DMCH18

42
©David Dubofsky and 18-1 Thomas W. Miller, Jr. Chapter 18 Continuous Time Option Pricing Models Assumptions of the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model (BSOPM): No taxes No transactions costs Unrestricted short-selling of stock, with full use of short-sale proceeds Shares are infinitely divisible Constant riskless interest rate for borrowing/lending No dividends European options (or American calls on non-dividend paying stocks) Continuous trading The stock price evolves via a specific ‘process’ through time (more on this later….)

description

derivatives

Transcript of DMCH18

Page 1: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-1 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Chapter 18Continuous Time Option Pricing Models

• Assumptions of the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model (BSOPM):– No taxes

– No transactions costs

– Unrestricted short-selling of stock, with full use of short-sale proceeds

– Shares are infinitely divisible

– Constant riskless interest rate for borrowing/lending

– No dividends

– European options (or American calls on non-dividend paying stocks)

– Continuous trading

– The stock price evolves via a specific ‘process’ through time (more on this later….)

Page 2: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-2 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Derivation of the BSOPM

• Specify a ‘process’ that the stock price will follow (i.e., all possible “paths”)

• Construct a riskless portfolio of:– Long Call

– Short Shares

– (or, long Shares and write one call, or long 1 share and write 1/calls)

• As delta changes (because time passes and/or S changes), one must maintain this risk-free portfolio over time

• This is accomplished by purchasing or selling the appropriate number of shares.

Page 3: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-3 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The BSOPM Formula

2rT

1 dNKedSNC

where N(di) = the cumulative standard normal distribution function, evaluated at di, and:

/2)Tσ(rln(S/K)d

2

1

Tσdd 12

N(-di) = 1-N(di)

Page 4: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-4 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The Standard Normal Curve

• The standard normal curve is a member of the family of normal curves with μ = 0.0 and = 1.0. The X-axis on a standard normal curve is often relabeled and called ‘Z’ scores.

• The area under the curve equals 1.0.

• The cumulative probability measures the area to the left of a value of Z. E.g., N(0) = Prob(Z) < 0.0 = 0.50, because the normal distribution is symmetric.

Page 5: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-5 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The Standard Normal Curve

The area between Z-scores of -1.00 and +1.00 is 0.68 or 68%.

                                             

The area between Z-scores of -1.96 and +1.96 is 0.95 or 95%.

Note also that the area to the left of Z = -1 equals the area to the right of Z = 1. This holds for any Z.

What is the area in each tail? What is N(1.96)? What is N(-1.96)?

What is N(1)? What is N(-1)?

Page 6: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-6 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Cumulative Normal Table(Pages 560-561)

Cumulative Probability for the Standard Normal Distribution

2nd digit of Z

z 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09

-1.3 0.0968 0.0951 0.0934 0.0918 0.0901 0.0885 0.0869 0.0853 0.0838 0.0823

1.3 0.9032 0.9049 0.9066 0.9082 0.9099 0.9115 0.9131 0.9147 0.9162 0.9177

N(-d) = 1-N(d) N(-1.34) = 1-N(1.34)

Page 7: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-7 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Example Calculation of the BSOPM Value

• S = $92• K = $95• T = 50 days (50/365 year = 0.137 year)• r = 7% (per annum)• = 35% (per annum)

What is the value of the call?

Page 8: DMCH18

Solving for the Call Price, I.

• Calculate the PV of the Strike Price:

Ke-rT = 95e(-0.07)(50/365) = (95)(0.9905) = $94.093.

• Calculate d1 and d2:

0.1370.35

.1370.1225/2)0(0.07ln(92/95)

/2)Tσ(rln(S/K)d

2

1

0.10890.12955

0.017980.03209

701)(0.35)(0.3

0.01798)ln(0.96842

d2 = d1 – σT.5 = -0.1089 – (0.35)(0.137).5 = -0.2385

Page 9: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-9 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Solving for N(d1) and N(d2)

• Choices:– Standard Normal Probability Tables (pp. 560-561)

– Excel Function NORMSDIST

– N(-0.1089) = 0.4566; N(-0.2385) = 0.4058.

– There are several approximations; e.g. the one in fn 8 (pg. 549) is accurate to 0.01 if 0 < d < 2.20:

N(d) ~ 0.5 + (d)(4.4-d)/10N(0.1089) ~ 0.5 + (0.1089)(4.4-0.1089)/10 = 0.5467Thus, N(-0.1089) ~ 0.4533

Page 10: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-10 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Solving for the Call Value

C = S N(d1) – Ke-rT N(d2)

= (92)(0.4566) – (94.0934)(0.4058)

= $3.8307.

Applying Put-Call Parity, the put price is:

P = C – S + Ke-rT = 3.8307 – 92 + 94.0934 = $5.92.

Page 11: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-11 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Lognormal Distribution

• The BSOPM assumes that the stock price follows a “Geometric Brownian Motion” (see

http://www.stat.umn.edu/~charlie/Stoch/brown.html for a depiction of Brownian Motion).

• In turn, this implies that the distribution of the returns of the stock, at any future date, will be “lognormally” distributed.

• Lognormal returns are realistic for two reasons: – if returns are lognormally distributed, then the lowest possible return in

any period is -100%.

– lognormal returns distributions are "positively skewed," that is, skewed to the right.

• Thus, a realistic depiction of a stock's returns distribution would have a minimum return of -100% and a maximum return well beyond 100%. This is particularly important if T is long.

Page 12: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-12 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The Lognormal Distribution

E S S e

S S e e

TT

TT T

( )

( ) ( )

0

02 2 2

1

var

Page 13: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-13 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

BSOPM Properties and Questions

• What happens to the Black-Scholes call price when the call gets deep-deep-deep in the money?

• How about the corresponding put price in the case above? [Can you verify this using put-call parity?]

• Suppose gets very, very close to zero. What happens to the call price? What happens to the put price?

Hint: Suppose the stock price will not change from time 0 to time T. How much are you willing to pay for an out of the money option? An in the money option?

Page 14: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-14 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Volatility

• Volatility is the key to pricing options.

• Believing that an option is undervalued is tantamount to believing that the volatility of the rate of return on the stock will be less than what the market believes.

• The volatility is the standard deviation of the continuously compounded rate of return of the stock, per year.

Page 15: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-15 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Estimating Volatility from Historical Data

1. Take observations S0, S1, . . . , Sn at intervals of t (fractional years); e.g., = 1/52 if we are dealing with weeks; = 1/12 if we are dealing with months.

2. Define the continuously compounded return as:

3. Calculate the average rate of return

4. Calculate the standard deviation, , of the ri’s

5. Annualize the computed (see next slide).

1i

ii S

Slnr ; on an ex-div day:

1i

ii S

divSlnr

Page 16: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-16 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Annualizing Volatility• Volatility is usually much greater when the market is open (i.e. the asset

is trading) than when it is closed.

• For this reason, when valuing options, time is usually measured in “trading days” not calendar days.

• The “general convention” is to use 252 trading days per year. What is most important is to be consistent.

252σσ day trading perannual

52σσ weeklyannual

12σσ monthlyannual

Note that σyr > σmo > σweek > σday

Page 17: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-17 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Implied Volatility

• The implied volatility of an option is the volatility for which the BSOPM value equals the market price.

• The is a one-to-one correspondence between prices and implied volatilities.

• Traders and brokers often quote implied volatilities rather than dollar prices.

• Note that the volatility is assumed to be the same across strikes, but it often is not. In practice, there is a “volatility smile”, where implied volatility is often “u-shaped” when plotted as a function of the strike price.

Page 18: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-18 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Using Observed Call (or Put) Option Prices to Estimate Implied Volatility

• Take the observed option price as given.• Plug C, S, K, r, T into the BSOPM (or other model).• Solving this is the tricky part) requires either an iterative

technique, or using one of several approximations.

• The Iterative Way:– Plug S, K, r, T, and into the BSOPM.

– Calculate (theoretical value)

– Compare (theoretical) to C (the actual call price).

– If they are really close, stop. If not, change the value of

and start over again.

c

Page 19: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-19 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Volatility Smiles

In this table, the option premium column is the average bid-ask price for June 2000 S&P 500 Index call and put options at the close of trading on May 16, 2000. The May 16, 2000 closing S&P 500 Index level was 1466.04, a riskless interest rate of 5.75%, an estimated dividend yield of 1.5%, and T = 0.08493 year.

call price put price Strike Call price Call IV with = 0.22 Put Price Put IV with = 0.22

1225 1.5625 0.336 0.0541250 2.34375 0.3283 0.1531275 2.625 0.3021 0.391300 3.8125 0.292 0.9041325 5.75 0.2855 1.9191350 129.5 0.2834 124.335 8.25 0.2762 3.7531375 107.625 0.2689 102.51 11.375 0.2641 6.8091400 86.625 0.2534 82.353 14.875 0.2463 11.5331425 67.625 0.2423 64.288 20.0625 0.2315 18.351450 50.6875 0.2324 48.648 29 0.2285 27.5921475 35.625 0.2201 35.612 38.625 0.2152 39.4371500 22.5 0.2036 25.178 50.875 0.2016 53.8851525 14 0.1982 17.173 66.75 0.1923 70.7621550 7.875 0.1912 11.291 85.375 0.1826 89.7611575 4.375 0.1896 7.154 106.875 0.1788 110.5051600 2.28125 0.1881 4.367 129.5 0.1668 132.61625 1.21875 0.1897 2.569 153.375 0.1512 155.6841650 0.625 0.1912 1.457

Page 20: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-20 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Graphing Implied Volatility versus Strike (S = 1466):

Using the call data:

α= 2.17; β1 = -4.47; β2 = 2.52; R2 = 0.988

Volatility Smiles

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

1200 1400 1600

Strike Price

Imp

lie

d V

ola

tility

Call IV

Put IV

εX

Slnβ

X

SlnβαIV

2

21

Page 21: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-21 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Dividends

• European options on dividend-paying stocks are valued by substituting the stock price less the present value of dividends into Black-Scholes.

• Also use S* when computing d1 and d2.• Only dividends with ex-dividend dates during life of option should be

included.• The “dividend” should be the expected reduction in the stock price

expected.• For continuous dividends, use S* = Se-dT, where d is the annual constant

dividend yield, and T is in years.

*

0

-rT C = S N(d ) - Ke N(d ) 1 2

Where: S* = S – PV(divs) between today and T.

Page 22: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-22 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The BOPM and the BSOPM, I.

• Note the analogous structures of the BOPM and the BSOPM:

C = SΔ + B (0< Δ<1; B < 0)

C = SN(d1) – Ke-rTN(d2)

• Δ = N(d1)

• B = -Ke-rTN(d2)

Page 23: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-23 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The BOPM and the BSOPM, II.

• The BOPM actually becomes the BSOPM as the number of periods approaches ∞, and the length of each period approaches 0.

• In addition, there is a relationship between u and d, and σ, so that the stock will follow a Geometric Brownian Motion. If you carve T years into n periods, then:

n

T

σ

μ0.50.5q

equal must q, uptick, an ofy probabilit the and,

1ed

1euT/nσ

T/nσ

Page 24: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-24 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The BOPM and the BSOPM: An Example

• T = 7 months = 0.5833, and n = 7. • Let μ = 14% and σ = 0.40• Then choosing the following u, d, and q will make the stock follow

the “right” process for making the BOPM and BSOPM consistent:

0.55050.08330.40

0.140.50.5q

equal must q, uptick, an ofy probabilit the and,

0.109051ed

0.12241eu0.8330.40

0.08330.40

Page 25: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-25 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Generalizing the BSOPM

• It is important to understand that many option pricing models are related.

• For example, you will see that many exotic options (see chap. 20) use parts of the BSOPM.

• The BSOPM itself, however, can be generalized to encapsulate several important pricing models.

• All that is needed is to change things a bit by adding a new term, denoted by b.

Page 26: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-26 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The Generalized Model Can Price European Options on:

1. Non-dividend paying stocks [Black and Scholes (1973)]

2. Options on stocks (or stock indices) that pay a continuous dividend [Merton (1973)]

3. Currency options [Garman and Kohlhagen (1983)]

4. Options on futures [Black (1976)]

Page 27: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-27 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The Generalized Formulae are:

b-r T -rTgen 1 2C = Se N d - Ke N d

b-r T-rTgen 2 1P = Ke N -d - Se N -d

2

1

ln(S/K) (b /2)Td

T

2

2 1

ln(S/K) (b /2)Td d T

T

Page 28: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-28 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

By Altering the ‘b’ term in These Equations, Four Option-Pricing Models Emerge.

By Setting: Yields this European Option Pricing Model:

b = r Stock option model, i.e., the BSOPM

b = r - d Stock option model with continuous dividend yield, d (see section 18.5.2)

b = r – rf Currency option model where rf is the

foreign risk-free rate

b = 0 Futures option model

Page 29: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-29 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

American Options

• It is computationally difficult to value an American option (a call on a dividend paying stock, or any put).

• Methods:– Pseudo-American Model (Sect. 18.10.1)– BOPM (Sects. 17.3.3, 17.4)– Numerical methods– Approximations

• Of course, computer programs are most often used.

Page 30: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-30 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Some Extra Slides on this Material

• Note: In some chapters, we try to include some extra slides in an effort to allow for a deeper (or different) treatment of the material in the chapter.

• If you have created some slides that you would like to share with the community of educators that use our book, please send them to us!

Page 31: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-31 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The Stock Price Process, I.

• The percent change in the stock prices does not depend on the price of the stock.

• Over a small interval, the size of the change in the stock price is small (i.e., no ‘jumps’)

• Over a single period, there are only TWO possible outcomes.

Page 32: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-32 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The Stock Price Process, II.

• Consider a stock whose current price is S

• In a short period of time of length t, the change in the stock price is assumed to be normal with mean of S t and standard deviation,

is expected return and is volatility

ΔtσS

Page 33: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-33 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

That is, the Black-Scholes-Merton model assumes that the stock price, S, follows a Geometric Brownian motion through time:

dS Sdt Sdz

dSdt dz

S

σdzdt2

σμdlnS

2

Page 34: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-34 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The Discrete-Time Process

S t z

S

Sln

S

a unit of time

z = a normally distributed random variable

with a mean of zero, and a variance of t

z = is distributed normally, with E( z) = 0, and V

t t t t t

t t

S S SS S

t

AR( z)= t

Page 35: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-35 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Example:

• Suppose t is one day. • A stock has an expected return of = 0.0005 per day.

– NB: (1.0005)365 – 1 = 0.20016, 20%• The standard deviation of the stock's daily return distribution is

0.0261725– NB: This is a variance of 0.000685– Annualized Variance: (365)(0.000685) = 0.250025 – Annualized STDEV:

• (0.250025)0.5 = 0.500025, or 50%• (0.0261725)(365)0.5 = 0.500025, or 50%

Page 36: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-36 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Example, II.

• Then, the return generating process is such that each day, the return consists of:– a non-stochastic component, 0.0005 or 0.05%– a random component consisting of:

• The stock's daily standard deviation times the realization of z,

z is drawn from a normal probability distribution with a mean of zero and a variance of one.

• Then, we can create the following table:

Page 37: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-37 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The First 10 Days of a Stochastic Process Creating Stock Returns:

 

NON‑STOCHASTIC STOCHASTIC S(T)=S(T‑1)[1.0+R]

TREND PRICE COMPONENT R = t + z

DAY z S(T)=S(T‑1)[1.00050] (0.0261725)z t = 1 DAY

0 1.000000 1.000000

1 ‑2.48007 1.000500 ‑0.064910 0.935590

2 ‑0.87537 1.001000 ‑0.022911 0.914623

3 ‑0.80587 1.001501 ‑0.021092 0.895789

4 ‑1.03927 1.002002 ‑0.027200 0.871871

5 0.10523 1.002503 0.002754 0.874709

6 0.66993 1.003004 0.017534 0.890483

7 ‑0.21137 1.003505 ‑0.005532 0.886002

8 2.19733 1.004007 0.057510 0.937398

9 ‑0.82807 1.004509 ‑0.021673 0.917551

10 0.58783 1.005011 0.015385 0.932126

Page 38: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-38 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

The Result (Multiplying by 100):

A Graph of a Stock Price Following a Geometric Brownian Motion Process

80.000

90.000

100.000

110.000

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61

Day

Pric

e (t

imes

100

)

Page 39: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-39 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Risk-Neutral Valuation

• The variable does not appear in the Black-Scholes equation.

• The equation is independent of all variables affected by risk preference.

• The solution to the differential equation is therefore the same in a risk-free world as it is in the real world.

• This leads to the principle of risk-neutral valuation.

Applying Risk-Neutral Valuation:

1. Assume that the expected return from the stock price is the risk-free rate.

2. Calculate the expected payoff from the option.

3. Discount at the risk-free rate.

Page 40: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-40 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Two Simple and Accurate Approximations for Estimating Implied Volatility

1. Brenner-Subramanyam formula. Suppose:

then,

2T

rTS Ke

CS

Page 41: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-41 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

2. Corrado and Miller Quadratic formula.

28If :

3

28If :

3

rT

rTrT

rT

rTrT

S KeC

S KeT S Ke

S KeC

S KeT Ke S

Page 42: DMCH18

©David Dubofsky and 18-42 Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Let’s Have a Horse Race

• Data: S = 54, K = 55, C = 1.4375, 29 days to expiration (T=29/365), r = 3%. We can verify:

• The actual ISD is 30.06%.

• Brenner-Subramanyam estimated ISD is 23.67%.

• Corrado-Miller estimated ISD is 30.09%.