Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2 Submission May 2010 Rich Kennedy, Research In MotionSlide 1 IEEE 802.11...

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

May 2010

Rich Kennedy, Research In MotionSlide 1

IEEE 802.11 TGafMeeting Plan and Agenda

Date: 2010-05-18

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Rich Kennedy Research In

Motion 7305 Napier Trail Austin, TX 78729

+1-972-207-3554 [email protected]

Peter Ecclesine Cisco Systems 170 W. Tasman Dr., San Jose, CA 95134

+1-408-527-0815 [email protected]

Zhou Lan NICT 3-4, Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka, 239-

0847, Japan +81-46-847-5110 [email protected]

Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

May 2010


AbstractThis presentation is the agenda and meeting plan for the

meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGaf taking place the week of May 17, 2010 at the IEEE 802 Wireless Interim in Beijing, PRC

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Plan for the Week

• Joint session with 802.19 and 802.22 (Tuesday PM3)• TVWS regulatory update• Overview of the Technical Review and comment

spreadsheet• Categorize the comments• Hear proposals directly related to received comments• Plan for July and teleconferences

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Tuesday PM3 Joint Session Agenda

• Meeting call to order• Administrative items including IEEE IP statement• Modify and approve the agenda• 802.11 TGaf Chair Election• Review 802.11 TGaf status and progress• Review 802.19 status and progress

– 4 presentations• Introduction and status• System design document• 802.19 July Tutorial• 802.19 July Workshop

• Review 802.22 status and progress• Recess

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Wednesday AM1 Agenda

• Meeting call to order• Administrative items including IEEE IP statement• Modify and approve the agenda• [Approve teleconference minutes]• [Vote to approve Draft d0.02 moved to Wednesday PM2]• Update on the TVWS regulatory status• Begin to review the received Technical Review comments• Recess

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Administrative Items• Please be familiar with the documents at the following links:

– IEEE Patent Policy - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt– Patent FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/faq.pdf– LoA Form - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/loa.pdf– Affiliation FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliationFAQ.html– Anti-Trust FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/resources/antitrust-guidelines.pdf– Ethics - http://www.ieee.org/portal/cms_docs/about/CoE_poster.pdf– IEEE 802.11 Working Group Policies and Procedures -

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/public-file/07/11-07-0360-04-0000-802-11-policies-and-procedures.doc

• Chair , Vice-chair and Secretary– Chair: Rich Kennedy (Research In Motion)– Vice-chair: Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)– Recording Secretary: Zhou Lan (NICT)

May 2010

Slide 6 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt

http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/faq.pdf

http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/loa.pdf

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Participants, Patents, and Duty to InformAll participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants:

“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents

“Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims

“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)

The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group

Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2

Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged

No duty to perform a patent search

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Patent Related LinksAll participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.Patent Policy is stated in these sources:

IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylawshttp://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manualhttp://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html

If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at [email protected] or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html

This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Call for Potentially Essential Patents

If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: – Either speak up now or– Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of

any and all such claims as soon as possible or– Cause an LOA to be submitted

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings

All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.

Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.

Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical

approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus

Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.

Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.

--------------------------------------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation:

What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

May 2010


Meeting Etiquette

• IEEE 802 is a world-wide professional technical organization

• Meetings are to be conducted in an orderly and professional manner in accordance with the policies and procedures governed by the organization.

• Individuals are to address the “Technical” content of the subject under consideration and refrain from making “personal” comments to or about the presenter.

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

TV Bands Regulatory Requirements

• These [FCC] rules are primarily intended to ensure the efficient sharing of the TV Bands while protecting incumbent users

• The FCC has enabled this band for TVBDs if and only if the licensed users’ interests are protected– We must not interfere– Mitigation of any interference issue should not increase the

enforcement requirements for the Commission

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Introduction

• WELCOME to the third face-to-face meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGaf!

• On Friday, November 20, 2009 the IEEE 802.11 TGaf was approved by the EC (10/1/4) with this motion: – Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the

document referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines,– Move to forward the 802.11 TVWS PAR information from 11-

09/934r8 to NesCom.• On December 8th NesCom approved the formation of the Task

Group for P802.11af• We have just completed a Technical Review and have many

comments to categorize and review

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

PAR Scope and Purpose

• Approved PAR Scope: An amendment that defines modifications to both the 802.11 physical layers (PHY) and the 802.11 Medium Access Control Layer (MAC), to meet the legal requirements for channel access and coexistence in the TV White Space

• Approved PAR Purpose: The purpose of this amendment is to allow 802.11 wireless networks to be used in the TV white space

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Purpose, Principles and Vision/Outcome“If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else.”*

• 11-06-0056-00-0000-cbp-and-david-allens-methods• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done• Purpose: the Task Group should create an amendment whose implementation in

solutions is likely to receive FCC approval for operation in the TV White Spaces under the 47 CFR Part 15 subpart H rules.

• Principles: – If the FCC changes the rules, the Task Group should change the amendment accordingly– The amendment should not duplicate functionality that is being standardized in other

Task Groups that are likely to complete before 802.11af.– There is no need for backwards compatibility with 2.45 GHz ISM operation. – The starting point is changes to Clauses 17 and 20 and Annexes I and J

• Vision/Outcome: Use the OFDM PHYs with 5-, 10- and 20-MHz channel widths to specify the basis for a system that the regulators can approve for operation in the TVWS bands.

* Yogi Berra

February 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Technical Review

• Started May 6th

• Closed May 16th (Midnight EDT – Noon May 17th here)• 16 Responders• 150 Comments received

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

The Comment Spreadsheet

• Starting comment spreadsheet in 11-10/595r1• Develop categories and group the comments• Limit the number of categories [7]• Following the review, spreadsheet is at r4

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Wednesday PM2 Agenda

• Meeting call to order• Modify and approve the agenda• Administrative items

– Reminder and Call for essential patents

• Approve Orlando meeting and teleconference minutes • Approve draft d0.02 • Approve comment spreadsheet in 10-11/595r4• Review and resolve comments

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Motion #1• Approve Meeting & Teleconference Minutes

– March Meeting in Orlando• 11-10-0428-00-00af-meeting-minutes-for-Orlando-2010 (posted 3/24)

– March 30th, April 13th, April 27th and May 11th teleconferences• 11-10-0452-00-00af-march-30-teleconference-minutes (posted 4/1)• 11-10-0475-00-00af-april-13-teleconference-minutes(posted 4/19)• 11-10-0516-01-00af-april-27th-teleconference-minutes (posted 5/9)• 11-10-0575-01-00af-may-11th-teleconference-minutes (posted 5/17)

• Motion:– To approve the TGaf minutes from the March Plenary in Orlando and the March 30th,

April 13th, April 27th and May 11th teleconferences in documents 11-10/428r0, 11-10/452r0, 11-10/475r0 11-10/516r1 and 11-10/575r1 respectively

– Moved by: Peter Ecclesine (Cisco)– Seconded by: Allan Thompson (Cisco)– Discussion on the motion? None heard– Vote: Approved by unanimous consent

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Motion #2• Approve Draft d0.02

– Draft d0.02 is the approved d0.01 with changes adopted from the proposals that were included based on the results of straw polls in March

– Draft d0.02 will be that starting point for the incorporation of Technical Review comments

• Motion: To approve P802.11af draft d0.02 as the base for the P802.11af amendment– Moved by: Yongho Seok (LGE)– Seconded by: Peter Ecclesine (Cisco)– Discussion on the motion? None heard– Vote: Approved by unanimous consent

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Motion #3

• Move: To accept 11-10/595r4 as the comment spreadsheet for d0.02 excluding column “T”– Moved by: Peter Ecclesine (Cisco)– Seconded by: C.S. Sum (NICT)– Discussion on the motion? None heard– Vote: Approved by unanimous consent

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Starting the Comment ReviewSpreadsheet in 11-10/595r4

• Step 1 – Priority (and efficiency)– Because we expect changes to the FCC rules in 3Q10, putting “US

Regulatory” last should prevent us from writing draft changes that we may have to redo once we know what the final rules are

• Step 2 - Impartiality– Select a starting point [a suggestion]

• 16 responders; each assigned a number between 0 and 15• Four coin tosses to randomly select a commenter to begin with

– Heads = 1; Tails = 0– LSB to MSB [ T, H, H, H ]– And the winner is:

– Continue in sequence from there

• Step 3 – Divide and conquer

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Thursday PM1 Agenda• Meeting call to order• Administrative items

– Reminders and Call for essential patents

• Modify and approve the agenda• Approve the revised spreadsheet• Review a few comments with proposals

– Enablement a good place to start

• Discussion of the timeline– REVmb will complete before us

• Plan for July and teleconferences• Adjourn

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Motion #4

• Move: To accept 11-10/595r5 as the comment spreadsheet for d0.02– Moved by: Peter Ecclesine (Cisco)– Seconded by: Marc Emmelmann (TU Berlin)– Discussion on the motion? None heard– Vote: Approved by unanimous consent

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Comment Groups [# of comments]

• Channelization [11]• Draft [3]• Enablement [45]• Map [27]• Measurement [5]• Multi-band [11]• PHY [5]• US Regulatory [20]

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

May 2010


TGaf Timeline – Updated May 2010 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: September 2010• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot:

November 2010• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: January 2011• Initial Sponsor Ballot: March 2011• Approved Sponsor Ballot: May 2011• Final WG/EC Approval: November 2011• RevCom/Standards Board Approval: December 2011

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Teleconferences

• June 8 and 22• July 6 and 20• August 3, 17 and 31• Time: 22:00 ET for 90 minutes (advanced two hours to

accommodate European members)

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Planning for July

• Continue resolving comments from the Technical Review

• Revise Draft 0.02

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Any Other Business

• None

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

May 2010


Process of Getting toLetter Ballot and Beyond

• Adoption of PAR and 5 Criteria• Technical Presentations and Discussions• Specify Any Additional Requirements, Comparison

Criteria, or Other Documents• Call For Proposals• Presentation of Proposals• Select from Submitted Complete Proposals to Produce a

Draft• Refine Draft• Letter Ballot – September 2010• Recirculation – November 2010• Sponsor Ballot – January 2010• Recirculation - • Final WG/EC Approval – June 2011• IEEE SB REVCOM Approval – July 2011

Com

pleted Steps | Future Steps

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

May 2010


3 Cycles of Comments and ResolutionCall for Informal Comments

Comment Resolution

WG Letter Ballot

Sponsor Ballot

Comment Resolution, Recirculation

Comment Resolution, Recirculation

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

References• 11-09-0749-03-0000-802.11-in-the-tvws• IEEE Std 802.11-2007 IEEE Standard for Information Technology—

Telecommunications and information exchange between systems— Local and metropolitan area networks— Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications

• FCC 08-260 Second Report and Order and Memorandum and Order (http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-260A1.pdf)

• 11-09-0934-09-tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c• 11-06-0056-00-0000-cbp-and-david-allens-methods• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done• 11-10-0021-06-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-los-angeles-2010• 11-10-0210-08-000m-lb160-cid-2113-proposed-resolution• 11-10-0218-00-00af-draft-call-for-proposals• 11-10-0221-01-00af-feb-16-2010-teleconferenc-plan• 11-10-0226-00-00af-feb-16-telecon-minutes• 11-10-0238-03-00af-petere-amendment-proposal• 11-10-0248-01-00af-amendment-proposal-for-measurement-report

February 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

References [2]• 11-10-0253-01-00af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-

tvws-part-2-hidden-node• 11-10-0256-01-00af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-

tvws-part-1-synchronized-quiet• 11-10-0257-03-00af-regulatory-operating-classes-specifications• 11-10-0258-00-00af-mac-and-phy-proposal-for-802-11af• 11-10-0260-03-00af-radio-resource-measurement-type-and-procedure-for-tvws-

application-under-fcc-rules• 11-10-0261-02-00af-enabling-procedure-of-communication-in-tvws-under-fcc-rules• 11-10-0262-01-00af-requirements-and-amendments-regarding-tvws-database-access• 11-10-0263-03-00af-amendment-proposal-for-tv-white-spaces-operation• 11-10-0288-00-00af-mar-9-2010-teleconferenc-plan• 11-10-0289-00-00af-summary-of-nict-fs-technical-proposals-for-tgaf• 11-10-0297-00-00af-march-9-teleconference-minutes

February 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

References [3]• 11-10-0299-02-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-orlando-2010• 11-10-0405-00-00af-closing-report-orlando-2010• 11-10-0428-00-00af-meeting-minutes-for-Orlando-2010• 11-10-0447-01-00af-text-document-for-proposal-11-10-261• 11-10-0448-01-00af-text-document-for-proposal-11-10-260• 11-10-0449-03-00af-text-for-regulatory-operating-classes-specifications-proposal• 11-10-0437-01-00af-mar-30-2010-teleconferenc-plan-and-agenda • 11-10-0452-00-00af-march-30-teleconference-minutes• 11-10-0471-01-00af-apr-13-teleconference-plan-and-agenda • 11-10-0472-01-00af-normative-text-for-scanning-in-tv-whitespaces• 11-10-0475-00-00af-april-13-teleconference-minutes• 11-10-0481-01-00af-apr-27-teleconferenc-plan-and-agenda• 11-10-0512-00-00af-global-operating-channels• 11-10-0513-01-00af-relocating-3650mhz-enabling-signal • 11-10-0516-01-00af-april-27th-teleconference-minutes

February 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

References [4]

• 11-10-0575-00-00af-May-11th-teleconference-minutes• 11-10-0576-00-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-beijing-2010 (this

document)• 11-10-0595-05-00af-d0-02-comment-spreadsheet

May 2010


doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2

Submission

Categorizing the Comments

• To simplify the process of reviewing and responding to the comments, we will– Group them into categories– Prioritize the categories– Process one category at a time

• The categories– Sorted by draft clause and/or annex

May 2010


Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2 Submission May 2010 Rich Kennedy, Research In MotionSlide 1 IEEE 802.11...

Documents

Transcript of Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0576r2 Submission May 2010 Rich Kennedy, Research In MotionSlide 1 IEEE 802.11...