 12th International VTS Symposium 2012, one week later also held in Istanbul. This report was prepared by Pieter Paap.

70 members from 22 countries participated, 48 input papers were considered, 11 output papers produced;

It was the last meeting for the Chairman of WG1 Barry Goldman participated - Bill Burns (USA) takes over as chair of WG1.

4.5.1 Operational

There was an assessment of two tasks

- Review of IMO Resolution A.857(20) Guidelines on VTS

- Review of IMO Resolution A.918(22) on SMCP (Standard Marine Communication Phrases)leading to the work on these issues being suspended due to 1) related developments in time -A.857(20)- and 2) rejection by IMO of an input document on A.918(22); guidance was sought from the Council about the further process for reviewing IMO documents.

A new World VTS Guide website was planned to be launched during the 12 th VTS Symposium 2012.

IALA Council approved to organize the workshop on VTS Portrayal; the workshop will be held, after final considerations, from 6-10 May 2013 at the Jacobs University in Bremen/Germany;

As requested by Council53 a special drafting group (Chair/Vice Chair and Secretary of the Committee and two members) drafted an outline for a Strategy Paper on the future delivery of VTS in a rapidly changing maritime world; this outline was sent as an output paper to Council and its Strategy Group in order to support structuring the future work on this item (the development of a vision and Strategy on VTS beyond 2020); it may be expected that the VTS Committee will be further involved in developing IALAs vision and Strategy;

11

Page 12: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

The following tasks of the VTS Committee were already completed and approved by Council at its 53rd or earlier sessions:

- Review Recommendation V-125 Use and presentation of symbology;

- Recommendation V-127 VTS Operating Procedures;

- Recommendation on Standard nomenclature (i.e. identifications) for use when referring to a VTS Centre.

The Committee completed

- the work on the Guideline provision of VTS Types of Services and the results were sent to Council for approval;

- a review of IALA Guideline 1018 Risk Management (the review was requested by the ANM Committee) and the result were sent by Liaison Note to the ANM Committee;

- a review of the VTS part in the IALAs Annual Questionnaire; results will be sent to the ANM Committee.

The Committee started

- the review on VTS Recommendation V-120 VTS on Inland Waters; it can be expected that this task will be completed during VTS36 (March 2013);

- the development of a new Guideline VTS support and interaction with allied services in emergency situations, SAR, disaster management, law enforcement and regulatory compliance; a complete restructure of the document has been made; the work will continue at VTS36;

- the development of a new Guideline on The use of decision support tools in VTS; this work will continue in the next sessions.

Good progress was made on the development of a Guideline on Assessing and Auditing the overall performance of VTS Centres with respect to their effectiveness in mitigating risk and as described in Chapter 18 in the VTS Manual concerning Quality Management.

4.5.2 Technical

Significant progress was made in revising the IALA Recommendation V-128 Operational and Technical Performance Requirements for VTS equipment; an extra inter-sessional meeting will be organized for the final editorial work on the General Chapters; at VTS 36 this task is scheduled to be finalized; on the Annexes 1, 2, 6 11 and 13 still some issues have to be addressed; the Annexes 5, 8, 9, 10, and 11 are nearly completed (some minor aspects to be incorporated or checked); the Annexes 3, 4, 7 and 12 are completed;

Recommendation on Harmonized VTS and vessel traffic management requirements for networking and information exchange was already completed. Within the scope of this task the Recommendation V-145 on the Inter VTS Exchange Format Service (IVEF) was approved by Council; it was decided that the revised Recommendation V-128 will contain an Annex, specially addressing data exchange, since this annex addresses precisely the harmonized functional requirements. Furthermore it was decided that Recommendation V-145 needs an update on the definition of polygons and its

12

Page 13: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

clarification, the identification of meta data and object data definitions, as well as to correct multiplicity.

A liaison note to the e-NAV Committee was prepared concerning AtoN Information - draft Product Specification. It was considered that the draft Product Specification served its intended purpose;

A response with a small number of comments was prepared to the Liaison Note to PAP & Committees Plan for AIS and VHF Data Exchange 2.

4.5.3 Personnel and Training

The Committee started with the development of a Guideline on Refresher Training and Revalidation; during the discussion it was proposed that a Model Course could be instead;

A proposal was endorsed for a VTS Simulation Training Seminar submitted from MARIN (Wageningen / the Netherlands) to host the Seminar (from 9-13 September 2013) in conjunction with the Port of Rotterdam Authority; this proposal is forwarded to Council for approval.

4.5.4 Rapporteur between VTS and e-NAV Committees

In view of the speed with which VTS and e-Navigation are proceeding it was felt essential that the reporting between the two Committees was resumed. Pieter Paap (Netherlands) was prepared to assume the role of rapporteur for the remainder of the current Working Programme.

The Chairman thanked Pieter Paap for his comprehensive report.

5 PRESENTATIONS

Nine presentations were made during the meeting, all during the opening plenary session. The presentations form part of the output from the meeting.

5.1 ACCSEAS

The presentation was made by Nick Ward, GLA R&RNAV.

The presentation began with an indication of the challenges facing shipping in the North Sea, which led to the establishing of the ACCSEAS project, which builds on work undertaken in the EFFICIENSEA project. The project’s aims and objectives were reviewed, before an overview of the project and its structure were shown. It was stated the project will be taking a systems engineering approach and will provide a testbed for resilient PNT (Position Navigation & Timing) and e-Navigation Services. The expected project outcomes were indicated as:

Geographic Information System (GIS):

- traffic patterns, priority locations, restricted areas, route topology models, route optimisation in open seas, infrastructure, resilient PNT coverage, service coverage areas.

Ship equipment and shore infrastructure prototypes;

Evaluation of the technology and training on the human factor;

Training Needs Analysis and training packages;

13

Page 14: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Annual ACCSEAS conference:

- the 2013 conference will be at Flensburg, Germany, 5-7 March.

Legacy for future coordination of North Sea e-Navigation services;

Develops e-Navigation sustainability plan (2015 to 2020).

The need for ‘outreach’ to the North Sea Region stakeholder was stressed. The presentation ended with the following conclusions:

• Potential for making a real positive impact on maritime accessibility and safety in the North Sea Region and potentially, worldwide

• Many questions remain to be answered

• Need for buy-in from ports, service providers, ship-owners and international e-Navigation community

• Good progress so far, with a lot more to come!

In response to questions, Nick Ward said that he is involved in the PNT work package of the project, that users and service providers are being consulted and their feedback used and that there may be an input to review current IALA guidance, particularly on position accuracy. With regard to the use of inertial technologies, Nick Ward said that they have proved too expensive in the past but consideration is being given to their being included in the mix of technologies for resilient PNT.

14

Page 15: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

5.2 Portrayal of AtoN information on ENCs

The presentation was made by David Lewald, USCG

Dave Lewald posed the question “As e-NAV continues to develop, what should be the appropriate amount of control that an e-NAV contributor such as a Lighthouse Authority has regarding the display of their data on an ENC?"

In late 2010, the USCG discovered that there were database errors regarding the positions of many of the nearly 1500 range structures nationwide. This discovery was made through observations of ENCs aboard ship where-in errant range lines were displayed.  Curiously not all ranges displayed wayward range lines and the USCG was surprised to learn that the hydrographic office often applied ‘cartographers license’ to show the range line as they thought the USCG had intended the line to be displayed. Subsequently, the USCG embarked on a nationwide survey project to regain the precise position of the range structures and has been providing hydrographic office with corrected data.

As the range survey project progresses a new dilemma has arisen.  Most of the affected 1500 AtoN are of an age that they predate the original digitization of the paper chart (mid 1990s) and as such their encoding was simplistic. Moving forward to 2012, the modern ENC cartographer armed with an abundant portrayal catalogue is now capable of encoding these ranges in greater detail, which may produce a complex or cluttered portrayal. Dave Lewald included several slides exampling this dilemma and concluded with the comment “more is not always better and the e-Navigation contributor such as a Lighthouse Authority needs to be conscious regarding the display of e-Navigation information and data.”

5.3 Canadian implementation of e-Navigation

The presentation was made by Natacha Riendeau, CCG, drawing on information previously provided to the IALA Council.

Having introduced herself, Natacha Riendeau, indicated that her presentation would cover:

Overall principles for the definition and implementation of e-Navigation in Canada;

Key accomplishments;

Concept of Operations;

Proposed roles for IALA.

The Canadian approach is for e-Navigation to take into account safety of life, property, and the protection of the marine environment, be applicable to all categories of mariners, co-operate with the international community, contribute to marine transportation efficiency. Considerable emphasis is placed on regular user consultation and ensuring inter-departmental co-operation.

With regard to potential roles for IALA within e-Navigation, it was suggested that process and involvement could be simplified, that IALA should concentrate its efforts on the shore side aspects of e-Navigation and that guidance on standardization of data sources and services and a Recommendation on data and services to be made available for e-Navigation would be helpful. It was also stated that the Canadian Coast Guard needs IALA to accelerate the work of IMO/IHO Harmonization Group on Data Modelling (HGDM)

15

Page 16: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

This latter point was a source of some discussion as there were Committee members that were in total agreement and others that wanted to let current work mature before formally approaching the HGDM.

In response to a question about funding, it was said that no additional charges are currently being considered. Full use of the present infrastructure, including the use of AIS, will be made, coupled with working ‘smarter’.

It was commented that Norway is proceeding in the same direction as Canada.

16

Page 17: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

5.4 The e-Navigation Suite

The presentation was preceded by a video on Maritime Service Portfolios in conjunction with the Single Window concept, provided by the Norwegian Coastal Administration, which can be accessed via www.kystverket.no, YouTube, Single Window Ship Reporting.

After that David Patraiko, Nautical Institute, and Jan-Hendrik Oltmann, German Federal Waterways & Shipping Administration, introduced the paper e-NAV12/84, which had been produced jointly by them.

The paper was then discussed and taking note of the comments, it was agreed that the matter would be reviewed further by both the Working Groups 1 (OPS/Strategy) and Working Group 5 (Architecture) in a joint breakout session (refer to Section 11 for results of this discussion).

At this point the IMO representative, Captain Gurpeet Singhota, asked that the following statement be ‘read into’ the minutes of the meeting.

With respect to document e-NAV12/84, proposing the development of an ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite’ to more clearly define the scope of e-Navigation and allow practical solutions to be investigated, the IMO representative once again underlined the pressing need to focus on the main tasks, as outlined in the co-ordinated approach to the implementation of IMO’s e-Navigation strategy overall planning (2012 – 2014), to avoid undue delays. There is a clear need for the IMO Correspondence Group on e-Navigation to strictly adhere to its approved terms of reference and not undertake any additional tasks without the express approval of the IMO Maritime Safety Committee.

5.5 The Structure of Maritime Service Portfolios (MSPs).

The presentation was made by Jan-Hendrik Oltmann, German Federal Waterways & Shipping Administration and drew on a presentation made at VTS2012.

The purpose of the presentation was to introduce the input document e-NAV12/90. Jan-Hendrik Oltmann first referred to the presentation given by him and Mr. Jarle Hauge at the IALA VTS Symposium (in particular to the slides #1 (Title), #2 (“MSP and the overarching architecture”), and #15 (“MSPs and the Common Maritime Data Structure”)). He re-iterated the point that the concept of the MSPs should be considered as “a strategic key for international/global harmonization of shore-based services offered to shipping”, as the consciously chosen title of the VTS Symposium presentation implies. He also stated that the concept of the MSPs transcends the scope of e-Navigation, as e-Navigation is by definition limited to services provided “by electronic means”; MSPs on the other hand comprise also all those services provided by human-human-interaction and/or by machines other than electronic devices (e.g. traditional Aids-to-Navigation). Jan-Hendrik Oltmann illustrated this point by a graphical, architectural representation of that concept (refer to part 2 of the presentation). He went on to report the recognition that there is a structure inherent to the MSPs that would provide a means to arrive at a seamlessly integrated view of all services provided to shipping, and that this structure needs to be further investigated and developed in general or architectural terms. Jan-Hendrik Oltmann concluded his presentation by a walk through the topics relevant for the structure of MSPs, as addressed in the strawman draft on a future document tentatively entitled “The Structure of Maritime Service Portfolios” (e-NAV12/90).

In subsequent discussion it was remarked that IMO, Canada and Norway are already developing MSPs and that IALA would need to take account of what is going on in the ‘real world’. To which the response was that e-Navigation would have failed if it does not harmonise existing initiatives.

17

Page 18: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

It was then noted that the deadline for input to the IMO Correspondence group, concerning MSP, is 4 October 2012.

There was also some concern that paper e-NAV12/90 had been presented as a Late Paper and, as such, there had been insufficient time for it to be studied and then adequately commented on. It was proposed (and accepted) that the paper be resubmitted to e-NAV13.

Note: The Architecture Working Group (WG5) has reviewed the input document during a break-out session (see section 11 below) and amended it to be brought forward to the forthcoming e-NAV13 Committee meeting.

5.6 ISIS – A system for Standardised Data Exchange.

The presentation was made by René Hogendoorn, HITT Traffic and drew on the presentation made to VTS2012.

It was stated that the VTS centre is a focal point for the flow of information related to vessel traffic – information collected to execute the primary task of a VTS. The amount of data is growing to a point when the VTS Operator could ‘drown’ under the weight of all the information. With this in mind the speaker highlighted the need to ensure standardised data exchange and the development of a response to this through the system termed ISIS

The need for data sharing has been highlighted by previous speakers and is related to ensuring information is available when needed, where needed and without ambiguity.

It was highlighted that there are many stakeholders that can also benefit from timely vessel traffic information. In some cases, stakeholders have been granted direct access to the VTS system (for instance pilots and port authorities); in other cases, these stakeholders have to collect their own information.

The presentation referenced the work that was initiated by some industrial members of IALA to develop a common framework - Inter VTS Exchange Format (IVEF) for the exchange of VTS information. This is now available as IALA Recommendation V-145

ISIS builds a traffic surveillance image in real-time, with data from various data sources. The access process enables full control over which data is delivered to what user. The system runs on standard hardware, using a web based interface and is currently in operation at the Dutch Coastguard Centre in Den Helder, The Netherlands.

5.7 How can IALA adopt S-100 for Product Specification

The presentation was made by Jae Yang Park, Korean Institute of Ocean Science.

The presentation began with a brief introduction to S-100 and then looked at the presenter’s view of IALA’s role as a domain holder. This included IALA’s needs for developing product specifications for its domain. It was said that S-100 provides a framework for the development of the product specification, which was followed by a slide indicating a product specification’s typical components. Jae Yang Park then described a product specification’s development process. The presentation concluded with a case study of work in Korea to develop an AtoN product specification, during which it was suggested that S-100 may contain some ambiguous statements, leading to a call for IALA’s product specifications to be consistent.

Further information on IHO S-100 is available on its website (http://www.iho.int/).

1 General overview: http://www.iho.int/iho_pubs/standard/S-100/S-100_Info.htm.

18

Page 19: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

2 Information Paper: http://www.iho.int/mtg_docs/com_wg/TSMAD/TSMAD_Misc/S-100InfoPaper_FinalJan2011.pdf.

3 PowerPoint Presentation [download]: http://www.iho.int/ under Standards, Download, S-100 Further Information. A copy is included in with the presentations made during the meeting.

4 S-99 Operational Procedures for Organization and Management of the S-100 Geospatial Information Registry : http://www.iho.int/iho_pubs/standard/S-99-Operational%20Procedures_E1_0_0.pdf

5.8 IALA World-Wide Academy (WWA) update

The presentation was made by Stephen Bennett, WWA Programme Manager.

Stephen Bennett updated the Committee about the activities of the WWA, including the development of a close relationship with IMO through activities involving capacity building, and the imminent placing of a website contract for the WWA, which will be the pilot for a revised IALA website. The WWA website is expected to be operational during December 2012 and the revised IALA website during January 2013. The accreditation process was then outlined, together with the provision of information about a register of experts. The presentation concluded with a look to the future, including the intention to hold a one-month AtoN management level 1 training course, at IALA, in January 2014.

5.9 Testbed Portal

The short presentation was made by Thomas Porathe, Chalmers University, who showed how the growing testbed portal can be accessed via www.e-navigation.net. He indicated that there are already 18 examples posted and requested that he be advised of any further testbeds. Information is shown at three levels, with the two highest levels being edited by the Danish Maritime Authority / Chalmers University and the most detailed level being produced by the provider of the information, after being given the appropriate access.

5.10 Statement by IMO

During the presentations the representative of the IMO, Captain Gurpreet Singhota, asked that the following text be ‘read in to’ the minutes of the meeting.

With respect to the need for amending the IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases (SMCP), the Committee’s attention is drawn to Annex 2 of IMO Resolution A.918(20), concerning Procedure for amending IMO SMCP. It was stressed that due care and diligence is needed as amendment proposals would be examined collectively, rather than individually, when, in the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee’s judgement they are of sufficient or of such importance as to warrant examination. Another important fact to keep in mind is that amendments to the IMO SMCP should normally come into force at intervals of approximately five years; however, when amendments are of a very important nature and for required urgent actions, the period might be shortened to three years.

It was noted that these remarks applied to the VTS Committee and the Secretary was asked to forward the remarks accordingly.

Action item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the IMO comments on the amendment of SMCP to the VTS Committee.

19

Page 20: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

5.10.1 Workshop notification

At the end of the presentations Mahesh Alimchandani announced that at IMO NAV 58 (2-6 July 2012, London), it had been decided that Australia would host a workshop on 5-6 March 2013, on usability, software quality assurance and human factors associated with usability of navigational equipment.

The associated brochure has been included in the presentations output from the meeting.

The Chairman closed this agenda item by thanking all the presenters for their presentations.

20

Page 21: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

6 ESTABLISH WORKING GROUPS

Six working groups and one drafting group were established, as outlined below:

Working Group Working Group Chair Working Group Vice Chair

WG 1 Operations and Strategy David Patraiko Mahesh Alimchandani

Portrayal Drafting group Lee Alexander Seo Jeong Lee

WG 2 PNT / Sensors Alan Grant Colin Day

WG 3 &4 AIS & Communications Rolf Zetterberg (Bill Kautz)

WG 5 Technical Architecture Jan-Hendrik Oltmann Paul Mueller

WG6 Data Modelling Peter Hooijmans (Jarle Hauge)

It was agreed that when the Committee was not in plenary session the Working Groups would meet separately, throughout the week, with Working Groups 3 and 4 now being effectively combined.

It was accepted that there would, inevitably, be some cross-over in personnel between the groups.

7 WORKING GROUP 1 – OPERATIONS

7.1 Monitor and co-ordinate input on Strategy & Operations to the IMO process (Task1*)

7.1.1 Report of the IMO Correspondence Group on e-Navigation

The Committee reviewed the recent report of the IMO Correspondence Group (CG) on e-Navigation (e-NAV12/81 refers). It contained the “post IMO NAV 58” updated tables on Risk Control Options, potential solutions, and examples of Maritime Service Portfolios.

The Committee made a number of editorial changes and comments; these are contained (in track changes) in document e-NAV12/output/5. The majority of editorial changes and comments suggested are in Annex 2 ‘Preliminary List of Potential e-Navigation Solutions’, as it is recognised that these proposed solutions are soon to be the subject of risk and cost benefit analyses.

The Committee also provided information on the resilience of PNT to aid the identification of risks and cost-benefits of proposed solutions (as required by the IMO strategy development plan). This is contained in Annex A to e-NAV12/output/4.

Action Item

The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note (e-NAV12/output/4) to the IMO CG on e-Navigation to the Co-ordinator of the IMO CG on e-Navigation by Monday, 1 October 2012.

The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the comments on the draft report of the IMO CG on e-navigation (e-NAV12/output/5) to the Co-ordinator of the IMO CG on e-Navigation by Monday, 1 October 2012.

7.2 Review and update IALA Strategy for e-Navigation (Task 2*)

21

Page 22: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Working Groups 1 and 5 met to discuss the proposed e-Navigation Platform Suite (e-NAV12/84 refers). A report on the outcome of the discussion is provided in section 11.3. It was agreed that further development will be carried out by inter-sessional correspondence.

The ‘road map’ for e-Navigation developed at e-NAV10 was reviewed. It was noted that the road map will remain within IALA and be further developed by the Committee.

Action Item

The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the road map for e-Navigation (e-NAV12/C&VC/WP1) to e-NAV13.

7.3 Maintain and update user requirements (in co-ordination with the VTS Committee) (Task 3*)

This task was not addressed at e-NAV12.

7.4 Monitor developments in navigation for the polar regions (Task 4*)

This task was not addressed at e-NAV12.

7.5 Update Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

The FAQs (version 1.6 of September 2011) were reviewed. The committee made minor changes, updates and additions to the FAQs. Output document e-NAV12/output/27 refers.

Action Item

The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the revised FAQs on e-Navigation (e-NAV12/output/27) to the IALA Council for approval.

If approved, the IALA Secretariat is requested to post the e-Navigation FAQs (e-NAV12/output/27) on the IALA website.

7.6 Update the IALA NAVGUIDE

The Committee reviewed the relevant content of the current (2010 edition) of the IALA Aids to Navigation Manual (NAVGUIDE). It noted that:

Most of the content was of an introductory nature;

The work of the IMO Correspondence Group on e-navigation was in progress; and

The deadline for completing this task is March 2013 (i.e. e-NAV 13).

Therefore, the Committee agreed to progress this task at its next session (e-NAV13).

Action Item

The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the working paper on the IALA NAVGUIDE (e-NAV12/WG1/WP1) to the next session to e-NAV13.

7.7 Liaison note to the EEP Committee

22

Page 23: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

The e-NAV Committee had been requested to respond to a liaison note from the EEP Committee (EEP18/output/2 refers).

By way of background, EEP’s liaison note was, in turn, a reply to a request from the e-NAV Committee (e-NAV9/output/20), seeking possible contribution to the development of e-Navigation.

The Committee drafted a reply to the EEP Committee (e-NAV12/output/7 refers).

Action Item

The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on e-Navigation (e-NAV12/output/7) to EEP19.

23

Page 24: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

7.8 Liaison note to the ANM Committee

The IALA Aids to Navigation Management (ANM) Committee had requested the e-Navigation Committee to review IALA Guideline No. 1018 (on risk management).

In conducting the review, the ANM Committee aims to include editorial changes and the impact of advances of e-Navigation on risk control measures. It is to be noted that the guideline is focused on risk management from a waterways management perspective.

The committee made editorial changes and provided comment in track changes. The liaison note e-NAV12/output/8 and output document e-NAV12/output/9 refer.

Action Item

The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on IALA Guideline 1018 (e-NAV12/output/8) to ANM19.

The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the marked up version of IALA Guideline No.1018 (e-NAV12/output/9) to ANM19.

7.9 Discussion on the use of AIS as an aid to navigation

The committee reviewed:

e-NAV12/69 (e-Navigation portrayal, user needs and AIS aids to navigation)

e-NAV12/75 (Report of NAV 58 on AIS AtoN) and

e-NAV12/76 (NAV 58 WP.7 – Development of policy and symbology on AIS AtoN)

It was noted that the IMO policy on AIS AtoN is expected to be finalised in 2014. It was further noted that there were benefits and risks from this emerging technology and that IALA will need to keep appraised of the IMO work and experience from its membership, to maintain its guidance on the issue.

7.10 Prepare recommendations and guidelines on Maritime Information Systems (in co-ordination with the VTS Committee) (Task 25*)

This task was completed at e-NAV9.

Given the additional work that is now envisaged and the proposed change to the Task’s title (Prepare recommendations and guidelines on Maritime Information Systems in the context of MSPs (in co-ordination with the VTS Committee)) it was noted that any further work would need to be covered by an application for a further work item.

7.11 Prepare recommendations and guidelines on the portrayal of information (Task 26*)

The Committee completed the draft Guideline on Harmonized Portrayal of e-Navigation-related Information. The guidance addresses the presentation and display of e-Navigation related information and provides advice on the harmonization of both ship-borne and shore-based systems / services. Since e-Navigation is an evolutionary process, this Guideline is intended to be descriptive – not prescriptive. Until more practical experience is gained, it is premature to prescribe specific means to present / display e-Navigation related information.

24

Page 25: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

The draft Guideline includes an Annex that provides examples of new applications or systems that may be e-Navigation-related. The compilation is a collection of single-page summaries that include extracts and a small thumbnail picture. More detail on each summary as well as a higher resolution image (i.e. portrayal example) can be found on the companion web site at: http://www.e-navigation.net.

The collection of e-Navigation related portrayal examples will continue on the companion web site, thus making the Annex and web site a living document. In the near term, the web site will be maintained by the Danish Maritime Authority (DMA). Interested parties are encouraged to submit portrayal examples though an interface on the web site.

Following review, it was agreed that the document should be sent to PAP and the other Committees for their comment (e-NAV12/output/31). A liaison note (e-NAV12/output/32) was also drafted.

Action items

The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on the draft Guideline on Harmonised Portrayal of e-Navigation Information (e-NAV12/output/32) to PAP24, VTS36, EEP19 & ANM19.

The Secretariat is requested to forward the draft Guideline on Harmonised Portrayal of e-Navigation Information (e-NAV12/output/31) to PAP24, VTS36, EEP19 & ANM19.

7.12 Monitor developments in ECDIS, INS, and ENCs (Task 27*)

This is an ongoing task for the Committee. The expectation is that those interested in these topics will continue to participate in the work of the Committee.

8 WORKING GROUP 2 – PNT (WG2)

8.1 Review and update the World Wide Radio Navigation Plan (Task 5*)

The World Wide Radio Navigation Plan has been revised. (e-NAV12/output/30).

Action Item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the revised WWRNP (e-NAV12/output/30) to the Council for approval.

8.2 Prepare Recommendations and Guidelines on PNT systems and radar AtoN (Task 6*)

A revision of Recommendation R-129 GNSS Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures has been prepared (e-NAV12/output/25).

Action Item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the revised Recommendation R-129 (e-NAV12/output/25) to the Council for approval.

A revision of the World Wide Academy level 2 course on Radionavigation has been reviewed, resulting in a liaison note to the world wide academy and the EEP committee (e-NAV12/output/29 & 29a).

Action Item25

Page 26: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note regarding the revised level 2 course structure (e-NAV12/output/29) to EEP19.

The Secretariat is requested to forward the revised level 2 course structure (e-NAV12/output/29a) to EEP19.

A plan to review and update IALA Recommendation R-121 “Performance and Monitoring of DGNSS Services in the Frequency Band 283.5 – 325 kHz” was developed, resulting in a request for an inter-sessional meeting.

The development of guidelines for GNSS augmentation systems to support port approach, port manoeuvres and automatic docking has been started. This has resulted in two working papers to be considered at the next meeting.

Action Item

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG2/WP1 (Development of guidelines on GNSS augmentation services for port and docking) to e-NAV13.

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG2/WP2 (Port and docking system guidelines mindmap) to e-NAV13.

A briefing on the further development of the modular PNT system was noted.

A briefing on the potential use of EGNOS in the maritime sector was noted.

8.3 Co-ordinate input to IMO, ITU and IEC on PNT systems (Task 7*)

An update on the September RTCM SC104 committee meeting was noted.

8.4 Prepare a Guideline on establishment and operation of navigation systems in polar regions (Task 8*)

No work was carried out on this agenda item.

8.5 Monitor developments in satellite and terrestrial EPFSs and non-radionavigation systems (Task 9*)

No work was carried out on this agenda item.

8.6 Prepare a Guideline on recommended measures for disaster recovery (Task 10*)

A working paper on disaster recovery was reviewed and amended. It has also been provided as an input to the ANM Committee, and the input for that meeting will be updated to reflect the amendments. WG2 will await feedback from the ANM Committee before considering this further.

Action Item

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG2/WP3 (Input to disaster recovery) to e-NAV13.

The Secretariat is requested to raise the question of topic responsibility for disaster recovery at PAP24.

8.7 Monitor developments in radar technology and their effect on racons (Task 11*)

26

Page 27: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

A briefing on the proposed changes to the operating frequencies for X band radar was noted.

8.8 Additional Items

The Working Group considered one of the proposed solutions to a gap identified during the IMO GAP analyses and provided a paper to WG1 to include in its liaison note;

The Working Group considered their Terms of Reference and provided feedback to the Vice Chairman;

The Working Group has developed a plan for a review and update to the NAVGUIDE and has provided feedback to the Vice Chairman;

The Working Group reviewed the PNT relevant dates within the e-Navigation road map and provided feedback to the Vice Chairman.

9 WORKING GROUPS 3/4 – AIS & COMMUNICATIONS

As decided by the Committee Chair, the working groups on AIS (WG3) and the working group on Communications (WG4) were merged to one working group, called ‘AIS and Communications WG’, effective from this meeting. The draft Terms of Reference for the group were discussed and agreed. The Chairman for the new WG is Rolf Zetterberg, SMA, and Vice Chairman is Bill Kautz, USCG.

All relevant input documents were reviewed by the group and the work was focused on finalizing some documents that have been progressed during several meetings; Draft revision of ITU-R M1371-4, IALA Recommendation A124 and the IALA Maritime Radio Communication Plan. The work on new tasks, such as ‘AIS and VDE’ was consequently given a lower priority at this meeting, although these issues are of high relevance and importance.

The AIS and Communications WG plans for an inter-sessional meeting before eNAV13. The main topics are to progress the discussion paper on AIS and VDE and further develop the inputs to ITU WP5B with the purpose to give justification for the need for allocation of additional spectrum and indicate the planned further work to test technology and applications to be used.

Action item

The Committee Chairman is requested to seek approval for an inter-sessional meeting about to progress the discussion paper on AIS and VDE and further develop the inputs to ITU WP5B from the Secretary-General.

9 AIS

9.1 Review and update documentation on AIS (M.1371; A-124, A-126) (Task 12*)

The proposed plan for finalizing the new edition of Recommendation A124, described in e-NAV12/57 was accepted. The remaining Appendices 0, 3, 9,10,11 and 12 were finalized and the Main Document updated to reflect that some Appendices will not be developed presently. Appendix 9, 10 and 11 are quite short and are kept together in one document.

Action Item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the draft revised Recommendation A-124 and its annexes (documents e-NAV12/outputs/20, 21, 22, 23 and 24) to Council for approval.

27

Page 28: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

A liaison note to the ANM Committee (e-NAV12/output/36) was developed based on e-NAV12/55 informing it about changes in ITU-R M.1371 regarding AIS Msg 21 and the codes for ‘Nature and Type of AtoN’ and asked for guidance regarding codes 3 and 31.

Action Item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on Msg 21 (e-NAV12/output/36) to ANM19.

9.2 Co-ordinate input to IMO, ITU, and IEC on AIS (Task 13*)

A final review of the draft revision of ITU-R M. 1371-4 was conducted and inputs from Japan were considered and incorporated, these included:

Clarifications for AIS SART/MOB/EPIRB devices and the use of NavStatus 15 when Under Test.

Clarifications regarding the slotted modulation mask and transmitter test sequence and modulation accuracy.

The inclusion of messages 25 and 26 for IFM 0 functionality - this change included adding two additional tables which required resequencing of all subsequent tables.

The draft revision is intended as an input for the next meeting of ITU WP5B and the deadline for submissions to that meeting is October 29, 2012.

Action Item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on the draft revision of ITU-R M. 1371-4 (e-NAV12/output/19) to the Council for approval by e-mail.

If approved, the Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on the draft revision of ITU-R M. 1371-4 (e-NAV12/output/19) to ITU WP5B by 29 October 2012.

The Secretariat is requested to forward the draft revision of ITU-R M. 1371-4 (e-NAV12/output/18) to the Council for approval by e-mail.

If approved, the Secretariat is requested to forward the draft revision of ITU-R M. 1371-4 (e-NAV12/output/18) to ITU WP5B by 29 October 2012.

9.3 Monitor and contribute to development of AIS, including the next generation of AIS (Task 14*)

The work on developments of AIS and VDE continued, particularly regarding of planning inputs to ITU but no output documents were develop.

It was recognised that the work item title needed to be change to ‘Monitor and contribute to development of AIS, including VHF data exchange’ and this is reflected in e-NAV12/output/2 (proposed changes to the Work Programme).

9.4 Monitor developments in the technical definition of AIS stations at IEC, satellite detection of AIS, and terrestrial long range AIS (Task 15*)

No work was carried out on this agenda item.

9.5 Monitor developments in GMDSS and LRIT (Task 21*)

28

Page 29: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

No work was carried out on this agenda item.

10 COMMUNICATION

10.1 Review and update IALA Maritime Radio Communications Plan (Task 17*)

Input related to the Maritime Radio Communication Plan was reviewed, including input papers e-NAV12/17, 12/56, 12/83 and Norrkoping WD4.

A detailed review of the overall document was carried out, amending it to reflect developments in radiocommunications and e-Navigation. In addition, the sections on VHF and spectrum requirements were amended to reflect the outcome of WRC 2012.

The document was reviewed and approved. An e-mail review process by the IALA Council was requested to ensure the MRCP can be provided to ITU WP5B (deadline for input to ITU WP5B 29 October 2012).

Action Item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on MRCP (e-NAV12/output/15) to Council for approval by email.

If approved, the Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on MRCP (e-NAV12/output/15) by 29 October 2012.

The Secretariat is requested to forward the revised MRCP (e-NAV12/output/16) to Council for approval by email.

If approved, the Secretariat is requested to forward the revised MRCP (e-NAV12/output/16) to ITU WP5B by 29 October 2012.

10.2 Prepare Recommendations and Guidelines on communications (Task 18*)

No work was carried out on this agenda item.

10.3 Co-ordinate input to ITU, IMO, and IEC on communications (Task 19*)

The WG reviewed input related to the ITU WRC-2015 agenda items 1.15 and 1.16, including input papers e-Nav12/28; 12/28A, 12/28B; 12/44, 12/45, 12/46, 12/47.

It was noted that agenda item 1.15 deals with onboard communications, which are out of the remit for IALA.  However, it was also noted that there is possible land use by Administrations. Members were asked to identify any land use of UHF frequencies for input to ITU in support of the initial inventory of spectrum use and sharing studies to be carried out in conjunction with this agenda item.

For agenda item 1.16, the time lines for submission of input were noted. It was also noted that ITU had encouraged Administrations to submit inputs to justify the additional channel requirements for review at the Nov 2012 meeting (deadline for input 29 October 2012). This item was viewed as being critical in the development process of the CPM text.

To ensure that input is provided in a timely and coordinated manner, it was agreed that a small correspondence group would be convened to support administrations providing input.  Noting the deadline for submissions, this group will look to provide assistance as the submissions are

29

Page 30: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

provided, noting that the technical aspects of the tests to validate use will be further discussed at an inter-sessional meeting.

Members are asked to note, with some urgency, the need to provide submissions to ITU WP5B by 29 October to justify spectrum requirements. These submissions need not contain the technical details of the testing to be carried out, but should include information suitable to justify the spectrum requirements

A liaison note was developed, e-NAV12/output/17, thanking ITU for their consideration of the input provided by IALA, including a response to WRC agenda item 1.15 and 1.16.

Action Item

Committee Members are requested to provide submissions to ITU WP5B by 29 October.

The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note to ITU on the WRC agenda (eNAV12/output/17) output to Council for approval.

If approved, the Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note to ITU on the WRC agenda (eNAV12/output/17) to ITU WP5B.

The Committee expressed strongly that IALA needs to be properly represented at meetings of ITU WP5B. It was said that considerable support had been received from Christian Rissone and the USCG but that it is necessary for IALA to be represented in its own right. The Secretary-General undertook to seek dedicated IALA participation.

Action Item

The Secretary-General is requested to seek dedicated IALA participation at meetings of ITU WP5B.

10.4 Prepare a Guideline on the establishment and operation of communications systems in polar regions (Task 20*)

The draft IALA Guideline on Communications in Polar Areas was progressed, taking the relevant inputs into consideration. The document seeks to establish guidelines for improved communication and dissemination of MSI (Maritime Safety Information) with ships operating in polar areas through enhanced communication systems. During review, it was agreed that some clarity is required about the target audience for the document and whether it ought to be a Guideline.

Action Item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the draft IALA Guideline on Communications in Polar Areas (e-NAV12/WG3&4/WP1) to e-NAV13.

10.5 Monitor developments in GMDSS and LRIT (Task 21*)

No work was carried out on this agenda item.

30

Page 31: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

11 WORKING GROUP 5 – TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE (WG5)

The Technical Architecture Working Group (WG 5) met in several break-out sessions and also had a joint break-out session with the Operations Working Group (WG1). The list of relevant input documents assigned to the Architecture Working Group is given in e-NAV12/3 rev10.

The main topics at the break-out sessions of the Technical Architecture Working Group were the structure of the Maritime Service Portfolios (MSPs) and the so-called ‘Seven Pillars of e-Navigation’ at the IALA domain ‘e-navigation.net’; the structure of the MSPs will have a strong impact on the future provision of maritime service to shipping, both ‘by electronic means’ and otherwise, by IALA membership. Also, to develop the domain ‘e-navigation.net’ to the focal point for the emerging international e-Navigation movement, even beyond 2014, will place IALA into a strategic vanguard position in that movement.

11.1 Develop and maintain shore-based e-Navigation architecture (Task 22*)

The Architecture Working Group reviewed and progressed the input document e-NAV12/90 (Outline / Draft of a future document ‘Structure of the Maritime Service Portfolios (MSPs)’). The progressed document is a working document e-NAV12/WG5/WP1. It was recognized that it would be necessary to hold an inter-sessional meeting on the structure of the MSPs, in order to finalize this work by e-NAV13 (March 2013) and as an IALA contribution to the IMO NAV Correspondence Group on e-Navigation in preparation for NAV59 (September 2013). The justification required by IALA Committee procedures for inter-sessional meetings is as follows:

- The proposed inter-sessional meeting of Architecture Working Group (WG5) of the IALA e-Navigation Committee (3 days meeting) will progress or even finalize the draft document ‘Structure of the Maritime Service Portfolios (MSPs)’ and also will further develop the proposal for an e-Navigation Platform Suite / focal point at the IALA e-Navigation domain ‘e-navigation.net’.

- The meeting is planned as a face-to-face meeting to be held at IALA Headquarters, St-Germain-en-Laye, starting at 9:30 AM on Tuesday 4 December and ending at 16:00 PM Thursday 6 December 2012. The meeting will not be in conjunction with any other IALA meeting.

- The ‘compelling need’ is to prepare IALA’s contribution to NAV59 (September 2013) via the IMO NAV Correspondence Group on e-Navigation for their preparation of the e-Navigation ‘Strategy Implementation Plan (SIP)’. Since any such contribution would require the e-NAV Committee’s review and approval, relevant materials need to be available before e-NAV13 (March 2013). Hence, inter-sessional work is required, starting in 2012. The nature of that work, i.e. the development of the proposed structure of the Maritime Service Portfolio (MSPs), of the proposed ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite / Seven Pillars of e-Navigation’ and of the corresponding layout of the IALA e-Navigation domain ‘e-navigation.net’ can only be done by ‘face-to-face’ work; inter-sessional work by correspondence may provide necessary follow-up work after the initial inter-sessional meeting proposed here.

Action Items

The Secretariat is requested to forward working document e-NAV12/WG5/WP1 to e-NAV13.

The Chair of the Committee is requested to liaise, as required by IALA Committee procedures, with the Secretary General regarding the holding of the inter-sessional meeting.

31

Page 32: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

If approved, the Chair of the Technical Architecture Working Group is requested to set up, in co-operation with IALA Secretariat, an inter-sessional meeting on the ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite / Structure of MSPs’.

Committee members are requested to prepare input regarding the structure of the MSPs for the planned inter-sessional meeting and/or e-NAV13.

Committee members are requested to prepare input regarding the ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite / Seven Pillars of e-Navigation’ and its representation in the IALA domain e-navigation.net for the planned inter-sessional meeting and/or e-NAV13.

11.2 Prepare Recommendations and Guidelines on e-Navigation architecture (Task 23*)

The Architecture Working Group reviewed input document e-NAV12/23 Information Paper on the Architecture for the Provision of e-Navigation Services as seen from Ashore. This document was finalized as an Information Paper for Council (e-NAV12/output/26).

Action Item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the Information Paper for Council on Architecture for the Provision of e-Navigation Services as seen from Ashore (e-NAV12/output/26) to Council to note.

The Secretariat is requested to seek the Council’s approval to release the Information Paper for Council on Architecture for the Provision of e-Navigation Services as seen from Ashore (e-NAV12/output26) for publication in The Bulletin, NAVGUIDE and for information of the other IALA Committees and PAP.

The Architecture Working Group also prepared a contribution to the IALA NAVGUIDE (future edition 2014) in regard to section 4.6 on the e-Navigation Architecture. This was passed to the Vice Chairman who is co-ordinating the Committee’s response to the ANM Committee.

11.3 Co-ordinate input to IMO, ISO, and IEC on e-Navigation architecture (Task 24*)

The WG held a joint break-out session with the Operations WG on the proposed ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite’ or the ‘Seven Pillars of e-Navigation’ (e-NAV12/84 and the presentation by Mr. David Patraiko and Mr. Jan-Hendrik Oltmann (see section 5.1.4) refer). The goal of that joint break-out session was to arrive at a common understanding how this proposal would be helpful for the work of the IMO NAV Correspondence Group on e-Navigation and how the Committee could progress this work until e-NAV13 (March 2013).

The representatives of the secretariat of the IMO NAV Correspondence Group on e-Navigation (Norway) made the statement that the above proposal does not contradict the studies carried out presently regarding the ‘Cost Benefit and Risk Analysis’ and that it may be helpful when preparing the ‘Strategy Implementation Plan (SIP)’ for submission to IMO in 2014. It was recognized that the above proposal in particular would be a direct contribution to the MSC stipulated chapter ‘Proposals on public relations and promotion of the e-navigation concept to key stakeholder groups’ of the SIP (MSC 86/23/4 and NAV57/6, Annex 3, refer).

It was recognized that the above proposal, once implemented, may have the potential to serve as the focal point for information and guidance for the emerging international e-Navigation movement at large and beyond the year 2014.

The joint break-out session concluded that

32

Page 33: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

- the proposal of the ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite’ / ‘Seven Pillars of e-Navigation’ should be further developed within the Committee with the goal to finalize an output document to the IMO NAV Correspondence Group on e-Navigation as a contribution;

- there should be developed, based on the input document e-NAV12/84 and the above discussion, a draft contribution to the IMO NAV Correspondence Group on e-Navigation inter-sessionally and that this draft contribution would need to be available at e-NAV13;

- it should be further investigated inter-sessionally how the web-portal would need to be structured to arrive at the desired goals and that a report/presentation should be given on the findings at e-NAV13;

- an inter-sessional meeting of the Architecture WG planned to progress the concept of the structure of the Maritime Service Portfolios (MSPs) inter-sessionally, as introduced above, could also be used to progress the proposal on the ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite’.

Action Items

The Secretariat is requested to forward input document e-NAV12/84 as an input document to e-NAV13.

The Chairman of WG1, in liaison with the Chair of WG5, is requested to prepare, inter-sessionally, an input document on the ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite’ to e-NAV13, using e-NAV12/84 as a starting point but taking into account relevant input from all interested members of the Committee.

The Chairs of WGs 1 & 5, together with interested members of the Committee, are requested to investigate, inter-sessionally, with the Danish Maritime Authority options to use the existing IALA web-page ‘e-Navigation.net’ as a focal point for the emerging e-Navigation international movement as described in e-NAV12/84 and report / present their findings at e-NAV13.

The Chair of WG5 is requested to invite members of WG1 to participate in the planned inter-sessional meeting on ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite / Structure of MSPs’.

12 WORKING GROUP 6 – DATA MODELLING AND INTERFACING (WG6)

12.1 Terms of Reference

In this first meeting of the working group the Terms of Reference where discussed, resulting in output document e-NAV12/output/11. For the action item see section 19.

12.2 Participation in the IHO GI registry

The Information Paper on IALA Participation in the IHO GI Registry was revised as requested by Council. This resulted in output document e-NAV12/output/12.

Action item

The Secretariat is requested to forward The Information Paper on IALA Participation in the IHO GI Registry (e-NAV12/output/12) to Council, requesting approval to publish it in the IALA Bulletin.

If approved for publication, the Secretariat is requested to forward The Information Paper on IALA Participation in the IHO GI Registry (e-NAV12/output/12) to the editor of The Bulletin.

12.3 Preparing an S-100 Product Specification

33

Page 34: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

During the review of document ‘Draft Guideline on Preparing an S-100 Product Specification’ it was determined that the information was sufficient as an introduction but more detailed guidance was needed. Therefore a more detailed draft Guideline on Producing an IALA S-100 Product Specification will be developed and validated at the foreseen Workshop on this subject (June 2013).

This guideline is intended to explain the process in a step-by-step manner, so that the development of product specifications for the IALA domains can be undertaken by other Committees and IALA members.

The work for the development of the guideline on “Producing an IALA S-100 product specification” will mainly be done by correspondence. However it is the opinion of Working Group that to meet the required milestones and have a mature version of the guideline before the workshop about the subject in June 2013 (see section 12.3.1) an inter-sessional meeting is needed. If approved, this meeting would be held in January 2013, preferably at IALA HQ.

Action item

The Committee Chairman is requested to seek approval for an inter-sessional meeting about producing an IALA S-100 product specification from the Secretary-General.

12.3.1 S-100 Workshop

For the development of the Guideline it is necessary to liaise directly with TSMAD and IHO on subject matters.

A workshop is proposed from 18 to 21 June 2013. The goal of this workshop is to develop an understanding of the process, workload and complexity related to product specification development and data registry management.

This 4-day workshop will include:

Introduction on the guideline;

Explanation of example in guideline;

Examples of product specifications in progress;

Working group sessions to “build your own” product specification;

Working group sessions for “expert help” with your product specification in progress.

The Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Action item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the request to hold an S-100 product Specification workshop (e-NAV12/output/10) to Council for approval.

12.4 Prepare recommendation and guidelines on data modelling

The Working Group created:

1 Draft Guideline Procedures for the Management of the IALA Domains under the IHO GI Registry, e-NAV12/output/13.

2 Draft Guideline Introduction to Preparing S-100 Product Specifications, e-NAV12/output/14.34

Page 35: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Action items

The Secretariat is requested to forward draft Guideline Procedures for the Management of the IALA Domains under the IHO GI Registry (e-NAV12/output/13) to Council for approval

The Secretariat is requested to forward draft Guideline Introduction to Preparing S-100 Product Specifications (e-NAV12/output/14) to Council for approval.

12.5 Support/advise the IALA Domain Manager in managing the IALA Domain, according to IHO standards S-100 & S-99 (TASK 32*)

This task remains pending until IALA becomes a Domain owner / manager.

12.6 Ownership and development of S-100 GI Registry Product Specifications.

Paper e-NAV12/29 refers.

In response to the query from the VTS Committee a liaison note was created.

Action item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on IVEF (e-NAV12/output/34) to VTS36.

12.7 Working Papers

Action items

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP1 to e-NAV13.

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP2 to e-NAV13.

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP3 to e-NAV13.

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP4 to e-NAV13.

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP5 to e-NAV13.

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP6 to e-NAV13.

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP7to e-NAV13.

The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP8 to e-NAV13.

13 MONITOR AND REPORT PROGRESS ON RELATED SYSTEMS (TASK 28*)

There was nothing to report.

14 LIAISE WITH OTHER IALA COMMITTEES AND OTHER BODIES (TASK 29*)

14.1 NAVGUIDE 2014

A liaison note (e-NAV12/output/28) was developed by the Vice Chairman from contributions from each of the working groups, informing the ANM Committee of progress to date, with a track changes version of the current NAVGUIDE at e-NAV12/output/28A.

Action item35

Page 36: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on the NAVGUIDE (e-NAV12/output/28) to ANM19.

The Secretariat is requested to forward the track changes version of the e-Navigation chapter of the NAVGUIDE (e-NAV12/output/28A) to ANM19.

15 PREPARE A COMBINED IALA e-NAVIGATION PLAN (ALL COMMITTEES) (TASK 30*)

This task is complete.

16 CONSIDER THE REGULATORY PROCESS FOR e-NAVIGATION AND RECOMMEND THE BEST APPROACH (Task 31*)

No work was done on this agenda item.

17 FUTURE WORK PROGRAMME (2014 – 2018)

e-NAV12/68 and e-NAV68a refer.

Work on this agenda item is on-going and Committee members were invited to contribute suggestions in time for e-NAV13.

Action item

Committee members are requested to contribute suggestions for inclusion in the 2014 – 2018 Work Programme as inputs to e-NAV13

18 REVIEW OF OUTPUT AND WORKING PAPERS

During the review it was proposed that the Committee should have a task dealing with software quality assurance. This was accepted by the Committee and members were asked to provide their thoughts during e-NAV13, when it would be decided if a change to the Work Programme or an application for a new work item would be appropriate.

Action item

Committee members are requested to provide their views on including software quality assurance in the work programme at e-NAV13.

The Secretariat is requested to include an agenda item on software quality assurance in the agenda for e-NAV13.

Output and working papers were reviewed and their disposition agreed as indicated above.

18.1 Changes to the current Work Programme

Paper e-NAV12/output/2 was reviewed and the changes found necessary to be represented to Council were agreed.

Action item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the requested changes to the current Work Programme (e-NAV12/output/2) to Council for approval.

36

Page 37: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

The Chairmen thanked the Working Groups for their productive efforts during the meeting and for their comments and suggestions in plenary. He then thanked the Secretary-General, Vice Chairman, Working Group Chairs and Vice Chairs and the Secretary.

19 ANY OTHER BUSINESS

19.1 Working Group Terms of Reference (ToR)

The WG Terms of reference will be posted to the FTP server and the Committee website but are not intended for public consumption.

Action item

The Secretariat is requested to post the ToR for WG1 (e-NAV12/output/35) to the FTP server and Committee website.

The Secretariat is requested to post the ToR for WG2 (e-NAV12/output/6) to the FTP server and Committee website.

The Secretariat is requested to post the ToR for WG3&4 (e-NAV12/output/37) to the FTP server and Committee website.

The Secretariat is requested to post the ToR for WG5 (e-NAV12/output/33) to the FTP server and Committee website.

The Secretariat is requested to post the ToR for WG6 (e-NAV12/output/11) to the FTP server and Committee website.

20 REVIEW OF SESSION REPORT

The report of the meeting (e-NAV12/output/1) was reviewed and approved by the Committee.

Action item

The Secretariat is requested to forward the report of e-NAV12 (e-NAV12/output/1) to the Council, to note.

21 DATE AND VENUE OF NEXT MEETING

e-NAV13 is expected to meet from 18 – 22 March, 2013 at IALA.

22 CLOSING OF THE MEETING

The Secretary-General remarked on the fantastic turnout and thanked the Committee for its hard work on what had been a most productive week. He said that he had just returned from a meeting in Singapore where there had been a meeting of about 200 people about the Marine Electronic Highway, where he had been asked to present his views on the future of AtoN. In his view, there is much to do in the field of safety of navigation. IMO is covering the ‘big picture’ but organisations such as IHO and IALA are making valuable contributions, not least in their inputs to the IMO Correspondence group on e-Navigation. He felt that there also much to be learned for the operations of other forms of transport.

37

Page 38: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

With the recent completion of a very successful VTS2012, where the challenges faced by VTS were all too visible in the Istanbul Strait, he foresaw a growing together of e-Navigation and VTS, which are both key areas for IALA.

The Chairman raised the issue of the ‘autumn’ meeting clashing with RTCM, which is expected to happen again in 2013. There was concern over the impact that this clash has, especially with AIS and Communications but there was no obvious alternative date for e-NAV14 and the Chairman undertook to liaise with RTCM for post 2013 RTCM meeting dates.

Action item

The Chairman is requested to liaise with RTCM about its post 2013 meeting programme.

The Chairman then added his thanks for what the Committee had achieved during the week and then wished everyone a safe journey home, saying that he hoped to see everyone again at e-NAV13. He then declared the meeting closed.

23 LIST OF ANNEXES TO THE REPORT

1 Agenda

A copy of the agenda is at Annex A.

2 Participants

A list of participants is at Annex B.

3 Working Groups – List of participants

A list of Working Group participants is at Annex C.

4 Input Papers

A list of input papers is at Annex D.

5 Output and Working Papers

A list of output and working papers is at Annex E.

6 Action Items

A list of action items is at Annex F.

38

Page 39: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

ANNEX A AGENDA

12th Meeting of the e-Navigation Committee

The 12th meeting of the e-NAV Committee will be held from 24 – 28 September, 2012 at IALA.

The opening plenary will commence at 1400 hours on Monday 24 September and the closing plenary will end at approximately 1300 on Friday 28 September.

Committee Chair, Vice-Chair and Working Group Chairs are requested to meet at 1000 hours on Monday 24 September.

Work items / Tasks being addressed during this meeting are listed in the final table of Annex G of the report of the previous meeting, which was included in the initial invitation to this meeting.

Change from e-NAV11.

AGENDA1. Approval of the agenda

2. Review of action items from last meeting

3. Review of input papers & inter-sessional Working Group reports

4. Reports from other bodies:

4.1. IALA Council – 53rd Session, June 20124.2. PAP23, May 20124.3. MSC90, May 20124.4. NAV58, July 201253.10-1.2 Report - MSC 90.doc

5. Presentations (15 minutes duration)

5.1. ACCSEAS Nick Ward5.2. Portrayal of AtoN Information on ENCs Dave Leewald5.3. Canadian implementation of e-Navigation Natacha Riendeau5.4. The e-Navigation Suite Jan-Hendrik Oltmann &

David Patraiko5.5. Maritime Service Portfolio Jan-Hendrik Oltmann5.6. ISIS - A system for Standardised Data Exchange René Hogendoorn5.7. How can IALA adopt S-100 for Product Specifications? Jae Yang Park5.8. WWA update Stephen Bennett5.9. Testbed website portal Thomas Christensen

6. Establish Working Groups

7. WG 1 – Operations & Strategy (User requirements)

7.1. Monitor and co-ordinate input on Strategy & Operations to the IMO process (Task1*)

39

Page 40: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

7.2. Review and update IALA Strategy for e-Navigation (Task 2*)7.3. Maintain and update user requirements (in co-ordination with the VTS Committee)

(Task 3*) - Complete7.4. Monitor developments in navigation for polar regions (Task 4*)7.5. Prepare Recommendations and guidelines on Maritime Information Systems (in co-

ordination with the VTS Committee) (Task 25*)7.6. Prepare Recommendations and guidelines on the portrayal of information (Task

26*) – Portrayal drafting group.7.7. Monitor developments in ECDIS, INS, and ENCs (Task 27*)

8. WG 2 – PNT / Sensors

8.1. Review and update the World Wide Radio Navigation Plan (Task 5*)8.2. Prepare Recommendations and Guidelines on PNT systems and radar AtoN (Task

6*)8.3. Co-ordinate input to IMO, ITU, and IEC on PNT systems (Task 7*)8.4. Prepare a Guideline on establishment and operation of navigation systems in polar

regions (Task 8*)8.5. Monitor developments in satellite and terrestrial EPFSs and non-radionavigation

systems (Task 9*)8.6. Prepare a Guideline on recommended measures for disaster recovery (Task 10*)8.7. Monitor developments in radar technology and their effect on racons (Task 11*)

9. WG 3 – AIS

9.1. Review and update documentation on AIS (M.1371; A-124, A-126) (Task 12*)9.2. Co-ordinate input to IMO, ITU, and IEC on AIS (Task 13*)9.3. Monitor and contribute to the efficient utilization of AIS, development of future VHF

Data Exchange (VDE) and technical standards (with WG4). (Task 14*)9.4. Monitor developments in the technical definition of AIS stations at IEC, satellite

detection of AIS, and terrestrial long range AIS (Task 15*)9.5. Monitor developments in the use of AIS in polar regions (e.g. AIS AtoNs) (Task 16*)

10. WG 4 – Communications

10.1. Review and update IALA Maritime Radio Communications Plan (Task 17*)10.2. Prepare Recommendations and Guidelines on communications (Task 18*)10.3. Co-ordinate input to ITU, IMO, and IEC on communications (Task 19*)10.4. Prepare a Guideline on the establishment and operation of communications systems

in polar regions (Task 20*)10.5. Monitor developments in GMDSS and LRIT (Task 21*)

11. WG 5 – Technical Architecture

11.1. Develop and maintain shore-based e-Navigation architecture (Task 22*)11.2. Prepare Recommendations and Guidelines on e-Navigation architecture (Task 23*)11.3. Co-ordinate input to IMO, IHO, ISO, IEC and CIRM on e-Navigation architecture

(Task 24*)

12. WG 6 – Data Modelling

40

Page 41: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

12.1. Prepare Recommendations and Guidelines on data modelling

12.2. Support/advise the IALA Domains Manager in managing the IALA domain, according to IHO standards S-100 & S-99 (Task 32*)

13. Monitor and report progress on related systems (Task 28*)

14. Liaise with other IALA Committees and other bodies (Task 29*)

14.1. NAVGUIDE14.2. IALA Dictionary

15. Prepare a combined IALA e-Navigation Plan (all Committees) (Task 30*)

16. Consider the regulatory process for e-Navigation and recommend the best approach (Task 31*)

17. Future Work Programme (2014 – 2018)

18. Review of output and working papers

19. Any Other Business

19.1. Working Group Terms of Reference (ToR)

20. Date and venue of next meeting

21. Review of session report

41

Page 42: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

ANNEX B LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Argentina Servicio de Hidrografia Naval

Capitan Armando ZORZONI

Av Montes de Oca 2124

1270 Ciudad de Buenos Aires

Argentina

Phone +54 11 43012249

Fax +54 11 43012249

Mobile phone: +54 911 59710413

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Australia Australian Maritime Safety Authority

Mr Mahesh ALIMCHANDANI

GPO Box 2181

Canberra ACT 2601

Australia

Phone +61 2 6279 5927

Fax +61 2 6279 5966

Mobile phone: +61 419 668 264

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Australian Maritime Safety Authority

Ms. Jillian CARSON-JACKSON

82 Northbourne Ave.

Braddon ACT 2612

GPO Box 2181, Canberra ACT 2601

Australia

Phone +61 2 6279 5092

42

Page 43: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Fax +61 2 6279 5966

Mobile phone: +61 448 468 867

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Bulgaria Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company

Mr Kiril IVANOV

69 Schipchenski

Prohod Sofia

Bulgaria

Phone +359 52 687 970

Fax +359 52 632 832

Mobile phone: +359 888 90 13 65

e-mail [email protected]

43

Page 44: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Canada Canadian Coast Guard

Dr. Lee ALEXANDER

University of New Hampshire

CCOM-JHC, Chase Ocean engineering Lab., 24 Colovos Road

Durham NH 03824

USA

Phone +1 603 862 1745

Fax +1 603 862 0839

Mobile phone: +1 603 866 2822

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Canadian Coast Guard

Mr Jean-François COUTU

101 Champlain #165

Québec, QC

G1K 7Y7

Canada

Phone +1 418 649 6689

e-mail [email protected]

Canadian Coast Guard

Ms Natacha RIENDEAU

200 Kent Street

Ottawa ON K1A 0E6

Canada

Phone +1 613 998 1405

Fax +1 613 991 4982

e-mail [email protected]

ExactEarth

44

Page 45: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Mrs Peggy BROWNING

398 Snapdragon Loop

Bradenton, FL 34212

USA

Phone +1 941 405 9797

e-mail [email protected]

China Dalian Maritime University

Prof Qing HU

No. 1 Linghai Road

Dalian, Liaoning

China

Phone +86 411 84723118 803

Mobile phone: +86 13387889389

e-mail [email protected]

45

Page 46: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Guangzhou AtoN Dept., Guang Dong Maritime Administration of PRC

Mr. Siming LUO

No. 438, HuanCun Dong Road, Luntou, Haizhu District

Guangzhou

Guang Dong

China

Phone + 86 20 34084186

Fax + 86 20 34084186

Mobile phone: +86 139 227 35152

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Maritime Safety Administration of P.R. of China

Mr. Jianbo BAO

150# DongTang Road

Shanghai 200086

China

Mobile phone: +86 139 166 752 56

e-mail [email protected]

CIRM CIRM - Comité International Radio Maritime

Mr Michael RAMBAUT

Southbank House

Black Prince Road

London SE1 7S3

UK

Phone +44 207 587 1245

Fax +44 207 587 1436

Mobile phone: +44 7798 850 626

e-mail [email protected]

46

Page 47: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Denmark Danish Maritime Authority

Mr Ole BORUP

Overgaden oven Vandet 62B

1023 Copenhagen K

Denmark

Mobile phone: +45 40 72 61 08

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Danish Maritime Authority

Mr. Ivan CARLSSON

P.O. Box 1919

Overgaden Oven Vandet 62B

DK-1023 Copenhagen K

Denmark

Phone +45 32 68 96 68

Fax +45 32 57 22 42

Mobile phone: +45 24 28 82 98

e-mail [email protected]

47

Page 48: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Danish Maritime Authority

Mr Thomas CHRISTENSEN

Overgaden oven Vandet 62B

Postboks 1919

DK-1023 Copenhagen K

Denmark

Phone +45 3268 9741

Fax +45 3257 4341

Mobile phone: +45 2511 1854

e-mail [email protected]

Danish Maritime Authority

Dr Thomas PORATHE

Chalmers Technical University

SE-412 96 Gothenburg

Sweden

Phone +46 31 7722679

Mobile phone: +46 31 7722679

e-mail [email protected]

Finland Finnish Transport Agency

Ms. Kaisu HEIKONEN

P. O. Box 33

FIN-00521 Helsinki

Finland

Phone +358 20 637 3302

Mobile phone: +358 40 573 4949

e-mail [email protected]

Furuno Finland Oy

Mr Tatsuya KOJIMA

48

Page 49: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

9-52, Ashihara-cho

Nishinomiya

Hyogo

Japan

Phone +81 798 63 1172

e-mail [email protected]

Furuno Finland Oy

Mr Hiroyasu NAKAGAWA

9-52, Ashihara-cho

Nishinomiya

Hyogo

Japan

Phone +81 798 63 1152

e-mail [email protected]

49

Page 50: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

France CETMEF

Mr Jean-Charles CORNILLOU

Technopôle Brest Iroise

BP 5

29280 Plouzané

France

Phone +33 2 98 05 67 41

Fax +33 2 98 05 67 67

e-mail [email protected]

CETMEF

Mr Yann GUICHOUX

155 rue Pierre Bouguer

29280 Plouzancé

France

Phone +33 2 98 05 88 03

Fax +33 2 98 05 67 67

e-mail [email protected]

CETMEF

Mr Michel IMART

151 Quai du Rancy

94381 Bonneuil-sur-Marne

France

Phone +33 1 45 13 52 93

Fax +33 1 45 13 53 49

Mobile phone: +33 6 29 45 61 72

e-mail [email protected]

CLS

Mr Gaëtan FABRITIUS

50

Page 51: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

8-10 rue Hermès

Parc Technologie du Canal

31520 Ramonville St Agne

France

Phone +33 5 61 39 37 02

Fax +33 5 61 39 47 97

e-mail [email protected]

Direction des Affaires Maritimes

Mr Yves DESNOËS

IFN chez SSBAIF

82 rue des Pyrénées

75020 Paris

France

Phone +33 1 43 48 53 98

Fax +33 1 43 48 53 98

Mobile phone: +33 6 50 43 65 31

e-mail [email protected]

51

Page 52: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

European Space Agency

Mr Philippe ERHARD

8-10 Rue Mario Nikis

75738 Paris Cedex 15

France

Phone +33 1 53 69 74 55

e-mail [email protected]

Germany Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency

Mr Jochen RITTERBUSCH

Bernhard-Nocht-Str. 78

20359 Hamburg

Germany

Phone +49 40 3190 7330

Fax +49 40 3190 5000

e-mail [email protected]

Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration

Mr. Michael HOPPE

Traffic Technologies Centre

Am Berg 3

56070 Koblenz

Germany

Phone + 49 261 9819 2221

Fax + 49 261 9819 2155

e-mail [email protected]

Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration

Mr. Jan-Hendrik OLTMANN

W&S Directorate North/North West

Hindenburgufer 247

52

Page 53: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

24106 Kiel

Germany

Phone + 49 431 3394 5701

Fax + 49 431 3394 6399

Mobile phone: +49 172 152 6928

e-mail [email protected]

German Aerospace Center

Dr Ralf ZIEBOLD

Institute of Communications and Navigation

Nautical Systems

Kalkhorstweg 53, 17235 Neustrelitz

Germany

e-mail [email protected]

53

Page 54: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

German Aerospace Centre

Dipl.-Ing. Thoralf NOACK

Institute of Communications and Navigation

Kalkhorstweg 53

D-17235 Neustrelitz

Germany

Phone +49 3981 480-136

Fax +49 3981 480-123

e-mail [email protected]

German Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration

Mr. Stefan BOBER

Am Berg 3

56070 Koblenz

Germany

Phone +49 261 9819 2231

Fax +49 261 9819 2155

e-mail [email protected]

SIGNALIS GmbH

Dipl.-Ing. Michael BRAUN

Hanna-Kunath-Strasse 3

28199 Bremen

Germany

Phone +49 421 457 2084

Fax +49 421 457 4215

e-mail [email protected]

Trimble Germany GmbH

Mr Goran JEDREJCIC

Am Prime Parc 11

54

Page 55: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

65479 Raunheim

Germany

Phone +49 89 60 666 906

Fax +49 89 60 666 907

Mobile phone: +49 175 279 07 12

e-mail [email protected]

Hong Kong Marine Department

Mr Adrian CHAN

Hong Kong

e-mail [email protected]

Marine Department

Mr Michael POON

M462, Outer Pier

Macau Ferry Terminal

Sheung Wan

Hong Kong

e-mail [email protected]

IALA IALA, Secretary General

Mr Gary PROSSER

10 rue des Gaudines

78100 Saint-Germain-en-Laye

France

Phone +33 1 34 51 70 01

Fax +33 1 34 51 82 05

e-mail [email protected]

Programme Manager, WWA

Mr Stephen BENNETT

10 rue des Gaudines

Saint Germain en Laye55

Page 56: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

France

Phone +44 243 533 148

Fax +33 1 34 51 82 05

Mobile phone: +44 7787 320 761

e-mail [email protected]

Senior Advisor

M. Jacques MANCHARD

10 rue des Gaudines

Saint Germain en Laye

78100

France

Phone +33 1 34 51 70 01

Fax +33 1 34 51 82 05

e-mail [email protected]

Technical Coordination Manager

Dr. Mike HADLEY

10 rue des Gaudines

78100 Saint Germain en Laye

France

Phone +33 1 34 51 70 01

Fax +33 1 34 51 82 05

Mobile phone: +44 7887 548 227

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

IMO International Maritime Organisation

Capt Gurpreet SINGHOTA

Maritime Safety Division

4 Albert Embankment

London SE1 7SR

56

Page 57: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7735 7611

Fax +44 (0)20 7587 3210

e-mail [email protected]

57

Page 58: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

IMPA Station de Pilotage Maritime Dunkerque

Mr Jean-Daniel GILLES

France

Mobile phone: +33 6 77 50 39 81

e-mail [email protected]

Indonesia Directorate General of Sea Transportation / Directorate of Navigation

Capt Mohamad SYAIFUL

Directorate of Navigation, The Indonesian Ministry of Transportation

Gedung Karya Floor 13

JL Medan Merdeka Barat N°8

Indonesia

Phone +62 213 507201

Fax +62 215 506534

Mobile phone: +62 813 64501399

e-mail [email protected]

Directorate General of Sea Transportation / Directorate of Navigation

Mr Edo BIMAWARDHANA

Gedung Karya Floor 13

JL Medan Merdeka Barat N°8

Indonesia

Phone +62 21 350 7201

Mobile phone: +62 81 76663167

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Ireland Commissioners of Irish Lights

Mr. Colin DAY

Harbour Road

Dun Laoghaire

58

Page 59: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Co. Dublin

Ireland

Phone +353 1 271 5478

Fax +353 1 271 5565

Mobile phone: +353 87 2197007

e-mail [email protected]

Italy ELMAN

Mr Francesco BORGHESE

Via di Valle Caia, 37

Pomezia - Roma

Italy

Phone +39 09 919 4405

Fax +39 06 919 4306

Mobile phone: +39 339 708 7107

e-mail [email protected]

Italian Coast Guard

Lt. Paolo RENZI

Via dei Calafati 17

Cagliari (Sardina)

Italy

Phone +39 07 06 05 17 201

Fax +39 07 06 05 17 218

Mobile phone: +39 33 96 64 77 50

e-mail [email protected]

Japan Japan Coast Guard

Cdr. Hideki NOGUCHI

2-1-3 Kasumigaseki

Chiyoda-ku

Tokyo 100-8918

59

Page 60: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Japan

Phone +81 3 3591 6361

Fax +81 3 3591 5468

Mobile phone: +81 803468 1198

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Japan Radio Co., Ltd.

Mr Yoshio MIYADERA

1-1, Shimorenjaku 5 chome

Mitaka-Shi

Tokyo 181-8510

Japan

Phone +81 42 245 95 38

Fax +81 42 245 99 57

e-mail [email protected]

Oki Consulting Solutions Co., Ltd.

Mr. Takamasa YAUCHI

4-11-15 Shibaura

Minato-ku

Tokyo 108-8551

Japan

Phone + 81 3 5445 6017

Fax + 81 3 3452 7814

Mobile phone: +81 90 8315 9999

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Zeni Lite Buoy Co., Ltd.

Mr. Michael D. CARD

2-176-1 Toyoshima Minami

60

Page 61: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Ikeda-City

Osaka 563-0035

Japan

Phone +81 80 3058 6543

Mobile phone: +81 8030586543

e-mail [email protected]

61

Page 62: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Korea Dong Seo University

Prof Dr (Ms) Su Hyun PARK

San 69-1 Jurae-Dong

Susang-Gu

Busan

Republic of Korea

Phone +82 51 320 1723

Fax +82 51 327 8955

Mobile phone: +82 10 9395 8326

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

ETRI

Mr Hanbyeog CHO

161 Gajeongdong

Yuseong

Daejon

Republic of Korea

Phone +82 42 860 5531

Fax +82 42 860 1085

Mobile phone: +82 1099 045524

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

ETRI

Mr Byung Doo KIM

161 Dajeong-dong

Yuseong-Gu

Daejeon

Republic of Korea

62

Page 63: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Phone +82 42 860 1027

Fax +82 42 860 1471

Mobile phone: +82 10 2902 5399

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

ETRI

Mr Joa Hyoung LEE

138 Gajeongno

Yuseong-gu

Daejeon 305-700

Republic of Korea

Phone +82 42 860 0845

Fax +82 42 860 1085

Mobile phone: +82 17 379 0114

e-mail [email protected]

63

Page 64: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology

Mr Jae Yang PARK

Republic of Korea

Phone +82 42 866 3692

Mobile phone: +82 10 2996 8653

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology

Mr Woo-Seong SHIM

Republic of Korea

Phone +82 42 866 3662

Mobile phone: +82 10 4567 0170

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Korea Maritime University

Prof. Seung-Gi GUG

#1, Dongsam-dong

Yeongdo-gu

Busan 606-791

Korea

Phone +82 51 410 4227

Fax +8251 410 4227

Mobile phone: +82 10 6396 4227

e-mail [email protected]

Korea Maritime University

Mr Jeongrok KIM

M406, #1, DongSam-dong

Yongdo-gu

64

Page 65: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Busan 606-781

Republic of Korea

Phone +82 51 404 3010

Fax +82 51 404 3012

Mobile phone: +82 10 2587 0359

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Korea Maritime University

Dr Seo-Jeong LEE

#1, Dongsam-dong

Yeongdo-gu

Busan 606-791

Republic of Korea

Phone +82 11 217 4190

Fax +82 11 404 4578

e-mail [email protected]

65

Page 66: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Korea Maritime University

Mrs Hyeri PARK

M406, #1, Dong-Sam-dong

Yongdo-gu

Busan 606-781

Republic of Korea

Phone +82 51 404 3010

Fax +82 51 404 3012

Mobile phone: +82 10 6217 7401

e-mail [email protected]

Ministry of Land and Transport Maritime Affairs

Mr Young Tae LEE

47, Gwanmun-ro,

Gwacheon-city,

Gyenggi-do 427-712

Republic of Korea

Phone +82 2 2110 8608

Fax +82 2 504 4076

Mobile phone: +82 10 8777 9869

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Nautical Nautical Institute

Institute

Mr David PATRAIKO

202 Lambeth Road

London SE1 7LQ

UK

Phone +44 207 928 1351

66

Page 67: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Mobile phone: +44 7980 984 038

e-mail [email protected]

Netherlands HITT Traffic

Mr René HOGENDOORN

PO Box 717

7300 AS Apeldoorn

The Netherlands

Phone +31 555 432 501

Mobile phone: +31 610 925 412

e-mail [email protected]

Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment

Mr Pieter PAAP

PO Box 5044

2600 Delft

Netherlands

Mobile phone: +31 6 466 36 190

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

67

Page 68: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment

Mr Peter HOOIJMANS

Department Infrastructure

Postbus 9070

6800 ED Arnhem

Netherlands

Mobile phone: +31 653 945 156

e-mail [email protected]

Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment

Mr. Rob LANGEN

Schoemakerstraat 97

2628 VK Delft

The Netherlands

Phone +31 88 7982313

Mobile phone: +31 6 2000 48 97

e-mail [email protected]

Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment

Mr Jeffrey VAN GILS

IT Application Management

P.O. Box 5023

2600 GA Delft

The Netherlands

Phone +31 15 275 73 29

Fax +31 10 402 7095

Mobile phone: +31 6 514 2 70 66

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Norway Norwegian Coastal Administration

68

Page 69: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Mr Sigmund Andreas BREIVIK

P.O. Box 466

5501 Haugesund

Norway

Phone +47 91727225

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Norwegian Coastal Administration

Mr. Jon Leon ERVIK

Service Box 2

6002 Alesund

Norway

Phone + 47 52 73 33 12

Fax + 47 52 73 32 01

Mobile phone: +47 91 68 15 38

e-mail [email protected]

69

Page 70: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Norwegian Coastal Administration

Mr Ulrich Alain KOUNCHOU TAGNE

Wergelands Gate 18

Norway

Phone +47 40085072

Mobile phone: +47 40085072

e-mail [email protected]

Norwegian Coastal Administration

M. Robert TREMLETT

Paddocks; Mill Street

Redhill

Surrey RH1 6PA

UK

Phone +44 1737 764 327

Mobile phone: +44 7809 496 447

e-mail [email protected]

Norwegian Coastal Administration

Mr Finn Martin VALLERSNES

Pb. 466

5001 Haugesund

Norway

Phone

Fax +47 5273 3201

Mobile phone: +47 9050 7790

e-mail [email protected]

Norwegian Coastal Administration - Maritime Safety Department

Mr Bjornar KLEPPE

Kongens gt 11

70

Page 71: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

6002 Alesund

Norway

Phone +47 70 23 10 81

Mobile phone: +47 900 28 347

e-mail [email protected]

Norwegian Coastal Directorate

Mr John-Erik HAGEN

PO Box 466

N-5501 Haugesund

Norway

Phone +47 70 23 10 00

Fax +47 52 73 32 01

Mobile phone: +47 909 47 630

e-mail [email protected]

71

Page 72: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Poland SPRINT SA

Mr. Artur BARANOWSKI

Str. Budowlanych 64E

Post Code 80-298

Gdansk

Poland

Phone +48 58 340 77 00

Fax +48 58 340 77 01

Mobile phone: +48 602 488 105

e-mail [email protected]

Urzad Morski Gdynia

Mr. Marek DZIEWICKI

ul. Chrzanowskiego 10

81-338 Gdynia

Poland

Phone + 48 58 355 3720

Fax + 48 58 620 19 36

Mobile phone: +48 691 766 172

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Russia Transas Ltd.

Mr Sergey CHEREPANOV

54-4 Maly pr., V.O.

St. Petersburg 199178

Russia

Phone +7 812 325 31 31

Fax +7 812 325 31 32

Mobile phone: +7 911 777 80 10

72

Page 73: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

e-mail [email protected]

Scotland Northern Lighthouse Board

Mr. Peter DOUGLAS

84 George Street

Edinburgh

EH2 3DA

UK

Phone + 44 131 473 3100

Fax + 44 131 220 2093

Mobile phone: +44 7836 787 898

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

73

Page 74: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Spain GMV

Mr Marcos LOPEZ CABECEIRA

c/Juan de Herrera, 17

P.T.B. Boecillo

47151 Valladolid

Spain

Phone +34 983546554

Mobile phone: +34 619128940

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Sweden Swedish Maritime Administration

Mr. Rolf ZETTERBERG

Sjöfartsverket

60178 Norrköping

Sweden

Phone + 46 10 478 4932

Mobile phone: +46 708 19 15 12

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Swedish Maritime Administration

Mr. Johan WINELL

S-601 78 Norrköping

Sweden

Phone +46 11 191 186

Mobile phone: +46 708 191 186

e-mail [email protected]

Swedish Transport Agency

Mr Sebastian IRONS

74

Page 75: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Marititme Department

60 173 Norrköping

Sweden

Phone +46 10 4953331

e-mail [email protected]

Turkey Directorate General of Coastal Safety

Mr. M. Celalettin UYSAL

Meclisi Mebuson CAD N° 18

Salipazari

Istanbul

Turkey

Phone + 90 212 234 4525

Fax +90 212 243 1122

Mobile phone: +90 505 292 1316

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

75

Page 76: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

UK GLA-RRNAV

Dr Alan GRANT

Trinity House

The Quay, Harwich, Essex

CO12 3JW

UK

Phone +441255 245 141

Mobile phone: +44 774 7768445

e-mail [email protected]

Kelvin Hughes

Mr David TURNAGE

Voltage

Mollison Avenue

Enfield EN3 7XQ

UK

Phone +44 1992 805 224

Fax +44 1992 805 310

Mobile phone: +44 7834 328890

e-mail [email protected]

Maritime and Coast Guard Agency

Mr Richard WOOTTON

Bay 3/01, Spring Place

105 Commercial Road

Southampton SO15 1EG

UK

Phone +44 238 032 9413

Fax +44 238 032 9290

Mobile phone: +44 7901 517041

76

Page 77: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

e-mail [email protected]

UK (Vice GLA - RRNAV

Chairman)

Dr. Nick WARD

12 Mariners Drive

Swanage

Dorset BH19 2SJ

UK

Phone + 44 1929 426 021

Mobile phone: +44 7795 367050

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

77

Page 78: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

USA Tideland Signal Corporation

Mr. Paul MUELLER

4310 Director's Row

Houston, Texas 77092

USA

Phone + 1 713 681 6101

Fax + 1 713 682 4635

Mobile phone: +1 713 851 6426

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

Truestone Maritime Operations

Mr Paul SMITH

USA

e-mail [email protected]

US Coast Guard

Lt Dave LEWALD

Commandant (CG-NAV-1)

2100 2nd Street SW

Washington DC 20593

USA

Phone +1 202 372 1549

Mobile phone: +1 202 615 9614

e-mail [email protected]

US Coast Guard

Mrs Kathleen WELDER

USA

e-mail [email protected]

e-mail (alternative) [email protected]

78

Page 79: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

USA (Chair) US Coast Guard

Mr. William CAIRNS

Commandant (CG-NAV)

2100 2nd Street SW

Washington DC 20593

USA

Phone +1 202 372 1557

Fax +1 202 372 1930

Mobile phone: +1 202 230 8069

e-mail [email protected]

79

Page 80: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

ANNEX C WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS

Working Group 1 Operations

Name Organization / Country

1 David Patraiko (Chair) The Nautical Institute

2 Mahesh Alimchandani (Vice Chair) Australian Maritime Safety Authority

3 Adrian Chan MARDEP / Hong Kong SAR

4 Thomas Christensen DMA / Denmark

5 Jean-Charles Cornillou CETMEF / France

6 Peter Douglas NLB / Scotland

7 Jon Leon Ervik Norwegian Coastal Administration

8 Daniel Gilles International Maritime Pilots’ Association

9 Sebastian Irons Swedish Transport Agency (STA)

10 Jeong Rok Kim Korean Maritime University

11 Young Tae Lee MLTM / Republic of Korea

12 Paul Mueller Tideland Signal / USA

13 Jan-Hendrik OltmannGerman Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration

14 Pieter PaapThe Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and for the Environment

15 Natasha Riendlau CCG / Canada

16 Jochen RitterbuschGerman Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH)

17 Ulrich Alain Kounchou Tagne Norwegian Coastal Administration

18 Finn Martin Vallersnes Norwegian Coastal Administration

19 Nick Ward GLA R&RNAV / UK

20 Kathleen Welder USCG / USA

80

Page 81: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

81

Page 82: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Portrayal Drafting Group

Name Organization / Country

1 Lee Alexander (Chair) CCG / Canada

2 Sea Jeong Lee (Vice Chair) Korean Maritime University

3 Arur Baranowski SPRINT / Poland

4 Jean-Danil Gilles IMPA

5 Thomas Porathe Chalmers University / DMA

6 Michael Rambaut CIRM

7 Woo Sung Shim Korean Institute of Ocean

8 Nick Ward GLA R&RNAV / UK

82

Page 83: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Working Group 2 PNT / Sensors

Name Organization / Country

1 Alan Grant (Chair) GLA R&RNAV / UK

2 Colin Day (Vice Chair) Commissioners of Irish Lights

3 Ivan M Carlsson Danish Maritime Authority / Denmark

4 Peter Douglas NLB / Scotland

5 Marek Dziewicki DMA / Denmark

6 Philippe Erhard NLB / Scotland

7 Kaisu Heikonen FMA / Finland

8 Michael Hoppe German Federal Waterways & Shipping Administration

9 Goran Jedrejcic Trimble Navigation / Germany

10 Bjornar Kleppe NCA / Norway

11 Tatsuya Kojima Furuno Electric / Finland

12 Rob Langen Rijkswaterstaat / The Netherlands

13 Thoralf Noach German Aerospace Centre

14 Michael Poon Marine Department, Hong Kong SAR

15 Luo Siming Guang Dong Maritime Administration / China

16 David Turnage Kelvin Hughes / UK

17 Nick Ward GLA R&RNAV / UK

18 Johan Winell Swedish Maritime Administration / Sweden

19 Ralf Ziebold German Aerospace Centre / Germany

83

Page 84: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Working Groups 3 & 4 AIS & Communications

Members Organization / Country

1 Rolf Zetterberg (Chair) Swedish Maritime Administration

2 Jianbo Bao China MSA

3 Stefan Bober WSV /Germany

4 Francesco Borgehese ELMAN / Italy

5 Sigmund Andreas Breivik Norwegian Coastal Administration

6 Peggy Browning exactEarth / Canada

7 Jillian Carson-Jackson AMSA / Australia

8 Hanbyeog Cho ETRI / Republic of Korea

9 Jean Francois Coutu Canadian Coast Guard

10 Gaetan Fabritius CLS / France

11 Jeffrey van Gils Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment / NL

12 Kaisu Heikonen Finnish Transport Agency

13 Joa Hyang Lee ETRI / Korea

14 Marco Lopez GMV S.A. / Spain

15 Yoshio Miyadera Japan Radio Co Ltd / Japan

16 M Syaiful Ministry of Transport / Indonesia

17 Hiroyasu Nakagawa Furuno Electric Co Ltd / Japan

18 Hideki Noguchi Japan Coast Guard

19 Paul Smith Truestone UC / USCG

20 Brian Tetrault Army Corps of Engineers / United States

21 Robert Tremlett Observer

22 M Celattin Uysal DGCS / Turkey

23 Antonio Vollero Italian Coast Guard

24 Nick Ward GLA R&RNAV / UK

25 Edo Bima Wardhana Ministry of Transport / Indonesia

26 Richard Wootton Maritime & Coastguard Agency / UK

84

Page 85: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

27 Takamasa Yauchi OKI Consulting Solutions /Japan

28 Armando Zorzoni Sevicia de Hydrografia Naval / Argentina

85

Page 86: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Working Group 5 Technical Architecture

Members Organization / Country

1 Jan-Hendrik Oltmann (Chair)German Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration

2 Paul Mueller (Vice Chair) Tideland Signal / USA

3 Bill Cairns United States Coast Guard

4 Sergey Cherepanov TRANSAS / Russia

5 Yves Desnoës Direction des Affaires Maritime / France

6 René Hogendoorn HITT Traffic / The Netherlands

7 Kiril Ivanov Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Co.

8 Byung Doo Kim ETRI / Republic of Korea

9 Paolo Renzi Italian Coast Guard

10 Gilles Soussain CETMEF / France

11 Nick Ward GLA R&RNAV / UK

12 Kathleen Welder USCG / USA

86

Page 87: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Working Group 6 Data Modelling and Interfacing

Members Organization / Country

1 Peter Hooijmans Ministry of Transport / The Netherlands

2 Ole Bakman Borup Danish Maritime Authority

3 Michael Braun Signalis / Germany

4 Yann Guichoux CETMEF / France

5 David Lewald USCG / USA

6 Suhyun Park DSU / Republic of Korea

7 Jaeyang Park KIOST / Republic of Korea

8 Nick Ward GLA R&RNAV / UK

87

Page 88: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

ANNEX D LIST OF INPUT PAPERS

All papers are posted on the FTP server and the Committee website

Number Title / Author (if required)Presented by /

WGPosting

e-NAV12/1 rev4

Agenda BC / TCM Late

e-NAV12/2 Action Items from ANM18 BC / TCM 1

e-NAV12/3 rev9

Papers’ List (Finalised at pre-meeting) BC / TCM V Late

e-NAV12/4Programme for the week (Finalised at pre-meeting)

BC / TCM 1

e-NAV12/5 Report of PAP23 BC / TCM 1

e-NAV12/6 Updating Ch4 of the IALA NAVGUIDE 1 1

e-NAV12/7 e-Navigation Roadmap 1 1

e-NAV12/8Liaison note from ANM on risk management guideline

1 1

e-NAV12/9 Draft revised 1018 Ed3 Risk Management 1 1

e-NAV12/10Liaison note from ANM on the e-NAV plan for the review of the NAVGUIDE

1 1

e-NAV12/11Liaison note From ANM on the NAVGUIDE review

1 1

e-NAV12/12 NAVGUIDE 2014 Action Plan 1 1

e-NAV12/13 NAVGUIDE 2014 Timetable 1 1

e-NAV12/14 Information paper on changes to radar frequency 2 1

e-NAV12/15 Draft performance specification for NAV59 2 1

e-NAV12/16 Draft Guideline on Polar Communications 4 1

e-NAV12/17 Draft revised IALA MRCP Ed1_29Mar2012 4 1

e-NAV12/18Developing the AIS and VDE Plan for e-Navigation

4 1

e-NAV12/19 Liaison Note from ANM on draft GSMD guideline 4 1

e-NAV12/20 Functional Requirements For Shipboard 5 1

88

Page 89: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Number Title / Author (if required)Presented by /

WGPosting

Technical Architecture As Seen From Ashore

e-NAV12/21Draft Proposal for the IMO/IHO Harmonisation Group on Data Modelling (HGDM) Initial Domain set-up for the IHO Registry

6 1

e-NAV12/22 Changes proposed for consideration by IHO 6 1

e-NAV12/23 Draft Architecture 101 Information Paper 5 1

e-NAV12/24Liaison Note to from EEP on contribution to e-Navigation

1 1

e-NAV12/25Liaison Note from EEP on Training Requirements

2 1

e-NAV12/26Liaison note from EEP on AtoN Product Specification

6 1

e-NAV12/27 AtoN Metadata Product Specification - review 6 1

e-NAV12/28Liaison Statement from ITU-R WP5B WRC-15 Agenda item 1.16

4 1

e-NAV12/28A Draft CPM text WRC-15 Agenda item 1.16 4 1

e-NAV12/28B Draft workplan - WRC-15 agenda item 1.1 4 1

e-NAV12/29Liaison note from VTS on the IVEF Product Specification

6 1

e-NAV12/30Liaison note from VTS on response on Portrayal Guidelines

1 / DG 1

e-NAV12/31 Communications in Polar Areas 4 1

e-NAV12/32 Revision of Recommendation R-129 2 1

e-NAV12/33 Draft revision e-NAV-140 (Ed2) 5 1

e-NAV12/34 rev2

Proposed data modelling group 6 Late

e-NAV12/35 What Does WG5 Want from the TSMAD Meeting 6 1

e-NAV12/36 IHO-IALA Meeting Report 6 1

e-NAV12/37The IHO S-100 Standard and e-Navigation Information

6 1

e-NAV12/38 rev1

Draft ToR WG1 - Ops 1 7

89

Page 90: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Number Title / Author (if required)Presented by /

WGPosting

e-NAV12/39 rev1

Draft ToR WG2 - PNT 2 7

e-NAV12/40 rev2

Draft ToR WG3 - AIS 3&4 7

e-NAV12/41 Draft ToR WG4 - Communications 3&4 1

e-NAV12/42 rev1

Draft ToR WG5 – Technical Architecture 5 7

e-NAV12/43 rev2

Draft ToR WG6 – Domain Management 6 1

e-NAV12/44 Liaison statement from ITU-R WRC AI1.15 4 1

e-NAV12/45 Temp draft CPM Workplan for AI 1.15 4 1

e-NAV12/46 Temp draft CPM Text for AI 1.15 4 1

e-NAV12/47 Presentation WRC AI 1.15 4 1

e-NAV12/48 Revised Meeting programme for 2012 post C53 All 2

e-NAV12/49 Report of C53 BC / TCM 2

e-NAV12/50IALA WWA L2 Model Course Module 9 Radionavigation

2 2

e-NAV12/51Liaison Note from WWA to eNav and EEP on Level 2 Model Course Module 9

2 2

e-NAV12/52Norrkoping Output 01 Report of the intersessional WG3 + WG 4 meeting July -12

3 2

e-NAV12/53Norrkoping Output 02 (Liaison to ITU re 1371)-rev1

3 2

e-NAV12/54Norrkoping Output 02-Annex-draft-revision-to-M 1371-4

3 2

e-NAV12/55Norrkoping Output 03 (Liaison to ANM re 1371)-rev1

3 2

e-NAV12/56 Norrkoping Output 04 MRCP Ed2_ 13jul2012 3 2

e-NAV12/57Norrkoping Output 05 Plan for finalizing Rec A 12

3 2

e-NAV12/58 Norrkoping Output 07 Draft A124 Appendix 12 3 2

90

Page 91: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Number Title / Author (if required)Presented by /

WGPosting

e-NAV12/59Norrkoping Output 08 Rec A124 main documen Ed 2.1

3 2

e-NAV12/60Norrkoping Output 06 Draft A-124 ed2.0 Appendix9-10-11 Functional description of AIS components

3 2

e-NAV12/61 Report of NAV58 1 / All 2

e-NAV12/62 IALA Participation in IHO Registry 6 2

e-NAV12/63Draft Guideline Procedures for the Management of the IALA Domains under the IHO Registry

6 2

e-NAV12/64Draft Guideline on Preparing an S-100 Product Specification

6 2

e-NAV12/65 Disaster Recovery 2 3

e-NAV12/66 e-Navigation Test-Beds 1 3

e-NAV12/67 AIS AtoN 3 3

e-NAV12/68 2014-18 Work Programme All 3

e-NAV12/68ADraft Committee workplan 2014-18 (Annex to e-NAV12/68)

All 3

e-NAV12/69 e-NAV portrayal and user needs - ICS 1 / DG 3

e-NAV12/70Cover note for AtoN Information Product Specification

6 3

e-NAV12/71 Draft AtoN Information Product Specification 6 3

e-NAV12/72Revisions to the World Wide Radio Navigation Plan

2 3

e-NAV12/73Draft revision of R-129 Ed2 GNSS Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures_Dec2008

2 3

e-NAV12/74Liaison Note from WWA to eNav and EEP on Level 2 Model Course Module 9

2 4

e-NAV12/75 AIS AtoN 1 4

e-NAV12/76Appendix NAV 58-WP.7 - Development of policy and new symbols for AIS AtoN

1 4

e-NAV12/77 Report of Channel Management Operation in Tokyo bay

3 4

91

Page 92: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Number Title / Author (if required)Presented by /

WGPosting

e-NAV12/78 Update on R-121-Accuracy_with comments 2 4

e-NAV12/79R-121 Ed1 1 Performance and Monitoring of DGNSS Services in the Frequency Band 283 5 325

2 4

e-NAV12/80 AMSA Usability workshop information INF 4

e-NAV12/81 Report to the IMO CG on e-Navigation 1 / All 6

e-NAV12/82Report to the IMO CG on e-Navigation to COMSAR 17 Australia's comments

1 / All 6

e-NAV12/83Proposed modifications to e-NAV12-56 (Norrkoping Output 04 MRCP Ed2

3 6

e-NAV12/84The ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite’ – an introduction

ALL 6

e-NAV12/85 Limitation of CSTDMA 3 7

e-NAV12/86Discussion paper for the development of IALA Guidelines on GNSS augmentation services for port and docking

2 7

e-NAV12/87Development of guidelines on GNSS augmentation services for port and docking

2 7

e-NAV12/88 Draft IALA Guideline - Portrayal of e-Nav Info 1 / DG 7

e-NAV12/89 Maritime Information S-100 Product Specification 6 Late

e-NAV12/90Strawman/Draft The Structure Of Maritime Service Portfolios (MSP)

5 Late

e-NAV12/91 Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal 6 Late

e-NAV12/92Comments on the Draft AtoN Information Product Specification

6 VLate

e-NAV12/93 Liaison note from VTS on Plan for AIS and VDE 3 VLate

e-NAV12/94 Report from MSC90 BC/TCM VLate

e-NAV12/95 Editable version of NAVGUIDE 2010 All VLate

92

Page 93: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

ANNEX E LIST OF OUTPUT AND WORKING PAPERS

Output papers are submitted for review by a body other than the Committee initiating the paper.

Number Title Status

e-NAV12/output/1 Draft e-NAV12 Report To Council to note

e-NAV12/output/2 Proposed changes to the Work Programme To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/3Liaison note to PAP-Strategy on e-Navigation Strategy items

To PAP/Strategy Group to note

e-NAV12/output/4 Liaison note to IMO CG on e-NavigationTo IMO CG on e-Navigation by 1 October 2012

e-NAV12/output/5 Comments on report of the IMO CGTo IMO CG on e-Navigation by 1 October 2012

e-NAV12/output/6 WG2 ToRTo FTP server & Committee website

e-NAV12/output/7 Liaison to EEP on e-Navigation To EEP19

e-NAV12/output/8Liaison to ANM on risk management guideline

To ANM19

e-NAV12/output/9 Comments on guideline on risk management To ANM19

e-NAV12/output/10 S-100 workshop proposal To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/11TOR Data Model and Interfacing Technical Working Group

To FTP server & Committee website

e-NAV12/output/12Information paper on IALA Participation in IHO GI Registry

To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/13Draft Guideline Procedures for the Management of the IALA Domains under the IHO GI Registry

To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/14Draft Guideline Introduction to Preparing S-100 Product Specification

To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/15 Liaison to ITU on MRCPTo Council to approve.Deadline for submission to ITU 29 October

e-NAV12/output/16 Draft revised MRCPTo Council to approve.Deadline for submission to ITU 29 October

e-NAV12/output/17Liaison Note to ITU-R Working Party 5B

WRC-15 Agenda Items 1.15 and 1.16To Council to approve

93

Page 94: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Number Title Status

e-NAV12/output/18Preliminary draft revision of Recommendation ITU-R M.1371-4

To Council to approveDeadline for submission to ITU 29 October

e-NAV12/output/19 Liaison to ITU on M.1371-4To Council to approveDeadline for submission to ITU 29 October

e-NAV12/output/20 Draft revised A-124 Ed 2.0 Main document To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/21 A-124 Ed2.0 A00 Glossary To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/22 A-124 Ed 2.0 A03 Distribution Model To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/23A-124 Ed 2.0 A09-10-11 Functional description of AIS components

To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/24 A124 Ed 2.0 A12 co-location issues To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/25R-129 Ed2 GNSS Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures

To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/26 Draft Architecture Information Paper To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/27 Updated FAQs To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/28 Liaison note to ANM on the NAVGUIDE To ANM19

e-NAV12/output/28ATrack changes revised e-Navigation chapter of the NAVGUIDE

To ANM19

e-NAV12/output/29Liason Note to EEP on WWA L2 Model Course Module 9 Radionavigation

To EEP19

e-NAV12/output/29ae-NAV review of WWA L2 Model Course Module 9 Radionavigation

To EEP19

e-NAV12/output/30 Draft revised IALA WWRNP To Council to approve

e-NAV12/output/31Draft IALA Guideline on Harmonised Portrayal of e-Navigation Information

To PAP, VTS36, EEP19 & ANM19 for comment

e-NAV12/output/32Liaison Note to PAP VTS EEP ANM on draft IALA Guideline on Harmonised Portrayal of e-Navigation Information

To PAP, VTS36, EEp19 & ANM19 to note

e-NAV12/output/33 WG5 ToRTo FTP server & Committee website

e-NAV12/output/34Liaison note to VTS on the IVEF Product Specification

To VTS36

e-NAV12/output/35 WG1 ToRTo FTP server & Committee website

e-NAV12/output/36 Liaison note to ANM on AIS AtoN To ANM19

94

Page 95: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Number Title Status

e-NAV12/output/37 WG3&4 ToRTo FTP server & Committee website

95

Page 96: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

Working Papers are papers that will remain within the committee for further review.

Number Title Status

e-NAV12/WG1/WP1 Draft review of IALA NAVGUIDE To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG1/WP2 To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG2/WP1Development of guidelines on GNSS augmentation services for port and docking

To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG2/WP2 Port and docking system guidelines mindmap To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG2/WP3 Input on Disaster Recovery To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG3&4/WP1 Draft Guideline on Polar Communications To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG5/WP1Draft Document The Structure Of Maritime Service Portfolios (MSPs)

To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG6/WP1Draft Proposal for the IMO/IHO Harmonisation Group on Data Modelling (HGDM)

To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG6/WP2 Changes proposed for consideration by IHO To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG6/WP3 AtoN Metadata Product Specification Review To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG6/WP4 IHO-IALA Meeting Report To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG6/WP5The IHO S-100 Standard and e-Navigation Information

To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG6/WP6 AtoN Information - draft Product Specification To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG6/WP7Maritime Information S-100 draft Product Specification

To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/WG6/WP8Liaison note from VTS to e-NAV AtoN Information draft Product Specification

To e-NAV13

e-NAV12/C&VC/WP1 Road map To e-NAV13

96

Page 97: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

ANNEX F ACTION ITEMS

Action Items for the IALA Secretariat

1 The Secretariat is requested to forward the IMO comments on the amendment of SMCP to the VTS Committee. 14

2 The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note (e-NAV12/output/4) to the IMO CG on e-Navigation to the Co-ordinator of the IMO CG on e-Navigation by Monday, 1 October 2012. 15

3 The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the comments on the draft report of the IMO CG on e-navigation (e-NAV12/output/5) to the Co-ordinator of the IMO CG on e-Navigation by Monday, 1 October 2012. 15

4 The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the road map for e-Navigation (e-NAV12/C&VC/WP1) to e-NAV13. 15

5 The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the revised FAQs on e-Navigation (e-NAV12/output/27) to the IALA Council for approval. 15

6 If approved, the IALA Secretariat is requested to post the e-Navigation FAQs (e-NAV12/output/27) on the IALA website. 15

7 The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the working paper on the IALA NAVGUIDE (e-NAV12/WG1/WP1) to the next session to e-NAV13. 16

8 The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on e-Navigation (e-NAV12/output/7) to EEP19. 16

9 The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on IALA Guideline 1018 (e-NAV12/output/8) to ANM19. 16

10 The IALA Secretariat is requested to forward the marked up version of IALA Guideline No.1018 (e-NAV12/output/9) to ANM19. 16

11 The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on the draft Guideline on Harmonised Portrayal of e-Navigation Information (e-NAV12/output/32) to PAP24, VTS36, EEP19 & ANM19. 17

12 The Secretariat is requested to forward the draft Guideline on Harmonised Portrayal of e-Navigation Information (e-NAV12/output/31) to PAP24, VTS36, EEP19 & ANM19. 17

13 The Secretariat is requested to forward the revised WWRNP (e-NAV12/output/30) to the Council for approval. 17

14 The Secretariat is requested to forward the revised Recommendation R-129 (e-NAV12/output/25) to the Council for approval. 18

15 The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note regarding the revised level 2 course structure (e-NAV12/output/29) to EEP19. 18

16 The Secretariat is requested to forward the revised level 2 course structure (e-NAV12/output/29a) to EEP19. 18

17 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG2/WP1 (Development of guidelines on GNSS augmentation services for port and docking) to e-NAV13. 18

18 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG2/WP2 (Port and docking system guidelines mindmap) to e-NAV13. 18

19 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG2/WP3 (Input to disaster recovery) to e-NAV13. 18

97

Page 98: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

20 The Secretariat is requested to raise the question of topic responsibility for disaster recovery at PAP24. 19

21 The Secretariat is requested to forward the draft revised Recommendation A-124 and its annexes (documents e-NAV12/outputs/20, 21, 22, 23 and 24) to Council for approval. 19

22 The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on the draft revision of ITU-R M. 1371-4 (e-NAV12/output/19) to the Council for approval by e-mail. 20

23 If approved, the Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on the draft revision of ITU-R M. 1371-4 (e-NAV12/output/19) to ITU WP5B by 29 October 2012. 20

24 The Secretariat is requested to forward the draft revision of ITU-R M. 1371-4 (e-NAV12/output/18) to the Council for approval by e-mail. 20

25 If approved, the Secretariat is requested to forward the draft revision of ITU-R M. 1371-4 (e-NAV12/output/18) to ITU WP5B by 29 October 2012. 20

26 The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on MRCP (e-NAV12/output/15) to Council for approval by email. 21

27 If approved, the Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on MRCP (e-NAV12/output/15) by 29 October 2012. 21

28 The Secretariat is requested to forward the revised MRCP (e-NAV12/output/16) to Council for approval by email. 21

29 If approved, the Secretariat is requested to forward the revised MRCP (e-NAV12/output/16) to ITU WP5B by 29 October 2012. 21

30 The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note to ITU on the WRC agenda (eNAV12/output/17) output to Council for approval. 21

31 If approved, the Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note to ITU on the WRC agenda (eNAV12/output/17) to ITU WP5B. 21

32 The Secretary-General is requested to seek dedicated IALA participation at meetings of ITU WP5B. 22

33 The Secretariat is requested to forward the draft IALA Guideline on Communications in Polar Areas (e-NAV12/WG3&4/WP1) to e-NAV13. 22

34 The Secretariat is requested to forward working document e-NAV12/WG5/WP1 to e-NAV13.23

35 The Secretariat is requested to forward the Information Paper for Council on Architecture for the Provision of e-Navigation Services as seen from Ashore (e-NAV12/output/26) to Council to note. 23

36 The Secretariat is requested to seek the Council’s approval to release the Information Paper for Council on Architecture for the Provision of e-Navigation Services as seen from Ashore (e-NAV12/output26) for publication in The Bulletin, NAVGUIDE and for information of the other IALA Committees and PAP. 23

37 The Secretariat is requested to forward input document e-NAV12/84 as an input document to e-NAV13. 24

38 The Secretariat is requested to forward The Information Paper on IALA Participation in the IHO GI Registry (e-NAV12/output/12) to Council, requesting approval to publish it in the IALA Bulletin. 24

39 If approved for publication, the Secretariat is requested to forward The Information Paper on IALA Participation in the IHO GI Registry (e-NAV12/output/12) to the editor of The Bulletin. 24

98

Page 99: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

40 The Secretariat is requested to forward the request to hold an S-100 product Specification workshop (e-NAV12/output/10) to Council for approval. 25

41 The Secretariat is requested to forward draft Guideline Procedures for the Management of the IALA Domains under the IHO GI Registry (e-NAV12/output/13) to Council for approval 25

42 The Secretariat is requested to forward draft Guideline Introduction to Preparing S-100 Product Specifications (e-NAV12/output/14) to Council for approval. 26

43 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP1 to e-NAV13. 2644 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP2 to e-NAV13. 2645 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP3 to e-NAV13. 2646 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP4 to e-NAV13. 2647 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP5 to e-NAV13. 2648 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP6 to e-NAV13. 2649 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP7to e-NAV13. 2650 The Secretariat is requested to forward e-NAV12/WG6/WP8 to e-NAV13. 2651 The Secretariat is requested to forward the liaison note on the NAVGUIDE

(e-NAV12/output/28) to ANM19. 2652 The Secretariat is requested to forward the track changes version of the e-Navigation

chapter of the NAVGUIDE (e-NAV12/output/28A) to ANM19. 2653 The Secretariat is requested to include an agenda item on software quality assurance in the

agenda for e-NAV13. 2754 The Secretariat is requested to post the ToR for WG1 (e-NAV12/output/35) to the FTP server

and Committee website. 2755 The Secretariat is requested to post the ToR for WG2 (e-NAV12/output/6) to the FTP server

and Committee website. 2756 The Secretariat is requested to post the ToR for WG3&4 (e-NAV12/output/37) to the FTP

server and Committee website. 2857 The Secretariat is requested to post the ToR for WG5 (e-NAV12/output/33) to the FTP server

and Committee website. 2858 The Secretariat is requested to post the ToR for WG6 (e-NAV12/output/11) to the FTP server

and Committee website. 2859 The Secretariat is requested to forward the report of e-NAV12 (e-NAV12/output/1) to the

Council, to note. 28

Action items for members

60 The Committee Chairman is requested to seek approval for an inter-sessional meeting about to progress the discussion paper on AIS and VDE and further develop the inputs to ITU WP5B from the Secretary-General. 19

61 Committee Members are requested to provide submissions to ITU WP5B by 29 October. 2162 The Chair of the Committee is requested to liaise, as required by IALA Committee

procedures, with the Secretary General regarding the holding of the inter-sessional meeting.23

99

Page 100: Example of an Agenda - Start - Sjofartsverket draft... · Web viewThe Draft S-100 Product Specs Workshop proposal was progressed and resulted in working document e-NAV12/output/10.

Report of the e-NAV Committee e-NAV12/output/1

63 If approved, the Chair of the Technical Architecture Working Group is requested to set up, in co-operation with IALA Secretariat, an inter-sessional meeting on the ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite / Structure of MSPs’. 23

64 Committee members are requested to prepare input regarding the structure of the MSPs for the planned inter-sessional meeting and/or e-NAV13. 23

65 Committee members are requested to prepare input regarding the ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite / Seven Pillars of e-Navigation’ and its representation in the IALA domain e-navigation.net for the planned inter-sessional meeting and/or e-NAV13. 23

66 The Chairman of WG1, in liaison with the Chair of WG5, is requested to prepare, inter-sessionally, an input document on the ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite’ to e-NAV13, using e-NAV12/84 as a starting point but taking into account relevant input from all interested members of the Committee. 24

67 The Chairs of WGs 1 & 5, together with interested members of the Committee, are requested to investigate, inter-sessionally, with the Danish Maritime Authority options to use the existing IALA web-page ‘e-Navigation.net’ as a focal point for the emerging e-Navigation international movement as described in e-NAV12/84 and report / present their findings at e-NAV13. 24

68 The Chair of WG5 is requested to invite members of WG1 to participate in the planned inter-sessional meeting on ‘e-Navigation Platform Suite / Structure of MSPs’. 24

69 The Committee Chairman is requested to seek approval for an inter-sessional meeting about producing an IALA S-100 product specification from the Secretary-General. 25

70 Committee members are requested to contribute suggestions for inclusion in the 2014 – 2018 Work Programme as inputs to e-NAV13 27

71 Committee members are requested to provide their views on including software quality assurance in the work programme at e-NAV13. 27

72 The Chairman is requested to liaise with RTCM about its post 2013 meeting programme. 28

100