dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

download dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

of 20

Transcript of dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    1/20

    Research and Innovation, Position Paper 07 - 2011

    Carbon Dioxide UtilizationElectrochemical Conversion of CO

    2 Opportunities and Challenges

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    2/20

    Contact details:Narasi Sridhar [email protected]

    Davion Hill [email protected]

    Research andInnovation in

    DNV

    This isDNV

    The objective o strategic researchis to enable long term innovationand business growth through newknowledge and services in supporto the overall strategy o DNV. Suchresearch is carried out in selectedareas that are believed to be oparticular signicance or DNV inthe uture. A Position Paper romDNV Research and Innovation

    is intended to highlight ndingsrom our research programmes.

    DNV is a global provider o servicesor managing risk. Establishedin 1864, DNV is an independentoundation with the purpose osaeguarding lie, property and theenvironment. DNV comprises 300oces in 100 countries with 9,000employees. Our vision is makinga global impact or a sae andsustainable uture.

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    3/20

    SummaryNature utilizes CO2 to produce myriad substances that are consumedby humans and animals. Some industrial processes aim to acceleratethe utilization o CO

    2. There are essentially three pathways or utilizing

    CO2: conversion o CO

    2into uel, utilization o CO

    2as a eedstock or

    chemicals, and non-conversion use o CO2. The various utilization

    technologies together have the potential to reduce CO2

    emissions by

    at least 3.7 gigatons/year (Gt/y) (approximately 10 % o total current

    annual CO2

    emissions), both directly and by reducing use o ossil uels.

    However, much greater reductions are possible through wider adoption

    o these technologies.

    Biochemical or chemical conversion o CO2

    to uels using biomass is an

    attractive technology or converting large quantities o CO2

    into readily

    usable chemicals. Should only 5 % o liquid ossil uel be replaced

    by biomass-based liquid uel, then, based on a range o liecycle CO2

    emissions, a reduction o approximately 0.4 Gt/y o CO2would result. CO

    2

    conversion to minerals and insertion into polymers may have the benet

    o sequestering CO2in relatively stable matrices. I 10 % o global building

    material demand was met by conversion o CO2

    to stable minerals, then a

    potential reduction o 1.6 Gt/y o CO2

    has been estimated. Chemical and

    electrochemical conversion o CO2

    into value-added chemical eedstock

    and intermediates is attractive in terms o ossil uel avoidance. It is

    estimated that the total CO2 emissions avoidance potential o this pathwayis about 0.3 Gt/y. The non-conversion uses o CO2, such as enhanced oil

    recovery and solvent use, have the potential to consume about 1.4 Gt/y

    o CO2.

    There is no single, universally applicable pathway or CO2

    utilization.

    Depending on the industry, location, and other constraints, one

    or more technologies may t better than others. An approach that

    integrates dierent methods may be the most practical solution or many

    applications. In this report, we present a small-scale demonstration o

    an electrochemical technology or converting CO2

    into ormic acid and

    ormate salts. The technology appears to be promising, but several actorsmust be addressed to ensure commercial viability.

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    4/20

    4

    CO2

    can be utilized in three major pathways [1-3]: 1) as a

    storage medium or renewable energy, 2) as a eedstock

    or various chemicals, and 3) as a solvent or working fuid

    (Figure 1). The use o CO2

    to convert solar energy into

    biomass and, rom there, to various renewable uels is now

    widely supported by industry and governments as a means

    to secure uture energy supplies and to decrease net CO2

    emissions to atmosphere. While the use o ood crops, such

    as corn, as a source or biomass uels will probably decrease

    in the uture, second and third generation biouels that

    are based on grasses and algae will increase in supply. It is

    expected that, by 2050, biomass-based sources will supply

    200 500 exajoules per year or about 50 % o the worlds

    energy requirements [5]. It is anticipated that about 5 %

    o the worlds liquid uel usage may arise rom biomass,

    with a net CO2 reduction ranging rom 20 to over 100 %,

    in comparison with conventional uels over their liecycles

    [7].

    Figure 1. Dierent pathways or utilizing CO2.

    Pathways or Utilization o CO2

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    5/20

    5

    It has been estimated that by 2035, the world will produce

    15 Gt/y o CO2 rom burning liquid uels [6]. Thereore,

    replacing about 5 % o liquid uels with biouel, and

    assuming a 50 % liecycle reduction in CO2

    emissions in

    comparison with petroleum-based uel, has the potential

    to reduce CO2

    emissions by 0.4 Gt/y.

    In addition to generating biomass, CO2 can be converted

    via chemical and electrochemical processes to other

    energy storage chemicals, such as syngas, ormic acid,

    methane, ethylene, methanol, and dimethyl ether (DME)

    [4]. Although it is more ecient to use the electricalenergy derived rom renewable power sources directly,

    their variability poses a problem or many industries.

    Furthermore, the distribution inrastructure or

    hydrocarbon uel is well established. Finally, chemicals

    such as ormic acid may be a useul storage medium

    or hydrogen that could be used in uel cells or burned

    directly.

    An alternative pathway is to convert CO2 into chemical

    eedstock. The entire portolio o commodity chemicals

    are currently manuactured rom a ew primary buildingblocks or platorm chemicals in the ossil-based chemical

    industry. CO2 can be used as a source material and,

    utilizing renewable energy sources and water, can be

    converted into a similar suite o building block chemicals.

    Insertion o CO2 into epoxides to manuacture various

    polymeric materials is an exciting technology as it not

    only utilizes CO2, but also avoids using ossil eedstock

    and creating CO2 emissions. It has been estimated that

    the various chemical conversion pathways can consume

    approximately 0.3 to 0.7 Gt/y o CO2 [8].

    Conversion o CO2 into inorganic minerals that may be used

    in building materials is being pursued by some companies

    [9]. This involves a combination o electrochemical

    reactions to generate the alkaline reactant and necessary

    mineralization reactions. Initial estimates suggest that

    even i 10 % o the worlds building materials were to be

    replaced by such a source, consumption o 1.6Gt/y CO2

    would result [8].

    CO2 can also be used in various processes without rst

    converting it into other chemical orms. The injection o

    supercritical CO2 into depleted oil wells to enhance the

    urther recovery o oil is well established. Indeed, this is

    presently the only commercially viable technology orcarbon capture and storage (CCS). It has been estimated

    that CO2 injection can increase oil recovery rom a

    depleting well by about 10 to 20 % o the original oil in

    place. Similarly, CO2 can be used to recover methane

    rom unmined coal seams. It has been estimated that in

    the U.S. alone, 89 billion barrels o oil could technically be

    recovered using CO2, leading to a storage o 16 Gt o CO2

    in the depleted oil reservoirs [10]. The use o supercritical

    CO2 as a solvent in processing many chemicals (e.g., favor

    extraction) is also well established. New uses o supercritical

    CO2 in chemical processing are emerging, and have theadded benet o reducing water usage. Supercritical CO2

    is also being explored as a heat transer fuid or some

    geothermal applications. These non-conversion methods

    o utilization constitute a signicant raction o the total

    CO2 emissions.

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    6/20

    6

    Although there are many pathways or CO2 utilization, this

    position paper details DNVs eorts in electrochemical

    reduction o CO2. The electrochemical method has

    several advantages:

    1. Extensive research during the last several decades

    has yielded high selectivity, low cost, heterogeneous

    catalysts or CO2 electrochemical reduction to

    various useul products or aqueous reaction systems

    [11-27].

    2. Electrochemical conversion can be perormed at

    room temperature and ambient pressure.3. I the supporting electrolytes are ully recycled and

    the anode reactions can be perormed using waste

    water, then the overall chemical consumption can be

    minimized to just water or wastewater.

    4. A renewable source o electricity can be used to drive

    the process, including solar, wind, hydroelectric,

    geothermal, tidal, and thermoelectric processes.

    Thereore this method can also be used as a

    renewable electricity storage mechanism; it converts

    the electrical energy to chemical energy by producing

    uels rom CO2, such as methanol and ormic acid.The stored energy can be released later or end-

    use by oxidization o the uels through uel cells or

    normal uel-burning engines.

    5. Electrochemical conversion can be augmented using

    light energy or solar thermal energy.

    6. The electrochemical reaction system is modular and

    thus scale-up is relatively simple.

    7. In general, the electrochemical systems have a

    compact design.

    Using metal or alloy electrodes/catalysts, various products

    can be produced by electrochemical reduction o CO2,

    including carbon monoxide (CO), ormic acid (HCOOH),

    oxalates (C2O4-), hydrocarbons (e.g., ethylene C2H4),

    and alcohols (e.g., methanol, CH3OH). DNV selected

    the Electrochemical Reduction o CO2 to Formate/

    Formic Acid (ECFORM) as the process or comprehensive

    evaluation o the technical easibility or CO2 utilization

    because commercialization o this process was considered

    to be most likely to be protable.

    As mentioned previously, ormic acid can be a useul

    storage medium or hydrogen that could be used in uel

    cells or burned directly. As shown in Figure 4, the energy

    density o ormic acid, via its use in a ormic acid uel cell, isquite attractive in comparison with other storage methods.

    The recoverable energy density that would be available via

    the combustion o methanol, ethylene, or methane, or the

    use o ormic acid in uel cells, is higher than conventional

    energy storage technologies, as shown in Figure 2. Note

    that the vertical axis is log scale.

    Figure 2. Products created rom electrochemical CO2 conversionprocesses have signifcantly more energy density than other energy

    storage technologies.

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    7/20

    7

    Formic acid and carbon monoxide require little energy

    or their respective market value, as shown in Figure 4.

    Methanol is another attractive uel, but requires more

    electrical energy than ormic acid or its production rom

    CO2. Ethylene and methane require signicantly more

    energy input, and the methane market price is constrained

    by natural gas prices.

    Both ormic acid and carbon monoxide sell or near

    $1,200 per ton o product and require approximately 2500

    kWh/ton or their production via electrochemical CO2

    conversion. These prices are likely to decrease as their

    production volume increases, and their usage may also

    increase as their price decreases. Other products, such as

    methane, require nearly 40,000 kWh/ton or conversion,

    and would only achieve $200-$300 per ton on the market.

    Carbon monoxide is dicult to store and transport, and

    thereore ormic acid is a more practical and desirable

    product.

    The current world market demand or ormic acid and

    ormate salts is quite low (several million metric tons). The

    traditional uses o ormic acid have been in the leather

    tanning industry and animal eed markets. However, new

    uses, in terms o hydrogen storage and uel cells, are being

    developed by BASF and others, making this an attractive

    chemical. Formate salts are used in oil well completion

    and in de-icing o airport runways. Larger volumes and

    somewhat lower prices may expand these, and other,

    applications.

    Figure 3. Formic acid and carbon monoxide have higher value rom

    the energy required or their creation than conventional uels such asmethanol or methane.

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    8/20

    8

    The ECFORM Process

    A schematic diagram o the ECFORM process is shown

    in Figure 4. It consists o two electrodes, the cathode

    (negative electrode) and the anode (positive electrode),

    across which an electrical voltage is applied. The two

    electrodes are placed in two dierent chambers, separated

    rom each other by an ion exchange membrane. This

    prevents bulk mixing o the solutions fowing in each o

    the chambers, while simultaneously allowing ions to move

    across the membrane and maintain electrical continuity. A

    suitable electrolyte is introduced into the cathode chamber

    along with CO2. The electrolyte comes into contact with

    the cathode, and the dissolved CO2 is electrochemicallyreduced to the desired products. This electrical circuit

    is completed by the complementary oxidation reaction

    occurring in the anode chamber. In ECFORM, tin or

    proprietary tin-based alloys are used as the cathodes that

    convert CO2

    to ormate salts. Small concentrations o by-

    products (hydrogen and CO) are also produced at the

    cathode. An oxygen evolution reaction takes place at the

    anode.

    An important metric o the process is the energy

    consumption, which is determined by the number oelectrons (n) involved in reducing 1 molecule o CO

    2to

    products, cell voltage, and the current eciency, also called

    Faraday eciency (FE). The FE denotes the percentage o

    the total current used or the desired product (i.e., the

    selectivity). The calculations in Figure 5 include additional

    energy consumed by auxiliary components, such as pumps.

    As shown in Figure 5, the reduction o CO2

    to ormate/

    ormic acid and to carbon monoxide, respectively, appears

    to be the best option or practical development or at least

    two reasons. First, both reactions involve the participation

    o only two electrons, and thereore the electrical power

    consumption is the lowest. Secondly, the high FE o CO

    and ormate/ormic acid reactions have been achieved onaordable metal cathodes, urther minimizing the energy

    consumption and cost. The next promising reaction may

    be the production o methanol. Although this involves 6

    electrons or each molecule o methanol ormed, the low

    over potentials on the catalysts reduce the cell potential

    to nearly hal o that or other electrochemical processes.

    Thus, relatively lower specic energy consumption can

    also be achieved.

    An economically viable electrochemical technology

    requires optimization o our key parameters (Figure 6):high current densities, high FE, low specic electricity

    consumption, and long electrode lietime. The minimum

    Figure 4. A schematic representation o the ECFORM process to convert CO2

    to ormate/ormic acid.

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    9/20

    9

    values or each parameter in a commercially viable

    electrochemical process are also included in Figure 6,along with target areas or improvements. In addition,

    there are other important requirements, such as high one-

    pass conversion rate and continuous operation.

    In general, higher current densities result in lower FE and

    shorter lietimes because o competing reactions. With

    longer run times, FE tends to decrease (catalyst/cathode

    degradation) and cell voltage increase, both o which

    result in greater power consumption. DNV has developed

    novel cathode and anode catalysts that reduce the total

    cell voltage by almost 1 volt [26, 27]. Additionally, DNV

    has designed a reactor that reduces the resistive losses

    by another 2 volts, thus resulting in an overall decrease

    in the total cell voltage by about 60 %, compared withthe data published in the literature [27]. Furthermore,

    the long-term perormance o the cathode catalyst has

    been increased by at least 20 times over that reported in

    the literature. This has mainly been achieved through

    improvements in the electrochemical cell design and

    operational parameters. Fundamental studies perormed

    by The Ohio State University, in collaboration with DNV,

    have improved our understanding o the cathode catalyst

    degradation mechanisms. This will enable urther

    advances in catalyst lie. DNV has also identied less

    corrosive electrolytes that will reduce both capital and

    operational expenditure.

    Figure 5. Specifc energy consumption vs. Faradaic efciency (FE)

    or various products. The thicker lines with data points indicate

    experimental results achieved in various studies.

    Figure 6. The relationship among the key parameters in ERC processes.

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    10/20

    10

    ECFORM Reactor Demonstration

    Testing o a lter-press type, bench-scale reactor indicated

    a set o conditions or most avorable selectivity and

    reactivity or ormate production. Figure 7 shows an

    example in which, under optimum pressure and fow rate

    control, the selectivity (FE) o a High Surace Area (HSA)

    cathode is kept constant over a range o applied potentials

    or one day. Since large electrodes have a tendency to

    display potential variation, this analysis indicates that

    slight changes in electrode potential will not aect the

    productivity o ECFORM, once process parameters are

    controlled.

    Long-term stable perormance o HSA electrodes was

    determined by periodic measurement o reactivity

    (current density) and selectivity (FE rom ormate product

    measurement in catholyte samples) under constant

    optimum operation. The results in Figure 8 indicate stable

    perormance over 4 days, with no appreciable damage or

    degradation o the tin electrodeposited carbon electrode.

    This is a signicant improvement over results reported in

    the literature. These results suggest that electrochemical

    conversion o CO2may be a commercially viable technology

    in the uture.

    A semi-pilot size reactor with a supercial area o 600 cm2

    (capable o reducing approximately 1 Kg/d o CO2) was

    built and assembled, with other process components and

    instruments, into a solar-powered trailer to demonstrate

    the operation o the process using completely renewable

    power (Figure 9). The demonstration reactor serves

    several purposes. Firstly, it showcases the capability

    o the ECFORM process to utilize renewable energy,

    such as solar, to convert CO2 into a commercially useulproduct. Secondly, the reactor system can be used to test

    and improve the process, in terms o the hydrodynamics,

    heterogeneity o the suraces, and eects on selectivity,

    automation, and controls, saety, and the overall eciency

    o the system. Finally, the demonstration reactor provides

    a useul means by which process and value chain analysis

    models can be validated. The reactor has been modeled

    using a model-based fow sheet simulator, gPROMS, and

    this model will also be used or scale-up assessments.

    Figure 7. Near constant FE over a potential

    range (-1.4 to -2.3 Vsce) o a HSA cathodeunder optimum operating conditions.

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    11/20

    11

    Figure 8. HSA electrodes displayed

    constant reactivity and selectivityover 4 days.

    Figure 9. Demonstration reactor

    assembled in a solar-powered trailer.

    Solar PanelECFORMSetup

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    12/20

    12

    Analysis o the CO2

    utilization processes can be conducted

    in terms o cradle-to-grave CO2

    emission (liecycle analysis

    or LCA) or a source-to-gate analysis, in which the boundaries

    start with the source o CO2

    and end with the product that

    is delivered by a given process. The latter analysis, reerred

    to here as value chain analysis (VCA) is convenient or

    understanding the net CO2

    emitted in a given utilization

    process, since the product delivered is no dierent rom

    that made by utilizing ossil uel. Most importantly (and

    unlike LCA), VCA also computes the net present value

    o the process. Thus, VCA provides an opportunity or

    comparing any new process with conventional processes,as well as indicating uture developmental work that could

    be targeted in an economically meaningul way. The VCA

    model that we developed or the ECFORM process can

    be readily modied or analysis o other CO2

    utilization

    processes.

    Most CO2utilization processes require mixed gas collection

    rom the emissions source. I the exhaust source contains

    additional gases (such as nitrogen, sulur, or nitrogen

    oxides), some additional purication or capture o the

    CO2 will be needed. The delivery o the mixed exhaustgas to the capture stage, and the capture process itsel,

    requires inputs o energy and/or consumables, and these

    must be included in the total VCA. Once the puried CO2

    has been diverted to the conversion process, this delivery

    may also require urther energy inputs. Finally, the

    conversion process itsel will have energy and consumables

    inputs. The entire value chain can be compared with

    direct emissions (with or without nes), carbon capture

    and storage (CCS), or with conventional processes or

    manuacturing the same product. Multiple scenarios

    can be computed, and these can include carbon taxes (i

    any), energy costs, consumables, and the value o the nal

    product, such that the total impact o these actors on the

    protability and net present value o the investment into

    the CO2 conversion process can be assessed.

    Emissions source and gas delivery

    DNV has analyzed emissions scenarios and sources,

    ranging rom the size and scale o a coal-red power plantto point sources within a petrochemical renery. The

    electrochemical CO2

    conversion process has been tested

    via the model and demonstrates the greatest probability o

    protability occurs when the ollowing conditions are met:

    - the CO2

    is delivered in pure or mostly-pure orm;

    - process heat or other renewable energy orms are

    available;

    - process volumes are manageable (

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    13/20

    13

    When the above conditions are met, the protability,

    energy balance, and carbon balance o the CO2conversion

    process become most sensitive to the parameters o the

    conversion process itsel.

    CO2

    Separation, Capture, and Delivery

    Because o the conditions described previously, the

    separation, capture, and delivery o CO2

    to the conversion

    process are considered separately and independently rom

    the CO2

    conversion process. The availability o already

    captured or puried CO2

    will aect the protability o the

    process. The energy penalty or a coal plant capturing CO2

    (not including transport and storage) ranges rom 0.2 to

    0.35 MWh/t o CO2

    captured. This represents about 5 to

    10 % o the energy required or conversion on a kWh/ton

    basis, as ECFORM requires approximately 2.5 to 4 MWh/

    ton o converted CO2. The dierence between ECFORM

    and the CCS process is that whereas ECFORM produces

    a useul product, CCS does not. Thereore ECFORM is

    an energy conversion process. There are other possible

    CO2 separation and sequestration technologies that couldlower these energy requirements.

    CO2

    Conversion

    Based on dierent chemical reaction routes, the

    protability o the CO2

    conversion process depends not

    only on the value o the nal products, but also on the

    energy and consumables that are required to support

    the electrochemical reaction. As shown in Figure 11,

    i the process requires additional chemicals, such as

    sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid, to support the

    reactions, then the net present value o the reaction is

    largely negatively driven by these consumables, on top o

    the already substantial energy demands.

    Figure 11. Reaction pathways that are heavily dependent on

    consumables drive the proftability o the reaction in the negative

    direction, more so than by the energy costs.

    Figure 12. Reaction pathways that minimize consumables become moredominated by energy, which must be eectively managed.

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    14/20

    14

    However, i the use o consumable chemicals is decreased,

    or example through the use o electrolyte recovery

    processes and the utilization o alkaline waste water, thenenergy demands dominate the overall process economics

    (Figure 12). While the energy costs are increased, the

    reaction is more sustainable i renewable energy is used

    or the process.

    As is shown in Figure 13, the prot margins can be

    increased as energy costs are reduced. There is potential

    or additional revenues in utilizing the load leveling

    needs o the electric grid. These opportunities are called

    responsive ancillary services. For example, i energy-

    intensive processes such as ECFORM are used to regulate

    voltage rom a wind energy acility, the processes gain

    additional revenues while being renewably powered.

    Additionally, revenues rom carbon credits or avoidance

    o carbon tax may also aid in protability. In this analysis, a

    carbon credit revenue o up to $50/ton does not alter theprotability substantially, but the combined revenues rom

    carbon credits and energy management reduce the energy

    costs by 15 %.

    Four Scenarios or CO2

    Conversion

    Four possible scenarios are envisioned or assessing the

    protability o an electrochemical conversion process.

    This assessment does not consider capital expenditures

    or the time value o money. Also, the cost o consumables

    is considered to be negligible in comparison with energy

    costs. Finally, it is assumed that the ormic acid resulting

    rom the electrochemical process does not need urther

    concentration, or example through distillation or

    Figure 13. Value-added process improvements decrease the energy

    costs o the ECFORM process.

    Figure 14. The dierence between sales price and operational cost or

    ECFORM process (red numbers) under dierent scenarios (only energy

    costs are included consumable costs are considered to be negligible).

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    15/20

    15

    evaporation. The X-axis represents the price o the

    product made in the ECFORM process. This depends on

    many actors, including the volume manuactured and

    market demands. The Y-axis represents the CO2

    price,

    either through a trading scheme or a tax. The numbers

    represent dierent values o protability (assumed as a

    simple dierence between expected value o price minus

    cost) or the dierent scenarios. The cost is calculated

    assuming an energy consumption o 3859 kW/ton ormic

    acid. Electricity prices are assumed to range rom $0.07/

    kWh to $0.15/kWh, with a peak requency at $0.10/kWh.

    The energy cost thereore ranges rom $270 to $578 per

    ton o ormic acid, with an average o $420 per ton o

    ormic acid. For example, i the price o ormic acid is

    assumed to be $1220/ton and the price o CO2

    is $200/

    ton o CO2

    (1 ton o ormic acid reduces CO2

    by almost 1

    ton), then operational prot is $1200+$200-$420 = $980

    per ton. Our analyses indicate that the simple margins

    (price minus the cost o manuacturing) are benecial or

    this process under the scenarios considered.

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    16/20

    16

    CO2

    utilization is being increasingly recognized as a

    method by which global CO2

    emissions can be reduced

    in an economical manner. This is especially true or

    industries, such as reneries, which cannot implement

    CCS economically.

    Considerable research is being conducted in many

    directions to urther the economic viability o processes

    that utilize CO2. Biomass conversion to uels is perhaps

    the most intensively pursued route, not only to mitigate

    CO2

    emissions, but also to secure alternative uel supply.

    Conversion o cellulosic biomass into alcohols and algaeinto biodiesel or other hydrocarbon uel is predicted

    to become extensively adopted in the coming decade.

    Liecycle assessments o these uel sources demonstrate

    considerable reductions in CO2

    emissions compared with

    petroleum uels. However, their present economic viability

    is dependent on government subsidies.

    Several companies are pursuing thermochemical

    conversion o CO2

    into chemical eedstock or polymers.

    Research and development are currently ocused towards

    reducing the temperature o conversion, increasing catalystlie, and decreasing the use o consumables. Conversion o

    CO2

    into minerals has advanced signicantly, with at least

    one company claiming commercial viability or large-scale

    deployment. Carbon policies that impose a signicant

    increase in carbon prices are necessary to sustain these

    eorts until they can become economically viable.

    Electrochemical and photoelectrochemical conversion

    routes will come to the ore in the next decade. Current

    research is yielding catalysts with long-term perormance

    characteristics and low energy use, but signicant

    technical advances are still needed or large-scale use.

    Electrochemical conversion promises to be deployable in

    many systems, because o its low ootprint, its scalability, its

    ungible use o electricity, and its ability to produce many

    end products. The combination o the electrochemical

    process with grid-based ancillary services can make these

    processes economically viable, even without a carbon

    tax. DNV will continue its eorts in improving the

    ECFORM technology, particularly making it more robust

    and economically viable, and explore opportunities

    or customizing CO2

    utilization methods or industrial

    applications.

    All these technologies will rely on ecient carbon capture,as many industrial sources produce dispersed and dilute

    efuents containing CO2.

    Just as integrated bioreneries have come to characterize

    the use o multiple technologies to make an array o

    products rom biomass, multiple technologies or utilizing

    CO2

    in interconnected systems, tailored to a given

    application, may be the path ahead or uture sustainable

    management o CO2.

    The uture

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    17/20

    17

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    18/20

    18

    Reerences

    General Reading

    1. M.M. Halmann, Chemical xation o carbon dioxide, Methods or

    recycling CO2

    into useul products, CRC Press, 1993.

    2. M.M. Halmann and M. Steinberg, Greenhouse Gas Carbon Dioxide

    Mitigation: Science and Technology, CRC Press, 1998

    3. M. Aresta (Editor), Carbon Dioxide as a Chemical Feedstock, Wiley-

    VCH, 2010.

    4. G.A.Olah, A.Goeppert, and G.K.Surya Prakash, Beyond Oil and Gas:

    The Methanol Economy, Wiley-VCH, 2009.

    Specifc Reerences

    5. Bioenergy A sustainable and reliable energy source, A review

    o status and prospects, IEA Bioenergy: Exco 2009:05, www.

    ieabioenergy.com.6. Increasing Feedstock Production or Biouels, Biomass Research and

    Development Board (U.S.), 2009.

    7. International Energy Outlook 2010, U.S. Energy Inormation

    Administration, DOE/EIA-0484 (2010).

    8. M.Aresta and A. Dibenedetto, Catalysis Today, 98 (2004), 455-462.

    9. http://www.calera.com/index.php/liecycle_carbon_scalability/

    scalability/

    10. U.S. Department o energy, Carbon Sequestration Technology

    Roadmap and Program Plan, 2007.

    11. Chaplin, R. P. S.; Wragg, A. A., Eects o process conditions

    and electrode material on reaction pathways or carbon dioxide

    electroreduction with particular reerence to ormate ormation.

    Journal o Applied Electrochemistry 2003, 33, (12), 1107-1123.12. Gattrell, M.; Gupta, N.; Co, A., A review o the aqueous

    electrochemical reduction o CO2

    to hydrocarbons at copper. Journal

    o Electroanalytical Chemistry 2006, 594, (1), 1-19.

    13. Jitaru, M.; Lowy, D. A.; Toma, M.; Toma, B. C.; Oniciu, L.,

    Electrochemical reduction o carbon dioxide on fat metallic cathodes.

    Journal o Applied Electrochemistry 1997, 27, (8), 875-889.

    14. Mahmood, M. N.; Masheder, D.; Harty, C. J., Use O Gas-Diusion

    Electrodes For High-Rate Electrochemical Reduction O Carbon-

    Dioxide .1. Reduction At Lead, Indium-Impregnated And Tin-

    Impregnated Electrodes. Journal o Applied Electrochemistry 1987,

    17, (6), 1159-1170.

    15. Hara, K.; Kudo, A.; Sakata, T., Electrochemical Reduction O Carbon-

    Dioxide Under High-Pressure On Various Electrodes In An Aqueous-

    Electrolyte. Journal o Electroanalytical Chemistry 1995, 391, (1-2),141-147.

    16. Hara, K.; Kudo, A.; Sakata, T., Electrochemical Reduction O High-

    Pressure Carbon-Dioxide On Fe Electrodes At Large Current-Density.

    Journal o Electroanalytical Chemistry 1995, 386, (1-2), 257-260.

    17. Oloman, C.; Li, H., Electrochemical processing o carbon dioxide.

    Chemsuschem 2008, 1, (5), 385-391.

    18. Li, H.; Oloman, C., Development o a continuous reactor or the

    electro-reduction o carbon dioxide to ormate Part 2: Scale-up.

    Journal o Applied Electrochemistry 2007, 37, (10), 1107-1117.

    19. Li, H.; Oloman, C., Development o a continuous reactor or the

    electro-reduction o carbon dioxide to ormate - Part 1: Process

    variables. Journal o Applied Electrochemistry 2006, 36, (10), 1105-

    1115.

    20. Li, H.; Oloman, C., The electro-reduction o carbon dioxide in a

    continuous reactor. Journal o Applied Electrochemistry 2005, 35,(10), 955-965.

    21. Hara, K.; Sakata, T., Large current density CO2

    reduction under high

    pressure using gas diusion electrodes. Bulletin o the Chemical

    Society o Japan 1997, 70, (3), 571-576.

    22. Hori, Y.; Ito, H.; Okano, K.; Nagasu, K.; Sato, S., Silver-coated ion

    exchange membrane electrode applied to electrochemical reduction

    o carbon dioxide. Electrochimica Acta 2003, 48, (18), 2651-2657.

    23. Hara, K.; Sakata, T., Electrocatalytic ormation o CH4 rom CO2

    on

    a Pt gas diusion electrode. Journal o the Electrochemical Society

    1997, 144, (2), 539-545.

    24. Schwartz, M.; Cook, R. L.; Kehoe, V. M.; Macdu, R. C.; Patel, J.;

    Sammells, A. F., Carbon-Dioxide Reduction To Alcohols Using

    Perovskite-Type Electrocatalysts. Journal o the ElectrochemicalSociety 1993, 140, (3), 614-618.

    25. Y. Zhai, L. Chiacchiarelli, and N. Sridhar, Eects o Gaseous Impurities

    on the Electrochemical Reduction o CO2

    on Copper Electrodes,

    Electrochemical Society Transactions, Accepted or Publication, 2009.

    26. D. Hill, L. Chiachiarell i, Y. Zhai, and N. Sridhar, Recycling o Carbon

    dioxide Using electrochemical Method, DNV Report No. 860-2008-

    002, Det Norske Veritas, July 2008.

    27. N. Sridhar, Y. Zhai, A. Agarwal, L. Chiachiarelli, and D.M. Hill, Long-

    term demonstration o the electrochemical reduction o CO2

    to ormic

    acid, The CO2

    Challenge Forum, September 27-28, 2010, CPE Lyon,

    Lyon, France.

    28. Y. Zhai, A.S. Agarwal, L.M. Chiacchiarelli, D.Hill, and N. Sridhar,

    Evaluation o Tin Electrocatalyst or Conversion o CO2

    to Formate

    Salt via Long Term Cathodic Hal cell and Continuous Full CellTesting, Future Directions in CO

    2Conversion Chemistry Workshop,

    October 21st, 2010, Department o Chemistry at Princeton University,

    Princeton

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    19/20

    19

  • 7/27/2019 dnv-position_paper_co2_utilization_tcm4-445820.pdf

    20/20

    Det Norske VeritasNO-1322 Hvik, NorwayTel: +47 67 57 99 00

    www.dnv.com

    Design,

    layoutandprintproduction:ErikTancheNilssenAS,

    01/2011

    Printedonenvironmentallyfriendlypaper.