Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 1 HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEYS: Summary of DSS conclusions Item IV of the agenda...
-
Upload
clement-blair -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 1 HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEYS: Summary of DSS conclusions Item IV of the agenda...
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 1
HOUSEHOLD BUDGET HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEYS: Summary of SURVEYS: Summary of
DSS conclusionsDSS conclusions
Item IV of the agenda
Household Budget Surveys Working Group - 5-6 May 2003
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 2
Household Budget Surveys 1. Historical background
2. Uses at EU level
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
4. Conclusion
Household Budget Surveys Working Group - 5-6 May 2003
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 3
Creation of the HBS Working Group in December 1989
Three rounds of data collected by Eurostat: Tables for 1988 (10 MS) Micro-data for 1994 (15MS+3 EFTA) Micro-data for 1999 (15MS+1 EFTA)
Gentlemen’s agreement
National surveys harmonized ex-post by Eurostat (big progress in harmonization but room for improvement)
10 new members will join the EU in 2004
1. Historical background
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 4
Consumer protection: support to the political management of the area for DG SANCO (request to improve frequency (every two years))
Poverty and social exclusion: complementary information to elaborate indicators and carry out analysis for DG EMPL (but ECHP/SILC now used; no longitudinal information; no access to micro-data by researchers; poverty rates not reliable due to seasonal behavior of consumption)
Control information for other statistics Raw data for research studies (economic, nutritional,
social) Other uses (general analyses on consumers, consumption
patterns, nutritional studies)
2. Uses and users at EU level
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 5
3.1. HBS frequency
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Current situation: Seven Member States with annual or continuous surveys,
eight others perform their HBS every five years (non-annual surveys reasonably well synchronized
Eurostat: collects information every five years
Options for the future: Keep HBS frequency at five years Reduce HBS frequency to two years Reduce HBS frequency to one year
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 6
3.1. HBS frequency
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Eurostat recommendation: Keep HBS frequency at five years (although DG SANCO
would prefer the second option)
DSS opinion: DSS agreed with the Eurostat recommendation
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 7
3.2. COICOP-HBS classification
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Current situation: COICOP-HBS 1999 was used for the 1999 round
(compatible with COICOP-OECD with an additional level of detail)
A Task Force met in June 2002 to make proposals for changes in food, housing, financial services and insurance categories
Options for the future: Use COICOP-HBS 1999 for the 2005 round Develop a COICOP-HBS 2005 introducing changes
proposed by the Task Force
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 8
3.2. COICOP-HBS classification
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Eurostat recommendation: Develop a COICOP-HBS 2005
DSS opinion: The development of a COICOP 2005 classification was
agreed by all except Cyprus
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 9
3.3. Type of data to be transmitted to Eurostat and variables list
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Current situation: Transmission of micro-data to Eurostat Format of the files delivered are very different Individual and household files (with many variables) are sent
Options for the future: Transmission of aggregated tables (would reduce Eurostat
capacity to perform ex-post harmonization) Transmission of simplified micro-data files (only household
files with a limited number of variables) Keep current situation (transmission of detailed household
and individual files)
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 10
3.3. Type of data to be transmitted to Eurostat and variables list
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Eurostat recommendation: Transmission of simplified micro-data files
DSS opinion: Agreement on the transmission of simplified micro-data files
by all countries (EU and CC) except NL and Lithuania Bilateral contacts between Eurostat and these two countries
should take place
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 11
3.4. Format of the micro-data files(if transmission of micro-data decided)
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Current situation: Format of transmission to Eurostat varies from one
country to another
Options for the future: Country-specific formats of transmission Single standardized format agreed by the HBS Working
Group
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 12
3.4. Format of the micro-data files(if transmission of micro-data decided)
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Eurostat recommendation: Single standardized format agreed by the HBS Working
Group
DSS opinion: All countries that accepted to transmit simplified micro-
data files agreed on the data transmission in a standardized format
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 13
3.5. Responsibility for imputed consumption expenditure/rent
calculation
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Current situation: Some Member States compute imputed expenditure/rent
while Eurostat carry out this work for other countries
Options for the future: Eurostat responsibility Member States’ responsibility Continuation of current situation (both Eurostat and
Member States)
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 14
3.5. Responsibility for imputed consumption expenditure/rent
calculation
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Eurostat recommendation: Member States’ responsibility
DSS opinion: All countries except the UK accepted to take responsibility
for the calculation of imputed consumption expenditure / rent
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 15
3.6. Methodological improvements
3. Current situation, options for the future and DSS opinion
Current situation: HBSs remain national surveys harmonized a posteriori by
Eurostat Frequency differs Basic concepts remain different (household, reference
person; actual final consumption/household final consumption expenditure)
Treatment of goods and services retained for own final consumption, of salaries in kind, of imputation of rentals for housing … differs
National classifications of expenditure or modified versions of COICOP classification are used
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 16
3.6. Methodological improvements
3. Current situation, option for the future and DSS opinion
Options for the future: Keep the current situation in terms of harmonization (stop
making any further improvements) Go a step forward in the harmonization process focussing
on the easiest possible improvements (basic concept remains household final consumption expenditure; harmonize as many concepts as possible with EU-SILC; separate monetary and non-monetary consumption expenditure)
Carry out an in-depth harmonization process (move to actual final consumption as a basic concept; health, education to be included)
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 17
3.6. Methodological improvements
3. Current situation, option for the future and DSS opinion
Eurostat recommendation: Go a step forward in the harmonization process focussing
on the easiest possible improvements (basic concept remains household final consumption expenditure; harmonize as many concepts as possible with EU-SILC; separate monetary and non-monetary consumption expenditure)
DSS opinion: Several countries asked Eurostat and the HBS Working
Group to be cautious with the proposed changes, particularly in relation to income
No changes for Spain before 2006
Doc. 146/2003 - Slide 18
The Working Group is invited to give its opinion on the six options for the future of the HBSs:
HBS frequency COICOP-HBS classification Type of data to be transmitted and variables list Format of the micro-data files Responsibility for imputed expenditures/rent computations Methodological improvements
4. Conclusion